“[A] prevailing party is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action or proceeding.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1032(4)(b).) However, the non-prevailing party can dispute the costs listed in the prevailing party's costs memorandum by filing a motion to tax costs.
The “prevailing party” includes “the party with a net monetary recovery, a defendant in whose favor a dismissal is entered, a defendant where neither plaintiff nor defendant obtains any relief, and a defendant as against those plaintiffs who do not recover any relief against that defendant. If any party recovers other than monetary relief and in situations other than as specified, the 'prevailing party' shall be as determined by the court, and under those circumstances, the court, in its discretion, may allow costs or not and, if allowed, may apportion costs between the parties on the same or adverse sides pursuant to rules adopted under Section 1034.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1032(4).)
On a motion to tax costs, “[i]f the items appearing in a cost bill appear to be proper charges, the burden is on the party seeking to tax costs to show that they were not reasonable or necessary. On the other hand, if the items are properly objected to, they are put in issue and the burden of proof is on the party claiming them as costs. Whether a cost item was reasonably necessary to the litigation presents a question of fact for the trial court and its decision is reviewed for abuse of discretion. However, because the right to costs is governed strictly by statute a court has no discretion to award costs not statutorily authorized.” (Ladas v. Cal. State Auto. Assn. (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 761, 774.)
“Unless objection is made to the entire cost memorandum, the motion to strike or tax costs must refer to each item objected to by the same number and appear in the same order as the corresponding cost item claimed on the memorandum of costs and must state why the item is objectionable.” (Cal. Rules of Court 3.1700(2).) “There is no requirement that copies of bills, invoices, statements, or any other such documents be attached to the memorandum. Only if the costs have been put in issue via a motion to tax costs must supporting documentation be submitted.” (Jones v. Dumrichob (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1258, 1267.)
Code of Civil Procedure section 1033.5, subdivision (a) sets forth items that are allowable as costs. Allowable costs under Section 1033.5 must be “reasonably necessary to the conduct of this litigation rather than merely convenient or beneficial to its preparation” and “reasonable in amount.” Any items “not mentioned in this section and items assessed upon application may be allowed or denied in the court's discretion.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5(16)(c)(2), (3), and (4).)
“The court’s first determination, therefore, is whether the statute expressly allows the item, and whether it appears proper on its face. If so, the burden is on the objecting party to show them to be unnecessary or unreasonable.” (Nelson v. Anderson (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 111, 131.) The objecting party does not meet this burden by arguing that the costs were not necessary or reasonable, but must present evidence and prove that the costs are not recoverable. (Litt v. Med. Ctr. (2015) 237 Cal.App.4th 1217, 1224; Seever v. Copley Press, Inc. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 1550, 1557.)
Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1700, “any notice of motion to strike or to tax costs must be served and filed 15 days after service of the cost memorandum. If the cost memorandum was served by mail, the period is extended as provided in Code of Civil Procedure section 1013. If the cost of memorandum was served electronically, the period is extended as provided in Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6(a)(4).” Cal. Rules of Court 3.1700(1).
“The party claiming costs and the party contesting costs may agree to extend the time for serving and filing the cost memorandum and a motion to strike or tax costs. This agreement must be confirmed in writing, specify the extended date for service, and be filed with the clerk. In the absence of an agreement, the court may extend the times for serving and filing the cost memorandum or the notice of motion to strike or tax costs for a period not to exceed 30 days.” Cal. Rules of Court 3.1700(3).
Jan 06, 2021
Stanislaus County, CA
Dec 29, 2020
Stanislaus County, CA
Dec 16, 2020
Stanislaus County, CA
Dec 09, 2020
Stanislaus County, CA
Dec 09, 2020
Stanislaus County, CA
Dec 03, 2020
CONVERSION, JUDGE
Fresno County, CA
Dec 02, 2020
Kern County, CA
Dec 02, 2020
Kern County, CA
Nov 30, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Nov 20, 2020
San Mateo County, CA
Nov 18, 2020
Placer County, CA
Nov 13, 2020
Yolo County, CA
Nov 12, 2020
Fresno County, CA
Nov 10, 2020
Fresno County, CA
Nov 04, 2020
San Mateo County, CA
Oct 30, 2020
Placer County, CA
Oct 27, 2020
Placer County, CA
Oct 21, 2020
Placer County, CA
Oct 15, 2020
Placer County, CA
Oct 15, 2020
Butte County, CA
Oct 14, 2020
Butte County, CA
Oct 14, 2020
Butte County, CA
Oct 14, 2020
Butte County, CA
Oct 07, 2020
Placer County, CA
Oct 02, 2020
Santa Clara County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.