Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information

California Rules of Court

California Rule of Court, rule 2.200 states: “An attorney or self-represented party whose mailing address, telephone number, fax number, or e-mail address (if it was provided under rule 2.111(1)) changes while an action is pending must serve on all parties and file a written notice of the change.” Thus, counsel has an obligation to file and serve all parties, in an action that involves counsel, with the Notice of Change of Address. (Cal. Rules of Ct., Rule 2.200.) Until such notice is filed and served on all parties, service directed to the address on file with the court is presumed valid. (Sweeting v. Murat (2013) 221 Cal.App.4th 507, 513-514.)

Notice of Change of Address and Consolidated Cases

If cases become consolidated, a party that is serving a Notice of Change of Address must serve the notice on all parties in the consolidated case as opposed to only parties in the serving party’s original case. (See Ca. Rules of Ct., Rule 2.200.)

Notice of Change of Address and Excusable Neglect

A matter of inadvertence or excusable neglect may be held when Plaintiff serves Defense counsel's old address after Defense counsel had sent a Notice of Change of Address, i.e., it appears likely that Plaintiff's counsel failed to properly update its records after receiving the Notice of Change of Address. Such a defect would warrant a continuance to provide time for adequate service so that the opposition brief could be considered and so that Defendant could have time to prepare and file a proper reply brief. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 473(b).)

Related Issues

Electronic Service

If there are service issues that likely could have been avoided by parties entering into an agreement for electronic service under Code of Civil Procedure § 1010.6(a)(2) and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.253(b), the court may ask why parties have not entered into such an agreement.

Presumption of Receipt

Evidence Code Section 641 provides: “A letter correctly addressed and properly mailed is presumed to have been received in the ordinary course of mail.” A presumption of receipt is rebutted by testimony denying receipt. (Bear Creek Master Ass'n v. Edwards (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 1470, 1486.) However, the disappearance of the presumption does not mean there is insufficient evidence to support a finding of receipt of notice. (Craig v. Brown & Root, Inc. (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 416, 421.) If the adverse party denies receipt, the presumption is gone from the case. But the trier of fact must then weigh the denial of receipt against the inference of receipt arising from proof of mailing and decide whether or not the letter was received. (Id. at p. 422; Bear Creek Master Ass'n v. Edwards, supra, at p. 1486.)

Judicial Council Form

Judicial Council Form MC-040 is for Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information.

Useful Rulings on Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information

Recent Rulings on Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information

JOSE M IBARRA VS BAKER COMMODITIES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION

Phoenix will update Agreement Employee addresses using the National Change of Address database, calculate and distribute Individual PAGA Payments, mail payments to all Aggrieved Employees together with the Explanatory Letter, and perform other duties that are integral to the effectuation of the Settlement. (Haines Decl., Exh. 1, §§ IV.2-6.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

JOSE CARRILLO V. NEW BALANCE ATHLETICS, INC., ET AL.

The administrator will mail the notice packet within 10 business days of receiving the class list from defendant, after updating addresses using the National Change of Address Database. Any notice packets returned as undeliverable will be re-mailed to any forwarding address provided or located through skip tracing. Class members who receive a re-mailed notice packed shall have an additional 15 days to respond. These notice procedures are appropriate and are approved. VIII.

  • Hearing

    Sep 17, 2020

JOSEFINA GARCES VS KAR AUCTION SERVICES, INC., ET AL.

Defendants will provide CPT with contact information for the employees and the administrator will then conduct a change of address search and mail the notice packet. (Decl. Zakay, Exh. 1, pg. 7.) For any returned mail, CPT will utilize an address refresher database and attempt a second mailing. (Ibid.) The Court finds the administration plan and accompanying cost to be reasonable. Attorneys’ fees and costs The requested $65,000 in attorney fees amount to 1/3 of the total settlement amount.

  • Hearing

    Sep 17, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

  • Judge

    Maurice A. Leiter or Salvatore Sirna

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTINA NOEL CHAMBLISS

Conservator shall file a Change of Address (GC-080) for Conservatee if she has a permanent address in Los Angeles. The next biennial status report shall be filed on or before 4/18/20, and set for filing/sufficiency hearing on 5/17/22, 10:30 AM, J6. The clerk shall give notice. __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible.

