The Code of Civil Procedure, section 473(b) provides the court with discretionary and mandatory authority to relieve a party from default.
The Code provides that “[t]he court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.... Notwithstanding any other requirements of this section, the court shall, whenever an application for relief is made no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an attorney’s sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect, vacate any (1) resulting default entered by the clerk against his or her client, and which will result in entry of a default judgment, or (2) resulting default judgment or dismissal entered against his or her client, unless the court finds that the default or dismissal was not in fact caused by the attorney's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect.” Code of Civ. Proc., § 473(b).
Under Code of Civil Procedure § 473(b), a motion to vacate a default under this discretionary section cannot be brought more than six months after the entry of default. Smith v. Pelton Water Wheel Co. (1907) 151 Cal. 394, 397, 90 P. 934; Schwartz v. Smookler (1962) 202 Cal.App.2d 76, 81, 20 Cal.Rptr. 507; Stevenson v. Turner (1979) 94 Cal.App.3d 315, 318; Weiss v. Blumencranc (1976) 61 Cal.App.3d 536, 541. “The six-month period runs from entry of default, not entry of judgment.” Manson, Iver & York v. Black (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 36, 42 (citation omitted).
As to mandatory relief, section 473(b) provides that mandatory relief whenever an application for relief is made no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an attorney's sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect. This mandatory provision only applies to mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect by counsel and not the party himself or herself. Lang v. Hochman (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248 (“We determine that where the parties to a lawsuit have contributed to a default or dismissal, they are not entitled to relief pursuant to subdivision (b) of section 473”). Further, unlike the discretionary relief whereby the six-month time frame begins to run at entry of default and not default judgment, the time frame under the mandatory prong of section 473(b) begins to run at the time of entry of default judgment. Sugasawara v. Newland (1994) 27 Cal.App.4t 294, 296-97.
If the Court “could not set aside the default, it also could not set aside the default judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, because that would be ‘an idle act.’” Pulte Homes Corp. v. Williams Mech., Inc. (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 267, 273.
If the party does not reply in time, Civil Code, section 473.5 may apply:
Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 473.5(a),(b).
Thus, the defendant must demonstrate that he lacked “actual notice” “in time to defend the action and a default or default judgment has been entered against him” in this action. (Id. § 473.5(a).)
Code of Civil Procedure, section 473(d) addresses court errors:
The court may, upon motion of the injured party, or its own motion, correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed, and may, on motion of either party after notice to the other party, set aside any void judgment or order.
“It is not open to question that a court has the inherent power to correct clerical errors in its records so as to make these records reflect the true facts.” People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185 (citations omitted).
Motion to Vacate Default Judgment and Set Aside Default TENTATIVE RULING The motion is granted based upon an attorney affidavit of default. The Court exercises its discretion to grant relief based upon “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” Relief is conditioned upon the following: Defendant’s actual answer must be filed (i.e. not merely lodged as it is now) within ten court days of the hearing on this motion.
Oct 17, 2019
Solano County, CA
Motion to Vacate Default Judgment and Set Aside Default TENTATIVE RULING The motion is granted based upon an attorney affidavit of default. The Court exercises its discretion to grant relief based upon “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” Relief is conditioned upon the following: Defendant’s actual answer must be filed (i.e. not merely lodged as it is now) within ten court days of the hearing on this motion.
Oct 17, 2019
Solano County, CA
Garabedian, et al MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT (CCP § 473.5) TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant Sevag Garabedian’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 13, 2019 AT 19:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 94. ANALYSIS: In October 2002, Plaintiff Providian National Bank (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action against Defendant Sevag Garabedian (“Defendant”). Following Defendant’s failure to file a responsive pleading, the court entered his default and default judgment.
Oct 02, 2019
James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo
Los Angeles County, CA
Defendant Grace Su’s MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT Responding Party: Plaintiff, Xiaomin Xing. 2. Defendant Meiguo Investment Group, LLC’s MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT Responding Party: Plaintiff, Xiaomin Xing. Tentative Ruling 1. Defendant Grace Su’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is DENIED. 2. Defendant Meiguo Investment Group, LLC’s Motion to Vacate Default and Default Judgment is DENIED.
