What is a Request for Entry of Default Judgment?

Useful Rulings on Request for Entry of Default Judgment

Recent Rulings on Request for Entry of Default Judgment

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

City of Costa Mesa 209 Cal. App. 4th 298, 306. “The showing of potential harm that a plaintiff must make in support of a request for preliminary injunctive relief may be expressed in various linguistic formulations, such as the inadequacy of legal remedies or the threat of irreparable injury (compare Civ. Code, § 3422 with Code Civ.

  • Hearing

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

On March 1, 2019 the Court issued its ruling regarding the interpretation of Section 13.2(f) of the parties’ lease agreement.

  • Hearing

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

s Motion for Summary Adjudication 4)Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant Turner Construction Company's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication Against Plaintiffs 1. Motion by Saddleback Corp. dba Saddleback Waterproof for Summary Judgment or Adjudication as to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint Defendant Saddleback’s motion for summary judgment and summary adjudication of Issues 5 and 6 (statute of limitations) is DENIED.

  • Hearing

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Where the judgment commands that the order or decision be set aside, it may order the reconsideration of the case in light of the court’s opinion and judgment and may order respondent to take such further action as is specially enjoined upon it by law, but the judgment shall not limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in the respondent. (Emphasis added.) Draft Proposed Judgment.

  • Hearing

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3).

  • Hearing

PERSOLVE LEGAL GROUP, LLP VS LETICIA HERNANDEZ

Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is GRANTED, contingent upon Plaintiff’s production of the original promissory note to the court for cancellation in compliance with California Rules of Court (“CRC”) Rule 3.1806 (i.e., “[i]n all cases in which judgment is rendered upon a written obligation to pay money, the clerk must, at the time of entry of judgment, unless otherwise ordered, note over the clerk’s official signature and across the face of the writing the fact of rendition of judgment

  • Hearing

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will not be heard on this date in Department 28. No further hearings will be heard in Department 28, Spring Street Courthouse, as of 11/13/20.

  • Hearing

CEMEX USA, INC. VS ATILANO, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

., et al. (20PSCV00550) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Cemex USA, Inc.’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Cemex USA Inc.’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. Background Plaintiff Cemex USA, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) alleges as follows: On or about November 15, 2011, Plaintiff and Atilano, Inc.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

717 NOGALES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS NEW DIAMOND TRUCKING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AND, ET AL.

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for January 15, 2021. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

MARK LIU VS XUEFAN LIU

Plaintiff does not provide the court with any documentary evidence in support of his claims. Plaintiff’s request for $300,000.00 in lost profit damages is unsupported. ANALYSIS Yes (11/9/19) Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.) Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

The Motion for Summary Judgment will not be heard on this date in Department 28. No further hearings will be heard in Department 28, Spring Street Courthouse, as of 11/13/20.

  • Hearing

PRIME STAFF INC VS PARTNERSHIP STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC

Partnership Staffing Solutions, LLC, BC665436 Ruling re: default judgment. Cross-Complainant’s request for default judgment came on for hearing on November 16, 2020. At that time, this Court informed counsel for the Cross-Complainant that there was insufficient information regarding the defendants’ resources to properly determine punitive damages. When this Court stated that it appeared that all other damages sought appeared to be appropriate, counsel withdrew the punitive damages request.

  • Hearing

AVITUS INC. VS ANDIAMO MANAGEMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ET AL.

Andiamo Management Company (19PSCV00240) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Avitus, Inc.’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Avitus, Inc.’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. Background Plaintiff Avitus, Inc.

  • Hearing

HASMIK KANATARYAN, ET AL. VS CHARLENE SARSTEDT, ET AL.

No further hearings are in Dept. 28, Spring StreetAFTER REVIEW OF THE COURT FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER:Department 28 of the Personal Injury Court has determined that the above entitled action is complicated based upon the number of pretrial hearings and/or the complexity of the issues presented.AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1:This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT, JUDGE CURTIS A. KIN presiding in DEPT.

  • Hearing

GRDSHP OF SCOTT

Letters of Temporary Guardianship issued to petitioner expire 6-8-2021. 2. Notice of Hearing filed 10-30-2020 reflects service of temporary guardianship petition. 3. Declaration Regarding Notice as to father filed 11-20-2020. ANANDA DUTTON TYGER ANTHONY LIVINGSTON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Court Investigator’s Report 2. Order Appointing Guardian of Minor Form GC-240 (revised 7-1-16) Note: Request for Interpreter (Spanish) filed 11-4-2020.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

HAI YING RUAN, ET AL. VS CUONG THOAI DIEP, ET AL.

