What is a counsel's Motion to Recuse?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Recuse – Counsel

Recent Rulings on Motion to Recuse – Counsel

1-25 of 10000 results

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

The Court has considered the administrative and the supplemental records, the papers of the parties and the arguments of counsel, and it has admitted the administrative record into evidence but declined to receive the supplemental record in evidence as it was unnecessary to its determination. Accordingly, the Court now: ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES that: 1.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

PRIME STAFF INC VS PARTNERSHIP STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC

At that time, this Court informed counsel for the Cross-Complainant that there was insufficient information regarding the defendants’ resources to properly determine punitive damages. When this Court stated that it appeared that all other damages sought appeared to be appropriate, counsel withdrew the punitive damages request.

  • Hearing

    Dec 21, 2020

HASMIK KANATARYAN, ET AL. VS CHARLENE SARSTEDT, ET AL.

The following order was made on 10-20-20 and sent to Plaintiff's counsel.

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2020

PETITION OF TRAVEON C GAINS

GAINS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Continue to 2-18-2021, at request of counsel When to proceed, will Need: 1. Proof of mailing to Atty. Christopher Schweickert at address in petition or waiver of notice. Proof of Service attached to Notice filed 11-23-2020 reflects mailing to him at an address other than that listed in petition.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRUST INSTRUMENT & CONFIRMATION

Leland Snow to appear or doctor’s declaration stating inability to appear or waiver by counsel 3. Report of Atty. Constance Figuers (limited) CEDRIC SNOW JENNIFER L STENEBERG LELAND SNOW CONSTANCE H FIGUERS LESLIE A SNOW JENNIFER L STENEBERG PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration in support of attorney’s fees paid as reported at paragraph 6.

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR COMPENSATION

Proof of mailing to conservatee or waiver by counsel. PrC § 1460 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify payments to AT&T. It appears amounts paid are excessive for periods in which conservatee lived in a care facility. 4. Original financial account statement(s) as required by PrC § 2620(c) (2), (3) 5. Original statements from the residential care facility PrC § 2620(c)(5) 6. Verified declaration by attorney to clarify whether fees were paid to attorney without a court order. PrC §2647 7.

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PUBLIC GUARDIAN RE: 2ND & 3RD & FINAL ACCT & RPT OF CONS & PET’N FOR

COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES DEPT COUNTY COUNSEL JANICE KITTREDGE TRACY S REGLI JOSCELYN JONES TORRU JOSCELYN JONES TORRU MARY E LEMAY

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

HQC INC VS VAPUR INC

In support of the current request for relief from default, defense counsel fully embraces all responsibility, and the record details staff changes, staff communication issues and health issues that contributed to the default and the delay in filing the stipulation. Defendant's counsel seeks relief under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP §473(b), but argues that he satisfies the requirements for discretionary relief as well.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

MATTER OF THE YOUNG REVOCABLE TRUST

Court will dispense with further formal service on temporary guardian and minor’s counsel who appeared 8-2-19. 2. Per 9-20-19 minute order, court adopted the stipulation of parties and extended temporary guardianship until 3-31-2020. 3. Stipulation and Order filed 8-5-2020 extended guardianship through 12-31-2020.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: STATUS OF REUNIFICATION THERAPY SET BY DEPT. 15 ON 08/12/2020.

Return on Citation or waiver by counsel. PrC § 1824 4. Ginger Traver Bumgardner to appear, or doctor’s declaration stating inability or waiver by counsel 5. Verified declaration by petitioner confirming attendance at orientation class for unlicensed conservators. 6. Order Appointing Probate Conservator Form GC-340 (adopted 1-15-16) Notes: 1. Letters of Temporary Conservatorship expire 12/4/2020. 2. Objection filed by son, Garrison Traver 1-15-20. 3.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR APPT OF CONSERVATOR OF PERSON & ESTATE

Complete Form ICWA-030 and submit to courtroom clerk in Dept. 15 for mailing unless you are represented by counsel. CRC 5.481 The Court is still waiting for: A. Court Investigator’s Report B. Report of court-appointed counsel Michael Pierson Notes: Minor possibly has Cherokee ancestry JASMYN BUTLER MICHAEL PIERSON LATISHA WILSON MICHAEL WILSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Michael Wilson, grandfather of older sister, still needs to do the following: 1.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CARRIEN QIAN HE, AN INDIVIDUAL VS JAY MIN CHEN, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

Chen, et al. (19PSCV00181) _____________________________________________ Counsel for Cross-Defendant Golden Globalinks Corporation’s (i.e., Darling & Risbrough, LLP) MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Responding Party: None (unopposed, as of 11/19/20, 10:01 a.m.; due 11/19/20) Tentative Ruling Counsel for Cross-Defendant Golden Globalinks Corporation’s (i.e., Darling & Risbrough, LLP) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is GRANTED, contingent upon counsel for Globalink filing

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

MARTINEZ VS. SSC NEWPORT BEACH OPERATING CO. LP

The court concludes that the $495,000 class action settlement, as approved, is fair, adequate and reasonable, and approves the following specific awards: • $165,000 to plaintiff’s counsel for plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees, as requested; • $11,294.27 to plaintiff’s counsel for plaintiff’s attorney costs, as requested; • $5,000 to plaintiff Evelia Martinez as an enhancement award, reduced from the $7,500 requested; • $12,500 to the Administrator, CPT Group, Inc, as requested; and • $18,750 to the LWDA for its share

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

SHOU-PON LEE VS ALBERT C.Y. CHANG, ET AL.

