What is a Motion to Recover Costs?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

Recent Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

126-150 of 10000 results

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA V. TRUE HORIZONS, LLC, ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion Judgment on Pleadings This matter is continued on the court's own motion to November 9, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. in Department 5.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

680 BVD LLC V. WILLIAM SCOTT GRIFFITHS

Nature of Proceedings: Motion Attorney Fees Tentative

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA V. TRUE HORIZONS, LLC, ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion Judgment on Pleadings Tentative

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

JOHN ROESSLER V. SYNECTIC SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion Compel Arbitration Tentative

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

PICO RIVERA FIRST MORTGAGE INVESTORS LP V. HENRY AGUILA

Nature of Proceedings: Motion Enforce Settlement Tentative

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

JUDITH M. HALL V. JAVIER JONATHAN ANTUNEZ, ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Demurrer to Complaint (2); Motions Strike Portions of Complaint (2) Tentative

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

ESTATE OF WILLIAM B. VAN VALIN, II

The proposed personal representative must fill out and sign this form and submit it to the court. No such form was submitted. 4) Proposed Order (Form DE-140). A proposed order must be submitted with relief that matches that requested in the petition. No such document was filed with the court. 5) Proposed Letters (Form DE-150). Proposed letters must be submitted with relief that matches that requested in the petition. No such document was filed with the court.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

GUARDIANSHIP OF DALLAS MARISOL FABING

Parties must come prepared to discuss mediation results.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ESTATE OF HELEN HEIBERGER

If the documents curing these deficiencies are not processed by 8:00 a.m. on October 23, 2020, it is recommended that the matter be continued to an open calendar date in the future, unless the party appears and requests a different date, or submits a request for a different continuance date prior to the hearing. (Local Rule 1721(c)(2)(A-B).) If the matter is continued, documents must be submitted at least 10 days prior to the new hearing date to be considered.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

RE: 2ND & FINAL ACCT & RPT OF TRUSTEE, PET’N TO STL

THOMPSON MARY DUNNE ROSE KEVIN URBATSCH MAUREEN TEMPLIN JANICE CROSETTI-TITMUS THE RICHARD GROVE SPCECIAL NEE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Continue to 12-4-2020, pursuant to 10-8-20 minute order. ELIZABETH ROSE HARLEY JOSEPH M. MORRILL GERARD SMITS MATTHEW B TALBOT JOSEPHINE DOWEY JONATHAN T. THOMPSON LOUIS SMITS TRACY S REGLI

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF ADA LUZ BUSTAMANTE NARVAEZ

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE FILED BY ADA LUZ BUSTAMANTE NARVAEZ PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Ada Bustamante Narvaez still must do the following: Have a copy of the Order to Show Cause personally served on the father and file a Proof of Service with the court or file a verified declaration by petitioner showing diligent efforts made to locate and serve him. Regrettably, this was not include on Order to Show Cause.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF LAKISHA WILSON

RE: 2ND RPT OF CONS & PET’N FOR STLMNT FILED ON 08/18/20 BY ANDREA LEUNG PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Proposed Order ALICIA HARRIS ANDREA LEUNG AVID ELI ALAVI LAKISHA WILSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE -Moving paper in Volume 2- Need: 1. Proof of mailing Supplement to Second Account and Report filed 10/13/2020 to all parties entitled to notice 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PUBLIC GUARDIAN RE: FIRST & SECOND & FINAL ACCTS & RPT OF CONS

Letters of Temporary Conservatorship issued to petitioner expire 5/31/2021 JAMES ZALMAN MARTHA MARIA PARMELEE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Taylor Morgan and Natalie Simmons, family friends, still need to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF JULIA E BONILLA

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status of filing final accounting or waiver of final accounting Note: Order Approving First Account and Report filed 10-6-2020 ordered a final accounting to be filed by 10-13-2020. None has been filed.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF ROBERT SWEATT