Sep 27, 2019
Personal Injury/ Tort
Fraud
Los Angeles County, CA
MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT (CCP § 473(b)) TENATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is GRANTED. ANALYSIS: On March 28, 2011, Plaintiff Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant collections action against Defendant Francisco M. Perez (“Defendant”). Default was entered on June 7, 2011, and default judgment was entered on June 9, 2011.
Sep 23, 2019
James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo
Los Angeles County, CA
Defendants Sepehr Khanian, Steven Hall, Parliament Financial Group, Summit Research Firm, Incorporated, and Nationwide Consumer Solutions’ Motion to Set Aside and Vacate Default Judgment – GRANTED, and unopposed. The Court finds that the moving Defendants have submitted sufficient evidence to entitle them to the relief requested. The default judgment entered against them shall be set aside. CV-18-004241 – FLORES, SYLVIA VS.
Sep 18, 2019
Stanislaus County, CA
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO SET ASIDE — DEFAULT AND VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT [DEFT] MILTON A. PACAS RULlNG Defendant’s motion to set aside default and default judgment is denied, Defendant has not made a showing of mistake. His statement that he did not have time to respond does not support a finding that he was mistaken as to his duty to respond. Rather, it indicates he knew he needed to respond but did not do so.
Sep 13, 2019
Marin County, CA
Motion to Set Aside Default and Vacate Default Judgment Appearance required.
Sep 03, 2019
Merced County, CA
TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant Tsendeekhuu Ganbaatar dba A & B Auto Electric’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is GRANTED. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (d), the entry of default and default judgment are hereby vacated. ANALYSIS: On October 18, 2017, Plaintiff Moris Sakhai (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Tsendeekhuu Ganbaatar dba A & B Auto Electric (“Defendant”).
Aug 26, 2019
James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo
Los Angeles County, CA
Medline Management Corp. v Braga Motion to Vacate Default Judgment Calendar: 06 Case No.: 19BBCV00535 Hearing Date: August 23, 2019 Action Filed: June 18, 2019 Trial Date: Not Set MP: Defendants Lifetouch Care, Inc.; Perfecto Braga RP: N/A ALLEGATIONS: The instant action is a commercial unlawful detainer action arising out of Defendants Lifetouch Care, Inc.
Aug 23, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is DENIED. (ROA 21.) Plaintiff is not seeking to vacate a default judgment and resume litigation, but to amend a final judgment. Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b) does not authorize such relief. Further, Plaintiff has not cited sufficient legal authority for the court to conclude it has jurisdiction to amend judgment under the circumstances presented here.
Aug 22, 2019
Collections
Collections
San Diego County, CA
Although reserved as a Motion to Vacate Default Judgment, Plaintiff appears to be requesting default judgment against Defendants. The Motion, however, is procedurally defective in a number of respects. First, as default has not been entered against Defendants, the request for default judgment is premature. (Code Civ. Proc., § 585, subd. (a).) Additionally, Plaintiff has not demonstrated service of the instant motion on Defendants as required by due process. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 1005.)
Aug 22, 2019
James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo
Los Angeles County, CA
(KC070456) _____________________________________________ Defendant Grace Su’s MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT Responding Party: Plaintiff, Xiaomin Xing. Tentative Ruling Defendant Grace Su’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is DENIED.
Aug 16, 2019
Personal Injury/ Tort
Fraud
Los Angeles County, CA
., ¶12.)[1] On July 9, 2019, the Court of Appeal denied Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss as to Defendant’s appeal of the motion to vacate default judgment, but granted the motion as to Plaintiff’s motion to compel, such that there was no longer a stay as to the motion to compel. (Id., ¶16.) Finally, Mr. Ganji states that on July 26, 2019, his office served supplemental responses to Plaintiff’s requests for production—which he states was done shortly after the Court of Appeal’s July 9, 2019 decision.
Aug 16, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Defendant Soonyoung Walsh's Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is granted. Defendant shall file her proposed answer on or before August 30, 2019. Plaintiff's request attorney's fees is denied.
Aug 15, 2019
Contract
Breach
San Diego County, CA
Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment Appearance required.
