What is a Supplemental Declaration?

Useful Rulings on Supplemental Declaration

Recent Rulings on Supplemental Declaration

3376-3400 of 3489 results

CHARLES STONES VS HOPE RANCH PARK HOMES ASSOCIATION ET AL

(In a supplemental declaration improperly submitted with the reply, he describes how he reached his conclusions.) What this evidence establishes or fails to establish is for argument. OVERRULED. #8: Objection to ¶ 9 of Stones’ declaration identifying defendant’s January 30, 2003 follow- up letter to Stones and the prior owner of the neighboring property laying out the benchmark for Schefflera height. Grounds: “Immaterial. Lacking in Foundation. Hearsay.

  • Hearing

    Mar 27, 2012

MATTER OF ALEXIS KING

King’s declaration and supplemental declaration, enable the court to make findings 3-5. In her declaration and supplemental declaration, Ms. King says she believes the transfer is in her best interest.

  • Hearing

    Mar 27, 2012

CHRISTINA HOPE VS. SEARS HOLDINGS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

Counsel's supplemental declaration claims that the mediator recalled that Plaintiff agreed to the settlement or else he would not have announced a settlement. That is not reliable evidence to prove there was a settlement approved by the Plaintiff. There is insufficient reliable evidence and therefore no proof that Plaintiff or her attorney agreed to the mediation proposal.

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2012

ECONOMY FOODS, INC A CORPORATION VS. SILVER LYNING INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DBA ET AL

., if Plaintiff supplies a supplemental declaration stating that defendants have failed to pay any monies voluntarily, have been uncooperative as alleged in its Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and that the full amount remains due on the money judgement as provided by CCP ?708.510(c)(3) the court will grant those portions of the motion seeking Assignment of Rights and Turnover CCP ?699.040(a) only.

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2012

  • Judge

    Rolando Pasquali

  • County

    San Francisco County, CA

ECONOMY FOODS, INC., A CORPORATION DBA FACCIOLA VS. GREEN VALLEY GRILL, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL

If Plaintiff supplies a supplemental declaration stating that defendants have failed to pay any monies voluntarily, have been uncooperative as alleged in its Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and that the full amount remains due on the money judgement as provided by CCP ?708.510(c)(3) the court will grant those portions of the motion seeking Assignment of Rights and Turnover CCP ?699.040(a) only.

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2012

  • Judge

    Rolando Pasquali

  • County

    San Francisco County, CA

BRIGHT V. SHEPPARD

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Disburse Settlement Funds The evidentiary deficiencies re the Payment Summary are satisfactorily addressed in the February 7, 2012 Supplemental Declaration of Julie Ann Robles. Moreover, the County has cured the defect identified in the tentative in its supplemental briefing submitted on February 7, 2012, e.g., it justified the particular expenses claimed as reimbursable.

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2012

HARTENSTEIN V. ASH ET AL.,

(iii) Find that (a) Plaintiffs' counsel Greg Jones's declaration summary of Plaintiffs' counsel's billing records, as clarified by his supplemental declaration, is sufficiently detailed to support Plaintiffs' claim for attorney's fees; and (b) there is no requirement that Plaintiffs' counsel submit their actual billing records in support of the motion. (See, e.g., Bernardu v. County of Monterey (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1379, 1398.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2012

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

WARD RAISIN ET AL VS KIMBERLY SWENEY ET AL

Again, the supplemental declaration supplies the information. Finally, in response to defendants’ argument that the stipulation entered into by their former counsel to allow the SAC to be filed did not encompass the broad amendments now sought, plaintiffs argue that just wasn’t true. Rather, they sent the stipulation to defendants’ then counsel with the proposed SAC. He reviewed the SAC, and then signed the stipulation. The Court will grant the motion for leave to amend.

  • Hearing

    Feb 08, 2012

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

FIA CARD SERVICES N.A. VS. AMIR SHARIFI

Amir's Supplemental Declaration filed January 5, 2012; Exh. 4 [account statement from December 8, 2011 to January 3, 2012].) 2. As a result, Mr. Amir is entitled to 75% of that remaining balance, or $35.87; and the creditor FIA Card Services, N.A., is entitled to 25% of those funds, or $11.95. (C.C.P. §704.070(b).) 3. The clerk is requested to prepare an order for the court's signature.

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2012

ROBERT LIGHTFOOT VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL

Notice Of Motion An Motion To Strike The Supplemental Declaration Set for hearing on Wednesday, January 11, 2012, Line 3, DEFENDANT PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD (CALTRAIN)'S Motion To Strike The Supplemental Declaration IS Off calendar as moot due to the filing of the amended complaint. =302/HK

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2012

MATTER OF PATRICIA A GONZALES

The documents submitted with the petition, including Gonzales’ declaration and supplemental declaration, enable the court to make findings 2-6. In her declaration and supplemental declaration, Gonzales says she will use the $25,000 “to catch up on all of the outstanding bills for my mother, my daughter and myself and to use any remaining funds to establish an emergency savings account.” She lists debts totaling $26,851, with monthly debt service of $1,375.

  • Hearing

    Jan 10, 2012

WELLS FARGO BANK NA VS. ANTHONY G GILES

(iii) Due to the fact that Plaintiff's sole "meet and confer" attempt was also served on Defendant at an incorrect address, order Plaintiff to engage in a "meet and confer" with Defendant prior to the continued hearing date in an attempt to resolve the issues raised by this motion informally, and to file and serve a supplemental declaration regarding these further "meet and confer" efforts.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2012

NATHAN LATTA VS MICHELLE ROBINSON

Father filed a supplemental declaration; his gross income is stated for 9 months but is paid over 12 months.

