What is a Motion to Transfer Venue?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Transfer Venue

Recent Rulings on Motion to Transfer Venue

RHENEA SINGH VS 7-ELEVEN INC., ET AL.

.: 19STCV46965 [TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. July 2, 2020 Plaintiff, Rhenea Singh filed this action against Defendants, 7-Eleven, Inc., Martiza Sura, and 1208 Tennessee, Inc. for damages arising out of a trip and fall.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

JOSE MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ VS JOSEPH H. HABRA TRUST, ET AL.

The accident occurred in Orange County, so Defendant moves to transfer venue to Orange County. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion, so the motion is granted. (See Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.) Defendant shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: July 1, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS. DAVID WALKER

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE [PLTF] AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK RULlNG After filing this collection action based on a “bad address” for defendant in San Rafael, Plaintiff located and served defendant with summons and complaint in the City of Davis, Yolo County Plaintiff s motion to transfer venue to Yolo County is DENIED. (Code Cive Proc. § 396a(b).)

  • Hearing

    Jun 30, 2020

CHARLES MENDOZA, ET AL. VS FCA US, LLC, ET AL.

20STCV05524 CHARLES MENDOZA vs FCA US, LLC Defendants FCA US, LLC and Redlands Automotive Sales, Inc’s Motion to Transfer Venue TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to transfer and request for sanctions is DENIED. Defendants filed their answers in this matter without filing a motion to transfer venue. Therefore, whether to transfer this action at this late date is within the court’s discretion. Walt Disney Parks & Resorts U.S., Inc. (2018) 21 Cal.App.5th 872, 876.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

ASHLEY PARTAIN, ET AL. VS PARDEEP KUMAR, ET AL.

On 5/18/20, Defendants filed this motion to transfer venue. They contend the accident occurred in Contra Costa County, and all of the defendants reside in Contra Costa County; they therefore conclude venue is improper in Los Angeles County and should be transferred to Contra Costa County. The motion is unopposed. The Court is concerned, however, about the proof of service of the moving papers.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

: ok (motion to transfer venue denied 2/28/20) RELIEF REQUESTED: Strike the action CAUSES OF ACTION: From Complaint 1) Violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code § 51 et seq.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

CAROL MAYNARD VS LISA CRANE, M.D., ET AL.

Now, Defendant moves to transfer venue to Orange County. A plaintiff may file a personal injury action in the county where any defendant resides, or the county where the injury occurred. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 395, subd. (a).) In this case, Defendant proffers evidence that she lives and works in Orange County. (Declaration of Lisa Crane, M.D., ¶¶ 2, 4-5.) Defendant also proffers evidence that the surgery occurred at St. Joseph Orange in Orange County, California.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

ASHLEY PARTAIN, ET AL. VS PARDEEP KUMAR, ET AL.

On 5/18/20, Defendants filed this motion to transfer venue. They contend the accident occurred in Contra Costa County, and all of the defendants reside in Contra Costa County; they therefore conclude venue is improper in Los Angeles County and should be transferred to Contra Costa County. The motion is unopposed. The Court is concerned, however, about the proof of service of the moving papers.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

PERLA MAGENO VS SOUTH PHILLY FOODS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

: ok (motion to transfer venue denied 2/28/20) RELIEF REQUESTED: Strike the action CAUSES OF ACTION: From Complaint 1) Violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code § 51 et seq.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Discrimination/Harass

CONSERVATORSHIP OF MAURI FRESCO

Nature of Proceedings: (1) Petition to Transfer Venue (2) Status of 1st Accounting

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2020

CONSERVATORSHIP OF MAURI FRESCO

Nature of Proceedings: (1) Petition to Transfer Venue (2) Status of 1st Accounting Absent objection, the Petition to Transfer to Vetntura County is granted. In light of granting of such Petition, the Accounting is off calendar.

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2020

MCPHERSON RANE LLP VS MARK TOWLE

Towle also moves to transfer venue of this case to the County of Riverside.[1] Plaintiff opposes. Motion to Quash Writ When a judgment is vacated, it “cannot be effective for any purpose,” and thus it is proper to recall and quash a writ of execution based on such ineffective judgment. ((Stegge v. Wilkerson (1961) 189 Cal.App.2d 1, 5.) Here, because the default judgment entered against Towle was vacated, the writ of execution is properly quashed. However, Towle also seeks the return of his levied funds.

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2020

GUSTAVO ANTONIO RUIZ, ET AL. VS JACQUELINE PACE

Motion to Transfer Venue Analysis Defendant requests to transfer venue within the same County of Los Angeles but at the Governor Deukmejian Courthouse located in Long Beach where Defendant resides and the property at issue is located. The Court finds that such request to transfer within the same county is unsupported by the statute or case law.

