What is a Motion to Disqualify Counsel?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Disqualify Counsel

Recent Rulings on Motion to Disqualify Counsel

1-25 of 10000 results

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

The Court has considered the administrative and the supplemental records, the papers of the parties and the arguments of counsel, and it has admitted the administrative record into evidence but declined to receive the supplemental record in evidence as it was unnecessary to its determination. Accordingly, the Court now: ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES that: 1.

  • Hearing

PRIME STAFF INC VS PARTNERSHIP STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC

At that time, this Court informed counsel for the Cross-Complainant that there was insufficient information regarding the defendants’ resources to properly determine punitive damages. When this Court stated that it appeared that all other damages sought appeared to be appropriate, counsel withdrew the punitive damages request.

  • Hearing

HASMIK KANATARYAN, ET AL. VS CHARLENE SARSTEDT, ET AL.

The following order was made on 10-20-20 and sent to Plaintiff's counsel.

  • Hearing

PETITION OF TRAVEON C GAINS

GAINS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Continue to 2-18-2021, at request of counsel When to proceed, will Need: 1. Proof of mailing to Atty. Christopher Schweickert at address in petition or waiver of notice. Proof of Service attached to Notice filed 11-23-2020 reflects mailing to him at an address other than that listed in petition.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRUST INSTRUMENT & CONFIRMATION

Leland Snow to appear or doctor’s declaration stating inability to appear or waiver by counsel 3. Report of Atty. Constance Figuers (limited) CEDRIC SNOW JENNIFER L STENEBERG LELAND SNOW CONSTANCE H FIGUERS LESLIE A SNOW JENNIFER L STENEBERG PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration in support of attorney’s fees paid as reported at paragraph 6.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR COMPENSATION

Proof of mailing to conservatee or waiver by counsel. PrC § 1460 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify payments to AT&T. It appears amounts paid are excessive for periods in which conservatee lived in a care facility. 4. Original financial account statement(s) as required by PrC § 2620(c) (2), (3) 5. Original statements from the residential care facility PrC § 2620(c)(5) 6. Verified declaration by attorney to clarify whether fees were paid to attorney without a court order. PrC §2647 7.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MATTER OF THE YOUNG REVOCABLE TRUST

Court will dispense with further formal service on temporary guardian and minor’s counsel who appeared 8-2-19. 2. Per 9-20-19 minute order, court adopted the stipulation of parties and extended temporary guardianship until 3-31-2020. 3. Stipulation and Order filed 8-5-2020 extended guardianship through 12-31-2020.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: STATUS OF REUNIFICATION THERAPY SET BY DEPT. 15 ON 08/12/2020.

Return on Citation or waiver by counsel. PrC § 1824 4. Ginger Traver Bumgardner to appear, or doctor’s declaration stating inability or waiver by counsel 5. Verified declaration by petitioner confirming attendance at orientation class for unlicensed conservators. 6. Order Appointing Probate Conservator Form GC-340 (adopted 1-15-16) Notes: 1. Letters of Temporary Conservatorship expire 12/4/2020. 2. Objection filed by son, Garrison Traver 1-15-20. 3.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR APPT OF CONSERVATOR OF PERSON & ESTATE

Complete Form ICWA-030 and submit to courtroom clerk in Dept. 15 for mailing unless you are represented by counsel. CRC 5.481 The Court is still waiting for: A. Court Investigator’s Report B. Report of court-appointed counsel Michael Pierson Notes: Minor possibly has Cherokee ancestry JASMYN BUTLER MICHAEL PIERSON LATISHA WILSON MICHAEL WILSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Michael Wilson, grandfather of older sister, still needs to do the following: 1.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CARRIEN QIAN HE, AN INDIVIDUAL VS JAY MIN CHEN, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

Chen, et al. (19PSCV00181) _____________________________________________ Counsel for Cross-Defendant Golden Globalinks Corporation’s (i.e., Darling & Risbrough, LLP) MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Responding Party: None (unopposed, as of 11/19/20, 10:01 a.m.; due 11/19/20) Tentative Ruling Counsel for Cross-Defendant Golden Globalinks Corporation’s (i.e., Darling & Risbrough, LLP) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is GRANTED, contingent upon counsel for Globalink filing

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC VS NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA COR~ORATION

An authorized representative of Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel must appear at the default prove-up hearing to provide live testimony. Plaintiff’s October 31, 2019 complaint contains a cause of action for quiet title. The court must “examine into and determine” the validity of Plaintiff’s claims to title, and “hear” such evidence as may be offered regarding defendant’s claims. (See Code Civ.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

IN THE MATTER OF ERIC ROSENBERG

Neither Petitioner nor his counsel has submitted separate time sheets detailing their ordinary services and extraordinary services. Neither has submitted declarations that comply with Cal. Rules of Court, rule 7.702. Accordingly, the Court intends to deny extraordinary fees to Petitioner and to his counsel. (Estate of Hilton (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 890, 912-913; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 7.703(a).) In violation of Prob.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN RE: JOHAN VAN WILPE AND MARIA VAN WILPE TRUST AND TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY

At the last hearing on 10/29/20, the matter was continued for Tonny Van Wilpe to obtain new counsel. Has he done so? What is the status of the settlement reached on 2/4/20? Mandatory appearance by Tony Van Wilpe either in person or by CourtCall. Proposed Order to be lodged prior to hearing per Local Rule 10.00.D.1. __________________ As COVID-19 cases continue to rise, we need to be even more vigilant. Please avoid coming into the courthouse in person for any reason for the foreseeable future.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF ERIC ROSENBERG

