What is a Supplemental Declaration?

Useful Rulings on Supplemental Declaration

Recent Rulings on Supplemental Declaration

ARMEN G KOJIKIAN ET AL VS AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

(Supplemental Declaration of Julie M. Kim (“Kim Supp. Decl.”), ¶4.) The parties agree to certification for purposes of settlement. (¶XI.A) TERMS OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The essential terms are as follows: Up to $644,750 for attorney fees and costs (¶I.13); and Up to $5,000 for a service award to a single representative or in total payments to representatives ($2,500 x2).

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB V. JEREMY PRESTON

However, to date, there is no supplemental declaration on file from Plaintiff’s process server, and no reply on file from Defendant. As the Court previously noted, there is insufficient information to support substituted service on a John Doe at an address that Defendant alleges he no longer lived in at the time service was attempted.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF WOOD RANCH LAKE PARK

Tentative ruling for September 28, 2020 on Petitioner Wood Ranch Lake Park Village Assocition's Petition for Court Order Approving Amended and Restated CC&Rs or Reducing the Number of Votes Required for Approval of Such Amendment The court continues the hearing on the Association's Petition to October 26, 2020, and directs the Association to, no later than October 19, 2020, (i) submit a supplemental declaration indicating whether the first mortgagees, the Planning Director, and the City Attorney of Simi Valley

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

KARLA GARCIA VS BUBBA GUMP SHRIMP CO ET AL

On 7/28/20, the Court ordered Plaintiff's counsel to file a supplemental declaration with a copy of counsel’s retainer agreement at least one week before the 9/28/20 hearing. The Court’s file does not reflect that counsel complied with the order. The hearing is continued to 10/13/20 at 8:30 a.m. in Dept SS-29. Counsel is ordered to comply with the Court’s 7/28/20 order within five days.

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

LUIS JENARO ENCISO, ET AL. VS A & J AUTO SALES GROUP, INC., ET AL.

Plaintiffs filed a supplemental declaration on September 16, 2020. To date, Defendants have not filed an opposition.

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

LUIS RODRIGUEZ VS. SECRET RECIPES, INC.

o In his supplemental declaration, he provides a breakdown of the 7.8 hours incurred from January 12, 2020 to January 28, 2020 to draft this motion for attorney’s fees. He requests a total of $5,070.00. (Abramson Supp. Decl., ¶5.) · Mr. Abramson states in his supplemental declaration that he will continue to incur fees of at least 2.2 hours for filing fees, notices of continuance, preparing and appearing at the hearing. (Abramson Supp. Decl., ¶6.) He seeks a total of $1,430.00 for this. (Id.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

IN RE: 2285 COLGATE DRIVE, COSTA MESA CA 92626

Petitioner is directed to file a supplemental declaration explaining the above discrepancies and attaching the missing exhibits no later than 09/28/20. The Court will make a further determination on the Petition following a review of the new supplemental declaration. MP give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

MITCHELL V LENTS HEARING RE: MOTION TO/FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST LENTS FORMER COUNSEL BY BLAKE WALTER DUNLAP, BLAKE WALTER DUNLAPINDEPENDENTEXECUTOR

Supplemental declaration to be filed on or before 10-13-2020. Any reply to the supplemental declaration ONLY to be filed and served on or before 10-16-2020 at noon. This four-year-old case involves multiple pleadings filed by various parties against one another and has been subject to a protected litigation. The instant Motion for sanctions pertains to the litigation history between the complainants of the two cross-complaints filed against each other.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

RONALD K WIGGINS VS WELLS FARGO BANK N A ET AL

Defendant’s Evidentiary Objections to Plaintiff’s Supplemental Declaration Objection 1 is sustained for lack of foundation. Objection 2 is overruled. Objection 3 is sustained for lack of foundation and speculation. Objection 4 is sustained for lack of foundation. Objection 5 is sustained for lack of foundation. Objection 6 is sustained for lack of foundation and speculation. Objections 7-8 are overruled.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

SHERRY STERLING VS EDWARD LEAL DE ROZA JR., ET AL.

On 9/11/20, Plaintiff filed a supplemental declaration pursuant to CCP § 437c(h) providing that Plaintiff expects the deposition of Defendants’ PMK, which is set for 9/28/20, to discover additional facts essential to Plaintiff’s opposition to the instant motion. Defendants filed an opposition to the declaration.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

BRUCE E. WICK VS, ALL PERSONS CLAIMING ANY INTEREST IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, ET AL

SGVPG's Objection to Wick‘s supplemental declaration is SUSTAINED. The Court has not considered the late frled papers. REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE SGVPG's Requests for Judicial Notice are GRANTED, (Evid. Code §§ 452(d),(h).) LEGAL STANDARD A preliminary injunction may be granted at airy time before judgment upon a verified complaint, or upon affidavits if the complaint or the affidavits show satisfactorily that sufficient grounds exist therefore. (Code Civ. Proc. § 527(a).)

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

HOVIK GRIGORIAN, ET AL VS. FELIX LOPEZ, ET AL

On September 4, 2020, Cross-Defendants filed the supplemental declaration of Hani Ganji.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ROBERT JOHN STEVENSON, SR. V. SJBH LLC, ET AL.

