What is a Notice of Lodging?

The court calls for a Notice of Lodging in several circumstances. e.g., proposed orders, trial exhibits, original wills, financial statements, and relief of counsel.

The Notice of Lodging requirements vary by county. For example, here's San Diego's lodging procedure for trial:

  1. A Notice of Intent to Lodge Documents (form SDSC D-235 or in pleading form) listing the name or description of the exhibit must be filed and timely served with the moving, opposition and reply papers
  2. The documents themselves must be lodged with the court no sooner than 10 court days and no later than three court days prior to the hearing, absent a court order
  3. Lodged documents will be stamped "received" by the court.
  4. Lodged documents must be tabbed to correlate to the notice of lodgment.
  5. A conformed copy of the notice of lodgment must be the face page of the lodged documents.

(The rest of the San Diego's trial lodging rules can be found here.)

For more information inquire with your court.

Useful Rulings on Notice of Lodging

Recent Rulings on Notice of Lodging

CITRUS OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLGY VS CITRUS VALLEY HEALTH

Sealing On August 2, 2019, Emanate filed a “Notice of Lodging. . . Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues Conditionally Under Seal,” a “Notice of Lodging. . . Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of. . . Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication of Issues” and a “Notice of Lodging Compendium of Evidence in Support of. . .

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

GRACE ALBA, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SYLVIA ALBA VS SPARKLETTS, INC., A CORPORATION, ET AL.

While the proposed orders submitted by DS Services in connection with the motion herein and the motion to seal below seek to seal the entirety of Coombs’ deposition transcript and all exhibits thereto, the “Notice of Lodging Records Conditionally Under Seal Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 2.551” is comprised of excerpts of Coombs deposition testimony and Exhibits 10-18 and 22 thereto, as well as the unredacted motion.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

CARDOSO VS. DATA CLEAN CORPORATION

of lodging (ROA 102).

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2020

FRANCISCA EUGENIA NUNEZ VS DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

On June 25, 2020, four court days before the hearing, Respondent filed and served a Notice of Lodging of Administrative Record. That same date, Respondent lodged a certified, 63-page administrative record Standard of Review Under CCP section 1094.5(b), the pertinent issues are whether the respondent has proceeded without jurisdiction, whether there was a fair trial, and whether there was a prejudicial abuse of discretion.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

BEATS ELECTRONICS LLC ET AL VS MONSTER LLC ET AL

Motion For Modification [Unreserved] On May 29, 2020, Monster filed a Notice of Lodging Under Seal Exhibits to the Declaration of Kirk Hallam and Excerpts From Monster’s Motion For Modification Previously Filed Under Seal By Order of the Court Dated August 9, 2019. Monster identifies Exhs. 1 – 3 to the Hallam Declaration, which are PwC’s Final Inspection Reports for the Royalty Agreement, the Sales Representative Agreement, and the Distribution Agreement.

  • Hearing

    Jun 23, 2020

CACERES VS. CRUISERS PIZZA BAR GRILL, LLC

The clerk is directed to seal Exhibits A and B to Defendant’s notice of lodging (ROA 65).

  • Hearing

    Jun 19, 2020

CACERES VS. CRUISERS PIZZA BAR GRILL, LLC

The clerk is directed to seal Exhibits A and B to Defendant’s notice of lodging (ROA 65).

  • Hearing

    Jun 18, 2020

CITRUS OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLGY VS CITRUS VALLEY HEALTH

Sealing On August 2, 2019, Emanate filed a “Notice of Lodging. . . Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues Conditionally Under Seal,” a “Notice of Lodging. . . Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of. . . Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication of Issues” and a “Notice of Lodging Compendium of Evidence in Support of. . .

