1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Kern County Superior Courts
  5. Meza Vs. Meza
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Meza Vs. Meza

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Trevino, Armando, Meza, Antonio, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Meza, Susan, in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Benavides, Jose R. presiding.

Case Details for Trevino, Armando v. Meza, Susan , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View) Track Case Changes

Judge

Benavides, Jose R. Track Judge’s New Cases

Filing Date

July 31, 2008

Category

Legal Separation Without Minor Children

Time To Trial

1138 days

Last Refreshed

November 19, 2021

Practice Area

Family

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

1174 days

Filing Location

Kern County, CA

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Case Cycle Time

1909 days

Parties for Trevino, Armando v. Meza, Susan , et al.

Plaintiffs

Trevino, Armando

Meza, Antonio

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Meza, Susan

Other Parties

Stoker, Ira L (Attorney)

Case Events for Trevino, Armando v. Meza, Susan , et al.

Date Type Description
October 22, 2013 Hearing Notice of Destruction of Subpoenaed Records Not Admitted
November 09, 2012 Hearing Order to Show Cause
Calendar Notes: filed by Ira StokerRESP TO CORRECT RULING ON EQUALIZATION PAYMENT filed by Ira StokerRESP TO CORRECT RULING ON EQUALIZATION PAYMENT

Judge: Compton, James L.
November 09, 2012 Docket Event Order to Show Cause
Calendar Notes: filed by Ira StokerRESP TO CORRECT RULING ON EQUALIZATION PAYMENT filed by Ira StokerRESP TO CORRECT RULING ON EQUALIZATION PAYMENT

Judge: Compton, James L.
September 21, 2012 Hearing Mail Returned Undelivered
08/17/12 MINUTE ORDER
September 21, 2012 Docket Event Mail Returned Undelivered
08/17/12 MINUTE ORDER
September 13, 2012 Hearing Findings and Orders
CT DATE 8/13/2012 SMG
September 13, 2012 Docket Event Findings and Orders
CT DATE 8/13/2012 SMG
August 21, 2012 Hearing Findings and Orders
CT DATE 6/14/2012 JLC
August 21, 2012 Docket Event Findings and Orders
CT DATE 6/14/2012 JLC
August 17, 2012 Hearing NP1820
Department: D Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: RULING. THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: The parties agreed that the total amount of money taken by the respondent $334,695, which included the tax returns of $51,073 and $18,237, when the tax returns were listed again it amounted to a double charge. There should have been a total community equity of $1,048,178 with the petitioner receiving $419,685 and the respondent receiving $628,494. This would leave an equalization payment of $104,404.50 payable from respondent to petitioner to equalize, which is to be paid from the amount being held in escrow. The amounts remaining in escrow would be to the respondent as part of her division of the community property sale. THE DECISION IS MAILED TO ANTONIO MEZA AND THE LAW OFFICE OF IRA STOKER.
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.