What is a Motion to Lift Stay?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Lift Stay

Recent Rulings on Motion to Lift Stay

176-200 of 10000 results

MONEYGRAM VS CASA DE CAMBIO

. _____________________________________________ The following is the Court's tentative decision concerning the motion of defendants, Casa De Cambio Calle Quinta, Inc., and Maria Luna ("defendants"), to compel further responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set Two, directed to plaintiff, Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc. ("plaintiff"): The Court GRANTS defendants' motion to compel further responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set Two, numbers 9 and 10.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

LISA HERNANDEZ SOLIS VS. CAMERON KIEFER

Notice Regarding Courtroom 20 Law & Motion Procedures: The law and motion calendar in Courtroom 20 before Judge Matthew P. Guasco starts promptly at 8:30 a.m. Ex parte applications will be heard at the same time as matters on the law and motion calendar. Parties appearing by Court Call must check in with the Judicial Assistant by 8:20 a.m. No notice of intent to appear is required.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

MARIANNE SABY VS DEBRA LOUKS

Discussion: Timeliness of Defendant's Motion: Upon the filing of an application to renew a judgement, the court clerk shall enter the renewal of the judgment in the court records. CCP § 683.150(a). The judgment creditor shall serve a notice of renewal of the judgment on the judgment debtor [defendant] who has 30 days within which to make a motion to vacate or modify the renewal. CCP § 683.160(a). Plaintiffs argue that Defendant's motion to vacate the renewal of judgment should be denied as untimely.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

GDNSHIP OF CARLOS LOBO

RE: SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE FINDINGS FILED ON 02/14/20 BY XIOMARA BEATRIZ LOPEZ LOBO PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proof of mailing to all parties entitled to notice Note: Spanish interpreter requested

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

GDNSHIP OF JOSE LOBO

RE: PET’N FOR APPTMNT OF GRDN OF PERSON FILED ON 02/14/20 BY XIOMARA BEATRIZ LOPEZ LOBO PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF MASSOUD FAQUIRYAN

Letters of Temporary Guardianship issued to petitioner expire 10-29-20. 2. Court will dispense with further formal service on mother Melissa Salinas, pursuant to Decl. filed 2-13-2020, 2-21-2020 and 7-22-2020. Court will dispense with further formal service on unknown maternal and paternal grandparents, pursuant to Decl. attached to UCCJEA Form GC-120 filed 7-22-2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS OF JAMES D. BROWN

Nina Dong is ordered to appear, pursuant to 6-29-2020 minute order Note: Letters of Temporary Conservatorship of Person/Estate issued to Public Guardian 3- 29-19. C.C. COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES DEPT COUNTY COUNSEL NENITA BERMUDEZ KONSTATINE A DEMIRIS

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

KIRA WALTHER AND HOWARD WALTHER

The Court grants Petitioner’s Request to Relocate the minor children to Boise, Idaho.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

SAMUEL SALEMAN, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, EMANUEL SOMECH VS ROSARIO GONZALEZ

ORDER Defendant Monex Credit Company's Motion to Compel Arbitration came on regularly for hearing on August 14, 2020, with appearances/submissions as noted in the minute order for said hearing, and the court, being fully advised in the premises, did then and there rule as follows: THE MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION IS GRANTED. DATE: _______________ _______________________________ JUDGE

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

EAG INVESTMENTS LLC VS. STEHRENBERGER

Motion to Quash Subpoena The Court continues the hearing of Motion to Quash Subpoena filed by "Nonparty Witness" Travis Agle to September 11, 2020, at 9:30 am in Dept. C16. The clerk is to give notice to the movant (Travis Agle) and all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

LOEFFLER VS. DEMARS & ASSOCIATES, LTD

Defendant’s motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

MARTINEZ VS. HARDIN IRVINE AUTOMOTIVE, INC

Plaintiff Leroy Martinez's Motion to Approve Settlement of PAGA Penalties, Settlement, and Release Agreement The hearing on the parties’ joint motion for approval of PAGA settlement is CONTINUED to September 18, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. in Department CX104 to permit the parties to respond to the following items of concern. Any supplemental briefing shall be filed on or before September 9, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

JAVIER ESPANA VS FRANK ALONSO ET AL

Plaintiff has still not filed a brief summary of the case identifying the parties and the nature of Plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1800(a)(1) despite this court explicitly stating this requirement in its prior ruling. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion is denied without prejudice. Dated: ____________________________ Gregory Alarcon Superior Court Judge