  • Hearing

    Mar 17, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

IVAN MORAN VS. CITY OF PASADENA, ET AL

City seeks to reduce costs in the following amounts: (1) $134.32 for "Petition of Writ of Mandate"; (2) $16.64 for "Trial Brief”; (3) $35.00 for "Trial Brief (Courtesy Copy)”; (4) $15.64 for "Opposition"; (5) $15.64 for “Reply”; (6) $33.00 for "Reply (Courtesy Copy)”; (7) $57.25 for "Opposition (Courtesy Copy)”; (8) $11.95 for "Ex Parte"; (9) $77.62 for "Ex Parte (Courtesy Copy)"; (10) $15.64 for "Notice of Lodging"; (11) $96.75 for "Ex Parte (Courtesy Copy)"; (12) $36.75 for "Ex Parte"; (13) $15.64 for "Opposition

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JOHN HANSON VS DOE 1, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION SOLE, ET AL.

On February 13, 2020 and on March 10, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice of lodging certificate of merit as to claims against Defendant, Doe 1 and certificate of merit as to claims against Defendant, Doe 2 conditionally under seal. On March 10, 2020, Plaintiff filed the instant ex parte application for an order allowing Plaintiff to file his certificates of merit under seal and for an in camera review of certificates of merit and a finding of merit under Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1(i).

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

(Attached hereto as Exhibit "B" to the Notice of Lodging Exhibits is a true and correct "certified copy" of the "Grant Deed" dated April 30, 2015)” (Chu Decl. ¶ 3, Exh. B.) Chu further declares that since April 30, 2015, she has not owned, managed, controlled, inspected, serviced, maintained, operated, leased, nor rented the Property. (Id. ¶¶ 4-12.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 03, 2020

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION VS HAMLET MANUKYAN

On October 28, 2019, plaintiff filed a Notice of Lodging and Reinstating Plaintiff’s Attorney Fee Motion, with a hearing date of December 13, 2019. On December 4, 2019, the court heard an ex parte application filed on behalf of defendant SPS and the Bank of New York Mellon, at Trustee to continue the hearing on the motion for attorney fees, which was granted, and the motion continued to this date.

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2020

POONSOOK BRAINANGKUL VS SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.

On October 28, 2019, plaintiff filed a Notice of Lodging and Reinstating Plaintiff’s Attorney Fee Motion, with a hearing date of December 13, 2019. On December 4, 2019, the court heard an ex parte application filed on behalf of defendant SPS and the Bank of New York Mellon, at Trustee to continue the hearing on the motion for attorney fees, which was granted, and the motion continued to this date.

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

STEVE SNOECK VS EXAKTIME INNOVATIONS INC

In reply, Defendant requests that the Court tax the following revised list of costs, in a total amount of $916.37: · Filing Service Fee – Complaint: $70.00 · Filing Service Fee – Case Management Statement – LASC: $55.00 · Filing Service Fee – Notice Jury Fee Deposit – LASC: $55.00 · Filing Service Fee – Motion to Quash: $40.75 · Filing Service Fee – Stipulation/Protective Order: $58.00 · Filing Service Fee – Objection to Def’s Evidence re MSJ: $91.50 · Filing Service Fee – Notice of Lodging Proposed Judgment

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2020

PASTORA GUTIERREZ ET AL VS JOSE A ALONZO ET AL

Accordingly the only motion to be addressed today is: Defendant TC-Chadron LLC and Turnstone Capital’s Motion for Summary Judgment ANALYSIS Defendant TC-Chadron LLC and Turnstone Capital’s Motion for Summary Judgment Documents Lodged Conditionally Under Seal On October 18, 2019, Defendants TC-Chadron LLC and Turnstone Capital, Inc. filed a Notice of Lodging Conditionally under Seal certain documents in support of their motion for summary judgment/summary adjudication.

  • Hearing

    Jan 03, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

NUMERICA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC VS SANT BABA LAL SINGH JI CORP., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

With the reply papers, Defendants request judicial notice of the proposed answer (filed as an exhibit to the 11/25/19 declaration of Jason Cirlin and filed with Defendants’ 12/2/19 notice of lodging a verified answer), and a copy of the docket showing that those documents were previously filed with the Court. The request is granted. (Evid. Code, §452(d).) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS Defendants object to the declaration of Aaron Rios at paragraphs 6 and 16. The objections are overruled.

