What is a Motion to Stay?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Stay

Recent Rulings on Motion to Stay

126-150 of 3220 results

DAVID DOYEL INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES PURSUANT TO THE PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT PAGA VS ALERE HOME MONITORING INC

Conclusion Defendants' alternative motion to stay proceedings is GRANTED. This matter is stayed until the Gooden matter is resolved. This minute order is the order of the Court. Defendants to give notice within two court days of this ruling.

  • Hearing

    Sep 17, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

CHARLES, ET AL. V. VARSITY TUTORS, LLC

(Declaration of Christopher C. 7 Swenson in Support of Defendant Varsity Tutors LLC’s Motion for an Order Staying Action, 8 Ex. 1.) 9 On this motion to stay, Defendant relies mainly on Code of Civil Procedure section 10 1281.4 and the case of Franco v.

  • Hearing

    Sep 16, 2020

KING, HOLMES, PATERNO & SORIANO, LLP VS JACOB KASHER HINDLIN

., Case No. 20SMCV0035 Hearing Date September 16, 2020 Defendant Hindlin’s Motion to Stay Action Defendant Hindlin engaged plaintiff King, Holmes, Paterno & Soriano (KHPS) to enforce his rights under a music publishing agreement. Hindlin began litigation in New York State Court regarding the publishing agreement and a claim for malpractice against KHPS. The New York court dismissed Hindlin’s claims against KHPS due to lack of personal jurisdiction and the existence of an arbitration clause.

  • Hearing

    Sep 16, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

SMITH VS VINKOV

The Motion to Stay is Stricken. The clerk is directed to reinstate the Motion to Deem Defendant a Vexatious Litigant. The clerk is directed to provide the Motion date for Plaintiff who will provide notice of the motion. The court will not entertain oral argument.

  • Hearing

    Sep 16, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

.: 19NWCP00001 HEARING: 9/15/20 JUDGE: OLIVIA ROSALES #1 TENTATIVE ORDER Defendants-in-Intervention Eric and Ronald Gustafson’s motion to stay the action and fix the value of Plaintiff’s interest in Defendant Rieder Enterprises, LLC is GRANTED, and the dissolution action is STAYED. Bond is set at $55,000.00. The court will set a Hearing on the Appointment of Appraisers within 60 days. Moving Parties to give NOTICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 15, 2020

  • Judge

    Lori Ann Fournier or Olivia Rosales

  • County

    Los xxxxxxx County, CA

FRONCIE OLSON , INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE ZISA GRANTOR TRUST, DATED APRIL 5, 2011 VS HIGH VELOCITY RESTORATION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION , ET AL.

] #16 TENTATIVE ORDER Plaintiff Olson’s motion to stay related arbitration proceeding pending the outcome of this court action; or in the alternative, consolidate the arbitration action with this court action is DENIED. Opposing Party to give NOTICE. Plaintiff Olson moves to stay related arbitration proceeding pending the outcome of this court action; or in the alternative, consolidate the arbitration action with this court action pursuant to CCP §§ 1281.2 and 1281.3.

  • Hearing

    Sep 15, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

  • Judge

    Lori Ann Fournier or Olivia Rosales

  • County

    Los xxxxxxx County, CA

MYUNG SIK KIM VS S&H BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.

Motion to Stay Defendants S&H Business Management, Inc., Chang, and Jang move to stay the dissolution pursuant to Corp. Code § 2000. Stay and Bond Corp.

  • Hearing

    Sep 15, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • Judge

    Lori Ann Fournier or Olivia Rosales

  • County

    Los xxxxxxx County, CA

JOHN JACKSON VS SWISSPORT SA LLC ET AL

On November 26, 2019, Defendants filed a motion to stay this action pending judgment from an earlier filed PAGA action. On December 4, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel Swissport USA to provide further responses to Requests for Production, Set One. (“Original RFP Motion.”)

  • Hearing

    Sep 11, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

ZOHAR MANAGEMENT, LLC VS HOLLOWAY DRIVE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.

As discussed above, the Court is denying the motion to compel arbitration; therefore, the motion to stay is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Sep 11, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

KULWINDER WALIA V. TIMOTHY CHEY, ET AL.

Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay this proceeding, demurrer, and motion to strike. II. Motion to Stay Defendants move to stay this action on the basis it should not proceed until such time as Defendants’ action against distributor Sony in Los Angeles County Superior Court is resolved. As a threshold matter, the legal basis for Defendants’ motion is unclear as is their analysis.

  • Hearing

    Sep 10, 2020

WESTBAY VS. CHATEAU AT POET'S CORNER

HEARING ON MOTION TO STAY THE ENTIRE CIVIL ACTION FILED BY CARLTON SENIOR LIVING, LLC, et al. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Defendants move to stay this action pending the hearing on their petition to compel arbitration. The motion, which is set for hearing on the same date as the petition, is denied as moot. Please see Line 9 for the ruling on the petition itself.

  • Hearing

    Sep 10, 2020

FLAHERTY VS. SEAMAN CORPORATION

Plaintiff’s objection and motion to strike Seaman’s “Appendix of Supplemental Federal Authority in Support of Motion to Stay” is SUSTAINED. For all of these reasons, the motion to stay by Seaman is GRANTED. The motion to set a trial by Flaherty is DENIED without prejudice. The Court sets an OSC re whether the stay should be lifted for April 15, 2021 at 9 a.m. The parties are directed to file a status report at least five court days prior to the hearing. Seaman to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 10, 2020

CHRISTOPHER HANNAN VS FUELSTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Arbitration A party’s “bad faith” or “willful misconduct” can constitute a wavier and justify a refusal to compel arbitration. St. Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of California (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1187. Writings or statements in connection with a mediation are typically inadmissible in arbitration. Cal. Evid. Code §1119(a), (b).