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

IREANA PRICE VS THERESA ANN RYNDERS

Defendant asks the Court to transfer venue to Sacramento County. Plaintiff does not argue either Sacramento County or San Joaquin County is the proper venue. As such, this action is properly transferred to Sacramento County. Defendant asked Plaintiff whether Plaintiff would stipulate to transfer venue multiple times to no avail. (Singh Decl., ¶¶ 3-9, Exh. B-G.) There is no evidence showing Plaintiff’s designation of Los Angeles County was made in good faith.

  • Hearing

    Jun 22, 2020

DOE VS. JUAREZ-HERNANDEZ

The unopposed Motion by Defendant Wendy Juarez-Hernandez to Transfer Venue is DENIED without prejudice. Defendant did not serve Plaintiff Doe with the motion papers as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 396b(a). Defendant to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jun 19, 2020

EDNA MILLER VS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ET AL

The motion to transfer venue is DENIED. Request for Protective Order This matter was set for hearing in Department 47 based on the request for an order transferring venue. (See Local Rule 1.05.) Plaintiff's request for a protective order seeks a distinct and separate form of relief from a request to transfer venue and must therefore be brought in a separate motion. Further, requests for a protective order are not among the list of proceedings heard by the Presiding Judge. (Local Rule 1.05.)

  • Hearing

    Jun 17, 2020

OROVILLE DAM CASES

Butte County DA's motion to sever and remand (improperly entitled a Motion to Transfer Venue) is hereby DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Jun 16, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

ROBERT STEVENS V. MICHELLE KALISH

On November 12, 2019, this Court granted Defendant’s motion to transfer venue to Santa Clara County and served its ruling on Motion to Transfer Venue on both parties. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 395, 397.) On December 3, 2019, Defendant’s counsel served Plaintiff’s counsel with the Notice of Entry of the Court’s Judgment. (RFJN, Ex. B; Martire Decl., ¶ 45.)

  • Hearing

    Jun 16, 2020

CAL-CARE INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL SYSTEMS VS. PRO ACTIVE WORK HEALTH SERVICES

Motion No. 1: Defendant Proactive Work Health Services, Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Los Angeles County Superior Court is GRANTED. Pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., § 399 (a), Plaintiff shall pay the transfer costs within thirty (30) days. . Code Civ. Proc., § 397 (a) provides that “The court may, on motion, change the place of trial in the following cases . . . When the court designated in the complaint is not the proper court.” It appears that the Complaint was mistakenly filed in the wrong court.

  • Hearing

    Jun 15, 2020

JOHN E, PIZZI, ET AL VS. WINDSOR BICYCLE CENTER, LLC, ET AL

When the individual defendant moved to transfer the action to his county of residence rather than the county in which the contract was allegedly executed, to be performed, and breached, the trial court denied the motion to transfer venue, and the Court of Appeal affirmed The Lebastchz’ court found that “. . .

  • Hearing

    Jun 03, 2020

ERIC ALSTON VS. MCCORMICK BARSTOW LLP

The motion to transfer venue to Fresno County is granted. As the grounds for transfer are based on the commencement of the action in an improper court, Plaintiff shall pay transfer fees. (Code Civ. Proc. § 399(a).) This case has been assigned to Department 47 for hearing. In the event that either party requests a hearing the matter will be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 47.

  • Hearing

    Jun 02, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CONSERVATORSHIP OF ALTHEA NOCAS

Please submit this accounting as soon as possible so that it may be reviewed before the Court determines whether to transfer venue of this case to San Luis Obispo County. When a hearing date becomes available, the Court will set that hearing and notify the parties.

  • Hearing

    Apr 14, 2020

ESMERALDA YVONNE ELIAS VS MARIA LOPEZ

.: BC721216 [TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. March 18, 2020 Plaintiff, Esemrelda Yvonne Elias filed this action against Defendant, Maria Lopez for damages arising out of an automobile accident. At this time, Defendant moves to transfer venue to San Bernardino County. Defendant provides evidence that the accident occurred in San Bernardino County, and she resides in San Bernardino County.

  • Hearing

    Mar 18, 2020

OTAY LAKES LP VS MOLLER OTAY LAKES INVESTMENT LLC

Defendant's motion to transfer venue is held in abeyance, pending any action by the Orange County court. The minute order is the order of the Court. Defendant is directed to serve notice on all parties within 2 court days of this ruling.

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CEM BMALKI, ET AL. VS MICHEL HIMY, ET AL.

3/11/20 Dept. 73 Rafael Ongkeko, Judge presiding CEM BMALKI, et al. vs MICHEL HIMY, et al. (19STCV33551) Counsel for Plaintiffs: Armen Papazian Counsel for Defendants: Robert Steele MOTION OF DEFENDANT INTERNATIONAL LAUNDRY LLC FOR AN ORDER TO TRANSFER VENUE OF THIS ACTION TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND REQUEST FOR AWARD OF SANCTIONS (filed 12/11/19) TENTATIVE RULING Defendant International Laundry, LLC’s Motion to Transfer Venue is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Mar 11, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 78     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.