What is a Petition to Coordinate Add-On Case?

Useful Rulings on Petition to Coordinate Add-On Case

Recent Rulings on Petition to Coordinate Add-On Case

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

In this case, Plaintiffs have failed to make a showing—let alone a significant showing—that there is an imminent threat of irreparable harm if the requested preliminary injunction does not issue.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

On March 1, 2019 the Court issued its ruling regarding the interpretation of Section 13.2(f) of the parties’ lease agreement.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

There is no question that this case involves physical damage to property arising from alleged defects. It is unlike the case authorities cited by Turner where parties were seeking to recover purely economic damages arising from alleged defects, such as repair costs to avoid potential future harm from defective construction or products. Here, the alleged defects caused water and other damage to walls, windows, ceilings, etc.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Where the judgment commands that the order or decision be set aside, it may order the reconsideration of the case in light of the court’s opinion and judgment and may order respondent to take such further action as is specially enjoined upon it by law, but the judgment shall not limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in the respondent. (Emphasis added.) Draft Proposed Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

The hearings on the applications are continued to 7/19/19 to allow the applicants to provide supplemental information regarding the foregoing factors. The supplemental information should be submitted by 7/12/19. No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

The Court made the following order on 9-18-20:AFTER REVIEW OF THE COURT FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Department 28 of the Personal Injury Court has determined that the above entitled action is complicated based upon the number of pretrial hearings and/or the complexity of the issues presented. AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE EAST DISTRICT, JUDGE GLORIA QHITE-BROWN presiding in DEPT.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

Upon motion by the plaintiff supported by appropriate affidavits and after a hearing, if the court deems a hearing to be necessary, the court may at any time enter an order permitting the discovery otherwise prohibited by this subdivision if the court finds, on the basis of the supporting and opposing affidavits presented, that the plaintiff has established that there is a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

On September 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Chen, Tissuesco and Does 1-10 for: Breach of Contract Breach of Fiduciary Duty On October 23, 2019, Chen’s default was entered. On September 1, 2020, Tissuesco’s default was entered. A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for November 2, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff Changliang Dai’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. MATTHEWS

Notice of the Conservatee's Death was filed by Conservator on 6/17/20. Status Report Hearing shall go off calendar. The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

Defendants move to strike portions of the Third Amended Complaint pertaining to Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages and attorney’s fees, as well as: The words "professional Hollywood shyster" TAC ¶ 10 at 3:13; The words commencing "Specifically, on or about" through "and Mary Margaret Humes (Case No. TAC 19-81" TAC ¶ 10 at 3:15-24; The words "as he had done before on at least three other occasions as set forth above."

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

On May 20, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Muniz and Does 1-100 for: Breach of Written Agreement Claim and Delivery Conversion Account Stated Unjust Enrichment Breach of Guaranty On July 8, 2020, Muniz’s default was entered. On July 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed two “Amendment[s] to Complaint,” wherein Dragon 9 Logistics Group (“Dragon”) was named in lieu of Doe 11 and Tom Zhang (“Zhang”) was named in lieu of Doe 12.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

On September 11, 2018, Plaintiff filed a verified complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendant and Does 1-10 for: Breach of Warranty of Habitability (Contract) Breach of Warranty of Habitability (Tort) Negligent Maintenance of Premises Maintenance of Nuisance Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Retaliatory Eviction (Civil Code § 1942.5) Compel Mediation On November 14, 2019, Defendant’s default was entered.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On November 1, 2019, Plaintiff JCWED Holdings Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint, asserting a cause of action against Defendants Joma Logistics Inc. (“Defendant”) and Does 1-25 for: Unlawful Detainer On December 5, 2019, Defendant’s default was entered; that day, a clerk’s default judgment for possession only was filed. A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for October 14, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

