What is a Motion to Recover Costs?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

Recent Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Provided that the City will stipulate to a preliminary injunction with respect to the provisions of Ordinance No. 6374 relating to immediate warrantless access to the short-term rental (STR) units, the Court DENIES the application for a preliminary injunction in all other respects, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

With respect to the first question, the Court concludes that Section 13.2(f) does not preclude SARVS from attempting to obtain compensation for any alleged loss of goodwill. Notably, nowhere in that section is there any reference to goodwill or any statement to the effect that any potential item of compensation not explicitly referenced therein is considered waived.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

It is unlike the case authorities cited by Turner where parties were seeking to recover purely economic damages arising from alleged defects, such as repair costs to avoid potential future harm from defective construction or products. Here, the alleged defects caused water and other damage to walls, windows, ceilings, etc.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Petitioners shall recover their costs in this proceeding in the amount of $_____.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Plaintiff Francisco Velazquez’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Kim D. Stephens, Gregory F. Coleman, Paul C. Peel, Jason T. Dennett and Adam A. Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3).

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

MALIN VS AMBRY GENETICS CORPORATION

Continued to 7-19-2019

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

HASMIK KANATARYAN, ET AL. VS CHARLENE SARSTEDT, ET AL.

The following order was made on 10-20-20 and sent to Plaintiff's counsel.

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2020

FALISHA PORTER VS PHARMAVITE, LLC

As to the subpoena to Optum Health, by claiming emotional distress damages and inability to work for a period of time, plaintiff has waived the right to privacy with respect to records concerning her medical condition or diagnoses which prevented her from working and as to her emotional distress damages from this case. However, the court will discuss whether records showing medical time off from other jobs is relevant or protected by privacy.

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

FUNDATION GROUP LLC VS BINH NGUYEN, ET AL.

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to File Default Judgment Packet is set for December 2, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is GRANTED. The court reduces attorney’s fees to $2,005.74, per Local Rule 3.214. ANALYSIS Yes (11/18/19) Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.) Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment.

  • Hearing

    Dec 02, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

1301 GLADSTONE STREET INVESTORS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ET, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

On or about May 2, 2018, Plaintiff and Defendant Et, Inc. dba Golden Spoon (“Et”) entered into a written agreement, wherein Et agreed to lease the premises from Plaintiff. Et breached the lease by vacating the Premises prior to the termination date and by failing to make payments due thereunder. Ali T. Demirel (“Demirel”) is liable via his execution of a guaranty of the lease.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE EAST DISTRICT, JUDGE GLORIA QHITE-BROWN presiding in DEPT. J of the Pomona Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

DEREK LEE VS JOANNA BOEY

Thus, Attorney Saunders has failed to properly attest to his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or neglect. The Motion is DENIED. Plaintiff’s application for default judgment is GRANTED. The Court will inquire of the parties whether Defendant has to ability to file another motion to set aside the Default Judgment within the next six months. The Default Judgment will be processed tomorrow and it appears that Defendant may be able to file another motion.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

VEJ POMONA 8, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. VS FRANK CURTIN, ET AL.

Under Code of Civil Procedure section 580(a), “[t]he relief granted to the plaintiff, if there is no answer, cannot exceed that demanded in the complaint, in the statement required by Section 425.11, or in the statement provided for by Section 425.115[.]” If Plaintiffs seek additional damages in addition to those set forth in the Complaint, Plaintiffs need to amend the Complaint to properly reflect the requested damages and give notice to Defendant.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

Again, at this point, this does not show a willful act by Defendant JMI to entitle Plaintiffs to punitive damages discovery against it. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

GDNSHIP OF BRUNSRIOS

RE: PET'N TO APPOINT GUARDIAN FILED ON 12/02/19 BY MISTY BRUNS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Misty Bruns, paternal grandmother, still must do the following: Appear at the hearing to report status, including mediation The Court is waiting for these items: Report of Atty. Craig Judson Notes: 1. Petition for Appointment of Temporary Guardian was denied, pursuant to Order filed 12-2-19. 2.

