What is a Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate?

Useful Rulings on Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate

Recent Rulings on Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate

151-175 of 301 results

GROO CONSTRUCTION, TRAVIS KIRK GROO OWNER VS. REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BOARD DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFAIRS

Nature of Proceedings: Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate – Tentative Ruling Respondent Contractors State License Board revoked the contractor license of Petitioner Travis Groo based on his 2014 conviction for unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor more than three years younger (Penal Code § 261.5(c)).

  • Hearing

    May 04, 2018

DOE VS CHANG

The Title IX investigation and Final Report do not constitute a final administrative decision upon which a writ of administrative mandate may be issued. See CCP § 1094.5(a); Security Nat. Guar., Inc. v. California Coastal Com’n (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 402, 415 (CCP § 1094.5 “permits courts to review only a final administrative order or decision made in an adjudicatory or quasi-judicial proceeding”) (internal quotation marks omitted)(emphasis supplied).

  • Hearing

    May 03, 2018

KONIER VS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

TENTATIVE RULING: Writ Petition Petitioners Barry Konier and KS Carwash LLC (dba Town & Country Hand Car Wash) seek a writ of administrative mandate compelling the Labor Commissioner to vacate its 7/13/17 decision to impose damages and penalties for various wage and hour violations. The initial citation sought $180,070 jointly and severally from each petitioner, but the hearing officer reduced that amount to $104,541.92 for Konier and $148,210.92 for KS Carwash LLC. (CCP 1094.5.)

  • Hearing

    May 02, 2018

CHRISTINA TORRES VS. TOM TORLAKSON IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPICITY AS STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

The County Superintendent argues Torres’s sole remedy lies in a petition for writ of administrative mandate under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. It fails to convince, for two reasons.

  • Hearing

    Apr 27, 2018

CHRISTINA TORRES VS. TOM TORLAKSON IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPICITY AS STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

The County Superintendent argues Torres’s sole remedy lies in a petition for writ of administrative mandate under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. It fails to convince, for two reasons.

  • Hearing

    Apr 27, 2018

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO VS. DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES

Nature of Proceedings: PETITION FOR WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE, APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF The following shall constitute the Court’s tentative ruling on the petition for writ of mandate, which is scheduled to be heard by the Court on Friday, April 27, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. in Department 28.

  • Hearing

    Apr 27, 2018

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO VS. DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES

Nature of Proceedings: PETITION FOR WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE, APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO F I L E AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF The following shall constitute the Court's tentative ruling on the petition for writ of mandate, which is scheduled to be heard by the Court on Friday, April 27, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. in Department 28.

  • Hearing

    Apr 27, 2018

MATHEIS VS. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH

Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate, or alternatively, Writ of Mandate is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Apr 23, 2018

MATHEIS VS. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH

Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate, or alternatively, Writ of Mandate is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Apr 23, 2018

LABOR COMMISSIONER VS JOSE REFUGIO RODRIGUEZ

(2) Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate Rodriguez also has filed a petition for issuance of a writ of administrative mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. (Petition, p. 1.)

  • Hearing

    Apr 11, 2018

SHEETZ V. COUNTY OF EL DORADO

As the only question before us is timeliness, and as a writ of administrative mandate, like a challenge under section 65009, subdivision (c)(1)(E), must be brought within 90 days of the final administrative decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.6, subd. (b)), we need not address the effect, if any, of plaintiffs' having failed to label their petition as one for administrative as well as ordinary mandate. ¶ Utility Cost Management v.

  • Hearing

    Apr 06, 2018

MATHEIS VS. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH

Issuance of Writ of Administrative Mandate CONTINUED on the Court’s Motion to April 23, 2018 at 1:30 p.m

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

JOHN DOE VS REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

On January 8, 2018, the court entered judgment granting the petition and entered a peremptory writ of administrative mandate commanding Regents to file, no later than 30 days after the date the writ was served on Regents, a return to the writ setting forth what it had done to comply with the writ. Doe filed a proof of service indicating personal service of the writ on January 10, 2018.

  • Hearing

    Mar 23, 2018

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

HARVEY MARK EDER VS SCAQMD ET AL

The Complaint does not specify whether it seeks a writ of traditional mandate under CCP section 1085, or a writ of administrative mandate under CCP section 1094.5. However, the Complaint does allege that SCAQMD is “required by law to use solar as the best technology/reasonable use.” Compl. at p.3. Traditional mandamus is the method of compelling the performance of a legal, ministerial duty. Pomona Police Officers’ Assn. v. City of Pomona, (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 578, 583-84.

