What is a Motion to Lift Stay?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Lift Stay

Recent Rulings on Motion to Lift Stay

201-225 of 10000 results

APODACA V. RANDSTAD US LLC, ET AL.

(1) Demurrer and Motion to Strike by Defendant COCA-COLA COMPANY (“COCA-COLA”) to Amended Complaint; and (2) Special Demurrer, Demurrer and Motion to Strike by Defendant RANDSTAD US, LLC (“RANDSTAD”) to Amended Complaint TENTATIVE RULING These motions were originally calendared to be heard on April 24, 2020. Due to the COVID-19 emergency and the stipulation of the parties to extend pleading time, the matter was continued by the court to June 4, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

MYHAND VS. ORANGE COAST AUTO GROUP, LLC

to strike class allegations from the SAC a motion to clarify the scope of the surviving class allegations a successful motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Plaintiffs’ individual Automobile Sales Finance Act (ASFA) claim a TAC that deleted the ASFA allegations at issue in the motion for judgment on the pleadings a 4AC that corrected a clerical error in the TAC an unsuccessful motion to strike class allegations from the 4AC a class certification motion that was continued twice for the parties to gather

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

D.L. V. AETNA, INC., ET AL.

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION No tentative ruling.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

LYRIC SANTOS ET AL VS LONG BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET

No appearance is required if proof of purchase of annuity and request for dismissal are filed and entered prior to 12/14/2020. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

SANG KI EUN VS A2Z SMOKE SHOP, ET AL.

Motion to Strike: Punitive Damages The motion to strike is moot per the ruling on demurrer. That said, the same analysis regarding Civ. Code section 3294(b) would apply. Leave would be granted to allege additional facts regarding ratification by a managing agent or corporate officer. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

DELFINA CORTEZ VS DARKSIDE INDUSTRIES INC ET AL

.: BC719914 Hearing Date: August 14, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: Defendant’s motion to re-open discovery Defendants Darkside Industries, Inc. and Henry S. Shuff, II (“Defendants”) move to re-open discovery, which Plaintiff Delfina Cortez (“Plaintiff”) opposes.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

CITY OF COSTA MESA VS. D'ALESSIO INVESTMENTS, LLC

Motion to Appoint Receiver The property at issue here is 1963 Wallace Avenue, Costa Mesa, and is identified by Assessor's Parcel Number 422-271-10 (hereinafter "Subject Property"). It was built in 1956. It is zoned Multi-Family Residential, Medium-Density (R2-MD). The Subject Property consists of four buildings (enumerated Buildings “A” – “D”) and is reportedly permitted for eight (8) residential units and one (1) office unit, for a total of nine units. There are eight (8) garage spaces on the property.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

KATIE O CONNELL MARSH VS GAUMONT TELEVISION USA LLC

The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary adjudication as to Defendants’ thirteenth and fifteenth affirmative defenses. Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling with respect to Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary adjudication. Defendants are ordered to give notice of this ruling with respect to their motion for summary adjudication.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

BAIRD VS. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.

The court needs a copy of the letter to verify that the settlement terms are consistent with the notice provided to the LWDA. Although the motion provides the estimated average payment to class members under the proposed settlement, it fails to provide the estimated high and low payments. Those estimates are needed to assist the court in properly determining the fairness of the proposed settlement to the class. If those figures are not available now, they must be provided in the motion for final approval.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

JOSEPH HARTLEY, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL. VS 935 937 OLIVE STREET LP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

.: 19STCV38615 Hearing Date: August 14, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: (1) motion to compel RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE (2) motion to compel RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE (3) motion to compel RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE Background Plaintiffs Joseph Hartley, Jason Hartley, Manuel Barrios, Richard Peck, Ricky Brown, Sharon Fingers, Matthew Fingers, Debbie Williams, Vincent Shepherd, Jeffrey Robb, Aurora Chavez, Deizariah Brown, Deizmeon Brown, and

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

WYNNE VS WYNNE

It does not appear that the Tatums provided supplemental responses or produced documents prior to the filing of the present sanctions motion. The evidence produced by Cross-Complainants shows a history or animosity and needlessly acrimonious communications between Cross- Complainants’ counsel and prior counsel for the Tatums. The hostility from both sides has blocked any productive discovery meet and confer process and required multiple discovery motions. In July 2020, the Tatums retained new counsel.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

HUA STAR CAPITAL USA, LLC VS DONALD G ABBEY, ET AL.

The demurrers were sustained with leave to amend as to the first cause of action for negligence and sustained without leave to amend as to the second cause of action for breach of implied warranty, and, at the concession of plaintiff in the opposition papers, sustained without leave to amend to the third cause of action for strict liability. The Second Amended Complaint asserts one cause of action for negligence.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

MIGUEL GUTIERREZ, ET AL. VS FCA US LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.

