What is a Notice of Coordinated Cases?

Useful Rulings on Notice of Coordinated Cases

Recent Rulings on Notice of Coordinated Cases

OROVILLE DAM CASES

Butte County DA failed to respond to DWR's petition to coordinate its action with the other Oroville Dam Cases, and its case was duly added to the coordinated cases.

  • Hearing

    Jun 16, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

CDWR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CASES

Concurrent with these proceedings in the coordinated cases, DWR personnel engaged in a number of planning activities for the construction of the WaterFix project. (Omnibus Declaration of Karla Nemeth in Support of DWR's Oppositions to Motion for Attorney Fees, filed 11/15/2019, ¶ 5 (Nemeth Omnibus Declaration).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

12 CORINTHIAN INTERNATIONAL WAGE AND HOUR

INTRODUCTION 26 These are two coordinated cases arising out of alleged Labor Code violations. The 27 Turner case is a putative class action.

  • Hearing

    Dec 20, 2019

12 CORINTHIAN INTERNATIONAL WAGE AND HOUR

INTRODUCTION 26 These are two coordinated cases arising out of alleged Labor Code violations. The 27 Turner case is a putative class action.

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2019

12 CORINTHIAN INTERNATIONAL WAGE AND HOUR

INTRODUCTION 26 These are two coordinated cases arising out of alleged Labor Code violations. The 27 Turner case is a putative class action.

  • Hearing

    Aug 30, 2019

MASSAGE ENVY SPA WAGE AND HOUR CASES

., d/b/a Massage Envy Spa; and Plaintiff Amanda Ruiz and Defendant Coastal Massage Santa Barbara d/b/a Massage Envy Spa move for Orders in their respective coordinated cases granting Final Approval for Class Action Settlement, entering judgment, appointing them as Class Representatives, and appointing Haeggquist & Eck LLP and Cohelan Khoury & Singer as Class Counsel.

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

14 WAGE AND HOUR

INTRODUCTION 21 This is a group of coordinated cases involving Arriaga & Associates, Inc. (“Arriaga, 22 Inc.”), a company that provides security for other businesses and entities. (See Verified First 23 Amended Complaint (24 before the Court, Arriaga, Inc. alleges defendants Jason Lara and Jose Segura were employees of 25 Arriaga, Inc. (FAC, ¶¶ 3 and 7.) On July 1, 2016, Lara and Segura contacted Arriaga, Inc.’s 26 27 1 Included Actions: (1) Giron, et al. v.

  • Hearing

    Aug 02, 2019

GILEAD TENOFOVIR CASES

The Plaintiffs who have filed the Petition request the coordinated cases be heard in Santa Clara County. Defendant Gilead also prefers Santa Clara County, but has no objection if San Francisco County were the selected venue. The Lujano Plaintiffs request the coordinated proceeding be heard in either Alameda County or San Francisco County.

  • Hearing

    Jul 30, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

SKANSKA-SHIMMICK-HERZOG, A JOINT VENTURE V. LAN/TYLIN, A JOINT VENTURE, ET AL. [COORDINATED INTO SKANSKA-SHIMMICK CONTRACT CASES, JCCP 4918]

In fact, on June 22, 2018, this Court denied the Moving Parties’ motion to 19 consolidate the two coordinated cases in this action. The Moving Parties cannot ignore the 20 Court’s prior ruling and attempt to file a consolidated pleading without the cases first being 21 consolidated. 22 There are two coordinated cases in this action.

  • Hearing

    May 24, 2019

MASSAGE ENVY SPA WAGE AND HOUR CASES

., d/b/a Massage Envy Spa; and Plaintiff Amanda Ruiz and Defendant Coastal Massage Santa Barbara d/b/a Massage Envy Spa move for Orders in their respective coordinated cases granting Preliminary Approval for Class Action Settlement, appointing them as Class Representatives, and appointing Haeggquist & Eck LLP and Cohelan Khoury & Singer as Class Counsel. As set forth below, good cause exists for the granting of the motions in that the proposed settlements are fair, reasonable, and adequate.

  • Hearing

    May 01, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

12 CORINTHIAN INTERNATIONAL WAGE AND HOUR

INTRODUCTION 26 These are two coordinated cases arising out of alleged Labor Code violations. The 27 Turner case is a putative class action. Turner’s Class Action Complaint for Damages, filed on 28 June 11, 2015, in Alameda County sets forth the following causes of action against Defendant TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 1 Corinthian International Parking Services, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2019

URIBE VS CROWN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO

The Court notes, however, that no Notice of Submission of Petition for Coordination has been filed in this Court as required by Rule 3.522, CRC. Neither has the Court received any notice of a stay in this matter. Accordingly, the Court proceeds to rule on the motions which are before it. Garibay’s Motion for Stay Invoking the rule of exclusive concurrent jurisdiction, Intervenor Isabel Garibay moves to stay this action pending resolution of Gama v. Able Services, et al., Case No.

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2019

RECHNITZ NURSING FACILITIES CASES

Factors 1, 2, and 4 are generally satisfied in the individual petitions, in the exhibits accompanying the petitions (the exhibits attach the complaints in each of the proposed coordinated cases), and in ¶1 of the Gerchik Declaration. As to factor 3, it appears that counsel in all seventeen (17) cases has served the summons and complaint on all parties in the included actions, after having examined this on the Court’s intranet site.

