How to Prepare a Petition to Vacate or Alter Arbitration Award

Useful Resources for Petition to Vacate or Alter Arbitration Award

Recent Rulings on Petition to Vacate or Alter Arbitration Award

JONATHAN D KRAUT VS. LEVI QUINTANA, AN INDIVIDUAL

Quintana PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD PETITION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD [Reciprocal Motions] Moving Party: Petitioner Jonathan Kraut (Confirm) Petitioner Levi Quintana (Vacate) Responding Party: Petitioner Levi Quintana (Confirm) Petitioner Jonathan Kraut (Vacate) RELIEF REQUESTED: Confirm Arbitration Award and enter judgment according to it. Vacate (Cancel) Arbitration Award. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND: Plaintiffs Jonathan D.

  • Hearing

    Jan 15, 2021

WYF SAN DIEGO LLC VS NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION

TENTATIVE RULING Petitioner Wyf San Diego, LLC's motion to correct or vacate arbitration award is denied.

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

MATTHEW HULSIZER, ET AL. VS PREMIER RAIL SERVICES, INC.

., Case No. 20STCP01735 Tentative Ruling re: Petitioners’ Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award; Respondent’s Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award Petitioners Matthew Hulsizer and Jennifer Just move to confirm the arbitration award rendered in their favor in the matter of Matthew Hulsizer and Jennifer Just vs. Premier Rail Services, Inc., American Arbitration Association case no. 01-19-0000-8895. Respondent Premier Rail Services, Inc. moves to vacate the Arbitration award.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

REALL INC VS LEGACY REAL ESTAT

HEARING ON PETITION TO/FOR VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD FILED BY REALL, INC., ROGER CUMMINGS, SHERIE CORSELLO * TENTATIVE RULING: * The petition to vacate the arbitration award, filed by petitioners Reali, Inc., broker of record Roger Cummings, and real estate agent-employee Sherie Corsello (collectively, "Reali"), is denied. The award is confirmed. Respondents shall recover attorneys’ fees and interest, as discussed below.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

MH PILLARS LTD VS PAYMENTWORLD LIMITED ET AL

.: BC607148 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: RENEWED MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD Date: November 24, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 MOVING PARTIES: Defendants Payment World, LLC and Roman Balanko RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff MH Pillars Ltd. The Court has considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers.

  • Hearing

    Nov 24, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ROSE DIPLOMAT LLC VS MARY NELSON ET AL

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD On December 18, 2017, Plaintiff Rose Diplomat, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants Mary Nelsen, Emily Paine, Franklin Paine, Julianna Paine Fritz, Donald Stratton, Christine Stratton, Raymond Weamer, Joan Weamer, Pamela Hanover, Thomas Banning, Jr., William L. Banning, Patricia Hanover, Margaret Parker, Norah Gail Forgues, Terry R. Parker, and Gary W.

  • Hearing

    Nov 23, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

1400 E. FOOTHILL, L.P., V. HOROWITZ

Petition to Dismiss/Vacate Arbitration Award (Petition) filed on 9-3-20 under ROA No. 2. Claimant (Leona Horowitz) is to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 20, 2020

1400 E. FOOTHILL, L.P. V. HOROWITZ

Petition to Dismiss/Vacate Arbitration Award (filed on 9-3-20 under ROA No. 2) is set on 11-20-20 at 10:00 a.m.

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2020

PERLA TELLEZ VS NENITA MCDONALD

On February 25, 2020, Petitioner filed a response in the Lead Case to Respondent’s petition to vacate arbitration award filed in the Vacate Case. In its March 6, 2020 minute order in the Lead Case, the Court set a June 5, 2020 hearing date on the motion to confirm arbitration award and the petition to vacate the arbitration award. The hearing on both matters was eventually set for August 20, 2020 via an oral stipulation between the parties.

  • Hearing

    Nov 13, 2020

TINA CHAPMAN VS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLANS, INC, ET AL.

Rice (1) Petitioner’s Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award Moving Party: Petitioner Tina Chapman Responding Party: Respondents Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, and Maria C. Nicdao Ruling: Petitioner Tina Chapman’s Petition to Vacate the September 19, 2019, Arbitration Award is denied. Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award As a general rule, the merits of an arbitrator’s decision are not subject to judicial review.

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award A. Legal Standard “Under California law, the scope of judicial review of an arbitration award is very narrow. [Citation.] Consistent with this limited role, a court may vacate an arbitral award only on certain statutorily enumerated grounds. [Citation.]

