How to Petition for Change of Name and Gender

Useful Rulings on Petition for Change of Name and Gender

Recent Rulings on Petition for Change of Name and Gender

ASHLEY MASTERTON VS NEW BOX SOLUTIONS LLC ET AL

HEARING DATE: July 15, 2020 CASE NUMBER: BC709215 CASE NAME: Ashley Masterton v. New Box Solutions, LLC, et al. MOVING PARTY: Defendant New Box Solutions, LLC RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Ashley Masterton TRIAL DATE: April 7, 2020 PROOF OF SERVICE: OK PROCEEDING: Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions and To Compel Compliance OPPOSITION: December 2, 2019 REPLY: None, as of July 13, 2020 TENTATIVE: Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions and to Compel Compliance is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

JANE DOE, ET AL. VS EMPLOYERS HR, LLC, ET AL.

“[T]hese provisions establish that the liability of employers … for ‘industrial injury which results in occupational disability or death’ is limited to workers’ compensation remedies. [Citation.] Where ‘the essence of the wrong is personal physical injury or death, the action is barred by the exclusiveness clause no matter what its name or technical form if the usual conditions of coverage are satisfied.’ [Citation.]

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

N.S. VS ALVORD UNIFIED

Plaintiff’s Pregnancy/Child (p. 80:12-18, 82:3-7, 82:17-85:7, 88:8-18) Defendant seeks to discover (1) Plaintiff's child's gender and name and (2) any medical complications during and after Plaintiff's pregnancy, including any stress or emotional distress. As discussed above, identity information is discoverable. Plaintiff's medical information is private and protected. (Pettus v. Cole (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 402, 440.)

  • Hearing

    Jun 30, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

.: 19STCV15273 Hearing Date: June 29, 2020 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: plaintiff adriana rubalcaba’s Motion for Protective Order regarding deposition subpoenas for production of business records The Motion for Protective Order is GRANTED according to the terms of the compromise offered by Rubalcaba.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

MARINA HARTOUNIAN VS MOHAMMAD AGHAEI, ET AL.

She also alleges gender discrimination, retaliation, and other causes of action including intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation. Defendants move to compel arbitration and to stay the case pending the outcome of the arbitration. TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff’s request to present oral testimony at the hearing is DENIED without prejudice. Defendants’ petition to compel arbitration is DENIED. Moving party to give notice, unless waived.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

ABRAHAM LOPEZ VS AVITUS, INC., ET AL.

Fifth Cause of Action: Hostile Work Environment FEHA makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer or any other person, based on race or gender (or other enumerated characteristics), to harass an employee. (Gov’t Code, §12940(j)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

BERNOLDOR HAIR VS 2MANGAS INC ET AL

On April 20, 2020, Plaintiff filed and served notice of the continuance. Legal Standard Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (a)(1) states: “The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms, as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading or proceeding by adding or striking out the name of any party, or by correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect; and may, upon like terms, enlarge the time for answer or demurrer.

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ELENA BARRIOS VS WEST HILLS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL.

Second Cause of Action for FEHA Harassment It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to harass an employee on the basis of race, physical and/or mental disability, medical condition, sex, gender, age, and other specified grounds. (Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (j)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

DOE VS. ACALANES UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT

For example, is it being asserted that no sexual misconduct or violence was alleged – or only that such allegations were made but are not (in petitioner’s view) “well founded”? (Petitioner’s papers identify petitioner only as “Doe” with no first name and no gender-specific pronouns. The Court is nevertheless aware of petitioner’s name because it is stated on the signature line of petitioner’s declaration.

  • Hearing

    Jun 05, 2020

ANNA BENEDETTI, ET AL. VS JOHNNY MIMS, ET AL.

TENTATIVE RULING Calendar: 8 Date: 3/13/20 Case No: 19 STCV30532 Trial Date: ok Case Name: Benedetti, et al. v. Mims, et al.

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2020

SHEROD VS. CALPINE CORPORATION

(Estate of Hearst (1977) 67 Cal. App. 3d 777, 784 [136 Cal. Rptr. 821].) ... Probate proceedings, including a petition for minor's compromise, are not closed proceedings. No statute exempts probate files from the status of public records.

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

SHEROD VS. CALPINE CORPORATION

(Estate of Hearst (1977) 67 Cal. App. 3d 777, 784 [136 Cal. Rptr. 821].) ... Probate proceedings, including a petition for minor's compromise, are not closed proceedings. No statute exempts probate files from the status of public records.

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

SHEROD VS. CALPINE CORPORATION

(Estate of Hearst (1977) 67 Cal. App. 3d 777, 784 [136 Cal. Rptr. 821].) ... Probate proceedings, including a petition for minor's compromise, are not closed proceedings. No statute exempts probate files from the status of public records.

