What is a Motion to Lift Stay?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Lift Stay

Recent Rulings on Motion to Lift Stay

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Provided that the City will stipulate to a preliminary injunction with respect to the provisions of Ordinance No. 6374 relating to immediate warrantless access to the short-term rental (STR) units, the Court DENIES the application for a preliminary injunction in all other respects, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

With respect to the first question, the Court concludes that Section 13.2(f) does not preclude SARVS from attempting to obtain compensation for any alleged loss of goodwill. Notably, nowhere in that section is there any reference to goodwill or any statement to the effect that any potential item of compensation not explicitly referenced therein is considered waived.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

The motion is MOOT as to Issue 2, which seeks adjudication of the Third Cause of Action, which Plaintiffs dismissed as to Count 1, under the General Contract. [ROA 2604.] The Court’s analysis with respect to Saddleback’s motion directed to the contract claims applies equally to this motion. 4.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

CAS004001, as amended on June 16, 2015 by State Board Order WQ 2015-0075, which is remanded to you for reconsideration in light of the Decision of this Court dated April 18, 2019. Nothing herein shall limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in you. YOU ARE FURTHER COMMANDED to file with this Court a return to this writ on or before (90 plus 30 days as per Respondents’ request) stating what you have done to comply.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Plaintiff Francisco Velazquez’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Kim D. Stephens, Gregory F. Coleman, Paul C. Peel, Jason T. Dennett and Adam A. Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3).

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

MALIN VS AMBRY GENETICS CORPORATION

Continued to 7-19-2019

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

HASMIK KANATARYAN, ET AL. VS CHARLENE SARSTEDT, ET AL.

The following order was made on 10-20-20 and sent to Plaintiff's counsel.

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2020

1301 GLADSTONE STREET INVESTORS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ET, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

On or about May 2, 2018, Plaintiff and Defendant Et, Inc. dba Golden Spoon (“Et”) entered into a written agreement, wherein Et agreed to lease the premises from Plaintiff. Et breached the lease by vacating the Premises prior to the termination date and by failing to make payments due thereunder. Ali T. Demirel (“Demirel”) is liable via his execution of a guaranty of the lease.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE EAST DISTRICT, JUDGE GLORIA QHITE-BROWN presiding in DEPT. J of the Pomona Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

DEREK LEE VS JOANNA BOEY

Thus, Attorney Saunders has failed to properly attest to his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or neglect. The Motion is DENIED. Plaintiff’s application for default judgment is GRANTED. The Court will inquire of the parties whether Defendant has to ability to file another motion to set aside the Default Judgment within the next six months. The Default Judgment will be processed tomorrow and it appears that Defendant may be able to file another motion.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

VEJ POMONA 8, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. VS FRANK CURTIN, ET AL.

Under Code of Civil Procedure section 580(a), “[t]he relief granted to the plaintiff, if there is no answer, cannot exceed that demanded in the complaint, in the statement required by Section 425.11, or in the statement provided for by Section 425.115[.]” If Plaintiffs seek additional damages in addition to those set forth in the Complaint, Plaintiffs need to amend the Complaint to properly reflect the requested damages and give notice to Defendant.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

Again, at this point, this does not show a willful act by Defendant JMI to entitle Plaintiffs to punitive damages discovery against it. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

Chen advised Plaintiff that he had been operating a successful business, Tissuesco Group (“Tissuesco”), for many years and could assist Plaintiff to open a business and obtain a visa. On or around March 24, 2018, the parties signed a contract, in which Plaintiff agreed to invest $120,000.00 to Tissuesco and, in return, Tissuesco would open, operate and manage a company for Plaintiff and assist Plaintiff in applying for an L-1 visa.

