What is a Motion to Vacate Sister-State Judgment?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Vacate Sister-State Judgment

Recent Rulings on Motion to Vacate Sister-State Judgment

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

State Water Resources Control Bd. (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 1459, 1471 [internal citations and footnote omitted].) “[A]n irreparable injury is one for which either (1) its pecuniary value is not susceptible to monetary valuation, or (2) the item is so unique its loss deprives the possessor of intrinsic values not replaceable by money or in kind.” (Jessen v. Keystone Savings & Loan Assn. (1983) 142 Cal.App.3d 454, 457.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

s Motion for Summary Adjudication 4)Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant Turner Construction Company's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication Against Plaintiffs 1. Motion by Saddleback Corp. dba Saddleback Waterproof for Summary Judgment or Adjudication as to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint Defendant Saddleback’s motion for summary judgment and summary adjudication of Issues 5 and 6 (statute of limitations) is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3). The hearings on the applications are continued to 7/19/19 to allow the applicants to provide supplemental information regarding the foregoing factors. The supplemental information should be submitted by 7/12/19. No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Where the judgment commands that the order or decision be set aside, it may order the reconsideration of the case in light of the court’s opinion and judgment and may order respondent to take such further action as is specially enjoined upon it by law, but the judgment shall not limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in the respondent. (Emphasis added.) Draft Proposed Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) No Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

These allegations fail to state facts constituting an actual controversy under a written instrument so as to maintain a claim for declaratory relief as to the Burbank property.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

A new proposed judgment clarifying the judgment to be entered against each defendant should be submitted. ANALYSIS Yes (7/8/20; Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.) 9/9/20)_________ See above Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).)

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

Zhao (KC070595) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

., “Security Deposit Accounting has been applied to rent due from the date after vacate and through end of the Lease term. No portion remains”) and provide such accounting. ANALYSIS Yes (12/5/19) Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.) Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) N/A Summary of the case.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

PTN OF RONALD WULFERDINGER

File a verified declaration to state names, current addresses and relationships of all persons entitled to receive notice. LR 7.112 3. File a verified declaration to clarify whether notice is needed or required to Veterans Administration, Director of State Hospitals and Director of Developmental Services 4. Have a Judicial Council Form Notice of Hearing and copy of petition mailed to all persons entitled to receive notice and file a Proof of Service with court. 5.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CHANHO C. JOO, APC, DBA LAW OFFICES OF CHANHO JOO VS HONGYE LLC, DBA SPA RENAISSANCE, ET AL.

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s request for entry of default judgment is GRANTED. Default judgment is entered in the amount of $67,304.02, consisting of $60,427.90 in damages, $6,291.12 in pre-judgment interest, and $585.00 in costs. Plaintiff must e-file a corrected proposed judgment at least 2 court days before the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

MATTER OF YVETTE DEROUEN FIGUEROA

HARRIS THE VIRGINIA RAGAN TRUST DATED PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Verified declaration by petitioner to state whether notice was given, or needed, to Dept. of Health Care Services as to predeceased spouse. PrC § 215, 9202(a); i.e., did predeceased spouse receive Medi-Cal benefits? CAROLYN B FEREIRA RICHARD HOBIN MARY LOU SHIVELY

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N ON FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR

Specifically, calculation must begin with date of death values and must state any loss on sale as relates to maximum statutory fees allowable. Regrettably, this was not included in prior tentative ruling. 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to include current address of Tina Hosford so court can confirm mailing. Proof of Service attached to Notice filed 9-4-2020 reflects mailing Amendment to her at an address other than that listed in petition. 3.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

JUAN PALMA ET AL VS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC ET AL

On December 1, 2017, SARH filed a cross-complaint, asserting causes of action against Cross-Defendants Aviation West Charters, LLC, dba Angel Medflight World Wide Air Ambulance (“Aviation”) and Roes 1-100 for: On April 26, 2018, the court granted KFHPI’s motion for summary judgment and granted KFH’s and SCPMG’s respective motions for summary adjudication of the third cause of action. On December 5, 2018, a Notice of Settlement was filed as between Plaintiffs and KFH, SCPMG, KFHPI and Shah.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

ROBERT HULL VS WILLIAM G. GILLESPIE, ET AL.

Denhart also demurs to the fourth cause of action therein, on the basis that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The hearing on the demurrer will be CONTINUED to November 10, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 128; 430.41[1].)

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

MATTER OF THE JOSEPH LEE REVOCABLE TRUST

Verified declaration by petitioner to state names, current addresses and relationships of all persons entitled to receive notice. LR 7.112 3. Proposed Order Note: Verified Response and Objection filed by Trustee Song Jong Pisimata 12-28-18.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ALEXANDRO FILIPPINI, ET AL. V. SANTA BARBARA COTTAGE HOSPITAL, INC., ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Motions Summary Judgment (3) Tentative

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. SUMMERLAND MARKET, INC., ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion for Separate Trials Tentative...

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY VS. ALAI

Defendant Nili N. Alai, M.D.’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Defendant Nili N. Alai, M.D. (“Alai”) moves for the court to reconsider its February 24, 2020, order denying Alai’s anti-SLAPP motion. However, Alai has not presented any new or different facts, circumstances, or law that would require a different result. (See CCP § 1008(a).) ...

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

ALONZO VS. NUWAVE, LLC

Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication filed by Carrie L. Alonzo on 5/26/20 Moot; Per Moving Party case has settled.

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

PISMO BEACH SELF-STORAGE, L.P. V. CITY OF PISMO BEACH, ET AL.

Of course, Government Code section 66001(b) does not state that Section 1094.5 applies. And Petitioner does not address the unavoidable fact that the criteria set forth in Section 194.5(a) (including a hearing, presentation of evidence, and findings of fact) are not present in this case. As to Petitioner’s reliance on Garrick, supra, 3 Cal.App.4th 320, the fees at issue in that case were also reviewed under traditional mandate.

  • Hearing

    Sep 26, 2020

JP WILSON FAMILY LLC ET AL VS ROBERT SHUMAKE ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Vacate Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

RE: PET’N TO APPROVE PMT OF COMPENSATION TO COUNSEL

Note: Petition to Approve Settlement Agreement; Request to Vacate the Trial Currently Set For September 25, 2020, is set for 11-12-2020. EDWARD CHARLES GARNER KATHLEEN NEWSOM DAVID A. BROWN LINDA L GARNER LINDA L. GARNER MARTHA GILSON DAVID G KNITTER MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY GINA D. BOER VALERIE ANNE FERREIRA CHARLES A. TRIAY VALERIE FERREIRA HOWARD E. KANE WILLIAM MICHAEL NORTON CHARLES A. TRIAY WILLIAM MICHAEL NORTON HOWARD E. KANE

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ANNA BENEDETTI, ET AL. VS JOHNNY MIMS, ET AL.

State your name at the beginning of all statements. Do not speak directly to other counsel without permission of court. Do not interrupt or attempt to speak over another speaker. Do not announce your presence until called by your name or case name. Take a deep breath frequently so that the court may interrupt your presentation, if necessary. (The system does not default to the court unless you are placed on mute by the court or go silent or mute on you own.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.