FCA points to 3.1 hours spent by Knight Law on drafting discovery requests and 4.8 hours spent by Knight Law in drafting the fee motion. The Court has reviewed Knight Law’s invoices and finds no excessive billing. Knight Law propounded several sets of written discovery accounting for the 3.1 hours billed on that task. Knight Law also produced a comprehensive fee motion accounting for the 4.8 hours billed on that task.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MARAT CHORNY VS SPECIAL CAKES BY RUBEN, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

Goorvitch found that Defendant was a suspended corporation and lacked legal capacity to defend a civil action during its suspension. Nonparty Ohio Security Insurance Company ("Ohio") filed the instant motion on July 20, 2020. No opposition has been filed. RELIEF REQUESTED: Ohio moves for leave to intervene in the instant lawsuit pursuant to CCP § 387.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

LEIGH E. CHARNESS, AN INDIVIDUAL D/B/A LAW OFFICES OF LEIGH E. CHARNESS VS KATHERINE GOLDMAN, ET AL.

For purposes of the demurrer, the first amended complaint alleges a minimum sum subject to dispute and in the control of Defendant. Further refinement of the amount can be resolved in discovery. The demurrer is therefore OVERRULED in its entirety. Motion to Strike: Denied. Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the punitive damages claim. The claim for punitive damages contains sufficient support based on the fraud causes of action. (Civ. Code, § 3294, subd. (c)(3).) The motion to strike is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JULIO CESAR CARMONA SANCHEZ VS GEORGE A AVILA, JR.

Avila Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Complaint, filed on 2/28/20, is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR as it is rendered moot by the filing of a First Amended Complaint on 4/13/20.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

REMI M VS WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER ET AL

.: BC710582 Hearing Date: August 14, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to compel auerbach to comply with deposition subpoena Background A. Complaint Plaintiff Remi M. (Plaintiff) commenced this action against Defendants White Memorial Medical Center (WMMC) and Adventist Health System/West (Adventist Health) (collectively, Defendants) on June 20, 2018. The operative pleading is the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed on September 4, 2018.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

BLAKESLEE, ET AL. V. DANIEL ANSEL AS CO-ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF JOSEPH ANTHONY TENA, ET AL.

MOTION TO STRIKE Moving Defendants’ motion to strike alter ego allegations from the FAC, is granted in part and denied in part. Moving Defendants move to strike paragraphs 49, 54 and 58 from the FAC. Although the motion is entitled as if Moving Defendants were targeting only the alter ego allegations, they also include allegations of an agency or successor relationship. The motion is granted with respect to only the alter ego allegations in paragraphs 49, 54, and 58 of the FAC.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

JEFF WADE, ET AL. VS SOURTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

If this assertion is an argument that the attorney’s fees allegation should be stricken, a motion to strike should have been filed. The demurrer on this ground also is overruled, and the demurrer to the first cause of action is accordingly overruled.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

BARBER VS ARMSTRONG GARDEN CENTERS INC.

Plaintiff Barber’s Motion for Approval of Class Settlement 2. Status Conference

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

THE SUNSET LANDMARK INVESTMENT, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PETITIONER VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL.

While Petitioner styles this motion as a “motion to augment,” the Petitioner is actually moving to correct the administrative record in accordance with section 21167.6(e). The extra-record requirements of CCP section 1094.5(e) do not apply to such a motion. (Madera, supra, 199 Cal.App.4th 48, 62 (distinguishing the two approaches).) Finally, the City attempts to assign blame for the non-inclusion of these documents to Petitioner. The Court does not see how this argument is fruitful.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

STARR VS. MAYHEW

Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award Petition to Correct/Vacate Arbitration Award This matter is Continued to 9/25/2020. Clerk shall give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

EDGAR PRADO VS CASTA CONSTRUCTION INC.

F-47 Date: 8/14/20 Case #19CHCV00325 MOTION FOR UNDERTAKING Motion filed on 3/4/20. MOVING PARTY: Defendant Casta Construction, Inc. RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Edgar Prado NOTICE: ok RELIEF REQUESTED: An order requiring an undertaking to secure an award of costs and attorneys’ fees in the amount of $54,300.00 pursuant to CCP 1030. RULING: The motion is denied without prejudice. This action arises out of Plaintiff’s employment with Defendant.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

HUGO PLANCARTE VS GENERAL MOTORS LLC

The Court also finds that Plaintiff has engaged in misuse of the discovery process under Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.010, by failing to sufficiently meet and confer by letter, telephone or in person in a reasonable and good faith attempt to informally resolve the issues in dispute raised in this motion, failing to submit the proper declaration in support of this motion, failing to comply with this Court's May 14, 2020 Order, and bringing this motion without substantial justification, even after being

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

URIOSTEGUI-LOPEZ VS. FCA US, LLC

Plaintiff to give notice. The motion by Plaintiff Susana Uriostegui-Lopez to compel further responses from Defendant FCA US, LLC, to Requests for Production (Set One) is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff to give notice. The motion by Plaintiff Susana Uriostegui-Lopez to compel further responses from Defendant FCA US, LLC, to Requests for Admission (Set One) is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.