  • Hearing

    Nov 14, 2018

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

FORD MOTOR WARRANTY CASES

Background In these coordinated cases, Plaintiffs have brought suit against Defendant Ford Motor Company arising from alleged breaches of warranty regarding the 2011-2015 model-year Ford Fiesta and 2012-2015 model-year Ford Focus vehicles equipped with the DPS6 transmission. II. Petition for coordination By and through this fourth add-on petition, Defendant Ford Motor Company seeks an order coordinating 48 cases with those cases already ordered coordinated by Judge Elias and by this Court.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2018

VS. PROC

The 4 coordinated cases will be venued in Santa Clara County. 8 NOTICE: The Court does not provide court reporters for proceedings in the complex civil 9 litigation departments. Parties may arrange for a private court reporter to provide services, but 10 those arrangements must be consistent with the local rules and policies posted on the Court’s 11 website. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION FOR COORDINATION Footnote 1: 2 Footnote 9: 10 (Code Civ. Proc., § 404.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2018

RICHARD HOCKISON V. BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, INC., ET AL.

., and California Rules of Court 3.522, Petitioner Richard Hockison hereby files this Notice of Submission of Petition for Coordination with the Santa Barbara County Superior Court. The same notice has been concurrently filed in the related action in Los Angeles County Superior Court as well. Petitioner Hockison filed a petition with the Chair of the Judicial Counsel of California on July l9, 2018, requesting coordination” of several actions in the Los Angeles County Superior Court.

  • Hearing

    Jul 31, 2018

PAUL COPPOLA VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY

All of the coordinated cases that have been made part of the JCCP Actions “make the same or similar allegations as Plaintiff in this case, i.e., that Ford breached warranties regarding 2011-2015 model-year Ford Fiesta and 2012-2015 model-year Ford Focus vehicles equipped with the DPS6 transmission. (Motion, p. 6:27-7:2.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2018

WILLIAMS VS CHEVRON U.S.A., IN

However, the Court also must consider Williams’s contention that the coordinated cases provided Chevron notice of his claims. Coordinated Cases Noteworthy here, Williams’s case is just one of a large number of cases centered on the same core facts. In August 2012, Chevron’s Richmond Refinery suffered a catastrophic fire. Subsequently, scores of nearby residents sued Chevron, alleging various injuries resulting from the fire.

  • Hearing

    Jun 28, 2018

SHAKE ROOF COORDINATED CASES

FINAL HEARING RE SETTLEMENT FUND SET BY PLAINTIFFS * TENTATIVE RULING: * Counsel to appear. Although the matter has taken way longer than anticipated, it appears that the administration of this class-settlement fund has been a model of effectiveness, with nearly all of the settlement fund now distributed to nearly all of the potenti...

  • Hearing

    May 25, 2018

EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS WAGE AND HOUR CASES

("PAGA") [as to Plaintiff Sanchez and aggrieved employees]; and Violation of California Business & Professions Code §§ 17200, et seq; Plaintiffs in some of the coordinated cases also seek declaratory relief and allege a claim for quantum meruit/unjust enrichment. The Court had earlier coordinated these cases.

  • Hearing

    May 03, 2018

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA V. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

Nature of Proceedings: Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice (2) Motion of Scott Summy for Admission Pro Hac Vice Ariel Colonne, Tom Shapiro; attorneys for Plaintiff Ruling: OFF CALENDAR; the case has been transferred to Los Angeles along with other “coordinated cases.”

  • Hearing

    May 01, 2018

RAEL & LETSON VS. CASSANO

However, this Court is far from convinced that the consolidated or coordinated cases should be in Contra Costa County rather than San Mateo County. The Court notes that the defendants in both cases are on record as preferring Contra Costa. Plaintiff, for its part, argues unconvincingly against transferring either case. But, if one of the cases is to be transferred, plaintiff gives no indication which County it thinks would be more appropriate.

  • Hearing

    Mar 23, 2018

MICHAEL JOHNSON V. ANDREW CHRISTMAN, ET AL.

Transfer of coordinated cases is simpler and easier for noncomplex cases. (Compare Rules of Court, rule 3.500 with rules 3.501-3.532.) Transfer to bring the two cases together is a far more efficient approach.

  • Hearing

    Feb 05, 2018

ALFONSO GUZMAN V. CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES, INC.

The instant action, Carl Karcher Wage and Hour Cases II (CORD4537, JCCP Nos. 4537 and 4630), was a series of coordinated cases involving wage and hour issues. After a series of rulings and settlements, the only outstanding matter in this coordinated proceeding is resolution of Cubias v. Carl Karcher Enterprises. (See Duarte Request for Judicial Notice [Duarte RJN], exhibit A.) Cubias was filed in 2009.

  • Hearing

    Jan 30, 2018

EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS WAGE AND HOUR CASES

Under Ford Motor Warranty Cases, the Court cannot second-guess the complex determination of the coordinated cases. Ford Motor Warranty Cases, supra, 11 Cal.App.5th 626. Taking the §404.1 factors in turn, Rincon with the alleged misclassification of Plaintiff as an “independent contractor.”

  • Hearing

    Jan 23, 2018

1 2 3     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.