  • Hearing

    Sep 15, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTINA NOEL CHAMBLISS

Conservator shall file a Change of Address (GC-080) for Conservatee if she has a permanent address in Los Angeles. Is Conservatee by and/or through her counsel going to petition to terminate the conservatorship? Ideally, counsel will have communicated with conservatee prior to hearing. Discuss. __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible.

  • Hearing

    Sep 15, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

WESLEY PANIGHETTI VS. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS

On February 28, 2020, he filed a notice of change of address, providing a new address (General Delivery, Auburn, California, 95603) that suggests he is now out of prison.

  • Hearing

    Sep 11, 2020

WESLEY PANIGHETTI VS. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS

On Febmary 28, 2020, he filed a notice of change of address, providing a new address (General Delivery, Auburn, Califomia, 95603) that suggests he is now out of prison.

  • Hearing

    Sep 11, 2020

CITY OF SAN MARCOS VS BHEAU VIEW RANCH INC

Shortly afterwords, I put in a change of address form at the post office to direct all my mail to the following address: Postal Amex 197 Woodland Pky Suite 104/640 San Marcos Ca 92069 (City's Lodgments, Ex. B (errors in original).) Subsequent to the nine attempts at personal service and the hospitalization of Defendant, the City sought and obtained an order from this Court allowing Defendant to be served via publication.

  • Hearing

    Sep 10, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

IN THE MATTER OF MARK PHILIP GOLDSTEIN

Co-Conservators to file a Notice of Change of Address of Conservatee forthwith. Set status review hearing since Conservatee plans on moving again. Discuss. __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Sep 08, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

RALEY V. TAYLOR, ET AL.

Although no formal change of address was ever filed with the court, the court updated counsel’s address and has served plaintiff’s counsel at the Locust address in every instance since June of 2018. The Locust address was therefore known to defense counsel, as the court has served all counsel with documents on several occasions.

  • Hearing

    Sep 02, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF ETHAN ZANE GRIFFITH

Conservator needs to file a Notice of Post-Move Change of Address to 6645 Thill Street, Apt 175, Ventura, CA. Conservator's biennial status report was due 08/03/20 and as of 8/25/20, it has not been filed timely. Unless the report is filed before the hearing, the Court will set an OSC re Failure to File Annual Status Report and require the mandatory appearance by Conservator Deborah Lopez.

  • Hearing

    Sep 01, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

JON CRITTENDEN VS LAURA A LAMBERT

On May 4, 2020, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a “Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information,” advising therein that, as of April 21, 2020, counsel had changed their address and contact information; more specifically, the notice indicated that counsel’s email address had changed to [email protected] The motion was served via email on June 17, 2020 to Attorney Sagi Schwartzberg (“Schwartzberg”) at [email protected]

  • Hearing

    Sep 01, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

JUAN AMAYA VS PITNEY BOWES PRESORT SERVICES INC

The settlement administrator shall use first class U.S. mail, using the most current mailing address available after a National Change of Address search. (Id.) The class notice shall state the total approximate amount each class member is estimated to receive and the number of workweeks credited to him or her. (Id.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 31, 2020

TRAN VS. FARMERS GROUP INC

In addition, the record shows that on August 8, 2020, Defendant provided Plaintiff's counsel electronic notice of its change of address (ROA No. 110). However, on August 12, 2020, Plaintiff served Defendant with her opposition and supporting documents at Defendant's counsel's old address (ROA No. 119). Defendant consequently did not receive Plaintiff's papers until August 21, 2020 – the same day its reply brief was due. See Cal. Code Civ. P. § 437c(b)(2).