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

RON CUELLAR VS WESTGATE COMMUNITY BIBLE CHURCH

Opposing Burden Any opposition to the motion was due on or before 8/3/20. As of August 10, 2020, the court has not received any opposition to the motion. Plaintiff thus failed to meet the shifted burden, and the motion is granted. Conclusion Defendant Corona South Hills Community Church’s motion for summary judgment is granted. Moving Defendant is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

FURRIEL VS. CSE INSURANCE GROUP

Plaintiff’s counsel is hereby reminded of his obligation to comply with CRC 3.1324 in connection with motions for leave to file an amended complaint. Failure to comply in the future will result in a denial of the motion. Plaintiff is to file the Second Amended Complaint by August 19, 2020. Demurrer. In light of the ruling on the Motion for Leave to Amend, Defendants’ Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint is moot. Plaintiff to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

VIVIAN BANH VS LAW OFFICES OF LARRY H. PARKER

On February 19, 2020, Defendant filed the instant unopposed motion to deem the requests for admission admitted and request for monetary sanctions in the amount of $2,500.00 against Plaintiff. ANALYSIS: A. Relevant Law For a motion to compel, all a propounding party must show is that it properly served its discovery requests, that the time to respond has expired, and that the party to whom the requests were directed failed to provide a timely response. (See Leach v.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY VS JANIS GOLDMAN

Now, Petitioner seeks to compel further responses to certain FROG and SROG. The Court grants the motion in part and denies the motion in part as follows: 1. FROG #6.4(b)-(d), FROG #6.5, SROG #23, SROG #24, and SROG #29 – Respondent represents that she will provide further responses by September 30, 2020. Therefore, the motion is granted with respect to these discovery requests.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

SAGE M. MCADAMS VS KIUMARS ARFAI, ET AL.

AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE NORTH VALLEY DISTRICT, JUDGE MELVIN D. SANDVIG presiding in DEPT. F47 of the CHATSWORTH Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANDREA DEBOSE ET AL VS ROBERT WELLER

The court notes that there is no meet and confer requirement prior to filing a motion to compel responses pursuant to CCP §§ 2030.290 or 2031.300, or for a motion to deem admitted under CCP § 2033.280.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

CANDIDA COTTO VS HOLLYWOOD PIANO COMPANY

Demurrer On March 9, 2020, Plaintiff filed a demurrer to Defendant’s answer and affirmative defenses. On July 24, 2020, Defendant filed an opposition to the demurrer. DISCUSSION Plaintiff demurs to the answer and the 1st to 22nd affirmative defenses asserted by Defendant in its answer. A. Time to Answer Plaintiff argues that Defendant belatedly filed an answer. Pursuant to CCP §412.20, a defendant has 30 days after the summons is served on it to file a response to the complaint.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

AMERICAN EXPRESS VS. DANIEL, CHARMAINE

Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Judgment and Dismiss Action with Prejudice – GRANTED, and unopposed. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief. The judgment is vacated and the matter is dismissed with prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

THE CANADA TRUST CO. V. DOCKTER

(1) Judgment Debtor’s Motion to Quash Subpoena. (2) Judgment Debtor Examination. Judgment Debtor’s Motion to Quash Subpoena. Upon stipulation of the judgment debtor and judgment creditor, the motion to quash subpoena is dropped from the calendar. Judgment Debtor Examination. The judgment creditor requested that the judgment debtor exam be dropped from the calendar. TENTATIVE RULING # 1: UPON STIPULATION OF THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR AND JUDGMENT CREDITOR, THE MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA IS DROPPED FROM THE CALENDAR.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

GREENOUGH V. FAMILY CARE CENTERS MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ET AL.

Hearing on motion for summary judgment off-calendar. Notice of withdrawal of motion filed 7/13/2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

WORLD LAB U.S.A., INC. V. YAMAKAWA

Counsel should be prepared to address whether the Court should exercise its discretion in considering the evidence. Counsel should also be prepared to discuss whether Plaintiff has shown a reasonable and good faith attempt at an informal resolution of each issue presented by the motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310, subd. (b)(2); see Code Civ. Proc., § 2016.040.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

ALICE JUNE DAVIDSON VS ANDREA LIN, ET AL.

Motion on Calendar On February 28, 2020, Lin filed a motion for leave of Court to file a cross-complaint. On March 9, 2020, Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion. On March 13, 2020, Lin filed a reply brief. On March 12, 2020, the Court held a hearing on Lin’s ex parte application to continue the trial date and for leave to file a cross-complaint. The Court denied the ex parte application. On August 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed an unauthorized sur-reply.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.