What is a Separate Statement – Summary Judgment / Adjudication?

Useful Rulings on Separate Statement – Summary Judgment / Adjudication

Recent Rulings on Separate Statement – Summary Judgment / Adjudication

1-25 of 10000 results

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Turner did not specify the ultimate material facts as to the economic loss rule as to each plaintiff’s negligence claim in its Separate Statement, instead reciting verbatim deposition testimony and other discovery responses, which left it to the Court the cumbersome task of trying to determine whether Turner established that Plaintiffs only have economic damages. (SSUF 44-61.)

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

N/A Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1); Not required in UD cases) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) Yes Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) N/A_________ _ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

JOSE AGUILERA VS 5 STAR DELIVERY INC

Yes Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) N/A Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.2; open book – CC 1717.5.) See above______ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

WEST COVINA CAR STOP, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ROUND TABLE REMARKETING D.R.S., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

Yes Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) Yes Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) Yes_______ __ _ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

UPGRADE SECURITIZATION TRUST I VS CHRISTOPHER LOPEZ

The following defects are noted: Plaintiff has not submitted a summary of the case, as per California Rules of Court (“CRC”) Rule 3.1800(a)(1). Plaintiff has not provided the court with the Loan Sale Agreement between WebBank and Upgrade, Inc. and the assignment/transfer of interest between Upgrade, Inc. and Plaintiff. ANALYSIS Yes (1/16/20) Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

Yes Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) Yes Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) Yes __ __ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

YESLENDER, LLC, A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS FIVE BULLS TRANSPORT, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

No Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) Yes Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) Yes __ _______ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CITRUS OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLGY VS CITRUS VALLEY HEALTH

Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues Conditionally Under Seal,” a “Notice of Lodging. . . Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of. . . Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication of Issues” and a “Notice of Lodging Compendium of Evidence in Support of. . .

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

HWANSHIK YOON VS ELLEN EUN YOO, ET AL.

Yes _____ Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) No Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) Yes Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ANTHONY SAM VS RENEE KWAN ET AL

On November 15, 2019, the Court denied First American Title Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication against Plaintiffs.

  • Hearing

    Jul 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

CHING FU CHANG, ET AL. VS PAN MING LEI, ET AL.

Yes Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) N/A Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) Yes __ _______ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Jul 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JOHNATHAN MOLTONI, ET AL. VS XTREME MOTOR SPORTS, INC., ET AL.

Yes Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) N/A Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) See Above Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PETITION OF ELBERT JAMES RUCKER

Summary must balance, accounting must not include changes in value of investments as a receipt and must not include transfers between accounts. 4. One account through date of death and another through date of transfer to personal representative. PrC § 2620(b) 5. Submit a proposed Order Note: A. The conservator has a duty to increase bond ex parte upon the realization that the bond is inadequate. CRC 7.204 B.

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CITY OF POMONA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL. VS HIGH SUPPLY, A BUSINESS ORGANIZATION, FORM UNKNOWN, ET AL.

Yes Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) Yes Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) N/A __ _______ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

MATTHEW P QUIRK ET AL VS BERL GOLOMB ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion: Summary Adjudication Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

CYNTHIA MARIA RIBAS VS BEAU MONDE ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

Alternatively, if this Court were to “rule in favor of Plaintiff on a summary judgment motion finding Defendants committed fraud, that finding would be inconsistent with or otherwise ‘affect’ the Order being reviewed on appeal.” Plaintiff further argues that a stay is warranted because: (1) proceedings in this Court pending appeal could lack subject matter jurisdiction, and thus be void and reversible; and (2) it would serve the interests of judicial economy. The Court disagrees.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

RUTH XIAOYU ZHANG VS NESTOR H. LLERNA

Breach of Contract On January 26, 2018, the court granted The Llerenas’ motion for summary judgment. On February 9, 2018, the “Order Granting Defendants Nestor H. Llerena and Myrna T. Llerena’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint” was filed. On February 26, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

VINCENT BERRY VS EVERPORT TERMINAL SERVICES, INC.

Separate Statement Everport submitted a separate statement; Plaintiff submitted a responsive separate statement and his own separate statement. The separate statements are substantially Code-compliant. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c, subd. (b)(1); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1350(c)(2).) Discussion Each of Plaintiff’s causes of action is considered separately. 1.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

BENJAMIN F. POCO, ET AL. VS WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, ET AL.

Benjamin cites to Code of Civil Procedure sections 437(c) and 1170.7 as his supporting authority; however, these provisions pertain to summary judgment. A motion for judgment on the pleadings, when moving party is a plaintiff, may be made only after defendant has already filed his/her/its answer to the complaint and the time for the plaintiff to demur to the answer has expired. 2. Motion to Expunge Deed of Trust and Promissory Note Discussion Plaintiffs’ motion is TAKEN OFF-CALENDAR.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

DAVID WHELAN VS RYAN A CULVER DPM ET AL

CASE NO: BC708595 [TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. July 15, 2020 Background Facts Plaintiff, David Whelan filed this action against Defendants, Ryan A. Culver, D.P.M. and Healthpoint Medical Group for damages arising out of alleged medical malpractice. Motion for Summary Judgment Analysis At this time Defendant, Ryan A. Culver, D.P.M.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MATTER OF JEAN P. ETHIER TRUST

This defect can be overlooked under the circumstances, but section 1060 et seq. should be followed for all future accountings, especially identifying schedules in the Summary of Account and labeling those schedules in each attached schedule (i.e. schedule A, Schedule B, etc.) Discrepancy no. 2 – Listed total property on hand ($210,907.56) at beginning of account (on the schedule page) does not equal the total of the values of property listed ($261,752).

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

JACK CASO-COLEBECK V. RYAN J. CUFF, COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, DUNN SCHOOL ET. AL.

Defendant Dunn School (named in third cause of action only) has filed Motion for Summary Judgment set for 9/23/20 (assumption of the risk/ waiver). Status of post mediation/ expert discovery/ further mediation session? To be discussed.

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

FEDORA BLISS, LLC VS JOHN LABIB + ASSOCIATES, A BUSINESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN

On November 19, 2019, the Court denied Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. On December 24, 2019, Defendant filed the instant motion to bifurcate, or in the alternative, to alter trial order. ANALYSIS: A.

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

RUBY VILLESCAS VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY ET AL

Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deputy Yvonne Reyes, Deputy Laura French, Deputy Felipe Perez, and Deputy Jonathan Byrne (collectively, Defendants) now move for summary judgment, or, in the alternative, summary adjudication as to the causes of action and issues raised in Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint. The motion is unopposed.

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

GOLDWATER SAG HOLDINGS, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COPORATION VS YUK SIN YUEN, ET AL.

In that case, defendants filed motions for summary judgment against plaintiff, who sought and received an extension to prepare and file oppositions that he was not able to complete in a timely manner. (Id. at 1122.) Despite the court granting plaintiff an extension of more than two weeks, the new due date for the oppositions passed without service or filing of any oppositions to the summary judgment motions. (Id.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.