Verified declaration by petitioner to include current address of mother 2. Proof of Personal Service on parents or verified declaration by petitioner showing diligent efforts made to locate and serve them. CRC 7.52 3. Proof of mailing to all persons entitled to receive notice 4. Form ICWA-020 filed with the Court. CRC 5.481 Note: Spanish Interpreter is requested. INC., LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY, ALSAC/ST. JUDE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Unable to review.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: EVIDENTIARY HRG RE: PET’N FOR ACCTG RETURN SET BY D15 (FILED 6/24/19 BY PJR)

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

GABRIELA NAJERA VS BRIAN OTCHIS, ET AL.

Counsel’s motion complies with all of the requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362, in that Counsel provided a notice of motion and motion to be relieved as counsel; order granting attorney’s motion to be relieved as counsel; and declaration in support of the motion to be relieved as counsel.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

KABBOUT VS. ST. JOSEPH HEALTH

Demurrer to Amended Complaint 2. Motion to Strike OFF CALENDAR- NOTICE WAS FILED PER MOVING PARTY 9/17/20

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

NGUYEN VS. TURBO

Motion to Strike Moving Party Defendant Trieu T. Tran, M.D. Responding Party none. 3. Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories Moving Party Defendant Bernard Turbow, M.D. Responding Party none. Ruling 1: Defendant Trieu T. Tran, M.D.’s Demurrer to the Complaint of Plaintiff Vinh Huu Nguyen is CONTINUED to 12/7/20 in this department at 10:30 a.m. Electronic service is authorized only where a party expressly consented to electronic service, or where the court has ordered electronic service.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

WESTLAKE SERVICES, LLC VS PLATINUM LUXURY MOTORS INC, A CORPORATION, ET AL.

Plaintiff Westlake Services, LLC’s Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions, and Demand for Production of Documents is CONTINUED to December 10, 2020. The moving papers for Plaintiff’s motions were originally filed on March 6, 2020 and served on Defendant Hassan Abdellatiff’s then counsel of record. On July 8, 2020, the Court granted attorney of record for Defendant, Alfred Manuel Freitas’ Motion to Be Relieved.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

TWIN OAKS LANDSCAPE AND MAINTENANCE, INC. VS. STRATHMORE CUSTOM HOMES, INC.

Motion for Leave to Intervene OFF CALENDAR- STIPULATION AND ORDER SIGNED 10/06/20

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

SYED M. HAMMAD RIZVI, ET AL. VS DILIGENT LENDING, LLC, ET AL.

Further, in addition to section 2023.030, section 2031.300(c) mandates the court to impose sanctions for failure to respond to discovery without substantial justification. Section 2030.290(b) allows the propounding party to file a motion to compel responses to interrogatories if a response has not been received. If responses are untimely, responding party waives objections. (CCP § 2030.290(a).)

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

JACINTA POOK VS FIVE POINTS PLAZA, LLC

Five Points Plaza, LLC, et al MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS; MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION (CCP §§ 2025.450, 2030.290, 2031.300) TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant Five Points Plaza, LLC’s (1) Motion to Compel Deposition of Plaintiff Jacinta Pook and Request for Sanctions; (2) Motion For Order Compelling Plaintiff To Respond to Special Interrogatories; Request for Sanctions; and (3) Motion For Order Compelling Plaintiff to Respond to Request for

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

DAVID S. MURANSKY, ET AL. VS THE CHEESECAKE FACTORY, INC., ET AL.

In addition, Plaintiffs contend that if they prove that this violation of FACTA was willful, both they and the Settlement Class would be entitled to the same relief, namely, statutory damages. (Motion at 11:8-16.) As to adequacy, Plaintiffs contend that Plaintiffs' and the Settlement Class Members' interests are aligned because they all stand to recover statutory damages if Plaintiffs prove that Cheesecake willfully violated FACTA in the manner alleged. (Motion at 12:10-12.) 4. Adequacy of class counsel.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.