How to Serve Someone Abroad (CCP § 413.10(c))

Useful Resources for Service Abroad (CCP § 413.10(c))

Recent Rulings on Service Abroad (CCP § 413.10(c))

1-25 of 10000 results

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Coleman, Paul C. Peel, Jason T. Dennett and Adam A. Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3).

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

LONG-HIM TANG, ET AL. VS PATRICIA PONCE DE LEON

Photos of his wound and healed scar are attached as Exhibits B, C, and D. Tang declares his wound eventually healed into a permanent scar. (Tang Decl., ¶ 12.) He received a referral to a dermatologist on May 6, 2017 and had a dermatologist administer injections on May 16, 2017 and February 23, 2018. (Tang Decl., ¶¶ 13-14.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Thus, the service requirements of Civil Code section 798.61, subdivision (c)(1), are satisfied.

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2021

V. L., ET AL. VS EVAN CARTER, ET AL.

20STCV36053 V. L., et al. vs EVAN CARTER, et al. Court Order Re: Transfer and Reassignment of Complicated Personal Injury (“PI”) Case to An Independent Calendar ("IC") Courtroom from Department 29, a PI Hub Court. The Court's order Re: Transfer of Complicated Personal Injury Case to an Independent Calendar Court, is posted on the Court's we...

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

V. L., ET AL. VS EVAN CARTER, ET AL.

20STCV36053 V. L., et al. vs EVAN CARTER, et al. Court Order Re: Transfer and Reassignment of Complicated Personal Injury (“PI”) Case to An Independent Calendar ("IC") Courtroom from Department 29, a PI Hub Court. AFTER REVIEW OF THE FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Department 29 of the Personal Injury Court has determined tha...

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

RE EDNA BELINDA BURGOS

Original financial account statement(s) as required by PrC § 2620(c) (2), (3) 6. Original statements from the residential care facility PrC§ 2620(c)(5) 7. Notice of Filing Inventory & Appraisal Form GC-042 filed as to I&A filed 4-20-2020, and Proof of Service re: same PrC § 2610 8. Proof of mailing Notice of Conservatee’s Death. PrC § 2361 9. Proposed Order Note: Reportedly, conservatee is now deceased, per 1-13-2021 minute order. LYNN A MEISCH JENNIFER E McGUIRE RICHARD A. MEISCH JONATHAN T.

  • Hearing

    Feb 03, 2021

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR APPTMNT OF CONS OF PERSON & ESTATE

None filed COLE RICHARDS SUMMER C SELLECK KIMBERLY ILEA ROMES MARCEL RICHARD JR SUMMER C SELLECK PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Yolanda Galvan and Brittany Miller, petitioners, still need to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2.

  • Hearing

    Feb 03, 2021

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF RICK LEE RENFROW

(Local Rule 1721(c)(2)(A-B).) If the matter is continued, documents must be submitted at least 10 days prior to the new hearing date to be considered. Due to staffing limitations, processing times may be delayed. To assist in processing, attorneys and parties should include the next court date in the “Filing Description” field provided by the electronic service provider.

  • Hearing

    Feb 02, 2021

MATTER OF THE LAWRENCE C ENSLOW TRUST

RE: PET’N FOR INSTRUCTIONS FILED ON 10/15/20 BY KIMBERLY A FOX-YODER PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proof of mailing Judicial Council Form Notice of Hearing to all persons entitled to receive notice. PrC § 17203 3. Proposed Order PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT...

  • Hearing

    Feb 02, 2021

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RAQUEL HERNANDEZ GARCIA VS MATHEW FARZAM, ET AL.

Sanctions CCP §§ 2023.010(d), 2030.290(c) and 2031.300(c) authorize the court to impose sanctions against Plaintiff for the failure to respond to discovery without substantial justification Here, sanctions are appropriate because Plaintiff failed to serve any responses to Defendant’s discovery, and failed to file any opposition to explain this failure. Defendant’s counsel bills at the rate of $350/hour. Defendant is awarded $350.00 in sanctions. It is so ordered. Dated: February , 2021 Hon. Jon R.

