What is a Motion to Recover Costs?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

Recent Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Provided that the City will stipulate to a preliminary injunction with respect to the provisions of Ordinance No. 6374 relating to immediate warrantless access to the short-term rental (STR) units, the Court DENIES the application for a preliminary injunction in all other respects, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

With respect to the first question, the Court concludes that Section 13.2(f) does not preclude SARVS from attempting to obtain compensation for any alleged loss of goodwill. Notably, nowhere in that section is there any reference to goodwill or any statement to the effect that any potential item of compensation not explicitly referenced therein is considered waived.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

It is unlike the case authorities cited by Turner where parties were seeking to recover purely economic damages arising from alleged defects, such as repair costs to avoid potential future harm from defective construction or products. Here, the alleged defects caused water and other damage to walls, windows, ceilings, etc.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Petitioners shall recover their costs in this proceeding in the amount of $_____.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Plaintiff Francisco Velazquez’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Kim D. Stephens, Gregory F. Coleman, Paul C. Peel, Jason T. Dennett and Adam A. Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3).

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

MALIN VS AMBRY GENETICS CORPORATION

Continued to 7-19-2019

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE EAST DISTRICT, JUDGE GLORIA QHITE-BROWN presiding in DEPT. J of the Pomona Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

Again, at this point, this does not show a willful act by Defendant JMI to entitle Plaintiffs to punitive damages discovery against it. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

Chen advised Plaintiff that he had been operating a successful business, Tissuesco Group (“Tissuesco”), for many years and could assist Plaintiff to open a business and obtain a visa. On or around March 24, 2018, the parties signed a contract, in which Plaintiff agreed to invest $120,000.00 to Tissuesco and, in return, Tissuesco would open, operate and manage a company for Plaintiff and assist Plaintiff in applying for an L-1 visa.

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MANUEL ALEJANDRE VS CAL-VILLA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

The court directs Defendant to prepare the order and submit it to opposing counsel for approval as to content. (Rule 3.1312) The case management conference scheduled for September 25, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 11B will remain. Ross 9/18/2020 ……………… Directions for Contesting or Arguing the Tentative Ruling: Tentative rulings for Law and Motion will be posted electronically by 1:30 p.m. the day before the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. MATTHEWS

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

. § 435.5(b) “[a] party moving to strike a pleading that has been amended after a motion to strike an earlier version of the pleading was granted shall not move to strike any portion of the pleadings on grounds that could have been raised by a motion to strike as to the earlier version of the pleading.” Here, the attorney’s fees request was included in the SAC, but Defendants did not move to strike such request. The Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Request for Attorney’s Fees is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

(“Hummingbird”) failed to provide him with rest and meal breaks, failed to pay him all wages due, including overtime, and failed to provide him with accurate wage statements. On October 25, 2017, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendants Hummingbird and Does 1-50 for: Failure to Provide Rest Periods—Cal. Labor Code § 226.7 Failure to Provide Meal Periods—Cal. Labor Code § 226.7 Failure to Pay Minimum Wage—Cal. Labor Code § 1197 Failure to Pay Overtime—Cal.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

The Judicial Council Form CIV-100 (“Request for Entry of Default (Application to Enter default)”) reflects that a court judgment in the amount of $123,186.97 is to be entered against Muniz, Dragon and Zhang. A new proposed judgment clarifying the judgment to be entered against each defendant should be submitted. ANALYSIS Yes (7/8/20; Default Entered.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for October 16, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: Plaintiff has failed to dismiss Does 1-10. Plaintiff has failed to provide a summary of the case. Plaintiff has not provided a calculation re interest.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

ARMEN G KOJIKIAN ET AL VS AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

Claims Administration Costs The Court declines ruling on the request for administration costs at this time as based on the denial of the motion for Final Approval due to the parties’ failure to obtain preliminary approval of the addendum to the settlement. Again, Counsel is to contact the courtroom directly to reserve a hearing date for a new motion for preliminary approval, if such motion is going to be filed, and parties must follow the directions given by the Court under INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for October 14, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The court notes that the lease provided for a $69,804.04 security deposit.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

BELINDA AGUILAR, ET AL. VS TG PROPERTIES LLC

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (ACCOUNTING SET BY D14 ON 1/15/20

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearance to report status of filing accounting. Laurie Schwarzrock was ordered to complete an accounting by 4-1-2020, and to file an accounting by 4-15-2020. Note: Response to OSC filed by Laurie Schwarzrock 2-11-20 needs verification and signature. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION AND FOR STLMT OF FIRST AND FINAL ACCT FILED ON 05/13/20 BY BABARA WAGNER

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status Notes: 1. Per m.o. dated 6/4/2020, any objections were to be filed by 7/2/2020. 2. Objections filed by John Wolf 7-2-2020. 3. Response to Objection filed 9-18-2020. BABARA WAGNER OLIVER W. BRAY JOHN WOLF MATTHEW SCHAUER PETER OSKAR PAUL WAGNER Need appearance by Atty. Benjamin D. Harvey to report status of filing accounting, pursuant to 9-4-2020 minute order.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST AMENDED PET’N FOR APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTING (MADISON)

If to proceed, Shannon Wapole, mother, would need to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2. File a verified declaration to state names, current addresses and relationships of all persons entitled to receive notice. LR 7.112 3. File a verified declaration to clarify whether notice is needed or required to Veterans Administration, Director of State Hospitals and Director of Developmental Services 4.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Tang is requested to provide the court with an explanation regarding how the amounts sought were calculated and whether or not they pertain to 16010 Phoenix Drive, City of Industry, CA, 91745 only or to the entirety of the property identified in the lease agreement. ANALYSIS Yes (11/22/19) Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

ESTATE OF DOUGLAS S ROBINSON

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF ADM, NO WILL, IAEA FILED ON 05/15/20 BY JULIA M ROBINSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Proof of mailing Notice of Petition to Administer Estate and copy of petition to all heirs. PrC § 8110; LR 7.151(e) DOUGLAS S ROBINSON JULIA M ROBINSON JOEL A. HARRIS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Juanita Cannady, surviving spouse, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: TRAILING: ELIZ ROSNER'S CREDITORS CLAIM SET BY DEPT.30

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status of settlement PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances to report status, including 7-21-2020 order to meet and confer 2. Proposed Order Notes: 1. Objection filed by Linda Fuentes Rosner 3-9-20. 2. Per 7-21-2020 minute order, court ordered parties to meet and confer, discuss standing and file a report. 3.

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST AND FNL RPT ON WVR OF ACCT, FOR COMPENSATION, FINAL DIST

Verified declaration by petitioner to state names, current addresses and relationships of all persons entitled to receive notice so court can confirm mailing. LR 7.112 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify statement ¶ 19 that Franchise Tax Board filed a Creditor’s Claim. It appears no claim was filed. 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to specify plan of distribution, including approximate amount of cash to be distributed to each beneficiary. LR 7.301 4.

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.