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

PETITION OF JANICE ANN DEGRAY ADACHI

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE FILED BY JANICE ANN DEGRAY ADACHI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Janice Adachi still must do the following: File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name JANICE ANN DEGRAY ADACHI MICHAEL RINNE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Jo Ann Schreiber still must do the following: File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name JO ANN SCHREIBER KAREN S.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF ANNIE MAE NASH

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status of filing final accounting, pursuant to 9-25-2020 minute order ANNIE MAE NASH MAGANY ABBASS ANNIE MAE NASH, SPECIAL NEEDS DARNELL ROLLINS AUDREY D. SHIELDS Drop. Note: First Account and Report filed by Public Guardian is set for hearing 12-14-2020. PUBLIC GUARDIAN STEVEN P RETTIG VERNE VANVLEAR EVAN GOLOGORSKY VERNE VANVLEAR MATTHEW B TALBOT

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF PHYLLIS J. THAMES

RE: PET’N FOR APPROVAL OF FIRST ACCT FILED ON 07/21/20 BY JOHN A MOZEE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to explain NSF charges on account 4/16/2019, 5/2/2019 and 5/20/2019 JOHN A MOZEE CAROLYN D CAIN PHYLLIS J THAMES PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Wesley Douglas Jones, son, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing to report status 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

FALISHA PORTER VS PHARMAVITE, LLC

TENTATIVE RULING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO QUASH 10/30/2020 First Amended Complaint alleges: In or around July 2018, defendant began psychological abuse against plaintiff Plaintiff was exposed to conversations, sounds, dinging of a bell, lines of people Plaintiff was a satisfactory employee with no reprimands Plaintiff was exposed to hours a day of throat clearing Plaintiff heard conversations about her personal life Plaintiff was exposed to mimicking Plaintiff was exposed to coordination of colors of clothes

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

FALISHA PORTER VS PHARMAVITE, LLC

As to the subpoena to Optum Health, by claiming emotional distress damages and inability to work for a period of time, plaintiff has waived the right to privacy with respect to records concerning her medical condition or diagnoses which prevented her from working and as to her emotional distress damages from this case. However, the court will discuss whether records showing medical time off from other jobs is relevant or protected by privacy.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

RE: CECIL W. RITZ TRUST

RE: MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO FM INTERRGATORIES AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS FILED ON 07/06/20 BY BRIAN KUCHARSKI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Moving paper is in Vol. 1 Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: VERIFIED PET’N FOR ORDER CONFIRMING TRUST ASSETS

FILED ON 06/29/20 BY LYDIA K MORENO, JAMES M WALSH PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify current address of Peter Walsh. Proof of Service attached to Notice filed 7-13-2020 reflects mailing to him at an address other than that listed in petition. 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to include pages 11-12 of trust, not attached as indicated. CAROL L. WALSH TRUST DATED MAY JAMES M WALSH JENNIFER L.

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF WILLIAM LEE ANDERSON

Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify whether Laurie Fogerty named in will is the same person as Laurie Cunliffe named in Item # 8 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to include current address of Laurie Cunliffe so court can confirm mailing. Proof of Service attached to Notice filed 9-28-2020 reflects mailing to her at an address other than that listed in petition. 4.

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF JOHN MATTHEW MARCELO LEE

JOHN MATTHEW MARCELO LEE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Ma Adelfa Bollozos still must do the following: File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name MA ADELFA BOLLOZOS JASON A CUEVA

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: CECIL W. RITZ TRUST

RE: MOTION TO QUASH MOTION TO ORDER MATTERS DEEMED ADMITTED FILED ON 08/27/20 BY KELLY D SISNEROZ PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order FILED ON 07/06/20 BY BRIAN KUCHARSKI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF JAMES L LANGSTON, JR

RE: SPOUSAL PROPERTY PETITION FILED ON 11/13/19 BY MARIA GARDNER LANGSTON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status, including 8-11-2020 order to meet and confer and mediation FILED ON 08/27/20 BY KELLY D SISNEROZ PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order Note: Memorandum of Petitioner Brian Kucharski in Opposition to Motions to Quash Discovery Motions filed 10-14-2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: CECIL W. RITZ TRUST

RE: MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPS TO REQS FOR DOCS; DOCUMENT PRODUCTION FILED ON 07/06/20 BY BRIAN KUCHARSKI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order Drop. Note: Calendared in error by clerk. CRYSTAL WHITEHEAD NIA CHRYSSIKOS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petitioners, daughters of decedent, still must do the following: 1. File evidence of what Notice of Hearing was served.

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.