  • Hearing

    Feb 02, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

ESTATE OF JACK J. HERNANDEZ

(Local Rule 1721(c)(2)(A-B).) If the matter is continued, documents must be submitted at least 10 days prior to the new hearing date to be considered. Due to staffing limitations, processing times may be delayed. To assist in processing, attorneys and parties should include the next court date in the “Filing Description” field provided by the electronic service provider.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

CONS OF LIPIKA BORKAKOTY BARDALAI

PrC § 10404 GUADALUPE ALVARADO JENNIFER S GOLDSMITH PAULINE C ZARAGOZA PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Proposed Order C.C. COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES DEPT COUNTY COUNSEL JOHN DOUGLAS TRACY S REGLI PAUL DAVID GREGORY SEAN P CULLIGAN

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MILDRED MANCE, BY AND THROUGH HER REPRESENATIVE AND ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, REGINA MANCE VS GLEN PARK AT VALLEY VILLAGE

Code of Civil Procedure section 36(c) states: Unless the court otherwise orders . . . [a] party may file and serve a motion for preference supported by a declaration of the moving party that all essential parties have been served with process or have appeared. (Code Civ. Proc. § 36, subd. (c).) Arguably, Plaintiff’s counsel has complied with this requirement.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

ORLI SANTOS, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL. VS LA PROPERTIES HEFFESSE LLC, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

Mejia; Gloria C. Mejia; and Miriam Ramirez The Court has considered the moving papers. No opposition papers were filed. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed a motion (the “Motion”) for an order granting Plaintiffs leave to file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). The Motion is unopposed, and the Court therefore GRANTS the Motion under Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

MILDRED MANCE, BY AND THROUGH HER REPRESENATIVE AND ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, REGINA MANCE VS GLEN PARK AT VALLEY VILLAGE

Code of Civil Procedure section 36(c) states: Unless the court otherwise orders . . . [a] party may file and serve a motion for preference supported by a declaration of the moving party that all essential parties have been served with process or have appeared. (Code Civ. Proc. § 36, subd. (c).) Arguably, Plaintiff’s counsel has complied with this requirement.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

RTA CARNEROS VILLAGE – PHASE II LLC VS AIRSHARP INC

Pursuant to Civil Code Section 8488, subdivision (c), RTA is awarded its attorney’s fees and costs.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ROY E STEPHENSON VS HICKINGBOTHAM LIMITED ET AL

C.) Defendant’s request for a protective order as to these items will be granted.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

CTRSHP OF KATHRYN E VINCENT

C. Letters of Temporary Conservatorship of Estate issued to Clinton Mitchell 9-27-19. Per Order filed 8-29-2020, bond is not required. D. Per 10-11-19 minute order, court granted general Petition for Appointment of Conservator. Need Order filed as to estate and letters issued. E. Status Review on Petition for Appointment is set for 2-3-2021.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE JOSPEH RUSSO TRUST

RUSSO DAVID T HORNSBY JOSEPH CYRIL RUSSO TESTAMENTAR PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required ARDIS SMITH STEVEN SMITH CYNTHIA C. SAYEGH PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Citation issued, served and returned. PrC §§ 1823, 1824 The Court is waiting for these items: 1.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF CAROLE DELAUTER

Original statements from the residential care facility PrC§ 2620(c)(5) 5. Original financial account statement(s) as required by PrC § 2620(c) (2), (3) Note: Per 11-6-2020 minute order, court ordered Memorandum of Points and Authorities as to character of property filed by 12-18-2020.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

“Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (c), requires the trial judge to grant summary judgment if all the evidence submitted, and ‘all inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence’ and uncontradicted by other inferences or evidence, show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” (Adler v. Manor Healthcare Corp. (1992) 7 Cal.App.4th 1110, 1119 [emphasis theirs].)

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

JASON YANUZZI VS REZA KHODAVERDIAN, M.D., ET AL.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT JASON YANUZZI, Plaintiff, v. REZA KHODAVERDIAN, M.D., ET AL., Defendants. Case No.: 19STCV38499 ORDER TRANSFERRING COMPLICATED PERSONAL INJURY (PI) CASE TO AN INDEPENDENT CALENDAR (IC) COURT INITIAL NOTE: This is not a tentative ruling. It...

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

VN PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. VS MACAULEY EKPENISI, ET AL.

C. Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to Statute CCP § 425.16(c) authorizes the Court to award a prevailing defendant the fees and costs which will adequately compensate the defendant for the expenses of responding to the lawsuit. (Dove Audio, Inc. v. Rosenfeld, Meyer, & Susman (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 777, 785.) The SLAPP statute reflects the Legislature's “strong preference for awarding attorney fees to successful defendants.” (Mann v. Quality Old Time Service, Inc. (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 328, 338.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ALISON SMITH VS CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA

Code, § 52.1(c).) The term “interferes” has been construed as “violates” under section 52.1. (Cornell, supra, 17 Cal.App.5th at 791.) Claims may be brought under the Act against rights-interfering conduct by private actors as well as by public officials. (Id.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ADELAIDE ROSE PALMSTROM VS CITY OF PASADENA ET AL

C. Motion on Calendar On September 30, 2020, PUSD filed a motion to set aside, vacate, correct, amend, or modify nunc pro tunc the Judgment dated March 24, 2020 to accurately reflect the Court’s order on summary judgment. On January 15, 2021, WCA filed an opposition to the motion. On January 22, 2021, PUSD filed a reply brief.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.