What is a Separate Statement – Summary Judgment / Adjudication?

Useful Resources for Separate Statement – Summary Judgment / Adjudication

Recent Rulings on Separate Statement – Summary Judgment / Adjudication

1-25 of 10000 results

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Turner did not specify the ultimate material facts as to the economic loss rule as to each plaintiff’s negligence claim in its Separate Statement, instead reciting verbatim deposition testimony and other discovery responses, which left it to the Court the cumbersome task of trying to determine whether Turner established that Plaintiffs only have economic damages. (SSUF 44-61.)

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

TRANSPORT FUNDING, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ERK LOGISTICS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

No Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) See above Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) See above ______ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Mar 24, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS LUCILLE ROBINSON

Yes Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) N/A Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) N/A_________ _ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Mar 18, 2021

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

I.L.W.U. CREDIT UNION VS JOHN SUA, ET AL.

The following defects are noted: Plaintiff has failed to provide the court with a summary of the case, as per California Rules of Court (“CRC”) Rule 3.1800(a)(1). It is unclear to the court how Defendants could have defaulted under the terms of the Agreement by allegedly failing to make an installment payment due on or about April 22, 2020 and all subsequent installments when the Agreement specifies that the last payment therein was due on November 23, 2017.

  • Hearing

    Mar 10, 2021

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

N/A Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1); N/A for UDs) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) See above Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) N/A ______ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Feb 16, 2021

717 NOGALES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS NEW DIAMOND TRUCKING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AND, ET AL.

N/A--UD Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) Yes Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) N/A _________ _ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

N/A Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1); N/A for UDs) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) See above Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) N/A ______ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Feb 06, 2021

UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE VS YOUNG ACTORS CAMP, ET AL.

Yes Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) Yes Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.2; open book – CC 1717.5.) Yes___________ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

JOSE SALAZAR VS JOSE L MUNIZ

BECAUSE PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO PROVE EVERY ELEMENT OF HIS CASE BY ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE, THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MUST BE DENIED. FIRST, THE COURT WILL ADDRESS THE PLAINTIFF’S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS. FACT NO. 8 IS NOT UNDISPUTED AS A MATTER OF LAW. THIS FACT CONCERNS WHETHER THE DEFENDANT RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING AND COMMUNITY INVESTMENT DEPARTMENT THAT “PLAINTIFF’S EVICTION WAS ILLEGAL.”

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

JOSE SALAZAR VS JOSE L MUNIZ

BECAUSE PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO PROVE EVERY ELEMENT OF EACH CAUSE OF ACTION IN HIS CASE BY ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE, THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MUST BE DENIED. FIRST, THE COURT WILL ADDRESS THE PLAINTIFF’S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS. FACT NO. 8 IS NOT UNDISPUTED AS A MATTER OF LAW. THIS FACT CONCERNS WHETHER THE DEFENDANT RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING AND COMMUNITY INVESTMENT DEPARTMENT THAT “PLAINTIFF’S EVICTION WAS ILLEGAL.”

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

RE EDNA BELINDA BURGOS

Summary of Account that complies with PrC § 1061(b). Accounting must begin with values as reported in Inventory & Appraisal ($1,744,633.01). 4. Verified declaration by petitioner to specify purpose of cash withdrawal of $631.23 on 1-15-2019. 5. Original financial account statement(s) as required by PrC § 2620(c) (2), (3) 6. Original statements from the residential care facility PrC§ 2620(c)(5) 7.

  • Hearing

    Feb 03, 2021

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RALPH CONTIOSO TRUST

Schedules must equal amounts reported in Summary of Account. LLOYD THOMAS HUNT SANDY HUNT JAMES J FALCONE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Moving paper is in Vol. 1 Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proof of service in the manner provided in CCP § 415.10 (30 days personal service) or CCP § 415.30 (30 days proof of mailing with Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt) on each person claiming an interest in, or having title to or possession of, the property. PrC § 851(a)(2) 3.

  • Hearing

    Feb 02, 2021

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

SAFAVI VS. KRISTEN RITZAU, D.D.S

Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication OFF CALENDAR PER MOVING PARTY

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

SUNPOWER CAPITAL, LLC VS BEN HE, ET AL.

