How to Petition for Change of Name and Gender

Useful Rulings on Petition for Change of Name and Gender

Recent Rulings on Petition for Change of Name and Gender

JANE JB DOE VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, A CALIFORNIA LOCAL PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL.

HEARING DATE: November 24, 2020 CASE NUMBER: 19STCV38655 CASE NAME: Jane JB Doe v. Los Angeles Unified School District, et al.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

RENE VILLA VS HANDLE FINANCIAL INC, A CORPORATION, ET AL.

To become one, JONES forced RENE to play the role of her gay buddy and side kick.” (FAC, ¶ 10.) · “Further, JONES treated RENE differently from other (read: heterosexual) male coworkers on account of his gender and orientation. She did this by, inter alia, subjecting him to demands, albeit not for sexual favors but for him to behave like her subservient gay male friend rather than her coworker and subordinate.” (Id. at ¶ 11.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

JANE JG DOE VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, A CALIFORNIA LOCAL PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL.

HEARING DATE: November 17, 2020 CASE NUMBER: 19STCV44879 CASE NAME: Jane GJ Doe v. Los Angeles Unified School District, et al.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JANE DOE VS SKANSKA USA CIVIL WEST CALIFORNIA DISTRICT, INC., ET AL.

The Complaint asserts causes of action for (1) sexual assault and battery, (2) discrimination in violation of the UCRA and FEHA, (3) harassment in violation of FEHA and Civil Code section 51.9, (4) violation of the Ralph Act, (5) interference with the exercise of civil rights in violation of the Bane Act, (6) gender violence in violation of Civil Code section 52.4, (7) retaliation in violation of FEHA, (8) failure to provide reasonable accommodation in violation of FEHA, (9) failure to engage in the interactive

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

CHERYL COLE VS RICK HAMPTON

Hampton for violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Plaintiff admits in the Opposition she used the wrong code sections to state a cause of action. Plaintiff claims she’s able to allege a cause of action under California Civil Code § 51 for discriminatory treatment based on gender. The demurrer is sustained with leave to amend. If argument is requested appear by Zoom at the following link: https://cc-courts.zoom.us/j/94775254734?

  • Hearing

WEI VS CONEJO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL

("CFRA"); 5) perceived and/or sex/gender harassment in violation FEHA; 6) perceived and/or sex/gender discrimination in violation of FEHA; 7) perceived and/or sex/gender retaliation in violation of FEHA; 8) retaliation for engaging in protected activity in violation of FEHA; and 9) declaratory relief. The District demurs to each of the first eight causes of action.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

KORGAN PHD VS UNIVERSITY OF SAINT KATHERINE

The list of items on which an employer may not discriminate is somewhat lengthy and includes a wide swath of things, as follows: "race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status..." (Gov't Code § 12940(d) (emphasis added).) This is the more general blanket rule.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

KORGAN PHD VS UNIVERSITY OF SAINT KATHERINE

The list of items on which an employer may not discriminate is somewhat lengthy and includes a wide swath of things, as follows: "race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status..." (Gov't Code § 12940(d) (emphasis added).) This is the more general blanket rule.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

JANE MS DOE VS PROACTIVE MEDICAL STAFFING, INC., ET AL.

;” – PRAYER FOR RELIEF heading of Cross-Complaint, located at page 12, line 4; and “For attorneys’ fees and costs in accordance with applicable law;” – PRAYER FOR RELIEF heading of Cross-Complaint, located at page 12, line 5.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

WAHAB VS. YRC INC.

Accordingly, it cannot be grounds for summary adjudication of these claims. Defendants’ motion for summary adjudication of the 7th and 10th causes of action for race/national origin and religious harassment are DENIED. Gender.

  • Hearing

FELIPE MARCIAL VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Plaintiff alleged Chief Wiles told him that if he refused to work on this shift, then the only option was for him to call in sick. (SAC ¶30.) Plaintiff alleged he called Chief Wiles in the afternoon of May 5, 2017, and asked who he should contact in order to call in sick, Chief Wiles, while looking for the name, noticed the name of the female firefighter who was scheduled to be working at Station 40’s on Sunday, May 7, 2017, and mentioned this to Plaintiff.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

FELIPE MARCIAL VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Plaintiff alleged Chief Wiles told him that if he refused to work on this shift, then the only option was for him to call in sick. (SAC ¶30.) Plaintiff alleged he called Chief Wiles in the afternoon of May 5, 2017, and asked who he should contact in order to call in sick, Chief Wiles, while looking for the name, noticed the name of the female firefighter who was scheduled to be working at Station 40’s on Sunday, May 7, 2017, and mentioned this to Plaintiff.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

LAUREN B. VS KF COMMUNITY CARE, LLC, ET AL.