  • Hearing

    Jan 03, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

FELIX FONTEBO ET ALVS AIRBNB INC ET AL

A proof of service filed on August 27, 2019 reflects that a “Proof of Service of Exhibits Related to Notice of Lodging Exhibits Related to Petition by Airbnb, Inc. and Airbnb Payments, Inc. to Confirm Arbitration Award and Enter Judgment Theron” was mail-served on August 26, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Dec 30, 2019

JOSEPH GUINAN VS STARBUCKS CORPORATION ET AL

Notice of Lodging, Ex. E. Defendant served the Notice of Ruling on 9/18/19. Id. Plaintiff has not served further responses to the Requests for Admission, nor has Plaintiff paid the sanctions imposed by the court. Declaration of Kelly Cox, ¶ 11. Accordingly, the Requests for Admission, Set One, Requests 1-7 are deemed admitted. Cal Code Civil Procedure § 2033.280(b).

  • Hearing

    Dec 27, 2019

COALITION TO PRESERVE LA, INC., A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES , A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL.

The court notes the FAP was attached to a Notice of Lodging, filed in support of the original motion for leave. However, it was not thereafter filed when this court granted leave to amend. As such, the FAP does not appear on the court’s docket. Petitioner is ordered to separately file the FAP so that the record is complete.

  • Hearing

    Dec 13, 2019

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

FORD MOTOR TRANSMISSION CASES

On December 2, 2019, in support of their opposition to this motion, the Hightowers filed a notice of lodging documents subject to a protective order under seal with the court clerk pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 2.551(b)(3). Ford has also lodged an unredacted "Response to Plaintffs' Separate Statement (Misrepresentation/Fraud)" with its Reply and a similar notice filed December 9, 2019. The lodged documents will remain conditionally sealed until December 20, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Dec 12, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

FORD MOTOR TRANSMISSION CASES

On December 2, 2019, in support of their opposition to this motion, the Hightowers filed a notice of lodging documents subject to a protective order under seal with the court clerk pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 2.551(b)(3). Ford has also lodged an unredacted "Response to Plaintffs' Separate Statement (Misrepresentation/Fraud)" with its Reply and a similar notice filed December 9, 2019. The lodged documents will remain conditionally sealed until December 20, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Dec 12, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

FELIX FONTEBO ET ALVS AIRBNB INC ET AL

A proof of service filed on August 27, 2019 reflects that a “Proof of Service of Exhibits Related to Notice of Lodging Exhibits Related to Petition by Airbnb, Inc. and Airbnb Payments, Inc. to Confirm Arbitration Award and Enter Judgment Theron” was mail-served on August 26, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2019

MICROSEMI CORP. - POWER MANAGEMENT GROUP V. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC.

ARI’s Motion In connection with ARI’s motion, both parties filed and served a notice of lodging material designated as confidential pursuant to CRC Rule 2.551(b)(3)(A)(iii). No party filed a motion to seal. The unredacted versions of the documents filed conditionally under seal shall be placed in the public file.

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2019

DEE ANN ABELAR ET AL VS JOHN R DINGILIAN M.D. ET AL

Copies of the medical records relied on are attached to the Notice of Lodging of Exhibits. The records include declarations from the custodians of records. [Exs. D-Q]. Dr. Wachtel’s declaration also provides substantial testimony setting forth an understanding of the facts and the reasons for Dr. Wachtel’s opinions. Specifically, Dr. Wachtel states that the care and treatment provided to plaintiff Dee Ann Abelar by Dr.

  • Hearing

    Nov 22, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

FONTES V. TRUE NORTH DEVELOPMENT, INC.

Notice of Lodging, Novini Transcript, Page 5. The Court reminds the parties that they are required to serve any papers filed on all parties.

  • Hearing

    Nov 18, 2019

1 2 3 4 5 6 7     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.