BELINDA AGUILAR, ET AL. VS TG PROPERTIES LLC

Reyes Fernandez Anderson Court Order Re: Transfer and Reassignment of Complicated Personal Injury (“PI”) Case to An Independent Calendar ("IC") Courtroom from Department 29, a PI Hub Court. The Court's order Re: Transfer of Complicated Personal Injury Case to an Independent Calendar Court, is posted on the Court's website.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On October 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant and Does 1-25 for: Unlawful Detainer On October 23, 2019, this instant case was related to Case No. 19PSCV00904; Case No. 19PSCV00904 was deemed the lead case. On November 22, 2019, a clerk’s default judgment for possession only was filed. On November 22, 2019, Defendant’s default was entered. A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for July 2, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

PTN OF RONALD WULFERDINGER

File a verified declaration to include a corrected Summary of Account on Judicial Council Form that is the same as Summary of Account attached to accounting. It appears value of assets on hand at end of account differ. 9. Accounting that complies with PrC § 1060 et seq. Increase in market value of $1,612.29 reported in Summary of Account only affects fair market value schedule and should not be included in Summary of Account. 10.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CHANHO C. JOO, APC, DBA LAW OFFICES OF CHANHO JOO VS HONGYE LLC, DBA SPA RENAISSANCE, ET AL.

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s request for entry of default judgment is GRANTED. Default judgment is entered in the amount of $67,304.02, consisting of $60,427.90 in damages, $6,291.12 in pre-judgment interest, and $585.00 in costs. Plaintiff must e-file a corrected proposed judgment at least 2 court days before the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

MATTER OF YVETTE DEROUEN FIGUEROA

RE: MTN TO QUASH DISCOVERY; FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FILED ON 05/05/20 BY ANDRE DEROUEN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order FILED ON 06/19/19 BY YVETTE DEROUEN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION, NO WILL, IAEA

File a verified declaration to add deceased spouse and parents with dates of death to petition Item # 8. LR 7.151(d) 4. File a verified declaration to specify relationships of persons listed in Attachment 8. PrC § 8002 5. File a verified declaration to clarify whether decedent had any predeceased siblings and if so, to include their names and dates of death. LR 7.151(d) 6.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO ESTABLISH CLAIM OF OWNERSHIP OVER REAL PPTY

FILED ON 05/13/20 BY WOLFGANG SCHILLING PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Proof of service in the manner provided in CCP § 415.10 (30 days personal service) or CCP § 415.30 (30 days proof of mailing with Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt) on each person claiming an interest in, or having title to or possession of, the property. PrC § 851(a)(2) Note: Exhibit B is a Consent to Petition, not a waiver of notice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N ON FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR

FILED ON 06/02/20 BY RAMON ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to show calculation of statutory fee base as required by CRC § 7.705. Specifically, calculation must begin with date of death values and must state any loss on sale as relates to maximum statutory fees allowable. Regrettably, this was not included in prior tentative ruling. 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST ACCOUNT OF TRUSTEE AND PET’N FOR ITS SETTLEMENT

FILED ON 08/13/19 BY KIMBERLY CZIRKELBACH PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status Note: Residuary Beneficiaries’ Response and Objections filed by American Cancer Society, Inc., Feed the Children, Inc., Leukemia & Lymphoma Society and ALSAC/St. Judge Children’s Research Hospital.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

JUAN PALMA ET AL VS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC ET AL

In his September 17, 2020 reply filing, Vigil reports that on September 2, 2020, counsel for SARC agreed to produce the following persons for their depositions: (1) the PMK on Electronic Medical Records; (2) the PMK on Audit Trail; (3) the PMK on Medical Staff Bylaws and (4) the Custodian of Records. (Wu Decl., ¶5.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

JENNIFER CHAN VS GREAT EASTERN COMPANY

form (MC-052)); (3) service of the notice of motion and motion and declaration on all other parties who have appeared in the case; and (4) a proposed order relieving counsel (prepared on the Order Granting Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-053)).

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

ROBERT HULL VS WILLIAM G. GILLESPIE, ET AL.

On May 13, 2020, Plaintiff dismissed Keller Williams Realty, without prejudice. A Case Management Conference is set for October 1, 2020. Discussion Denhart demurs to the entirety of Plaintiff’s complaint, on the basis that Plaintiff does not own the subject property and thus lacks standing. Denhart also demurs to the fourth cause of action therein, on the basis that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.