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2020

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

TRAN VS. FARMERS GROUP INC

In addition, the record shows that on August 8, 2020, Defendant provided Plaintiff's counsel electronic notice of its change of address (ROA No. 110). However, on August 12, 2020, Plaintiff served Defendant with her opposition and supporting documents at Defendant's counsel's old address (ROA No. 119). Defendant consequently did not receive Plaintiff's papers until August 21, 2020 – the same day its reply brief was due. See Cal. Code Civ. P. § 437c(b)(2).

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2020

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

IVO NKWENJI, ET AL VS. ROUNDTREE 1 VAN NUYS, LLLC

FAILURE TO FILE NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS Ms. Nshlai filed a change of address for his office on 5/14/20. However, he states in his declaration that he moved his offices on 8/15/19, thereby acknowledging a 9 month delay in notifying the court of his change of address.

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2020

JIMENEZ VS REYES HOLDINGS LLC [EFILE]

Approving Notice of Class Action Settlement be mailed together with a Change of Address Form, via first class U.S.

  • Hearing

    Aug 20, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

AUSCENCIO CARRILLO ET AL VS ANALEA PAULE ET AL

On November 1, 2019, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a notice of change of address. Defendant served these motions at the prior address. There are no oppositions on file, suggesting that Plaintiff’s counsel did not receive the motions. Therefore, the motions are denied without prejudice. Defendant shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: August 19, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2020

IN RE: CARL GOEDINGHAUS FAMILY TRUSTS

Footnote 1: Petitioner had also filed a Change of Address form on April 20, 2020. The RFAs were correctly served on Petitioner at his prior address of record in Piedmont, California. (Moroski Decl., Exs. 1-3.) Petitioner further states that he served responses to the first set of RFAs on July 13, 2020 (Ex. E); served amended responses to the first set of RFAs the following day (Ex. F); and served responses to the second set of RFAs on July 27, 2020 (Ex. J).

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2020

JOSE R. HUERTA VS ACCURATE PERSONNEL, LLC, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

Prior to mailing the Individual Settlement Payments and letters, CPT will run PAGA Member addresses through the United States Postal Service’s National Change of Address database to obtain current address information. (¶VI(29).) The Individual Settlement Payment and letters will be mailed via U.S. First Class mail with directions to the postmaster to forward to an updated address and/or to return all undeliverable envelopes to CPT.

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

MIGUEL ANGEL GONZALEZ VS ANALEA PAULE, ET AL.

On November 1, 2019, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a notice of change of address. Defendant served these motions at the prior address. There are no oppositions on file, suggesting that Plaintiff’s counsel did not receive the motions. Therefore, the motions are denied without prejudice. Defendant shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: August 19, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2020

TYCO VS. CENTURY FURNITURE

There is no document in the file reflecting that defense counsel took any action to notify counsel of any change of address to his current address (450 Post Street, San Francisco). . Plaintiff’s Opposition The Plaintiff opposes the motion to vacate the Default Judgment. Plaintiff claims that it was never served with the Defendant’s motion.

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

STEVE KOTT VS NATALIA BENSHAW, ET AL.

Thompson has not filed a notice of change of address since that date. The proofs of service also indicate that both versions of this motion were served via electronic service in addition to being mailed. However, the lack of opposition paired with what appears to be the wrong address for plaintiff’s counsel on the proof of service, warrant a continuance of this hearing to ensure that plaintiff has notice and the opportunity to file an opposition.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

MIGUEL ANGEL GONZALEZ VS ANALEA PAULE, ET AL.

On November 1, 2019, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a notice of change of address. Defendant served these motions at the prior address. There are no oppositions on file, suggesting that Plaintiff’s counsel did not receive the motions. Therefore, the motions are denied without prejudice. Defendant shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: August 11, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Aug 11, 2020

THOMPSON LY V. SAGE INTACCT, INC., ET AL.

The administrator will mail the notice packet within 15 days of preliminary approval, after updating class members’ addresses using the National Change of Address Database. Any notice packets returned as undeliverable will be re-mailed to any forwarding address provided or more recent address located through a skip trace or by calling the class member’s mobile telephone. Class members who receive a re- mailed notice will have an additional 20 days to respond.

  • Hearing

    Aug 07, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 21     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.