HEARING DATE: October 21, 2020 CASE NUMBER: 19STCV11268 CASE NAME: Lauren B. v. KF Community Care, LLC, et al.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Discrimination/Harass

JOHN AA DOE ET AL VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET

Further, Plaintiffs cited authority still does not stand for the proposition that Moving Defendants are liable under the Unruh Act for Gillard’s actions based on a theory of respondeat superior or ratification. Thus, Plaintiffs’ seventh cause of action is insufficiently pled. For these reasons, Moving Defendants’ demurrer to the seventh cause of action is sustained. Conclusion Moving Defendants’ demurrer to the TAC’s seventh cause of action is sustained without leave to amend.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

EUGENE BYRD ET AL. VS TTL AUTOMOTIVE ENTERPRISES, INC

In a recent San Francisco Daily Journal, dated Sept. 30, 2020, front page, there's an article entitled "Judge accuses lawyer of 'gender incivility'". While I don't know if gender played any role in the vitriolic comments of Plaintiffs' Counsel which were directed at Defense Counsel, it's important to be thoughtful in one's legal writing and understand that you are preserving your words for further review, not only by your trial judge, but perhaps others thereafter.

  • Hearing

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

CASE NAME: James Parker v. MM Enterprises USA, LLC, et al. CASE NO.: 19SMCV00189 MOTION: Motion for Protective Order HEARING DATE: 10/9/2020 BACKGROUND/ DISCOVERY DISPUTE On October 9, 2019, Plaintiff served on MM Enterprises USA, LLC (MM Enterprises or Defendant), his third set of requests for production (“the RFPs”) (See Ex. 3 to Wenter Decl.) RFP Set Three contains requests numbers 144 through 170.

  • Hearing

JAMES PARKER VS MM ENTERPRISES USA, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

CASE NAME: James Parker v. MM Enterprises USA, LLC, et al. CASE NO.: 19SMCV00189 MOTION: Motion for Protective Order HEARING DATE: 10/9/2020 BACKGROUND/ DISCOVERY DISPUTE On October 9, 2019, Plaintiff served on MM Enterprises USA, LLC (MM Enterprises or Defendant), his third set of requests for production (“the RFPs”) (See Ex. 3 to Wenter Decl.) RFP Set Three contains requests numbers 144 through 170.

  • Hearing

ZOBEL VS CALPINE CORPORATION

Defendants do not point to any California law holding that receipt of unequal pay cannot constitute an adverse action. Plaintiff has alleged sufficient facts to state a claim for gender discrimination based on disparate treatment. And, because plaintiff has stated a valid claim, her "derivative" claims for retaliation and failure to prevent discrimination likewise survive.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

ZOBEL VS CALPINE CORPORATION

Defendants do not point to any California law holding that receipt of unequal pay cannot constitute an adverse action. Plaintiff has alleged sufficient facts to state a claim for gender discrimination based on disparate treatment. And, because plaintiff has stated a valid claim, her "derivative" claims for retaliation and failure to prevent discrimination likewise survive.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

ZOBEL VS CALPINE CORPORATION

Defendants do not point to any California law holding that receipt of unequal pay cannot constitute an adverse action. Plaintiff has alleged sufficient facts to state a claim for gender discrimination based on disparate treatment. And, because plaintiff has stated a valid claim, her "derivative" claims for retaliation and failure to prevent discrimination likewise survive.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

ZOBEL VS CALPINE CORPORATION

Defendants do not point to any California law holding that receipt of unequal pay cannot constitute an adverse action. Plaintiff has alleged sufficient facts to state a claim for gender discrimination based on disparate treatment. And, because plaintiff has stated a valid claim, her "derivative" claims for retaliation and failure to prevent discrimination likewise survive.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

VALERIE JIMENEZ, ET AL. VS MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., ET AL.

CASE NAME: Valerie Jimenez, et al. v. Martin Luther King Jr., et al.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JANE JG DOE VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, A CALIFORNIA LOCAL PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL.

HEARING DATE: September 29, 2020 CASE NUMBER: 19STCV44879 CASE NAME: Jane JG Doe v. Los Angeles Unified School District, et al.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA BENEDETTI, ET AL. VS JOHNNY MIMS, ET AL.

Video Appearances: Since these are the functional equivalent of a personal appearance in court, no special protocols are in place at this time. Audio Only Appearances. Argument is limited to three minutes, unless the court grants a request for additional time. The reading of argument is feckless and nugatory. State your name at the beginning of all statements. Do not speak directly to other counsel without permission of court. Do not interrupt or attempt to speak over another speaker.

  • Hearing

ANNA BENEDETTI, ET AL. VS JOHNNY MIMS, ET AL.

Video Appearances: Since these are the functional equivalent of a personal appearance in court, no special protocols are in place at this time. Audio Only Appearances. Argument is limited to three minutes, unless the court grants a request for additional time. The reading of argument is feckless and nugatory. State your name at the beginning of all statements. Do not speak directly to other counsel without permission of court. Do not interrupt or attempt to speak over another speaker.

  • Hearing

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 19     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.