OSC re Failure to File Petition for Final Distribution *************** On 6/6/19, the Court ordered the administrator's counsel to file an I&A by 9/4/19 and to file a petition for final distribution by 11/27/19. On 11/22/19, the I&A was filed. No petition for final distribution was filed. On 7/8/20, the Court set this OSC re Failure to File Petition for Final Distribution and ordered the mandatory appearance of Daniel Cutright. As of 8/4/20, no petition for final distribution had been filed.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF ANGELA CUCCHIARA

Approve $2,225 in voluntarily reduced statutory fees to Petitioner's counsel. Petitioner waives her fees. The intestate heirs of this estate are the decedent's two children: Petitioner and Vincent Cucchiara. Vincent post-deceased his mother on 3/1/18, survived by his two daughters: Angela Thom and Christina Cucchiara. Thus, the intestate heirs to this estate are Petitioner and Vincent's estate, not his daughters. However, Ms. Thom and Ms.

  • Hearing

RE: 1ST & FNL RPT OF ADMNTR, PET’N FOR ITS SETTLEMENT, FNL DIST

Have a copy of the Citation Form GC-320 personally served on conservatee or waiver by counsel. File the original with the Clerk of the Court with Proof of Service completed by server. 5. Submit a completed Order Appointing Probate Conservator Form GC-340 (adopted 1- 15-16) The Court is waiting for these items: Report of Atty. Cara Lankford Notes: 1. Capacity Declaration indicates proposed conservatee has dementia; however, petition does not request dementia powers.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS OF NIKHIL KULKARNI

The Court is still waiting for: Report of court-appointed counsel Oliver Greenwood Notes: 1. Letters of Guardianship issued to great-grandparents Guadalupe and Arnoldo Ruiz 10-29-08. 2.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MARTIN BALMACEDA VS ZHICHENG LIU ET AL

Finally, the Court denies the request for a continuance because it finds that Plaintiff’s counsel has been dilatory in attempting to serve Liu with a deposition subpoena. Plaintiff’s counsel did not contact and retain Aaron Lukken to serve Liu with the summons and complaint until August 2019. (Declaration of Aaron Lukken, ¶¶ 7-8.) In other words, Plaintiff’s counsel waited almost four years after the accident and almost two years after the case was filed to attempt to locate and serve Liu.

  • Hearing

CHELSEA GOTTFURCHT VS RST & ASSOC., ET AL.

Defendant and its counsel of record, Harry A. Safarian, jointly and severally, are ordered to pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $861.65 to Plaintiff, by and through counsel, within thirty (30) days of notice of this order. Plaintiff shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: December 2, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MIRI GAVRIELI-HOD VS STONEFIRE GRILL INC.

.: 20STCV21539 Hearing Date: December 2, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to be relieved as counsel Plaintiff’s counsel filed a motion to be relieved. Prior to the hearing, Plaintiff filed a substitution of counsel form. Therefore, the motion is denied as moot. Plaintiff’s new counsel shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: December 2, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

RAYMOND A. PADILLA VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ET AL.

On the latter date, Plaintiff’s counsel, the co-defendant’s counsel, and a court reporter were prepared to take the deposition via video conference at 10:00 a.m. (Id., ¶ 19.) Defendant’s counsel emailed at 10:23 a.m. stating that neither defense counsel nor Defendant would participate. (Ibid.) Therefore, Plaintiff’s counsel took a certificate of non-appearance. (Id., ¶ 20.)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

POLLY MALONEY V. DEVEN WEK

Pinnacle’s counsel declares that on July 15, 2020, he appeared in Santa Cruz County Superior Court and took a debtor’s exam of Wek, and that Wek was sworn and testified that he could not provide the actual date range for when he was out of the country and could not find travel information or his passport with stamps in it. (Lewi Decl., ¶ 10.) Pinnacle further attaches copies of grant deeds showing Wek as title owner for 1533 Brighton in Grover Beach from February 1, 2007 through May 12, 2010.

  • Hearing

SIMON RUIZ-HERNANDEZ VS WALTER ZAMORA, ET AL.

The Court orders Plaintiff’s counsel to serve a copy of this order, as well as a copy of the Court’s order on Form MC-053, upon all parties including Plaintiff within ten (10) days. The Court orders Plaintiff’s counsel to file proof of service within twenty (20) days. Counsel shall remain counsel-of-record until the Court’s orders are served and he files proof of service with the Court. Counsel shall provide notice. DATED: December 2, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I.

  • Hearing

TRACEY BRAXTON VS CITY OF GARDENA, ET AL.

The remaining documents proffered by Plaintiff’s counsel are largely incomprehensible and do not clearly support his argument. “Judges are not like pigs, hunting for truffles buried in briefs [or the record].” (See United States v. Dunkel (1991) 927 F.2d 955, 956.) CONCLUSION AND ORDER The Court continues the hearing on this motion, as well as the Trial Setting Conference, to January 29, 2021, at 1:30 p.m.

  • Hearing

MARIELA DIAZ, ET AL. VS JOHN RUBEN RAMOS COVARRUBIAS, ET AL.

.: 18STCV04559 Hearing Date: December 2, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to be relieved as counsel The Law Offices of Jacob Emrani, APC (“Counsel”) move to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Evelyn Aguirre (“Plaintiff”). Counsel has filed forms MC-051 and MC-052 and has lodged with the Court a copy of the proposed order on form MC-053 as required. (Cal Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.) The basis for this motion is that Plaintiff is not cooperative with Counsel, which constitutes good cause.

  • Hearing

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.