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

SHEROD VS. CALPINE CORPORATION

(Estate of Hearst (1977) 67 Cal. App. 3d 777, 784 [136 Cal. Rptr. 821].) ... Probate proceedings, including a petition for minor's compromise, are not closed proceedings. No statute exempts probate files from the status of public records.

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

MONA SERAJI VS MEHRZAD SERAJI

A further response is required for Special Interrogatory No. 18 because defendant did not identify the name or contact information of defendant’s family member who plaintiff purportedly told that she struck defendant, which was set forth in defendant’s response to Special Interrogatory No. 14. A further response is required for Special Interrogatory No. 19 because defendant only identified persons with knowledge of plaintiff’s “violent and drug induced personality disorder.”

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2020

BERNOLDOR HAIR VS 2MANGAS INC ET AL

Legal Standard Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (a)(1) states: “The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms, as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading or proceeding by adding or striking out the name of any party, or by correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect; and may, upon like terms, enlarge the time for answer or demurrer.

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION VS. OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARD ASSESSMENT

Nature of Proceedings: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE Following is the court’s tentative ruling denying the petition for writ of mandate. If either party requests a hearing, they must follow the instructions at the end of this ruling. The Court notes that it is not available to hear this case on February 21, 2020, as originally scheduled. Should a hearing be requested, it will be held on March 13, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.

  • Hearing

    Feb 21, 2020

CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION VS. OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARD ASSESSMENT

Nature of Proceedings: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE Following is the court's tentative raling denying the petition for writ of mandate. If either party requests a hearing, they must follow the instructions at the end of this ruling. The Court notes that it is not available to hear this case on February 21, 2020, as originally scheduled. Should a hearing be requested, it will be held on March 13, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.

  • Hearing

    Feb 21, 2020

MAHLER VS BELSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

That [name of plaintiff] [was an employee of [name of defendant]/applied to [name of defendant] for a job/[other covered relationship to defendant]]; 3. That [name of defendant] had [an employment practice of [describe practice]/a selection policy of [describe policy]] that had a disproportionate adverse effect on [describe protected group—for example, persons over the age of 40]; 4. That [name of plaintiff] is [protected status]; 5. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and 6.

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

LUIS AGUIAR VS PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEMS ? SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

Despite Reyes wearing PHS’ name badge, scrubs, and being an employee with them at the time of the alleged sexual assault (TAC at ¶ 13), the Court finds that there are no facts indicating that Reyes was acting on behalf of PHS. The TAC even alleges that Reyes’ purported massage was not related to the reason for Plaintiff’s admission, which was respiratory issues. (Id. at ¶ 29.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

CARRILLO V. COUNTY OF ORANGE

“It is an unlawful employment practice, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification, or, except where based upon applicable security regulations established by the United States or the State of California: (a) For an employer, because of the race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, . . . sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, . . . to refuse to hire or employ the person or to refuse to select the person for a training program leading to employment

  • Hearing

    Feb 13, 2020

JANE DOE VS STARBUCKS CORPORATION, ET AL.

procedural history Doe filed the Complaint on October 16, 2019, alleging eight causes of action: FEHA discrimination on the basis of sex/gender FEHA sexual harassment FEHA retaliation for complaining of discrimination and/or harassment on the basis of sex/gender Violation of Labor Code § 1102.5 Negligent hiring, supervision, retention FEHA Wrongful termination FEHA failure to prevent discrimination, harassment, and retaliation Intentional infliction of emotional distress Starbucks filed the present

  • Hearing

    Feb 13, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

ALMA SONIA ALONZO VS BRIGHT HORIZONS FAMILY SOLUTIONS INC., ET AL.

Thus the failure to allege the specific grounds for discrimination is not fatal to those claims, because they arise from the very same nexus of facts supporting the claims that Alonzo reported. The same is not true of Paramount’s omission from the charge. A failure to name a party in a charge is a failure to exhaust administrative remedies as to that party. (See Cole v.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

physical conduct of a sexual nature or of a hostile nature based on gender, that were unwelcome and pervasive or severe. (3) There is an inability by the plaintiff to easily terminate the relationship. (4) The plaintiff has suffered or will suffer economic loss or disadvantage or personal injury."

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2020

KATHY L COX ET AL VS VN PARTNERSHIP ET AL

TENTATIVE RULING Calendar: 11 Case Number: BC 596578 Date: 2/7/20 Trial date: April 27, 2020 Case Name: Cox, et al. v. VN Partnership, et al. MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION [CCP § 437c; CRC 3.1350 et seq.]

  • Hearing

    Feb 07, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 17     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.