The Code of Civil Procedure, section 473(b) provides the court with discretionary and mandatory authority to relieve a party from default.
The Code provides that “[t]he court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.... Notwithstanding any other requirements of this section, the court shall, whenever an application for relief is made no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an attorney’s sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect, vacate any (1) resulting default entered by the clerk against his or her client, and which will result in entry of a default judgment, or (2) resulting default judgment or dismissal entered against his or her client, unless the court finds that the default or dismissal was not in fact caused by the attorney's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect.” Code of Civ. Proc., § 473(b).
Under Code of Civil Procedure § 473(b), a motion to vacate a default under this discretionary section cannot be brought more than six months after the entry of default. Smith v. Pelton Water Wheel Co. (1907) 151 Cal. 394, 397, 90 P. 934; Schwartz v. Smookler (1962) 202 Cal.App.2d 76, 81, 20 Cal.Rptr. 507; Stevenson v. Turner (1979) 94 Cal.App.3d 315, 318; Weiss v. Blumencranc (1976) 61 Cal.App.3d 536, 541. “The six-month period runs from entry of default, not entry of judgment.” Manson, Iver & York v. Black (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 36, 42 (citation omitted).
As to mandatory relief, section 473(b) provides that mandatory relief whenever an application for relief is made no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an attorney's sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect. This mandatory provision only applies to mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect by counsel and not the party himself or herself. Lang v. Hochman (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248 (“We determine that where the parties to a lawsuit have contributed to a default or dismissal, they are not entitled to relief pursuant to subdivision (b) of section 473”). Further, unlike the discretionary relief whereby the six-month time frame begins to run at entry of default and not default judgment, the time frame under the mandatory prong of section 473(b) begins to run at the time of entry of default judgment. Sugasawara v. Newland (1994) 27 Cal.App.4t 294, 296-97.
If the Court “could not set aside the default, it also could not set aside the default judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, because that would be ‘an idle act.’” Pulte Homes Corp. v. Williams Mech., Inc. (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 267, 273.
If the party does not reply in time, Civil Code, section 473.5 may apply:
Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 473.5(a),(b).
Thus, the defendant must demonstrate that he lacked “actual notice” “in time to defend the action and a default or default judgment has been entered against him” in this action. (Id. § 473.5(a).)
Code of Civil Procedure, section 473(d) addresses court errors:
The court may, upon motion of the injured party, or its own motion, correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed, and may, on motion of either party after notice to the other party, set aside any void judgment or order.
“It is not open to question that a court has the inherent power to correct clerical errors in its records so as to make these records reflect the true facts.” People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185 (citations omitted).
Defendant filed the instant motion to vacate default judgment on October 5, 2018. Plaintiff filed its opposition on November 13, 2018. To date, no reply has been filed. Defendant moves pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 473, subdivision (b) on the grounds of excusable neglect.
Nov 29, 2018
Personal Injury/ Tort
Auto
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
Motion to Set Aside Default, Vacate Default Judgment and Stay Execution of Judgment Appearance required.
Nov 28, 2018
Merced County, CA
Motion to Set Aside Default, Vacate Default Judgment and Stay Execution of Judgment Appearance required.
Nov 28, 2018
Merced County, CA
Motion: By Plaintiff to set aside/vacate default judgment Tentative Ruling: To deny the motion on various grounds. See infra. To continue the hearing to December 12, 2018 at 3:30 p.m. in Dept. 403 to allow the tentative ruling to be mailed to the Plaintiff. Explanation: Background Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at Mule Creek State Prison. While he was incarcerated at Pleasant Valley State Prison, he filed a Complaint on March 9, 2015.
Nov 27, 2018
Personal Injury/ Tort
other
Fresno County, CA
On October 3, 2018, Silverberg filed a Motion to Vacate Default Judgment (the “Motion”) under CCP § 473.5. Plaintiff filed its opposition on November 9. II. Legal Standard “When service of a summons has not resulted in actual notice to a party in time to defend the action and a default or default judgment has been entered against him or her in the action, he or she may serve and file a notice of motion to set aside the default or default judgment and for leave to defend the action.
Nov 27, 2018
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
The six-month period within which to bring a Motion to vacate default judgment runs from the date of the default, and not the judgment taken thereafter. (Rutan v. Summit Sports, Inc. (1985) 173 Cal.App.3d 965, 970.) Since this motion was filed within 180 days of the entry of default, it is timely and will be considered on the merits. Defendant first argues that the Default Judgment in this matter was improper because she never received valid service of the Complaint.
Nov 21, 2018
Real Property
Landlord Tenant
Los Angeles County, CA
Motion to Vacate Default Judgment Appearance required.
Nov 15, 2018
Merced County, CA
Defendant Marley Kate Rizzuti’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is granted. Background On August 23, 2017, Plaintiff Alyssa Pizer dba Alyssa Pizer Management, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Marley Kate Rizzuti (“Defendant”). Default was entered against Defendant on December 27, 2017, and default judgment was entered against Defendant on June 15, 2018. On September 4, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Vacate Default Judgment (the “Motion”).
Nov 15, 2018
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
Defendant Shalom Rubanowitz’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is denied. Discussion Plaintiff White, Zuckerman, Warsavsky, Luna & Hunt, LLP (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action for breach of contract against Defendant Shalom Rubanowitz (“Defendant”) on December 20, 2017. Following Defendant’s failure to appear, the court entered default on April 13, 2018, and default judgment on May 16, 2018. Defendant filed the instant motion to vacate default judgment on October 19, 2018.
