What is a Motion to Lift Stay?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Lift Stay

Recent Rulings on Motion to Lift Stay

151-175 of 10000 results

ASTRID G NELSON MEGEL ET AL VS THE STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Compel; Motion for Leave to File FAC; Motion for Trial Preference; Case Management Conference Tentative Ruling: 1. The court grants plaintiffs Astrid G. Nelson Megel and Clifford Nelson’s motion for trial preference under CCP § 36(a). The court sets this matter for trial call on December 4, 2020 at 11:30 am. 2. The court grants, in part, plaintiffs Astrid G.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

CHELSEA HERZOG VS NUSIL TECHNOLOGY LLC ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: (3) Motions to Compel TENTATIVE RULING: Defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to attend deposition is moot and ordered off calendar. Defendants’ request for monetary sanctions as part of this motion is denied. Defendants’ motion to compel further responses to written discovery is denied without prejudice. Defendants’ request for monetary sanctions as part of this motion is denied.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

COURTNEY CROSBY VS SPITZER HELICOPTER LLC ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Quash Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ASTRID G NELSON MEGEL ET AL VS THE STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Compel; Motion for Leave to File FAC; Motion for Trial Preference; Case Management Conference Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

TAYLER HANNES VS PARKS MANAGEMENT COMPANY

Nature of Proceedings: Case Management Conference; Motion to Compel Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

CHELSEA HERZOG VS NUSIL TECHNOLOGY LLC ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: (3) Motions to Compel Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

COURTNEY CROSBY VS SPITZER HELICOPTER LLC ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Quash The Court will continue the hearing on this motion to December 11, 2020, to allow plaintiff sufficient opportunity to conduct discovery on the jurisdictional issues. Plaintiff may file supplemental opposition to the motion no later than November 30, 2020, and defendant Avco may reply to that supplemental opposition by papers filed no later than December 4, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

TAYLER HANNES VS PARKS MANAGEMENT COMPANY

Nature of Proceedings: Case Management Conference; Motion to Compel Tentative Ruling: The court grants defendant Parks Management Company’s Petition to Compel Arbitration and Motion to Stay Litigation. The court orders plaintiffs Tayler Hannes and Paul Voigt to arbitrate the first eight causes of action in their first amended complaint and orders that this action is stayed pending the arbitration. Background: This is a purported class action for wages and Labor Code violations.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

IN THE MATTER OF SEAN WILLIAM HAINES REEDER

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF JEREMY BALLARD

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

BUCHANAN V. ARAMARK CAMPUS, LLC, ET AL.

NOTICE: Pursuant to the Judicial Council’s Emergency Rule 3(a)(1) and (3), all law and 13 motion hearings will be conducted telephonically until further notice. Please see the General 14 Order re: COVID-19 Emergency Order Regarding Complex Civil Actions, and in particular sections 7 and 10.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

360 RESIDENCES, L.P. V. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC., ET AL.

To the extent WSP refers to these statements for their effect as a 18 declaration to establish the truth of other matters in the Notice of Completion, the hearsay 19 exception for the use of declarations in motion practice is inapplicable here because the 20 verification in the Notice of Completion is not a declaration filed in support of a motion in the 21 present action. (See Code Civ.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL.

Plaintiffs state that 10 Roston agreed to be an additional class representative in this matter, but the case resolved before 11 Plaintiffs’ counsel filed a motion to add him as a class representative. Plaintiffs assert that 12 Roston has participated in providing information to Plaintiffs’ counsel, and the settlement 13 agreement treats him as a plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF ERIC OTA

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

MARTINEZ V. FRITO-LAY, INC., ET AL.

Class members 2 who wish to appear at the final fairness hearing should contact class counsel to arrange a telephonic appearance through CourtCall, at least three days before the 3 hearing if possible. Any CourtCall fees for an appearance by an objecting class member will be paid by class counsel. 7 The motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement is GRANTED, subject 8 to the modification to the class notice. The final approval hearing is set for December 11, 2020, 9 at 9:00 a.m.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL.

Plaintiffs state 5 Roston agreed to be an additional class representative in this matter, but the case resolved before 6 Plaintiffs’ counsel filed a motion to add him as a class representative. Plaintiffs assert that 7 Roston has participated in providing information to Plaintiffs’ counsel, and the settlement 8 agreement treats him as a plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF SALVADOR BELTRAN VAZQUEZ

Continue for a complete capacity declaration to be filed as to requested authority for MND placement and administration of medications. Set due dates and hearing dates for care plan, I&A, annual status report and first account.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF CARMEN ANA WELLS

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF SHELDON ALI CHAN

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF THE BROWN CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST

Yin Brown to Return Personal Property to petitioner. The court ordered A. Yin Brown to immediately return $1,309,099.44 to petitioner, Joseph H. Brown and respondent A. Yin Brown's jointly owned bank accounts. The court set this hearing to confirm the transfer of the money to petitioner. Need status of transfer.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL.

MOTION TO QUASH 2 Shugong moves to quash service of the summons and the FAC on the grounds that SinCo 3 attempted substitute service at his purported residence in Singapore, but he does not reside at that 4 address or even in Singapore. 5 Generally, “[a] summons may be served by personal delivery of a copy of the summons 6 and of the complaint to the person to be served.” (Code Civ.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF KAYLIE ANDERSON

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IRIS BERNDT BY AND THROUGH HER SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST ANDREA HUNSBERGER VS. COASTAL VIEW HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC

Ratification allegations are sufficient as Plaintiffs have identified the Administrators, their knowledge of the staff's failings and the Administrator's failure to act. Cal. Civ. Code § 3294. The Court overrules the demurrer to Cause of Action 3 – Wrongful death: there is no statute of limitation issue. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 338(a), Cal. Health & Safety Code § 1430(a) (b). Defendant's Motion to strike is moot. First amended complaint due by September 9, 2020. Moving party to give notice

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

WILLIAMS VS ATRIA LAS POSAS

Notice Regarding Courtroom 20 Law & Motion Procedures: The law and motion calendar in Courtroom 20 before Judge Matthew P. Guasco starts promptly at 8:30 a.m. Ex parte applications will be heard at the same time as matters on the law and motion calendar. Parties appearing by Court Call must check in with the Judicial Assistant by 8:20 a.m. No notice of intent to appear is required.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

MONEYGRAM VS CASA DE CAMBIO

. _____________________________________________ The following is the Court's tentative decision concerning the motion of defendants, Casa De Cambio Calle Quinta, Inc., and Maria Luna ("defendants"), to compel further responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set Two, directed to plaintiff, Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc. ("plaintiff"): The Court GRANTS defendants' motion to compel further responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set Two, numbers 9 and 10.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.