What is a Motion to Lift Stay?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Lift Stay

Recent Rulings on Motion to Lift Stay

9976-10000 of 10000 results

CAREY F. MCLAUGHLIN VS KATHLEEN MCMANUS-PELOSO

In light of the liberal policy in allowing amendment, the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Therefore, CHPC’s motion for summary adjudication of the punitive damages claim is granted. Attorney Fees and Costs The issue of attorney fees and costs are not properly subject to a motion for summary adjudication and will therefore not be addressed in this ruling. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (f)(1).) Conclusion CHPC’s motion for summary judgment is denied.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

AARON MEYER VS BRET BREWER

The court notes a statement of damages was not filed pursuant to CCP §425.11. The court will permit an amended complaint be filed within 15 days and to be served within 60 days. The OSC is discharged. The court sets a case management conference in 120 days: ______________.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MICHAEL JACOBSEN VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

MOTION FOR AN ORDER COMPELLING VERIZON TO COMPLY WITH A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE RECORDS [CCP §2025.480(a)] Date: 6/29/20 (10:00 a.m.) Case: Jacobsen v. Southern California Edison Company, et al. (18STCV09319) TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Michael Jacobsen’s Motion for An Order Compelling Verizon to Comply with a Subpoena to Produce Records is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

IN RE THE MATTER OF LOUIS MICHAEL SMALDINO SURVIVOR’S TRUST

However, because of emergency orders and public health directives due to the COVID-19 pandemic, neither counsel, petitioner, nor any interested party need appear in person, but may do so. Counsel for petitioner will receive an invitation to attend court remotely via Zoom. Counsel may forward that invitation to petitioner and any other interested party who may also appear remotely.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

ROY MASON VS NATUREWELL, ET AL.

location of the alleged barrier to enable a reasonable person to identify the access barrier

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

ARTUR MANUKYAN VS YS PROPERTIES LLC

L-3 (Count Two) alleges Willful Failure to Warn pursuant to Civil Code §846 but is not applicable and there are no facts to support it.” (Motion, p. 2:8-10.) In opposition, Plaintiff argues that “Defendant’s motion violates Code of Civil Procedure §437(c)(f)(1).” (Opp., p. 2:2.)

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

ALLEEANCE SERVICE GROUP, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL. VS JOHN SUH, ET AL.

The Court suggests that Plaintiffs prepare a stipulation to file a corrected TAC with the signed Subcontract attached and with the error corrected and submit it to Defendants for their signature and ultimate filing with the Court to avoid further motion practice during these challenging times. The Court orders Defendants to file and serve an answer within 10 days of the date of this order. Defendants are ordered to give notice of this Order. DATED: June 29, 2020 ________________________________ Hon.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ROBSON VS CARNO

Continued to 7/6/20

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

SNELL V. QUINN

Subject to Defendant either (1) confirming that it was properly served with the initial opposition papers, or (2) waiving any improper service, the Court tentatively grants the motion in part and denies the motion in part. To the extent Defendant was not properly served with the Opposition and wishes to file a reply brief, the hearing will be continued to permit Defendant an opportunity to do so.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

LISA PORUSH VS CALIX DRUG PHARMACY, INC.

Therefore, the Petition is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PETITIONER FILING AND SERVING AN AMENDED PETITION PURSUANT TO THE CORRECT STATUTORY AUTHORITY. Court clerk to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

DAVID J. DOVICHI VS. JAMES V. DE LA VERGNE

Defendant points to no legal authority to support her position that service was timely and/or that the failure to effectuate timely service can be cured in any way. Accordingly, the Court lacks jurisdiction to rule on the motion and the motion therefore is DROPPED.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JOSE CERVANTES VS PAK FAMILY CORPORATION ET AL

This motion has also not been opposed by any party to the case. The motion to be relieved as counsel is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

MORELLO V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC.

1) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories 2) Motion to Compel Production Motion to Compel Defendant’s Further Responses to Special Interrogatories (Set One) Motion to Compel Defendant’s Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents (Set One) Plaintiff Ronald Jeffery Morello (“Plaintiff”) seeks an order striking the objections by Defendant Kia Motors America, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF: ARNOLD BURAG MARUKOGLU

The Court intends to GRANT the Petition. PLEASE DO NOT APPEAR IN PERSON ON THE DATE OF THE HEARING. NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. To obtain a Certified Copy of your Name Change Decree, please send a request with the required fee to Attn: Certification Unit, Los Angeles Superior Court, 111 North Hill Street, Room 112C, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Please include your name and Case Number on your request. The Court’s schedule of fees can be viewed at: http://www.lacourt.org/forms/Fees

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

SHONG-CHING TONG VS DAVIND HUANG, M.D., AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

For failing to comply with discovery obligations and thereby forcing defendants to file this motion, the Court imposes $2,589.50 in monetary sanctions on plaintiff Shong-Ching Tong (5 hours x $210 per hour + $374.50 court reporter (Powell Decl. Ex. H) + $1,105 interpreter (Powell Decl. Ex. I) + $60.00 motion filing fee), payable to defendants’ counsel within 30 days.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANTHONY BLISS VS LEONORA FIHMAN, ET AL.

Motion to Strike Any party, within the time allowed to respond to a pleading may serve and file a notice of motion to strike the whole or any part thereof. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 435, subd. (b)(1); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1322, subd. (b).)

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

DEREK PARK VS THE CIRCLE II, INC., ET AL.

The motion reflects non-compliance with CRC Rule 3.1324. In addition to deleting allegations regarding the Act, the proposed SAC appears to add causes of action for fraud and Violation of Labor Code section 2802. With that said, the court notes that neither defendant has filed a responsive pleading, to date (i.e., as of June 17, 2020, 9:03 a.m.). Plaintiff’s motion is granted.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

JOHNNY GALLO VS SARA GHIRUM ET AL

Instead, Defendants quote the applicable time limit – obliquely – in their motion, but they make no reference to the actual time limit under the rule to which they refer, Rule 8.278(c)(1). (Defendants’ Motion, at pp. 3-4.) That rule establishes the 40-day limit.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

CHERE PHILLIPS VS. VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and pursuant to the Presiding Judge's Order re: Implementation of Emergency Relief, dated March 17, 2020, and related subsequent administrative orders of the Presiding Judge, the parties are to appear at 1:30 p.m. via Zoom conference by the link and ID number(s) below. https://saccourt.zoom.us/my/dept41a (888) 475-4499 ID: 349 373 7884

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

NAVID ASLAM VS. CYPRESS SECURITY LLC

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and pursuant to the Presiding Judge's Order re: Implementation of Emergency Relief, dated March 17, 2020, and related subsequent administrative orders of the Presiding Judge, the parties are to appear at 11:30 a.m. via Zoom conference by the link and ID number(s) below. https://saccourt.zoom.us/my/dept41a (888) 475-4499 ID: 349 373 7884

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

METALS USA SPECIALTY METALS NORTHCENTRAL INC VS ORION SOLAR

(Motion at 3:10-16.) Plaintiff’s motion is unopposed. Due to Plaintiff’s motion being unopposed, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for an order setting aside dismissal and entering judgment against Defendant pursuant to the stipulation entered into between the parties. (Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 1403, 1410.) Moving party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CHARLES MENDOZA, ET AL. VS FCA US, LLC, ET AL.

20STCV05524 CHARLES MENDOZA vs FCA US, LLC Defendants FCA US, LLC and Redlands Automotive Sales, Inc’s Motion to Transfer Venue TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to transfer and request for sanctions is DENIED. Defendants filed their answers in this matter without filing a motion to transfer venue. Therefore, whether to transfer this action at this late date is within the court’s discretion. Walt Disney Parks & Resorts U.S., Inc. (2018) 21 Cal.App.5th 872, 876.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

MARIA CERVANTES VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY METRO TRANS AUTHORITY

Plaintiff failed to arrange for an IDC prior to the filing of this motion. Further, Defendant had a good faith basis for opposing the motion. Given those factors, the Court finds that the imposition of sanctions would be unjust and the Court declines to impose them here.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

MARTINEZ VS ROSS

Motion granted. No opposition filed. Court will sign proposed order at hearing, with modifications as to TSC date.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  « first    1 ... 395 396 397 398 399 400

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.