Footnote 2: In a supplemental declaration filed on August 24, 2020, plaintiff’s counsel explains that this estimate was based on an incorrect calculation. Footnote 3: Plaintiff’s moving papers seek $8,360.21 in litigation costs and $19,504 in administrative costs, consistent with their supporting declarations filed on April 9. The supplemental declarations filed on August 24 inconsistently refer to $8,361.21 in litigation costs and $19,540 in administrative costs.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

MONET LITTLE, ET AL. VS PHUONG NGUYEN, ET AL.

Moving party is to file a supplemental declaration on or before October 6, 2020, showing that the LWDA has been served with the proposed settlement. The declaration of counsel filed in support of the motion only states that the copy of the instant motion "will be submitted" to the LWDA Counsel for Defendants to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

CARISSA SANCHEZ ET AL VS JAMES P THOMPSON ET AL

His supplemental declaration makes this exceedingly clear. (See Supp. McCone Decl., ¶¶ 4-5.) Further, Plaintiff’s arguments regarding excusable neglect do not apply to a request for mandatory relief. As noted above, such relief must be granted “unless the court finds that the default or dismissal was not in fact caused by the attorney's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect.” (Martin Potts & Assocs., Inc., supra, 244 Cal.App.4th at 438-441.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

MARTINEZ VS URBINA

Counsel for Plaintiff to file a Supplemental Declaration at least 5 calendar days before the next hearing with the Proposed Second Amended Complaint attached.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

YI HAN VS QINGYUN JIANG

Jiang also filed a supplemental declaration to explain that he “lived in Los Angeles between 2011 and approximately July 2016, while [he] attended the University of Southern California” but “moved back to China in approximately July 2016” and has “not lived in California, or anywhere in the United States, since approximately July 2016.” (Jiang Supplemental Decl., ¶¶ 4-6.) Jiang asserts that since July 2016, any work he has done on behalf of US-based companies has been done primarily from China.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

A C A LLC VS MYRON JEPPSON HOLMSTROM

However, Plaintiff’s declaration – and supplemental declaration – also utterly fail to comply with CRC 3.1324, as discussed below. Supporting Declaration Plaintiff’s declaration – and supplemental declaration – fail to explain (1) the effect of the amendments, (2) why the amendments are necessary and proper, and (3) when the facts giving rise to the amended allegations were discovered.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

ANTONIA BASURTO VS. MARKETSOURCE

The Court has received the Second Supplemental Declaration of Tim Cunningham on Behalf of CPT Group Inc. with respect to Disbursement (Supplemental Cunningham Declaration), filed September 18, 2020. No appearance is required subject to the following conditions: The Supplemental Cunningham Declaration attests that the un-cashed amount of settlement checks ($354.96) has been distributed to the cy pres recipient, Boys Hope Girls Hope.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

JOHNIE HONEYCUTT VS. CALIFORNIA SIERRA EXPRESS INC

The Court has received the Supplemental Declaration of Cassandra Cita Regarding Disbursement of Settlement Funds, filed August 12, 2020 (Supplemental Cita Declaration). The Supplemental Cita Declaration attests that all payments have been made as required by the November 12, 2019 Order of Final Approval and Judgment, including the disbursement of the un-cashed amount to the cy pres recipient, Legal Aid at Work.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

TERRI DAVIS VS. USRG (CALIFORNIA) INC

The Court has received the Supplemental Declaration of Norman Alcantara Regarding Disbursement (Supplemental Alcantara Declaration), filed September 18, 2020. No appearance is required subject to the following conditions: The Supplemental Alcantara Declaration attests that all payments have been completed including the distribution of the un-cashed amount per the Court's prior order and judgment. In light of the completion of payments, the Court now deems the matter closed.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

JULIO P. AYALA, ET AL. VS GENERAL MOTORS LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

Defendant is ordered to provide a supplemental declaration within fifteen days of this order. Both parties are to brief the court on the propriety of an amended opposition and reply. Discussion Case Background Plaintiffs Julio P. Ayala and Maria C.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

REPUBLIC UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY VS C J CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION INC., ET AL.

Defendant is ordered to file and serve a supplemental declaration on or before October 23, 2020, that outlines the additional meet and confer efforts conducted. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

IDUVINA ARTEAGA VS 1 THROUGH 100 DOES

Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice (x2) Having considered the moving papers and supplemental declaration in support of the moving papers, the Court rules as follows. No opposing papers were filed. BACKGROUND On February 6, 2017, Plaintiff Maria L. Arteaga (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Afshin Farzadmehr aka Sean F. Mehr and Surgery Center of Beverly Hills, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

GIANFRANCO INTERLANDI, ET AL. VS LYLE R. MINK, ET AL.

Plaintiff’s objections to the Court’s consideration of the supplemental declaration of Thomas J. Weiss attached to Defendants’ Reply memorandum are SUSTAINED. Defendants did not obtain leave to submit additional evidence with their reply. The Plaintiffs’ sur-reply “Response to Evidentiary Objections of Defendant….” filed 9-21-20 is disregarded. Plaintiff did not obtain leave to submit a sur-reply.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

  • Judge

    H. Jay Ford

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 136     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.