As currently pled, the four causes of action named against fail to state sufficient facts against Moving Defendants. Demurrer to this cause of action is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. Motion to Strike Based upon the recommendation made on the demurrer, Defendants’ motion to strike portions of the complaint is MOOT.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PETITION OF TRAVEON C GAINS

GAINS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Traveon Gaines still must do the following: Proof of Publication. PrC § 8120 The Court is waiting for these items: CLETS Report from Sheriff’s Office with last name spelled correctly and AKA listed TRAVEON C.K. GAINS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Continue to 2-18-2021, at request of counsel When to proceed, will Need: 1. Proof of mailing to Atty.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF CO-EXECUTORS ON WAIVER OF ACCOUNT

FILED ON 08/19/20 BY DIANA LEE ASKEW, VICKI E STRICKLAND PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Proposed Order CLARK F STRICKLAND DIANA LEE ASKEW ROBERT J. SILVERMAN VICKI E STRICKLAND ROBERT J. SILVERMAN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition...

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO COMPEL TIMOTHY MARTINI TO ACCT; RPT ACTS COMPEL

Proof of mailing to trustee of trust and trust beneficiaries. PrC § 8110; LR 7.151(e) 4. Waiver of Bond by Heir or Beneficiary on mandatory Judicial Council Form DE-142 by trustee of trust. PrC § 8481 5. Lodge Original Will (w/legal process). PrC § 8200 6. Evidence to overcome presumption of revocation by the fact that the original cannot be located. PrC § 6124 7. Proof of mailing notice that will is lost. PrC § 1202 8. Proof of Subscribing Witness Form DE-131. PrC § 8220. 9.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST STATUS REPORT OF THE EXECUTOR'S ADMINISTRATION

Verified declaration by petitioner to include date of each receipt, and itemized expenses re: sale of real property. Reference to closing statement is insufficient. PrC §§ 1062(a) and (b) 6. Verified declaration of petitioner showing compliance with Probate Code § 11005 7. Evidence of agreement between Attorneys Ashe and Healy as to payment of attorney’s fees. 8.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF ETHEL MAE HARTS

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION FILED ON 08/19/20 BY DELPHIA LANCASTER PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Petition verified. Petition verification was not dated by petitioner. (CCP § 2015.5) DELPHIA LANCASTER JASON JM ROSS ETHEL MAE HARTS

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRUST INSTRUMENT & CONFIRMATION

File proof of mailing to mother Christine Pickard or her consent and waiver 3. Submit Order Fixing Residence Outside the State of California Form GC-090 Note: Pursuant to court’s order dated 8/1/2018, Petitioners previously moved the ward to Nevada and were ordered to transfer the guardianship to Nevada within four months of the move. ARMANI JARED PICKARD SUMMER C SELLECK DIANA LYNN PICKARD MATTHEW ALLEN PICKARD Need appearances Need appearances

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR COMPENSATION

Verified declaration by attorney and petitioner to show nature and difficulty of tasks performed, results achieved, benefit of services to the conservatee, and to specify the amount requested for each category of service provided. CRC §§ 7.702; 7.751(b) (also time and hourly rate) 8. Summary of Account on mandatory Judicial Council Form GC-400/GC-405 9. Verified declaration by petitioner to specify payee of unknown disbursements of $20,738.35. 10.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF CHE ANDREA TRAVERS

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE FILED BY CHE' TRAVERS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Che Travers still must do the following: File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name CHE ANDREA TRAVERS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Meiasha Davis, mother, still must do the following: Have a copy of the Order to Show Cause personally served on each father and file a Proof of Service with the court or file a verified declaration

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE

Parental Notification of Indian Status Form ICWA-020 filed 5. Proposed Order The Court is waiting for these items: 1. Report of Atty. Summer Selleck 2. Report of Atty. Robert O. Morris Need: 1. UCCJEA Form FL-105 verified. Verification is not dated. 2. Court Investigator’s Report Note: Form ICWA-030 was filed 11-18-2020. Need proof of mailing by clerk.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.