  • Hearing

    Dec 13, 2011

FRANCIS SEARS VS. CERTAINTEED CORPORATION

In his new motion, plaintiff has provided a supplemental declaration from Dr. Hearn reaffirming his prior diagnosis and describing an examination he made of the plaintiff in October. Based upon this most recent declaration the court is satisfied that the condition of plaintiff's health warrants preference in this case. Accordingly, the motion for preference will be granted.

  • Hearing

    Dec 13, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

ROBERT LIGHTFOOT VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL

Notice Of Motion An Motion To Strike The Supplemental Declaration Set for hearing on Thursday, November 17, 2011, Line 2. DEFENDANT PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD (CALTRAIN)'S Notice Of Motion An Motion To Strike The Supplemental Declaration. Continued to January 11, 2012 per stipulation of the parties. = (302/HEK)

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2011

MONTECITO BANK & TRUST VS ROGER MEYER

Meyer’s second supplemental declaration. The court overrules all of defendant Roger W. Meyer’s evidentiary objections. The court denies plaintiff Montecito Bank & Trust’s motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, summary adjudication of issues. Discussion: This is an action to collect on a guaranty of a commercial construction loan secured by real property – a medical office suite located in Agoura Hills, California.

  • Hearing

    Nov 14, 2011

STANLEY DUFFY VS. AMERICAN GOLF COMPANY

Plaintiff's Objection to Miller Supplemental Declaration: Sustained. See San Diego Watercrafts, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 308, 316. The declaration is stricken. Plaintiff's Objections to Schaeffer Declaration: The objections have not been numbered. The court refers to each objection by reference to the order in which it appears in the written objections.

  • Hearing

    Oct 31, 2011

DREW AND DREW

On 9/23 mother filed a 11-page supplemental declaration opposing any temporary order for custody of the minor children [which I have read and summarize here]; she attaches exhibits A through M; contends this entire matter is being orchestrated by her mother; reports that her relationship with Chris King has been damaged and they are separated; she volunteers that the children will not be in his presence for a period of one year; that the children have been in a stable and nurturing home; that she lives in a

  • Hearing

    Sep 27, 2011

DANITA CHRISTIE VS. GLEN KIMBALL

Danita submits a supplemental declaration attesting to her direct care of her mother prior to her mother's relocation to Montana, and Danita's financial support of her mother, once relocated. This case is replete with triable issues of fact, perhaps not as to decedent's capacity to make a will and sign a grant deed, because there is no admissible evidence that Mary was not competent.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2011

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX AND ANGELINE XXXXXX

Father filed a supplemental declaration on 9/9 saying mother makes false allegations and distortions of historical events; wants all pickup and returns of the minor child to be through a third-party, Kristina Brumbaugh; says he has been informed mother is renting out a room. Rulings: 1. This case needs to be tried: the trial date is January 17, 2012; the mandatory settlement conference date is January 6, 2012.

  • Hearing

    Sep 13, 2011

STARDANCER LLC VS FELIPE CASTANEDA

(Hermanson Supplemental Declaration, Exhibit C.) The second document is entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Policy and Agreement” and was allegedly signed by defendant on April 29, 2008, when he began his employment. (Hermanson Supplemental Declaration, Exhibit D.) However, neither document is applicable here. The April 2010 Handbook expressly provides that “[t]he information and guidelines contained in this employee handbook supersede any previous versions of handbooks prepared by [plaintiff].”

  • Hearing

    Sep 13, 2011

JACK JUNG VS. SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Motion To Strike 1) Supplemental Declaration Of Jack Jung 2) Further Declaration Of David Weintraub In Support Of Reply To Opposition To Motion To Strike Set for hearing on Monday, September 12, 2011, line 13. RESPONDENT SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Motion To Strike 1) Supplemental Declaration Of Jack Jung 2) Further Declaration Of David Weintraub In Support Of Reply To Opposition To Motion To Strike. Off calendar as moot. =(302/CWW)

  • Hearing

    Sep 12, 2011

AUTOVILLE OF STOCKTON VS. MOHAMAD NASSER ABOUI

Counsel Mittelman further indicates in a supplemental declaration filed September 7 that he intends to move to recuse plaintiff's counsel Plaintiff vigorously opposes the continuance. He maintains that the auto inventory is his life savings, defendants are liquidating it, and unless the matter is tried quickly there will be no assets to satisfy a judgment.

  • Hearing

    Sep 09, 2011

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MATTER OF THE HAROLD AND MAYLA SULLWOLD FAMILY TRUST

Supplemental Declaration: The trustee filed a supplemental declaration a mere two days before the hearing. Among other things, she states that the bank account in Santa Barbara is used only for deposits of rent from the tenant of the Carpinteria property and that she uses a bank in Conifer, Colorado for trust administration and to pay trust expenses.

  • Hearing

    Aug 25, 2011

JOLON-PUAC V. JEFFORD

There is no prejudice to the plaintiff; he responded to the allegations of the supplemental declaration in his opposition. Plaintiff's Objections to Sample Declaration No. 10: Overruled. Counsel may properly authenticate the copy. No. 11: Overruled. Admissible to establish basis for expert's opinion. (See People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 1253, 1279.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 25, 2011

  « first    1 ... 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.