What is a Petition to Coordinate Add-On Case?

Useful Rulings on Petition to Coordinate Add-On Case

Recent Rulings on Petition to Coordinate Add-On Case

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

In this case, Plaintiffs have failed to make a showing—let alone a significant showing—that there is an imminent threat of irreparable harm if the requested preliminary injunction does not issue.

  • Hearing

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

On March 1, 2019 the Court issued its ruling regarding the interpretation of Section 13.2(f) of the parties’ lease agreement.

  • Hearing

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

There is no question that this case involves physical damage to property arising from alleged defects. It is unlike the case authorities cited by Turner where parties were seeking to recover purely economic damages arising from alleged defects, such as repair costs to avoid potential future harm from defective construction or products. Here, the alleged defects caused water and other damage to walls, windows, ceilings, etc.

  • Hearing

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Where the judgment commands that the order or decision be set aside, it may order the reconsideration of the case in light of the court’s opinion and judgment and may order respondent to take such further action as is specially enjoined upon it by law, but the judgment shall not limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in the respondent. (Emphasis added.) Draft Proposed Judgment.

  • Hearing

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

The hearings on the applications are continued to 7/19/19 to allow the applicants to provide supplemental information regarding the foregoing factors. The supplemental information should be submitted by 7/12/19. No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

PERSOLVE LEGAL GROUP, LLP VS LETICIA HERNANDEZ

On June 5, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Hernandez and Does 1-100 for: Breach of Contract Money Lent Account Stated On November 3, 2020, Hernandez’s default was entered. An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for February 1, 2020.

  • Hearing

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will not be heard on this date in Department 28. No further hearings will be heard in Department 28, Spring Street Courthouse, as of 11/13/20.

  • Hearing

CEMEX USA, INC. VS ATILANO, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

On August 20, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Corporation, Atilano and Does 1-10 for: Breach of Contract Open Book Account Account Stated Reasonable Value Personal Guarantee On October 16, 2020, Corporation’s and Atilano’s defaults were entered. A Case Management Conference is set for January 22, 2021. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

717 NOGALES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS NEW DIAMOND TRUCKING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AND, ET AL.

On or about February 24, 2012, Plaintiff conveyed to an entity known as “Sunrise Logistics Group” (“SLG”) a leasehold interest in the subject property for a three year term (“Lease”). On or about August 19, 2014, Plaintiff and SLG amended the Lease by a First Amendment to Lease. On or about April 14, 2017, Plaintiff and SLG agreed to assign and amend the Lease, with Plaintiff’s consent, to New Diamond Trucking, Inc. (“New Diamond”).

  • Hearing

MARK LIU VS XUEFAN LIU

., Money Had and Received) On November 9, 2019, X. Liu’s and S. Zhang’s defaults were entered. On July 23, 2020, Plaintiff dismissed L. Zhang, without prejudice. An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for January 12, 2021. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: S. Zhang’s liability remains unclear.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

The Motion for Summary Judgment will not be heard on this date in Department 28. No further hearings will be heard in Department 28, Spring Street Courthouse, as of 11/13/20.

  • Hearing

PRIME STAFF INC VS PARTNERSHIP STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC

On the other hand, the FACC and the Cross-Complainant's additional declarations state that the request is based upon the terms of the parties' agreement that provides for recovery of reasonable attorney fees. In such case, the Local Rule 3.214(a) applies and the Court orders the Cross-Complainant to revise and reduce the amount in accordance with the rule and the new compensatory damage. Clerk to give notice _____________________________ Dennis J. Landin, Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

AVITUS INC. VS ANDIAMO MANAGEMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ET AL.

On March 11, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendants and Does 1-10 for: Breach of Written Promissory Note Open Book Account Account Stated Breach of Personal Guarantee On July 9, 2019, Andiamo’s default was entered; on that date, Plaintiff dismissed Tunzi without prejudice. An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment and a Case Management Conference are set for December 18, 2020.

  • Hearing

HASMIK KANATARYAN, ET AL. VS CHARLENE SARSTEDT, ET AL.

The following order was made on 10-20-20 and sent to Plaintiff's counsel.

