1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. New York
  4. Kings County Supreme Courts
  5. Ark393 Doe V. Diocese Of Brooklyn A/K/A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York, Holy Family, Does 1-5 Whose Identities Are Unknown To Plaintiff
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Documents Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Ark393 Doe V. Diocese Of Brooklyn A/K/A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York, Holy Family, Does 1-5 Whose Identities Are Unknown To Plaintiff

Case Last Refreshed: 8 months ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Ark393 Doe, filed a(n) General Torts - Torts case represented by Anderson, Jeffrey Robert, Goffe, Trusha Patel, Shaikh, Nahid Aftab, against Diocese Of Brooklyn A K A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York, Diocese Of Brooklyn A K A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York, Does 1-5 Whose Identities Are Unknown To Plaintiff, Holy Family, represented by Peknic, Charles Martin, Scahill, Francis J, in the jurisdiction of Kings County, NY, . Kings County, NY Superior Courts with Laurence L. Love presiding.

Case Details for Ark393 Doe v. Diocese Of Brooklyn A K A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View) Track Case Changes

Judge

Laurence L. Love Track Judge’s New Cases

Filing Date

June 11, 2021

Category

Torts - Child Victims Act

Last Refreshed

August 02, 2023

Practice Area

Torts

Filing Location

Kings County, NY

Matter Type

General Torts

Parties for Ark393 Doe v. Diocese Of Brooklyn A K A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York , et al.

Plaintiffs

Ark393 Doe

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Anderson, Jeffrey Robert

Goffe, Trusha Patel

Shaikh, Nahid Aftab

Defendants

Diocese Of Brooklyn A K A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York

Diocese Of Brooklyn A K A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York

Does 1-5 Whose Identities Are Unknown To Plaintiff

Holy Family

Attorneys for Defendants

Peknic, Charles Martin

Scahill, Francis J

Case Documents for Ark393 Doe v. Diocese Of Brooklyn A K A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York , et al.

for Ark393 Doe V. Diocese Of Brooklyn A/K/A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York, Holy Family, Does 1-5 Whose Identities Are Unknown To Plaintiff

AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED OSC/EXPARTE APP

Date: June 11, 2021
for Ark393 Doe V. Diocese Of Brooklyn A/K/A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York, Holy Family, Does 1-5 Whose Identities Are Unknown To Plaintiff

ORDER - ADMINISTRATIVE

Date: June 14, 2021
for Ark393 Doe V. Diocese Of Brooklyn A/K/A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York, Holy Family, Does 1-5 Whose Identities Are Unknown To Plaintiff

ORDER - ADMINISTRATIVE

Date: June 15, 2021

Case Events for Ark393 Doe v. Diocese Of Brooklyn A K A The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Brooklyn, New York , et al.

Date Type Description
October 31, 2022 Answer and Notice to Take Deposition
View Document
July 10, 2022 ORDER - AMENDED
Second Amended Confidentiality Order July 6, 2022.
View Document
May 13, 2022 ANSWER
View Document
May 13, 2022 AFFIRMATION/AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
View Document
May 13, 2022 NOTICE OF DEPOSITION UPON ORAL EXAMINATION
View Document
May 13, 2022 CERTIFICATION OF SIGNATURE ( ATTORNEY OR PARTY )
View Document
August 12, 2021 EXHIBIT(S)
Exhibit D to CMO #2 Hon. George J. Silver (Standard Combined Demands directed at Plaintiffs)
View Document
August 12, 2021 EXHIBIT(S)
Exhibit E to CMO #2 Hon. George J. Silver (Standard Combined Demands directed at Defendants)
View Document
July 07, 2021 DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION (Motion #1)
So ordered stipulation attached
View Document
June 28, 2021 STIPULATION - OTHER (Motion #1)
Stipulation Resolving Order to Show Cause
View Document
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.