What is an Offer to Compromise and Acceptance?

Useful Rulings on Offer to Compromise and Acceptance

Recent Rulings on Offer to Compromise and Acceptance

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

As an initial matter, the City agrees that it will not enforce AMC § 4.05.100.0115, which requires immediate warrantless access to a STR; will not issue citations for failure to grant immediate access pending a trial in this case, pursuant to AMC § 4.05.140.020.0201(6); and will offer the City Council amendments to remove language providing for the issuance of citations for failure to grant immediate access.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

With respect to the first question, the Court concludes that Section 13.2(f) does not preclude SARVS from attempting to obtain compensation for any alleged loss of goodwill. Notably, nowhere in that section is there any reference to goodwill or any statement to the effect that any potential item of compensation not explicitly referenced therein is considered waived.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

There is nothing in the Contract that can be read to express an intent by the parties to benefit Tarsadia as to Turner’s other contractual obligations, including the obligation to produce a defect-free project. Therefore, the analysis applicable to MaryJane’s contract claims applies equally to Evolution. The analysis applicable to MaryJane as to the negligence claim applies equally to Evolution. 3.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

The hearings on the applications are continued to 7/19/19 to allow the applicants to provide supplemental information regarding the foregoing factors. The supplemental information should be submitted by 7/12/19. No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

CAS004001, as amended on June 16, 2015 by State Board Order WQ 2015-0075, which is remanded to you for reconsideration in light of the Decision of this Court dated April 18, 2019. Nothing herein shall limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in you. YOU ARE FURTHER COMMANDED to file with this Court a return to this writ on or before (90 plus 30 days as per Respondents’ request) stating what you have done to comply.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

MALIN VS AMBRY GENETICS CORPORATION

Continued to 7-19-2019

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE EAST DISTRICT, JUDGE GLORIA QHITE-BROWN presiding in DEPT. J of the Pomona Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

However, the plaintiff may subpoena documents or witnesses to be available at the trial for the purpose of establishing the profits or financial condition referred to in subdivision (a), and the defendant may be required to identify documents in the defendant’s possession which are relevant and admissible for that purpose and the witnesses employed by or related to the defendant who would be most competent to testify to those facts.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

Chen advised Plaintiff that he had been operating a successful business, Tissuesco Group (“Tissuesco”), for many years and could assist Plaintiff to open a business and obtain a visa. On or around March 24, 2018, the parties signed a contract, in which Plaintiff agreed to invest $120,000.00 to Tissuesco and, in return, Tissuesco would open, operate and manage a company for Plaintiff and assist Plaintiff in applying for an L-1 visa.

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MANUEL ALEJANDRE VS CAL-VILLA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

(You do not have to be an attorney to register.) We thank you for your cooperation, assistance, patience and flexibility as we maneuver around the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. MATTHEWS

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

she did not want to.”

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

(“Hummingbird”) failed to provide him with rest and meal breaks, failed to pay him all wages due, including overtime, and failed to provide him with accurate wage statements. On October 25, 2017, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendants Hummingbird and Does 1-50 for: Failure to Provide Rest Periods—Cal. Labor Code § 226.7 Failure to Provide Meal Periods—Cal. Labor Code § 226.7 Failure to Pay Minimum Wage—Cal. Labor Code § 1197 Failure to Pay Overtime—Cal.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

The Judicial Council Form CIV-100 (“Request for Entry of Default (Application to Enter default)”) reflects that a court judgment in the amount of $123,186.97 is to be entered against Muniz, Dragon and Zhang. A new proposed judgment clarifying the judgment to be entered against each defendant should be submitted. ANALYSIS Yes (7/8/20; Default Entered.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for October 16, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: Plaintiff has failed to dismiss Does 1-10. Plaintiff has failed to provide a summary of the case. Plaintiff has not provided a calculation re interest.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

ARMEN G KOJIKIAN ET AL VS AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

Counsel contends that the predominant relief sought in the First Amended Complaint is a “declaration that Defendants are financially responsible for notifying all class members about the defective nature of the Subject Vehicles and to offer repair and remedy the J37 engine as alleged herein.” Plaintiffs believe the proposed settlement, which offers a warranty extension, provides this precise relief.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for October 14, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The court notes that the lease provided for a $69,804.04 security deposit.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

BELINDA AGUILAR, ET AL. VS TG PROPERTIES LLC

(NOTE: All hearings currently set in Department 29 of the Spring Street Courthouse are taken off calendar subject to being reset and notified by the receiving court Re: New hearing dates.) Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

ESTATE OF EUGENIA NG

Have a Judicial Council Form Notice of Hearing and copy of petition mailed to all persons entitled to receive notice and file a Proof of Service with court. 4. Proposed Order Notes: 1. Per 7-21-2020 minute order, court ordered Atty. Flood to respond to all petitions. 2. “Omnibus Response, Objection and Opposition to Estate Related Pleadings Filed by Efren Delgadillo” filed by Anthony Francis LoForte, Sr. 7-22-2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 08, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO DECLARE THE 2007 RESTATEMENT OF TRUST & 2019 INSTRUCTIONS FILED ON 05/26/20 BY RHONDA BRINK

GERARD SMITS MATTHEW B TALBOT HELEN SMITS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE -- See also Lines # 15 and 25 -- Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proof of Publication. PrC § 8120 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to add deceased spouse with date of death to petition Item # 8. LR 7.151(d) 4. Verified declaration by petitioner to include fair market value of estate so court has sufficient facts to fix bond. Item # 3.d. is incomplete. 5.

  • Hearing

    Oct 08, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF KATHERINE L LOFORTE-DELGADILLO

RE: CASE MANAGMENT (CONSOLIDATED CASE) SET BY JUDGE FANNIN ON 9/25/19 DEMURRER ORDER PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances Note: It appears this petition is moot.

  • Hearing

    Oct 08, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF KATHERINE L LOFORTE-DELGADILLO

RE: APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER FILED ON 12/06/19 BY EFREN DELGADILLO JR PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proof of mailing Judicial Council Form Notice of Hearing to all persons entitled to receive notice 3. Proposed Order PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 08, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST AND FNL ACCOUNTING FOR STATUTORY AF AND PERSONAL

Proposed Order Note: Letters Testamentary issued to Atty. Kathryn S. Korn 9-10-2019. JAVIER ROJAS KATHRYN S KORN OLIVER W. BRAY SABRINA GARCIA PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Waivers of Accounting from presumptive contingent remainder beneficiaries of the trust. The Trustee has a fiduciary duty to protect their interests, and cannot use her fiduciary position to relieve herself of the obligation to provide an accounting in this proceeding.

  • Hearing

    Oct 08, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF CHUN CHAK BENEDICT CHU

P STARLA PACINI PETER A HASS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Verified declaration by petitioner to include a copy of estate tax return closing letter EUGENIA NG JUDITH NG HALE KRONEBERG

  • Hearing

    Oct 08, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (ACCOUNTING SET BY D14 ON 1/15/20

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearance to report status of filing accounting. Laurie Schwarzrock was ordered to complete an accounting by 4-1-2020, and to file an accounting by 4-15-2020. Note: Response to OSC filed by Laurie Schwarzrock 2-11-20 needs verification and signature. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.