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

ORKHON ONKHUDAI VS CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER

Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award A. Legal Standard “Under California law, the scope of judicial review of an arbitration award is very narrow. [Citation.] Consistent with this limited role, a court may vacate an arbitral award only on certain statutorily enumerated grounds. [Citation.]

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

LAURAN CUNNINGHAM, ET AL. VS STANISLAV FILATOV, ET AL.

Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award A. Legal Standard “Under California law, the scope of judicial review of an arbitration award is very narrow. [Citation.] Consistent with this limited role, a court may vacate an arbitral award only on certain statutorily enumerated grounds. [Citation.]

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

HOME REMODELING GIANT, ET AL. VS LAUREN CUNNINGHAM

Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award A. Legal Standard “Under California law, the scope of judicial review of an arbitration award is very narrow. [Citation.] Consistent with this limited role, a court may vacate an arbitral award only on certain statutorily enumerated grounds. [Citation.]

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

TALLEN VS. KESHEN

See discussion under motion to vacate arbitration award, above. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On September 1, 2020, Respondent filed her response and Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award. Legal Standard Per Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondent all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.”

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On September 1, 2020, Respondent filed her response and Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award. Legal Standard Per Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondent all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.”

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

RITTERSBACHER SUNSET, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS GOLDEN CREST, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

Respondents have made arguments that a party would make on demurrer and not in response to a petition to confirm/vacate arbitration or a petition to compel arbitration. “A petition to compel arbitration ‘ “is in essence a suit in equity to compel specific performance of a contract.” ’ [Citations.]” (Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 515, 532 [omitting extensive caselaw].).

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

JERRY LUJAN VS SUSAN CLARK

PETITION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD (CCP § 1286.6) TENTATIVE RULING: Petitioner Jerry Lujan’s Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award is DENIED. ANALYSIS: Petitioner Jerry Lujan (“Petitioner”) filed the instant Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award (“the Petition”) against Respondent Susan Clark (“Respondent”) on January 21, 2020. To date, no opposition has been filed.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY V. HOROWITZ

Petition to Dismiss/Vacate Arbitration Award (filed on 9-3-20 under ROA No. 2 in Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2020-01158913) for hearing on 11-17-20 at 9:00 a.m. in Department C19. Court Clerk is to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

MELISSA PARKER, ET AL. VS CLARK GRANDIN, ET AL.

u The Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award with Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities. u The Supporting Declaration of Jerold Fagelbaum and the following accompanying exhibits: u Demand for Arbitration Form with attached agreements in JAMS Arbitration REF No. 1220065512, dated 6/12/20, (Exh. A); u Demand for Arbitration and Statement of Claims, dated 6/12/20, JAMS Arbitration REF. No. 1220065512) (Exh.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

MELISSA ROSE WILLIAMS ET AL. VS USA MOTORS COM INC.

To attend the remote hearing with Judge Kronlund in Dept. 10-D: Call into (209) 992-5590, then follow the prompts and use the Bridge # and Pin # as follows: Bridge # 6940 Pin # 3782 COURT IS ISSUING ONE TENTATIVE RULING FOR BOTH PETITIONS ON CALENDAR THIS DATE Tentative Rulings Defendants' Petition to vacate arbitration award is Denied. CCP section 1285. Plaintiffs' Petition to confirm arbitration award is Granted. CCP section 1285.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

MARSHALL GELLER VS ST. CLOUD CAPITAL II, LLC ET AL.,

The motion to vacate arbitration is denied and the motion to confirm arbitration is granted.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

PINEAPPLE EXPRESS, INC. VS RAMSEY HOUSTON SALEM

Even if the opposition and competing petition to vacate arbitration award was timely, Respondents have failed to show that the arbitrator exceeded the arbitrator’s powers As stated, the Court determined that the opposition and petition to vacate were untimely. If they were not, the Court would still confirm the arbitration award as set forth below.

  • Hearing

    Oct 08, 2020

MATTOX VS SHULMAN

HEARING ON PETITION TO/FOR VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD FILED BY JEFFREY S. SHULMAN, RHONA SHULMAN, THE SHULMAN FAMILY TRUST * TENTATIVE RULING: * The petition to vacate the arbitration award, filed by Jeffrey S. Shulman, Rhona Shulman, and the Shulman Family Trust dated March 16, 2006 (collectively, “Shulmans”), is denied. The petition to confirm the award, filed by Jefferson H. Mattox and Khwando Hadsombat Mattox (collectively, “Mattoxes”) is granted. The award is confirmed. (See CCP § 1285.2.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 17     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.