Aug 09, 2019
Merced County, CA
On May 14, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 26, 2019 order with respect to Defendant’s motion to set aside default and vacate default judgment.
Aug 02, 2019
Personal Injury/ Tort
Fraud
Los Angeles County, CA
MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT (CCP § 473(d)) TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant Mark Varela’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is GRANTED. SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT: Action for breach of automobile purchase agreement. OPPOSITION: Filed on January 24, 2019. REPLY: Filed on February 14, 2019. ANALYSIS: On July 3, 2017, Plaintiff Westlake Services, LLC dba Westlake Financial Services (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Mark Varela (“Defendant”).
Jul 29, 2019
James E. Blancarte or Wendy Chang
Los Angeles County, CA
On May 31, 2018, the court denied Judgment Debtors’ Motion to Vacate Default Judgment. Judgment Creditor filed the instant motion for attorneys’ fees on April 8, 2019. To date, no opposition has been filed. Code of Civil Procedure section 685.040 states: “The judgment creditor is entitled to the reasonable and necessary costs of enforcing a judgment. Attorney's fees incurred in enforcing a judgment are not included in costs collectible under this title unless otherwise provided by law.
Jul 29, 2019
James E. Blancarte or Wendy Chang
Los Angeles County, CA
RELIEF REQUESTED: Vacate default judgment in this action FACTUAL BACKGROUND: Plaintiffs Ruben Sandoval and New Harvest Christian Fellowship allege that while they were lessees of premises located in Alhambra, and using the property for religious services, church offices, and related activities, the owner and lessor of the premises, defendant Ethel Valley, LLC, forcibly entered the property without permission, changed the locks, and retained plaintiffs’ personal property.
Jul 26, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT (CCP § 473(b)) TENATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 23, 2019 AT 9:00 AM IN DEPARTMENT 94. ANALYSIS: On June 12, 2009, Plaintiff Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant collections action against Defendant Akop Torosyan (“Defendant”). Default was entered on May 12, 2010, and default judgment was entered on May 18, 2010.
Jul 25, 2019
James E. Blancarte or Wendy Chang
Los Angeles County, CA
MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT (CCP § 473(b)) TENATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 23, 2019 AT 9:00 AM IN DEPARTMENT 94. ANALYSIS: On March 28, 2011, Plaintiff Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant collections action against Defendant Francisco M. Perez (“Defendant”). Default was entered on June 7, 2011, and default judgment was entered on June 9, 2011.
Jul 25, 2019
James E. Blancarte or Wendy Chang
Los Angeles County, CA
The court having granted Defendant Timothy Grady’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment on May 30, 2019, hereby AWARDS PLAINTIFF EDGAR RENTERIA ATTORNEY’S FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,562.50. Plaintiff Edgar Renteria’s separate Motion for Attorneys’ Fees is PLACED OFF CALENDAR. I. Background Plaintiff Edgar Renteria (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action for discrimination on the basis of disability against Defendant Timothy Grady (“Defendant”) on January 22, 2016.
Jul 23, 2019
James E. Blancarte or Wendy Chang
Los Angeles County, CA
The court having granted Defendant Timothy Grady’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment on May 30, 2019, hereby AWARDS PLAINTIFF EDGAR RENTERIA ATTORNEY’S FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,500.00. Plaintiff Edgar Renteria’s separate Motion for Attorneys’ Fees is PLACED OFF CALENDAR. I. Background Plaintiff Edgar Renteria (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action for discrimination on the basis of disability against Defendant Timothy Grady (“Defendant”) on January 22, 2016.
Jul 23, 2019
James E. Blancarte or Wendy Chang
Los Angeles County, CA
Motion to Set Aside Defendant Tammy Metzger’s Application to Set Aside and Vacate Default Judgment and Default under C.C.P. § 473(b) is Denied. Ms. Metzger seeks discretionary relief based on a showing of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect under C.C.P. § 473(b). However, a motion for relief from default under C.C.P. § 473(b) must be made within a reasonable time after discovery of the default, and the moving party must show reasonable diligence in seeking such relief. (See e.g.
Jul 19, 2019
Orange County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.