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2018

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

MONTEREY COASTKEEPER VS. CENTRAL COAST REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Petitioners seek a writ of administrative mandate declaring the Central Coast Waiver unlawful and directing the Central Coast Regional Board to make revisions to bring the Waiver into compliance with the law.

  • Hearing

    Feb 23, 2018

MONTEREY COASTKEEPER VS. CENTRAL COAST REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Petitioners seek a writ of administrative mandate declaring the Central Coast Waiver unlawful and directing the Central Coast Regional Board to make revisions to bring the Waiver into compliance with the law.

  • Hearing

    Feb 23, 2018

MONTEREY COASTKEEPER VS. CENTRAL COAST REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Petitioners seek a writ of administrative mandate declaring the Central Coast Waiver unlawful and directing the Central Coast Regional Board to make revisions to bring the Waiver into compliance with the law.

  • Hearing

    Feb 23, 2018

CHARLTON H. BONHAM, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE VS. LINDA CABATIC, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF ADMINSITRATIVE HEARINGS

Nature of Proceedings: ORDER TO APPEAR ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE I. TENTATIVE RULING AND ORDER. The Court orders the parties to appear for the hearing on the merits of the Petition in Department 27, on Friday, February 16, 2018, at 11:00 a.m.

  • Hearing

    Feb 16, 2018

GARRET ADELMAN VS. LOS ANGELES HOUSING AND COMMUNITY INV.

., LC 103848 Tentative decision on (1) motion to augment: denied; (2) petition for writ of mandate: denied Petitioner Garret Adelman (“Adelman”) seeks a writ of administrative mandate to compel Respondent Los Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department (“HCIDLA”) to set aside its decision that Adelman is not a Qualified Tenant under Los Angeles Municipal Code (“LAMC”) section 151.02. Adelman further seeks to augment the Administrative Record in this matter.

  • Hearing

    Feb 06, 2018

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

MOVE THE JUNKYARD ET AL VS CITY OF CHICO ET AL

The court also will hear from the parties, in light of the court's ruling on the motions for judgment on the pleadings, as to whether the court trial set for February 26, 2018 (the petition for writ of administrative mandate filed in 16CV02872) should remain calendared or be vacated until after resolution of the referendum.

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2018

MELBA TYSON VS. SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY ET AL

AMENDED MOTION For Peremptory Writ Of Administrative Mandate Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 7, 2017 line 1. PETITIONER MELBA TYSON AMENDED MOTION For Peremptory Writ Of Administrative Mandate Hearing Required. By no later than 9:00 a.m. on December 7, 2017 parties are to submit supplemental briefs (not to exceed 2 pages) addressing the authority of the reviewing officer to consider evidence not presented with the original request in his/her determination.

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2017

RICH V. CA DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES

Proofs of service of the application for stay and petition for writ of administrative mandate on respondents California Department of Social Services and California Department of Health Care Services were filed on November 22, 2017. The administrative record and audio recording were lodged on November 22, 2017. TENTATIVE RULING # 4: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED AT 8:30 A.M. ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2017 IN DEPARTMENT NINE.

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2017

AARON ARIF AFZALI VS DAVE JONES

Second, unless the licensee timely requests preparation of the administrative record, the licensee must file a petition for writ of administrative mandate within 30 days of the last day for reconsideration if she wishes to challenge the Board’s decision in court. (Gov. Code § 11523; [citations.])” (208 Cal.App. 4th at 669.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 06, 2017

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

VOS V. AAA OF N. CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA

Petitioner’s petition for writ of administrative mandate was filed on October 12, 2017. Petitioner moves to have the date of filing corrected nunc pro tunc to reflect a filing date of October 10, 2017, which was purportedly the date it was transmitted to the court for fax filing.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2017

MELBA TYSON VS. SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY ET AL

AMENDED MOTION For Peremptory Writ Of Administrative Mandate Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 02, 2017 line 1. PETITIONER MELBA TYSON's AMENDED MOTION For Peremptory Writ Of Administrative Mandate Continued to November 13, 2017 on Court's own motion. = (501/REQ)

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2017

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 13     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.