What is a Motion to Disqualify Counsel?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Disqualify Counsel

Recent Rulings on Motion to Disqualify Counsel

1-25 of 10000 results

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

The Court has considered the administrative and the supplemental records, the papers of the parties and the arguments of counsel, and it has admitted the administrative record into evidence but declined to receive the supplemental record in evidence as it was unnecessary to its determination. Accordingly, the Court now: ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES that: 1.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

CITRUS OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLGY VS CITRUS VALLEY HEALTH

Counsel for Emanate is admonished. Counsel is instructed to comply with the court’s General Order in future filings. Sealing On August 2, 2019, Emanate filed a “Notice of Lodging. . . Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues Conditionally Under Seal,” a “Notice of Lodging. . . Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of. . . Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication of Issues” and a “Notice of Lodging Compendium of Evidence in Support of. . .

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

ANTHONY SAM VS RENEE KWAN ET AL

Board of Fire and Police Pension Commissioners’ counsel, Christopher E. Deal, declares that “the proposed amendment could not be made earlier because trial counsel substituted into this matter on December 27, 2019, and identified the necessity of the amendment as soon as was practical upon getting up to speed on this lawsuit.” (Deal Decl., ¶ 8.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

MED CAFE CORP, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS MOSTAFA KARIMBEIK, ET AL.

Defense counsel represents she met and conferred by letter when Defendants were contemplating filing an earlier demurrer, and because the amended complaint did not cure the identified deficiencies, defense counsel determined further meet-and-confer efforts were unnecessary. These efforts do not comply with the statutory requirements, which exist to determine whether the parties can reach an agreement as to the issues raised in the demurrer and motion to strike.

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

EDUARD GASPARYAN VS. DANIEL GREEN ET. AL.

It was not until 1/22/20 that plaintiff’s counsel Mr. Tamer responded to the deposition notice indicating that he was not available on 1/24/20 and asking for dates in late February 2020. At that time, trial was set for late February. On 1/29/20, Mr. Tamer indicated that 2/3/20 would be an available date for the deposition but it turns out that defense counsel Mr. Malek was unavailable. On 1/30/20, Mr. Tamer was offered 2/4/20 for the deposition of his client. Mr.

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2020

ESTATE OF T.S. DRAYDEN

Counsel submitted an Ex Parte Application to Correct Clerical Error on 12/9/2019. No revised orders with corrected name of decedent have been submitted ALETHIA DRAYDEN GEORGE HOLLAND T S DRAYDEN FILED ON 08/20/19 BY CSC FIDUCIARIES, INC. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order Notes: 1. Objections filed by David Nace 10-29-19. 2. Response to Objection filed 12-12-19. BARBARA BAILEY CSC FIDUCIARIES, INC.

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ILAN BITTON VS TYLER THORNTON, ET AL.

May ("Applicants") seek admission to appear as counsel pro hac vice to represent Defendants Sunfire Nutrition, LLC and Tyler Thornton in this action, and to be associated as co-counsel with Agnes M. Sullivan. (Letts Application, ¶¶ 1, 6; May Application, ¶¶ 1, 6.) Applicants are residents of Illinois, are members in good standing in the State of Illinois and has been admitted to practice before the Supreme Court, State of Illinois. (Letts Application, ¶¶ 2-4; May Application, ¶¶ 2-4.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

CONS. OF EVELYN BACKMAN

Adoption of the petition by petitioner’s counsel (signed only by petitioner) 2. Confidential Conservator Screening Form GC-314 verified by Megan. Verification is not dated. 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify whether you have attended the orientation class for unlicensed conservators pursuant to LR 7.416 4. Order Appointing Probate Conservator Form GC-340 (adopted 1-15-16) The Court is waiting for these items: 1. Court Investigator’s Report 2. Assessment from Regional Center.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

RE: APL FOR APRVL OF 2ND ACCT, TRANSFER ASSETS, FEES

Appointment of counsel B. Report of court-appointed counsel JULIE ARMENDAREZ MICHAEL RINNE MARTIN ARMENDAREZ MICHAEL RINNE NOAH ARMENDAREZ PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Zenobia Johnson, paternal aunt, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: CONCERNS OF THE CT INVESTG'R, RPT OF COUNSEL SET BY D30 (UMO 5/12/20 PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE

COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES DEPT COUNTY COUNSEL RAYMOND PERRINE

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE

Per 8-12-19 minute order, mother appeared in objection and counsel was appointed for mother, father and minor. 2. Per 11-18-19 minute order, this matter will be set for trial.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

CONS. OF GERALDINE ROSINE

Court ordered counsel to file and serve objection by 7-2-20. None has been filed.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

VAZGEN MIRZAKHANYAN VS JV & T CAPITAL LLC ET AL

Counsel correctly provided a notice of motion and motion to be relieved as counsel; an order granting attorney’s motion to be relieved as counsel; and a declaration in support of the motions to be relieved as counsel. Additionally, the declaration states that Volodya Adanyan was served by mail the copies of the motion and supporting documents, and Counsel confirmed by telephone that her client’s address is current. (See Declaration, Nos. 3(a)(2), 3(b)(1)(b).)

