1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Kern County Superior Courts
  5. Velocity Investments Llc Vs Martinez
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Velocity Investments Llc Vs Martinez

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Velocity Investments Llc, filed a(n) Collections - Creditor case represented by Arrincon-Tepeli, Gissela, against Martinez, Emilia, in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Etienne, Linda S. presiding.

Case Details for Velocity Investments Llc v. Martinez, Emilia

Case Number

(Subscribe to View) Track Case Changes

Judge

Etienne, Linda S. Track Judge’s New Cases

Filing Date

January 17, 2020

Category

09-Cl <10K Rule 3.740 Collections

Last Refreshed

November 18, 2021

Practice Area

Creditor

Filing Location

Kern County, CA

Matter Type

Collections

Parties for Velocity Investments Llc v. Martinez, Emilia

Plaintiffs

Velocity Investments Llc

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Arrincon-Tepeli, Gissela

Defendants

Martinez, Emilia

Case Events for Velocity Investments Llc v. Martinez, Emilia

Date Type Description
January 18, 2022 Hearing Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.740(f)
Cont. from 01/20/21 No disposition in 2 yrs, case to be dismissed.

Judge: Etienne, Linda S.
January 18, 2022 Docket Event Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.740(f)
Cont. from 01/20/21 No disposition in 2 yrs, case to be dismissed.

Judge: Etienne, Linda S.
January 20, 2021 Hearing To ensure the public has access to court proceedings
during the COVID-19 pandemic, this court will be audio live streaming all non-confidential matters. This alternative method for observing courtroom proceedings is strongly encouraged during this time for all non-parties to avoid attending court in-person where social distancing protocols and limited courtroom access applies. It is also available because Judicial Officers may have to limit, or impose other reasonable restrictions upon, public access to their courtrooms and adjacent hallways based on recommended social distancing requirements. Each judge retains the discretion and authority to refuse, limit or terminate audio live streaming of the proceedings, or portions thereof, pursuant to the factors and prohibitions articulated in California Rules of Court, rule 1.150, and in consideration of other statutory and constitutional provisions. By Court Order and California Rules of Court, rule 1.150, audio live streams may NOT be recorded, broadcasted or rebroadcasted without prior written permission from the Court. Witnesses who have been instructed not to discuss their testimony or court proceedings with others may not listen to the audio streaming of any portion of the trial.
January 20, 2021 Hearing Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.740(f)

Judge: Etienne, Linda S.
January 20, 2021 Docket Event To ensure the public has access to court proceedings
during the COVID-19 pandemic, this court will be audio live streaming all non-confidential matters. This alternative method for observing courtroom proceedings is strongly encouraged during this time for all non-parties to avoid attending court in-person where social distancing protocols and limited courtroom access applies. It is also available because Judicial Officers may have to limit, or impose other reasonable restrictions upon, public access to their courtrooms and adjacent hallways based on recommended social distancing requirements. Each judge retains the discretion and authority to refuse, limit or terminate audio live streaming of the proceedings, or portions thereof, pursuant to the factors and prohibitions articulated in California Rules of Court, rule 1.150, and in consideration of other statutory and constitutional provisions. By Court Order and California Rules of Court, rule 1.150, audio live streams may NOT be recorded, broadcasted or rebroadcasted without prior written permission from the Court. Witnesses who have been instructed not to discuss their testimony or court proceedings with others may not listen to the audio streaming of any portion of the trial.
January 11, 2021 Hearing Declaration
Re: Fees
January 11, 2021 Hearing Declaration
Re: Copies
January 11, 2021 Hearing Declaration
Re: 1788.60 a
January 11, 2021 Hearing Declaration
Re: 1033
January 11, 2021 Hearing Request for Dismissal (Partial)
Without prejudice as to Does 1-10
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.