What is a Motion to Pay Judgment in Installments?

“In a limited civil case in which the defendant has appeared, if the judgment or order is for the payment of money by the defendant, the defendant shall pay the judgment immediately or at any time and upon terms and conditions, including installment payments, that the court may prescribe.” Code Civ. Proc., § 582.5.

“The court may amend the terms and conditions for payment of the judgment or order at any time to provide for installment payments for good cause upon motion by a party and notice to all affected parties, regardless of the nature of the underlying debt and regardless of whether the moving party appeared before entry of the judgment or order.” Id.

“In any determination regarding the imposition of terms and conditions upon the payment of the judgment, the court shall consider any factors that would be relevant to the determination of a claim for exemption pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 703.010) of Division 2 of Title 9 of Part 2 or the examination of a debtor pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 708.110) of Chapter 6 of Division 2 of Title 9.” Id.

Useful Rulings on Motion to Pay Judgment in Installments

Recent Rulings on Motion to Pay Judgment in Installments

MCT GROUP VS. ANGEL

For general information regarding Judge DeNoce and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.denoce.com _____________________________________________ The court's tentative ruling is as follows: The court intends to deny the motion to pay judgment in installments and allow garnishment of $500/pay period until judgment paid in full.

  • Hearing

LABOR COMMISSIONER VS MORSHEDA J HOSIAN

On June 3, 2019, Judgment Debtor filed a motion to pay judgment in installments. On October 2, 2019, Judgment Creditor filed an Order to Appear for Examination (set for January 27, 2019). II.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

TD BANK USA, N.A., V SEGURA

Motion: Defendant Frank Segura’s Motion to Pay Judgment in Installments Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 582.5 Tentative Ruling: To deny Defendant Frank Segura’s Motion to Pay Judgment in Installments Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 582.5. Proof that plaintiff TD Bank USA, NA was given adequate notice of the motion is not in the court’s file. Accordingly, under Code of Civil Procedure section 582.5 the motion is denied without prejudice.

  • Hearing

CAPITAL ONE BANK USA NA VS NUNEZ

The Court intends to Grant the Defendant's motion to pay judgment in installments (unopposed).

  • Hearing

JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS LLC VS. DENISE JOHNSON

The Court intends to Grant Defendant/Debtor's unopposed motion to pay judgment in installments.

  • Hearing

FARMERS INSURANCE VS YENDE, BUSISIWE

On June 29, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Pay Judgment in Installments (the “Motion”), requesting that the Court prescribe an installment payment plan of $100 per month payable on the 22nd of each month. (Motion, Yende Decl. ¶ 3.) On July 25, 2018, Plaintiff filed an opposition.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

FARMERS INSURANCE VS YENDE, BUSISIWE

On June 29, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Pay Judgment in Installments (the “Motion”), requesting that the Court prescribe an installment payment plan of $100 per month payable on the 22nd of each month. (Motion, Yende Decl. ¶ 3.) On July 25, 2018, Plaintiff filed an opposition.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

BH FINANCIAL VS. PIERCE

HEARING ON MOTION TO PAY JUDGMENT IN INSTALLMENTS PER CCP 582.5 FILED BY CHRISTOPHER PIERCE * TENTATIVE RULING: * There is no proof of service showing that plaintiff was given notice of this hearing. If defendant sent a copy of the motion to plaintiff, he can call to contest this tentative ruling and appear with a copy of the proof of service. However, the Court notes that a hearing is also set for May 7, 2018 on defendant’s claim of exemption.

  • Hearing

ACCESS GROUP INC. VS PATRICIA RAYOS

TENTATIVE RULING MOTION TO PAY JUDGMENT IN INSTALLMENTS [No Authority Cited] Calendar: 5 Date: 5/19/17 Case No: GC 047616 Trial Date: None Set Case Name: Access Group, Inc. v. Rayos Moving Party: Defendant Patricia Rayos Responding Party: Plaintiff Access Group, Inc. RULING: Motion to Pay Judgment in Installments is denied.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

STATE FARM BANK VS. IRENE CAMACHO

The court's tentative ruling is as follows: Motion to pay judgment in installments is granted. Defendant is ordered to pay to Plaintiff $30 per month beginning January 1, 2014. _____________________________________________ Absent waiver of notice and in the event an order is not signed at the hearing, the prevailing party shall prepare a proposed order and comply with CRC 3.1312 subdivisions (a), (b), (d) and (e).

  • Hearing

CAPITAL ONE BANK USA NA VS. JUANITA L CRAWFORD

The court's tentative ruling is to: Grant the motion to pay judgment in installments, per CCP § 582.5. Order defendant Juanita L. Crawford to pay $50 per month commencing 12/15/11 and $50 each succeeding month thereafter until the entire $2,565.24 is paid off in full. This should result in the judgment being paid off in a little over 4 years.

  • Hearing

CAPITAL ONE BANK USA NA VS. MARIO A MONRREAL

The court's tentative ruling is to: Grant motion to pay judgment in installments pursuant to CCP 585.2. Order a payment schedule of $50 per month commencing on May 31, 2011, and $50 each succeeding month thereafter until the entire $4,805.35 judgment amount is paid in full. (CCP § 585.2)

  • Hearing

SUNLAN-062804, LLC VS. SIRAJ MIRZA

Tentative Ruling Re: Judgment Debtor Siraj Mirza's Motion to Pay Judgment in Installments Grant Judgment Debtor Siraj Mirza's motion to pay the $ 7,304.59 judgment entered against him in monthly installments of $ 50.00, commencing May 15, 2011 until paid. 1. This is a limited case, where the defendant appeared. He is entitled to request to pay the judgment by installments. (Code Civ. Proc., § 582.5.) 2. No opposition was filed. 3.

  • Hearing

1

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.