1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Butte County Superior Courts
  5. Benedict, John Et Al Vs Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Et Al
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Documents Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Benedict, John Et Al Vs Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Et Al

Case Last Refreshed: 4 months ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Benedict, Doreen, Benedict, John, filed a(n) Civil case represented by Yurtsan, Andrey R., against Bank Of America, Na, Bank Of America, N A, Clear Recon Corp, Wells Fargo Bank, Na, Wells Fargo Bank, N A, (total of 5) See All represented by Ladi, Laszlo, in the jurisdiction of Butte County. This case was filed in Butte County Superior Courts with Tamara L. Mosbarger presiding.

Case Details for Benedict, Doreen v. Bank Of America, Na , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View) Track Case Changes

Judge

Tamara L. Mosbarger Track Judge’s New Cases

Time To Management

177 days

Filing Date

December 30, 2019

Category

Civil

Time To Trial

602 days

Last Refreshed

December 10, 2023

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

72 days

Filing Location

Butte County, CA

Parties for Benedict, Doreen v. Bank Of America, Na , et al.

Plaintiffs

Benedict, Doreen

Benedict, John

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Yurtsan, Andrey R.

Defendants

Bank Of America, Na

Bank Of America, N A

Clear Recon Corp

Wells Fargo Bank, Na

Wells Fargo Bank, N A

Attorneys for Defendants

Ladi, Laszlo

Case Documents for Benedict, Doreen v. Bank Of America, Na , et al.

for Benedict, John Et Al Vs Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Et Al

Case Management Statement

Date: June 17, 2020
for Benedict, John Et Al Vs Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Et Al

Complaint

Date: December 30, 2019
for Benedict, John Et Al Vs Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Et Al

Case Management Statement

Date: June 02, 2020

Case Events for Benedict, Doreen v. Bank Of America, Na , et al.

Date Type Description
August 23, 2021 Docket Event Jury Trial
10 Day Estimate

Judge: Mosbarger, Tamara L
August 19, 2021 Docket Event Trial Readiness Conference
10 Day Estimate

Judge: Mosbarger, Tamara L
July 19, 2021 Docket Event Settlement Conference

Judge: Candela, Michael P
June 16, 2021 Docket Event Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
Motion for Summary Judgment
Defendant's Notice of Motion and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication

Judge: Mosbarger, Tamara L
View Document
April 21, 2021 Tentative Ruling The Court finds that Defendants have established that there is an overriding interest in sealing the documents, namely the financial privacy rights of the Plaintiffs, to prevent public disclosure of D...

Judge: Mosbarger, Tamara L
April 21, 2021 Docket Event Declaration of Laszlo Ladi in Support of Motion to Seal Records Lodged Conditionally Under Seal
Motion hearings - Predispo
Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Seal Records Lodged Conditionally Under Seal; Lodged Doc 3/30/21

Judge: Mosbarger, Tamara L
View Document
April 21, 2021 Docket Event Civil Minutes
Minute Order
April 21, 2021 Docket Event Tentative Ruling
The Court finds that Defendants have established that there is an overriding interest in sealing the documents, namely the financial privacy rights of the Plaintiffs, to prevent public disclosure of Defendants' trade secrets, and to protect the privacy rights of non-party employees of Defendants that overcomes the right of public access to the records that supports the sealing of the records. The Court finds that a substantial probability exists that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed. The proposed sealing of call recordings submitted in support of Defendants' motion for summary judgment is narrowly tailored and no less restrictive means exist to achieve the overriding interest. Defendants' Motion to Seal Records Lodged Conditionally Under Seal is unopposed, satisfies the requirements of California Rules of Court Rule 2.550, and is therefore granted. No other records, other than the call recordings submitted in support of Defendants' motion for summary judgment are to be sealed. The Plaintiff shall submit a proposed Order which complies with CRC Rules 2.550(e) and 2.551(e).
March 25, 2021 Docket Event Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
Statement
Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication
View Document
March 25, 2021 Docket Event Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication
Memorandum of Points and Authorities
View Document
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.