Yes Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) Yes Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) Yes _________ _ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

PERSOLVE LEGAL GROUP, LLP VS LETICIA HERNANDEZ

Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824 No Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) N/A Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) Yes _________ _ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

BROWN VS. ANAHEIM GLOBAL MEDICAL CENTER

Motion for Summary Judgment Moving Party: Defendants Anaheim Global Medical Center and KPC Healthcare, Inc. Responding Party: Plaintiff Barbara Eva Brown Ruling: Defendants’ unopposed motions for summary judgment are granted. A defendant moving for summary judgment bears the initial burden to show the plaintiff’s action has no merit.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

Defendant Ower Castro, M.D.’s MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Responding Party: Plaintiffs, Oscar Escobedo, individually and as successor-in-interest to the Estate of Christina Stephenson and Christian Escobedo[4] Tentative Ruling 1. Defendant Adam J. Snyder, M.D.’s unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Defendant Mojtaba Moghadam, M.D.’s unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 3.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

AARON JUSTIS, ET AL. VS. MICHAEL HODGES

In her notice, she states that she moved the hearing because the original motion papers inadvertently did not contain her separate statement. On January 25, 2021, Hodges filed an opposition to the amended motion papers. On January 25, 2021, Mrs. Justis filed a Response to the Late-Filed Opposition, arguing that the untimely opposition is proof of Hodges’ bad faith delay and sanctions are appropriate. DISCUSSION 1. Discussion of Motion Mrs.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JASON YANUZZI VS REZA KHODAVERDIAN, M.D., ET AL.

COUNSEL ARE TO NOTE THAT EVEN IF THE CASE SUMMARY STILLS SHOWS DEPARTMENT 31 WITH FUTURE HEARINGS, COUNSEL ARE TO CONSIDER THEM TO BE OFF CALENDAR UNTIL THE NEW COURT SAYS OTHERWISE DATED: January 29, 2021 ___________________________ Hon. Judge Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

VN PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. VS MACAULEY EKPENISI, ET AL.

Ogbogu filed May 7, 2019; (4) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment or adjudication filed August 23, 2019; (5), (7), and (8) Plaintiffs’ opposition and the declarations of Felisa Ramirez and Ricard Urizar in support of the opposition to the motion for summary judgment or adjudication filed January 21, 2020; and (6) Judge Ralph C. Hofer’s minute order dated February 7, 2020 on the motion. The request for judicial notice is granted. (Evid. Code, § 452(d).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

CIELO ROSADO VS CITY OF EL MONTE, ET AL.

In lieu of a separate statement required under the California Rules of Court (“CRC”), the court may allow the moving party to submit a concise outline of the discovery request and each response in dispute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.300, subd. (b)(2).) Notice of the motion must be provided within 45 days of service of the verified response, or any supplemental verified response, or on or before any specific later date to which the parties have agreed in writing. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.300, subd. (c).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ADELAIDE ROSE PALMSTROM VS CITY OF PASADENA ET AL

On March 24, 2020, the Court entered judgment regarding the motion for summary judgment. The judgment states: West Coast Arborists, Inc's ("WCA") Motion for Summary Judgment (the "Motion") was heard on August 30, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. in Department B of the above-entitled court. All parties appeared through their respective counsel.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

SARA ARABSHAHI VS THE MEADOWS POST ACUTE

COUNSEL ARE TO NOTE THAT EVEN IF THE CASE SUMMARY STILLS SHOWS DEPARTMENT 31 WITH FUTURE HEARINGS, COUNSEL ARE TO CONSIDER THEM TO BE OFF CALENDAR UNTIL THE NEW COURT SAYS OTHERWISE. Dated this 29th day of January, 2021 Hon Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ALISON SMITH VS CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA

Thus, City’s arguments based on immunity and privilege are better brought after Plaintiff has amended the pleadings or at the summary judgment stage. The demurrer to the 4th cause of action is sustained with 20 days leave to amend. CONCLUSION AND ORDER City’s special motion to strike the 4th cause of action is denied. City’s demurrer to the 4th cause of action in the TAC is sustained with 20 days leave to amend. City shall provide notice of this order.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MATTER OF HELGE T GRAHN FAMILY TRUST

Nature of Proceedings: Motion for Summary Adjudication The court has been advised that this matter has settled. The court anticipates the receipt of appropriate documentation.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.