  • Hearing

    Sep 10, 2020

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT VS. SIERRA PACIFIC FARMS

The instant motion to stay would appear to be in response to the court's ruling. A trial court's inherent power to stay an action awaiting the final resolution of a related action that might have res judicata effect in the present action appears well-established. (See, e.g., Koch-Ash v. Sup. Ct. (1986) 180 Cal.App.3d 689, 696. ) Sierra argues that the judgment in the CAPS/Sunshine Action could trigger the preclusive effect of the res judicata doctrine. Fidelity disagrees.

  • Hearing

    Sep 09, 2020

CESARE VIETINA VS SECURITY PACIFIC ASSOCIATES INC ET AL

On March 20, 2019, the Court granted SPA’s motion to stay the proceedings and appoint appraisers for the purpose of ascertaining the fair value of Plaintiff’s shares in the corporation. The appointment order states that the appraisers are “required to consider the value of any corporate assets and liabilities including shareholder derivative claims.” The appointment order also states that the appraisers “shall consider Madu.”

  • Hearing

    Sep 08, 2020

STEVEN JONES V. GARY CONWAY, ET AL.

On April 7, 2020, Defendants filed a motion to stay this lawsuit and compel arbitration. Plaintiff did not oppose this request, so long as this Court retained jurisdiction to the full extent permitted under Code of Civil Procedure section 1281 et seq. On July 14, 2020, this Court granted the motion to compel arbitration and stayed the action. On July 9, 2020, Plaintiff filed an application for right to attach order and an order for the issuance of a writ of attachment against Defendants. (Code Civ.

  • Hearing

    Sep 08, 2020

JOHN JACKSON VS SWISSPORT SA LLC ET AL

On January 21, 2020 the court denied the Swissport Defendants’ motion to stay this action. Further, the court denied the Original SROG Motion without prejudice on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to file a complete Separate Statement along with the Original SROG Motion. Plaintiff now moves to compel Swissport USA, Inc. (“Swissport USA”) to provide further responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, numbers 2, 11, 12, 13, 33 and 34. Swissport USA opposes the motion.

  • Hearing

    Sep 08, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

PERSONNEL STAFFING GROUP, LLC VS ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, ET AL.

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO STAY ACTION; PETITION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD On March 25, 2020, a panel of arbitrators entered an interim final award requiring Petitioner Personnel Staffing Group, LLC (“Petitioner”) to post $8.6 million in pre-hearing security.

  • Hearing

    Sep 04, 2020

STEPHANIE BROWN JACOBSON SPIES ET AL VS HRAYR SHAHINIAN MD E

On January 15, 2020 – 26 days before the motion deadline -- at the hearing on Shahinian’s ex parte application to shorten time on his motion to stay the action, the Court entered a stay on all discovery through February 26, 2020, to allow the Court to hearing the stay motion based on full briefing and on the merits. On February 26, 2020, the Court extended the stay to June 2, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Sep 04, 2020

MICHAEL NEWTON VS ADAM TENENBAUM, ET AL.

Thus, for the reasons stated above, the Court denies the petition to compel arbitration and motion to stay the proceedings. CONCLUSION AND ORDER Defendant Tenenbaum’s petition to compel arbitration and motion to stay the proceeding is denied. Defendant Tenenbaum shall provide notice of this order.

  • Hearing

    Sep 04, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  • County

    Los xxxxxxx County, CA

TRILOGY PLUMBING INC A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS. MEZA

The Court DENIES without prejudice Defendant Rosalba Meza’s Motion to Stay Case, or Alternatively, to Stay Discovery, Pending Resolution of the Criminal Case. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ unopposed request for judicial notice (ROA 117) of the existence and filing of court records in this action and Defendant’s declaration in another OC court case. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)

  • Hearing

    Sep 03, 2020

DAVID ALOMATSI VS KINDRED HOSPITAL

Hearing Date: September 3, 2020 Moving Parties: Plaintiff David Alomatsi Responding Party: Defendant KND Development 53, LLC dba Kindred Hospital South Bay Motion to Stay Deposition and Quash the Deposition Notice (filed on July 13, 2020) The court considered the moving and opposition (filed on August 21, 2020) papers. RULING The motion is DENIED. The court orders plaintiff to pay sanctions to defendant in the amount of $600 within 30 days.

  • Hearing

    Sep 03, 2020

JILL NIELSEN VS UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A CORPORATION, ET AL.

.: 19STCV46278 (related to BC705695) Hearing Date: September 3, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: defendants’ motion to stay plaintiff’s declaratory relief action NOTICE Department #32 will be dark for motions. The parties are ordered to email the Court’s clerk at [email protected] to inform the clerk whether they are submitting on the Court’s tentative or whether they are requesting a hearing. If any party requests a hearing, one will be scheduled.

  • Hearing

    Sep 03, 2020

COFFIN VS MAGELLAN HRSC INC

TENTATIVE RULING Defendant's motion to stay proceedings is GRANTED without prejudice. A status conference is set for April 2, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Preliminary Matters The parties' unopposed requests for judicial notice are granted. ROA ## 12, 30, 33. Background Defendant requests the Court to stay proceedings in this Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA") action until two cases pending in New Mexico, Deakin v.

  • Hearing

    Sep 03, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

GONZALEZ, ET AL. V. FOOD MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, INC., ET AL.

MOTION TO STAY ACTION 7 A. Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice 8 Defendants request judicial notice of the following: 9 (1) The Complaint filed by Tyrell Mack against Defendants on June 28, 2019 in the 10 Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, 11 (2) The Complaint from Plaintiffs’ sister lawsuit pending in the Central District of 12 California, Gonzalez et al. v.

  • Hearing

    Sep 02, 2020

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 129     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.