Nov 14, 2018
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
Defendant Angus Delroy, Jr.’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is CONTINUED to January 3, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 94. Defendant to file supplemental papers and evidence to address the defects identified herein and serve them as required by CCP § 1005—service by mail must be made at least 21 days before the continued hearing date above. Plaintiff may file a response and Defendant may file a reply thereto within the times prescribed by Section 1005. I.
Nov 06, 2018
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
Restivo's Motion to Vacate Default Judgment. CCP § 473. Defendant persuasively argues that this motion should be granted per CCP section 473.5 on the grounds that the summons and complaint was never served and because the judgment in this case was discharged in bankruptcy on 12-15-11.
Nov 01, 2018
Ventura County, CA
Based on the foregoing, Defendant’s motion to vacate default judgment is continued to January 10, 2019 at 8:30 am in Department 94. Defendant is ordered to file a declaration in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 2015.5, and that addresses sub-service of the Second Amended General Order.
Nov 01, 2018
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
Arroyo v Younis Defendant Emad Younis’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is CONTINUED to December 20, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 94. Defendant is ordered to (1) file a propose answer and (2) supplemental evidence and declarations to adress the “reasonable time” issue. The supplemental documents must be served on Plaintiff pursuant to CCP § 1005; that is, at least 16 court days before the next hearing date.
Oct 30, 2018
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
Defendant Armando D’Avila moves to vacate default judgment upon the equitable grounds of extrinsic fraud or mistake. Defendant concedes that CCP § 473.5 does not apply because the motion is brought over three years after entry of default judgment.
Oct 29, 2018
Los Angeles County, CA
Motion to Set Aside Default and Vacate Default Judgment Appearance required.
Oct 29, 2018
Merced County, CA
Yeliazyan’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is DENIED. I. Background In 2017, Plaintiff Jarvis Dean (“Plaintiff”) filed this action for alleged civil rights violation against Defendant Aram K. Yeliazyan (“Defendant”). Default was entered against Defendant on June 14, 2017, and default judgment was entered against Defendant on January 11, 2018. On September 7, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Vacate Default Judgment (the “Motion”) under CCP § 473(b). On September 27, Plaintiff filed an opposition.
Oct 24, 2018
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
North Mill Equipment Finance v Badalyan MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT Calendar: 6 Case No: EC066126 Hearing Date: 10/12/18 Action Filed: 12/6/16 Trial: Not set MP: Defendant Susanna Badalyan RP: Plaintiff North Mill Equipment Finance LLC ALLEGATIONS IN COMPLAINT: Plaintiff North Mill Equipment Finance LLC alleges Defendant Artak Badalyan (individually and dba AAT) breached two written loan agreements that were secured by a tractor and trailer.
Oct 12, 2018
Los Angeles County, CA
TENTATIVE RULING # 4: DEFENDANT HANNA SCHAEFER’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT AND VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT HANNAH SCHAEFER IS TO FILE AN ORIGINAL, EXECUTED RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT AND SERVE A COPY OF THE RESPONSE ON PLAINTIFF. NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD (LEWIS V.
Oct 11, 2018
El Dorado County, CA
HEARING ON MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT FILED BY JESSICA BASINGER * TENTATIVE RULING: * Appear.
Oct 04, 2018
Contra Costa County, CA
Defendant Mark Varela’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. I. Background On July 3, 2017, Plaintiff Westlake Services, LLC dba Westlake Financial Services (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Mark Varela (“Defendant”). Default was entered against Defendant on February 5, 2018, and default judgment was entered against Defendant on February 28, 2018. On August 23, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Vacate Default Judgment (the “Motion”). II.
Oct 03, 2018
Contract
Breach
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
Motion to Set Aside Default and Vacate Default Judgment Appearance required.
Oct 03, 2018
Merced County, CA
On September 4, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Vacate Default Judgment (the “Motion”). II. Discussion The Court notes that Defendant is requesting an order to vacate only the default judgment—not including the entry of default. (Notice of Motion p. 1; Motion p. 4.) If the Court “could not set aside the default, it also could not set aside the default judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, because that would be ‘an idle act.’” (Pulte Homes Corporation v.
Oct 02, 2018
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
On February 9, 2018, Aalam filed a Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Vacate Default Judgment (the “Motion”). On April 6, 2018, Plaintiff filed an opposition (labeled as Declaration of Ali R. Moghaddami). Aalam twice filed his reply on April 20 and 25, 2018. The reply papers appear to be the same; the Court considers the April 25 reply in lieu of the April 20 reply.
Oct 01, 2018
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
MOTION FOR SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT Set for hearing on Wednesday September 19, 2018, Line 1, PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK's MOTION FOR SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT The Court grants Plaintiff Capital One Bank's unopposed motion to set aside default and vacate default judgment and dismiss action without prejudice.
Sep 19, 2018
San Francisco County, CA
Defendant Aviance Jones’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is DENIED. I. Background The Court entered default judgment in favor of Plaintiff Ford Motor Credit Co. (“Plaintiff”) and against Defendant Aviance Jones (“Defendant”) on November 21, 2000. On August 21, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Vacate Default Judgment (the “Motion”) under the CCP §§ 473(b) and 473.5. II.
Sep 19, 2018
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.