  • Hearing

    Nov 04, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

GDNSHIP OF MARIA ISABEL LEYVA MORO

RE: PET’N FOR SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE FINDINGS FILED ON 09/04/20 BY MARIA ISABEL LEYVA MORO PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Resolution of Line # 12.B.

  • Hearing

    Nov 04, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

REVIEW RE: CONCERNS OF COURT INVESTIGATOR (UMO 02/03/20).

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status of appointing successor conservator; prior conservator was relieved pursuant to court order dated 2/28/2020. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to include 2nd degree relatives in Item # 11, if any. PrC § 1821 2. Proof of mailing to Regional Center and all 2nd degree relatives, if any. PrC § 1822 3.

  • Hearing

    Nov 04, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PAN NU VS TU AUNG, ET AL.

Defendant Roi San’s MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER Responding Party: Plaintiff, Pan Nu[2] 2. Defendant Tu Aung’s MOTION FOFR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER Responding Party: Plaintiff, Pan Nu Tentative Ruling 1. Defendant Roi San’s Motion for Leave to Amend Answer is GRANTED. 2. Defendant Tu Aung’s Motion for Leave to Amend Answer is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Nov 04, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

FORWARDLINE FINANCIAL, LLC VS PAUL TAYLOR, ET AL.

TENTATIVE RULING ON MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL 11/4/2020 DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE OR CONTINUE TO SUPPLEMENT PAPERS The settlement stipulation in paragraph 9 requires that there be notice with a 7 day cure period. The declaration in support of the motion states that the default letter of 9/9/2020 was attached but it is not attached. Instead there is an email dated 7/30/2020 which is not in compliance with paragraph 9.

  • Hearing

    Nov 04, 2020

FORWARDLINE FINANCIAL, LLC., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS GILBERT JOLICOEUR, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

TENTATIVE RULING ON MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL AND ENTER JUDGMENT 11/4/2020

  • Hearing

    Nov 04, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

RE: 1ST & FNL RPT OF EXECUTOR, PET’N FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION,

LOOFBOURROW TRUST A DAVID LOOFBOURROW JAMES J PHILLIPS ELIZABETH CHRISMAN JAMES J PHILLIPS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to include Samuel Johnson in Item # 8. PrC § 8002 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to add deceased spouse with date of death to petition Item # 8. LR 7.151(d) 3. Proof of mailing Notice of Petition to Administer Estate and copy of petition to all heirs and beneficiaries.

  • Hearing

    Nov 03, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION, NO WILL, IAEA

FILED ON 07/16/20 BY MADELINE SHIELDS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Proof of mailing Notice of Petition to Administer Estate and copy of petition to all heirs and beneficiaries. PrC § 8110; LR 7.151(e) 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to include herself in Item # 8. PrC § 8002 3. Order for Probate Form DE-140 GREGORY LYNN FITZWATER MADELINE SHIELDS JENNIFER E.S. MARTIN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1.

  • Hearing

    Nov 03, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR INSTRUCTIONS

FILED ON 07/16/20 BY GREGORY S MASON, STEVEN E MASON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proof of mailing to all persons entitled to receive notice. PrC § 17203 3. Proposed Order GREGORY S MASON PETER SHELTON STEVEN E MASON PETER SHELTON THE 2000 LEON S. MASON & NOREE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Order for Probate Form DE-140 KORI N MORTON GARSON C SOE TERESE R LIVINGSTON

  • Hearing

    Nov 03, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: APPLICATION TO SUSPEND DENNIS CASTO'S POWERS AS TRUSTEE

FILED ON 10/23/19 BY DEANN LANTRY, DENISE HACKMAN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances Note: Declaration and Objection of Dennis Casto filed 10-13-19. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances

  • Hearing

    Nov 03, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF DANIELA RIVERA

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE FILED BY DANIELA RIVERA PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Daniela Rivera, mother, still needs to do the following: 1. File a Proof of Service of Order to Show Cause on child’s father, or his consent DANIELA RIVERA PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved. Proposed Order Submitted. No Appearance Required.

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.