“[O]n a seasonable motion to suppress the deposition, accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040, the court may determine that the reasons given for the failure or refusal to approve the transcript require rejection of the deposition in whole or in part.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.520.)
Rule 5-220 states that an attorney shall not suppress evidence that he or his client has a legal obligation to produce. Lawyers are subject to discipline for participating in the suppression or destruction of evidence. (Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 6106, 6077; Rules Prof. Conduct, rule 5-220 (member shall not suppress evidence member has legal obligation to reveal or produce).)
The court has the inherent power to “provide orderly conduct of proceedings before it, or its officers” and to “amend and control its process and orders so as to make them conform to law and justice.” (Id., § 128.)
“Our discovery statutes are designed to ascertain the truth, not suppress it.” (Advanced Modular Sputtering, Inc. v. Super. Ct. (Mishin) (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 826, 837.) “Any doubt about discovery is to be resolved in favor of disclosure.” (Id.; see also Perlan Therapeutics, Inc. v. Super. Ct. (Nexbio, Inc.) (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 1333, 1346-1347, citing and discussing Advanced Modular, supra, 132 Cal.App.4th 835-837.)
Ntc Of Mtn And Mtn For A Sanction For Destruction Of Evidence
Set for hearing on Monday, December 2, 2013, Line 3 - DEFENDANT SHERRI KING's Motion For A Sanction For Destruction Of Evidence.
Pro Tem Judge Ernst Halperin, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hea...
..n by email. If not all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the Pro Tem Judge will hold a hearing on the motion and, based on the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing, issue a report in the nature of a recommendation to the Dept. 302 Judge, who will then decide the motion. If a party does not appear at the hearing, the party will be deemed to have stipulated that the motion will...
HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR DISQUALIFY ATTORNEY DEVRIES AND FOR A
MISTRIAL FILED BY THOMAS E DALY
* TENTATIVE RULING: *
Cross-Complainant Thomas Daly’s motion to disqualify Cross-Defendants Nyna Armstrong’s attorney Robert De Vries is denied.
Daly’s motion was filed on October 16, 2017. Armstrong filed an opposition on October 17, 2017. These papers were filed while this case was in trial. A mist...
..ing his deposition.
Daly argues that De Vries’ representation of Richard Armstrong at his deposition violates Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3-310(B). Daly also argues that De Vries continued representation in this case presents a threat to the integrity of the judicial process.
Armstrong is correct that there is often an issue of standing when a non-client seeks to have an attorney disqual...
GLORIA MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, vs. JUAN CARLOS CARBAJAL CEBALLOS, et al., Defendants.
CASE NO.: BC602678
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT SABURO AMERICANA dba MIFUNE’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE, STRIKE, AND/OR SUPRESS THE FIRST DEPOSITION OF NONPARTY WITNESS MARISELA RAMIREZ HERNANDEZ
Dept. 98
1:30 p.m.
September 8, 2017
On December 1, 2015, Plaintiff Gloria Martinez filed this action against Defendants...
..tion of Ms. Hernandez was taken. Mifune now moves to suppress all or portions of Ms. Hernandez’s first deposition pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 128 and 2025.520 and Evidence Code section 352. Plaintiff filed an opposition, and no reply was filed.
“[O]n a seasonable motion to suppress the deposition, accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040, the court ma...
CM-200
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address)
|_Ghrstopher B. Mandarich SB 220083: s Ainy Marshall SB961601; Amber Swearingen-Ojuri $B324689; David C.
McGaffey SB315632;
MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP. P 0 Box 109032 Chicago, IL 60610,
TELEPHONE NO 877.285 4918 FAX NO. 818 888 1260
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional)
ATTORNEY FOR (Name)* Cavalry SPV I, LLC
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OFBUTTE
STREET ADDRESS’ 1775 CONCORD AVE.
MAILING ADDRESS:
cITy AND zip cov
CM-200
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
t-Terry A. Duree, Esq. SBN: 61008 GENTS
Terry A. Duree, Inc.
622 Jackson St Fairfield, CA 94533 FF — Superior Court of Califomia__ =
TELEPHONE No: 707-422-8933 FAX NO. (Optional): | County of Butte I
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Name):Kelsti Group, Inc. L L
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE E E
street appress: Chico Courthouse
maine aopress: 1775 Concord Avenue D Ki Fiener, Clerk D
10
12
12
13
“Ls
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
FILED
YOLO SUPERIOR COURT .
nasi
Deputy!
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF YOLO
. ) Case No. CV-G-19-2467
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL )
DISTRIBUTORS ING., ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
Plaintiff ) DISMISSAL AND SANCTIONS
)
vs. )
)
JOSE L. LOPEZ and )
EVANGELINA C. LOPEZ, )
Defendant. )
TO PLAINTIFF AND. THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD: This matter came on regularly fo:
a OSC RE: DISMISSAL on June 29, 2020, in Department 9
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) FOR COURT USE ON
Charles L. Post, SBN 160443 Zack S. Thompson, SBN 317110
Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law Corporation
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1100
Sac
Sacramento, CA 95814