  • Hearing

GRDSHP OF SCOTT

RE: VISITATION SET BY D30 ON 2/24/20 PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status Notes: 1. Letters of Guardianship of Person issued to paternal grandmother, Barbara Scott 8-12- 16. 2. Parties entered into a mediated settlement agreement on 1/31/2020. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Lutricia Randolph, maternal aunt, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

HAI YING RUAN, ET AL. VS CUONG THOAI DIEP, ET AL.

If Plaintiffs’ case theory rests on the idea that Moving Defendants are liable because they aided and abetted the other defendants in this case, while not directly engaging in the tortious acts complained of, this tort needs to be pled as a separate cause of action specifically against these Moving Defendants, and not consolidated into the causes of action for conversion, fraud, etc. as against the other defendants not part of this motion.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PETITION OF TRAVEON C GAINS

BRAY HJALMAR A ISABELLE JR LORIN B BENDER FILED ON 04/22/19 BY ELIZABETH SOLOWAY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status, including 8-20-2020 order to meet and confer Notes: 1. Letters Testamentary issued to Deborah I. Isabelle 3-23-16. 2. Hjalmar A. Isabelle, Jr.’s Joinder filed 5-10-2019. 3. Inventory and Appraisal filed 6/18/2019. 4.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF CO-EXECUTORS ON WAIVER OF ACCOUNT

FILED ON 08/19/20 BY DIANA LEE ASKEW, VICKI E STRICKLAND PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Proposed Order CLARK F STRICKLAND DIANA LEE ASKEW ROBERT J. SILVERMAN VICKI E STRICKLAND ROBERT J. SILVERMAN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required CASSANDRA L GREEN JOHN A MANGINI ETHEL L. SMITH PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SHARON L.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO COMPEL TIMOTHY MARTINI TO ACCT; RPT ACTS COMPEL

Proof of service in the manner provided in CCP § 415.10 (30 days personal service) or CCP § 415.30 (30 days proof of mailing with Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt) on each person claiming an interest in, or having title to or possession of, the property. PrC § 851(a)(2) KRISTEN GATES CHARLES B WOOD KRISTEN GATES CHARLES B.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST STATUS REPORT OF THE EXECUTOR'S ADMINISTRATION

FILED ON 07/18/19 BY DEBORAH I ISABELLE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances to report status, including 8-20-2020 order to meet and confer 2. Proposed Order PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances Notes: 1. Declaration in objection filed by Florian Taylor and Elzada Reed 10-7-2020. 2. Stipulation filed 11-2-2020. ELZADA REED FLORIAN TAYLOR PETRINA ARMOUR MATTHEW B TALBOT THE HATTIE M.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF ETHEL MAE HARTS

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION FILED ON 08/19/20 BY DELPHIA LANCASTER PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Petition verified. Petition verification was not dated by petitioner. (CCP § 2015.5) DELPHIA LANCASTER JASON JM ROSS ETHEL MAE HARTS

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRUST INSTRUMENT & CONFIRMATION

FILED ON 06/22/20 BY PAUL A. JOHNSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances Note: Per 10-20-2020 minute order, court ordered responses to be filed by 11-13-2020; replies by 11-30-2020. None has been filed. PAUL A. JOHNSON MATTHEW S TOTH THE ARTHUS E. IRMA S. JOHNSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Unable to review. File is unavailable at this time. Need: 1.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR COMPENSATION

A transfer from Chase savings accounts of $43,590.35 was reported on 7-10-19. 12. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify ATM fees. Need clarification of payee and purpose of each. 13. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify whether conservatee owns a timeshare. Disbursements related to timeshare are reported; however, no timeshare appears in list of assets on hand at beginning of account. 14. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify purpose of payments to AAA Insurance.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF CHE ANDREA TRAVERS

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE FILED BY CHE' TRAVERS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Che Travers still must do the following: File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name CHE ANDREA TRAVERS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Meiasha Davis, mother, still must do the following: Have a copy of the Order to Show Cause personally served on each father and file a Proof of Service with the court or file a verified declaration

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE

CRC 5.481 FILED ON 06/11/20 BY SHEILA CRANDELL PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances Note: Objection filed by Atty. Rex Crandell 10-5-2020. JUANITA ROSE CRANDELL 1991 TRU REX L. CRANDELL SHEILA CRANDELL KONSTANTINE A DEMIRIS

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.