DUE TO THE ONGOING COVID-19 PANDEMIC, PARTIES AND COUNSEL ARE ENCOURAGED TO APPEAR VIA LA COURT CONNECT.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

MICHELLE MENDEZ VS THE KROGER COMPANY

.: BC677305 Hearing Date: December 4, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to be relieved as counsel Attorney Tim D. Wright (“Counsel”) moves to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Michelle Mendez (“Plaintiff”). Counsel has filed forms MC-051 and MC-052 and has lodged with the Court a copy of the proposed order on form MC-053 as required. (Cal Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.) The basis for this motion is that communication between Counsel and Plaintiff has broken down, which constitutes good cause.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

CHARISSE STRODE, ET AL. VS FLOWER 77TH, LLC, ET AL.

.: 19STCV20929 Hearing Date: December 4, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to be relieved as counsel Attorney Sharona Eslamboly Hakim. (“Counsel”) moves to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiffs Charisse Strode and Kenneth Strode (“Plaintiffs”). Counsel has filed forms MC-051 and MC-052 and has lodged with the Court a copy of the proposed order on form MC-053 as required. (Cal Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

NINA MONTOYA VS OLUFEMI OGUNTOLU, ET AL.

Parties, counsel, and court reporters present are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied entry if admission could create a public health risk. The court encourages the parties wishing to argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect. For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517. Your understanding during these difficult times is appreciated.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

JUAN PALMA ET AL VS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC ET AL

No subsequent Notice of Deposition was ever served, despite the fact that SARC’s counsel communicated to Plaintiffs’ counsel in March 2020 that Lioudakis was the correct PMQ.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

RODRIGUEZ VS. VENUS GROUP, INC.

The court concludes that the $27,500 PAGA and individual settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable, and approves the following specific awards: • $10,725 to plaintiff’s counsel for plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees, as requested; • $1,835.52 to plaintiff’s counsel for plaintiff’s attorney costs, as requested; • $11,675 to plaintiff Joanna Rodriguez for her individual settlement, as requested; • $2,448.36 to the LWDA as its share of PAGA penalties; and • $816.12 to the Aggrieved Employees as their share of PAGA penalties

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

REVELS VS. BOTTLING GROUP, LLC

The court concludes that the $1,500,000 class action settlement, as approved, is fair, adequate and reasonable, and approves the following specific awards: • $450,000 to plaintiff’s counsel for plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees ($247,500 (55%) to the Wand Law Firm, P.C. and $200,000 (45%) to the Law Office of Scott E. Wheeler), reduced from the requested $500,000; • $15,996.84 to plaintiff’s counsel for plaintiff’s attorney costs ($15,679.25 to the Wand Law Firm, P.C. and $317.59 to the Law Office of Scott E.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

MARYAM TAGHAVIGOLCHINI VS JEREMY JON CRUZ REYES

Counsel shall remain counsel-of-record until the Court’s orders are served and he files proof of service with the Court. Counsel shall provide notice. DATED: December 4, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

NICHOLAS DAN VS LYNN HOFFER

.: 18STCV09309 Hearing Date: December 4, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to be relieved as counsel The Law Offices of Jacob Emrani, APC (“Counsel”) moves to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff David Shalom (“Plaintiff”). Counsel has filed forms MC-051 and MC-052 and has lodged with the Court a copy of the proposed order on form MC-053 as required. (Cal Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.) The basis for this motion is a breakdown in communication between Plaintiff and Counsel, which constitutes good cause.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

KURT BEACH VS WINDWARD BAR & GRILL LLC

The Court orders Counsel to serve a copy of this order, as well as a copy of the Court’s order on Form MC-053, upon all parties including Plaintiff within ten (10) days. The Court orders Plaintiff’s counsel to file proof of service within twenty (20) days. Counsel shall remain counsel-of-record until the Court’s orders are served and he files proof of service with the Court. Counsel shall provide notice. DATED: December 4, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

NIRA WOODS, DR. VS DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT

Thus, while defense counsel may have warned Plaintiff of their future intention to file a dispositive motion and seek sanctions, this does not amount to a violation of Plaintiff’s rights. It is unclear how this is a ground upon which she is seeking to disqualify counsel. For these reasons, the motion is denied. CONCLUSION AND ORDER Plaintiff’s motion to disqualify counsel is denied. Defendants City of Torrance and Jon Megeff shall give notice of this order.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

GATICA VS. BISTANGO-IRVINE

Counsel must file supplemental papers addressing the court’s concerns (not fully revised papers that would have to be re-read) at least 16 days before the next hearing date. Counsel must submit an amendment to the settlement agreement rather than any amended settlement agreement. Counsel also must provide a red-lined version of any revised papers, including the proposed letter to the aggrieved employees.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.