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

STEPHEN J. BROWN VS AMBITIOUS PRODUCTIONS, INC., ET AL.

Plaintiff’s Counsel made many attempts to pick a mediator and schedule mediation, but these attempts were unsuccessful. However, Plaintiff’s counsel did “not believe the lack of meaningful response was due to their gamesmanship.” (Greenup Decl. ¶ 3.) Accordingly, while there is a delay in discovery, it does not appear to be in bad faith. CONCLUSION AND ORDER Based on the forgoing above, Defendants’ motion for leave to file a cross-complaint is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

PETITION OF TAMARIN NICOLE MARTINEZ

The Court requests that counsel provide a courtesy copy. DARLENE D. THOMS J VIRGINIA PEISER DARLENE D. THOMS NICHOLAU W ADAMS JOAN H. PATTERSON J VIRGINIA PEISER SANDRA E. BUEHLER NICHOLAU W ADAMS THE ROBERT W DRAKE, SR. AND LO

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

SAE GLOBAL LOGISTICS LTD. VS RICHARD TSIU, ET AL.

., former counsel for Defendant Richard Tsiu) 2. Plaintiff Sae Global Logistics Ltd.’s MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET TWO Responding Party: Non-Party, Laura Each Nguyen (i.e., former counsel for Defendant Richard Tsiu) Tentative Ruling 1. & 2. See below. Background Plaintiff Sae Global Logistics Ltd. (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of Sae Global Logistics (USA) Inc.

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

SAE GLOBAL LOGISTICS LTD. VS RICHARD TSIU, ET AL.

Plaintiff’s counsel to give notice.” On March 18, 2020, a “Notice Re: Continuance of Hearing and Order” was filed, in which the court continued the April 9, 2020 hearing, on its own motion, to June 18, 2020; Plaintiff’s counsel was provided the notice and ordered to give notice to all other parties. There is no indication on ecourt that this notice was provided.

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

GREGORY WARD VS ISABEL M. COATS

Defendant’s counsel is to lodge a proposed Judgment within 30 days.

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

JULIA SARADJIAN, ET AL. VS ARMEN KHACHATRYAN, ET AL.

Moving Parties also asks the Court to impose $3,007 in monetary sanctions against Defendant/Cross-Complainant Armen Khachatryan and his counsel of record for their abuse of the discovery process. Defendant/Cross-Complainant Armen Khachatryan (“Opposing Party”) asks the Court to impose $2,850 in monetary sanctions against Moving Parties and their counsel of record for bringing this meritless motion.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

MERCURY INSURANCE GROUP VS WENCESLAO RODRIGUEZ, ET AL.

Defendants further declare that they had no knowledge of this lawsuit until counsel contacted them after default had already been entered. (Wenceslao Rodriguez Decl., ¶ 5; Dolores Rodriguez Decl., ¶ 5.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

JANE MI VS HOSSEIN ZAHED ZADEH

Plaintiff and her counsel of record are ordered to pay Defendant $550, jointly and severally, within 30 days of this ruling. Defendant is ordered to give notice of this ruling. The parties are directed to the header of this tentative ruling for further instructions.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

ABEL VALDEZ VS AUGUSTO ROJAS, ET AL.

Defendants seek sanctions against Plaintiff (but not Plaintiff’s counsel) in connection with the motions. The Court concludes that Plaintiff’s failure to respond to the discovery is an abuse of the discovery process. The Court awards sanctions against Plaintiff (but not Plaintiff’s counsel), in the amount of $1,417.30, based upon five hours of attorney time at a billing rate of $200 per hour plus $94 for the Court Call fee and two filing fees of $61.65 each.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

YAN LI VS APRIL LI

Counsel for Shigang Li’s (i.e., Eugene S. Alkana, Esq. of Eugene S. Alkana, APLC) MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Responding Party: None (unopposed, as of 6/26/20, 8:32 a.m.; due 6/24/20) 3. Counsel for Moon Management Consulting, LLC’s (i.e., Eugene S. Alkana, Esq. of Eugene S. Alkana, APLC) MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Responding Party: None (unopposed, as of 6/26/20, 8:32 a.m.; due 6/24/20) 4. Counsel for April Lin’s (i.e., Eugene S. Alkana, Esq. of Eugene S.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

FRIDA KORSHUNOVA VS 1116 MAPLE STREET, LLC

Plaintiff and her counsel of record, David Mamann, jointly and severally, shall pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $960 to Defendant, by and through counsel, within thirty (30) days of notice of this order. Defendant shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

KATIE O CONNELL MARSH VS GAUMONT TELEVISION USA LLC

.: BC713123 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO BE ADMITTED AS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE Date: July 8, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 MOVING PARTIES: Defendants John C. Depp, II and Infinitum Nihil Defendants filed a verified application for Benjamin G. Chew (“Chew”) to specially appear as counsel pro hac vice on behalf of Defendants.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.