Motion to Deem Facts Admitted

Useful Resources for Motion to Deem Facts Admitted

Recent Rulings on Motion to Deem Facts Admitted

BENEVIDES VS. RIVER OAKS APARTMENTS

(1) Motion to Compel Answers to Form Irogs (2) Motion to Compel Answers to Special Irogs (3) Motion to Deem Facts Admitted (4) Motion to Deem Facts Admitted (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Ruling: (1-9) Off Calendar – no hearing will be held. Continued to 2-9-21, Dept. c11, at 2 pm. Clerk to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

WARD SINK V. BACHELIER & SONS’S MASONRY

Ward-Sink’s (“Plaintiff”) unopposed Motions to Compel Discovery Responses and Deem Facts Admitted (Motions Nos. 1 and 2) from defendant Bachelier & Sons Masonry (“Defendant”) are GRANTED as follows. Plaintiff’s Motions are timely because no discovery responses were ever served by Defendant, even after Plaintiff’s voluntary meet and confer efforts. (See Sink Decls., ¶¶ 2-7.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

BENEVIDES VS. RIVER OAKS APARTMENT LLC

(1) Motion to Compel Answers to Form Irogs (2) Motion to Compel Answers to Special Irogs (3) Motion to Deem Facts Admitted (4) Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Ruling: Off Calendar – no hearing will be held. Continued to 2-9-21, Dept. C11, at 2 pm. Clerk to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY VS. CASTREJON

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Moving Party: Plaintiff State Farm Automobile Insurance Company Responding Party: Defendants Mara Castrejon and Thomas Somma Ruling Motion 1) Defendant’s motion for protective order is denied without prejudice. Though there is no indication Plaintiff served Defendant Castrejon (“Defendant”), in-house counsel for Defendant’s insurer filed an Answer on behalf of both Defendant and Defendant Somma on December 4, 2019. (Mousa Decl., ¶¶ 3-4.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY VS. CASTREJON

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Moving Party: Plaintiff State Farm Automobile Insurance Company Responding Party: Defendants Mara Castrejon and Thomas Somma Ruling Motion 1) Defendant’s motion for protective order is denied without prejudice. Though there is no indication Plaintiff served Defendant Castrejon (“Defendant”), in-house counsel for Defendant’s insurer filed an Answer on behalf of both Defendant and Defendant Somma on December 4, 2019. (Mousa Decl., ¶¶ 3-4.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

EDWARD SCHELLINCK M.D. VS LORENA FLORES

On the court's own motion the Motion to Deem Facts Admitted and Further Case Management Conference set for January 20, 2021 are continued to May 21, 2021 at 9 AM for review and status of Defendant's bankruptcy. Hon. George J. Abdallah, Jr., Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Jan 15, 2021

  • Judge

    George J. Abdallah

  • County

    San Joaquin County, CA

SAM ROTER VS VALEE KUNARGTHAI

facts admitted filed February 6, 2020; That the following facts are deemed admitted as a consequence of the events identified in items 4 and 5, supra: 1.

  • Hearing

    Jan 15, 2021

BENEVIDES VS. RIVER OAKS APARTMENTS, LLC

(1) Motion to Compel Answers to Form Irogs (2) Motion to Compel Answers to Special Irogs (3) Motion to Compel Answers to Special Irogs (4) Motion to Compel Answers to Special Irogs (5) Motion to Compel Production (6) Motion to Compel Response to RFAs (7) Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Ruling: Off Calendar – no hearing will be held. Continued to 1-26-2021, Dept. C11, at 2 pm. Clerk to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2021

CITTELL VS. SOUTH COAST PLAZA

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Moving Party: Defendant South Coast Plaza Responding Party: N/A Ruling Motion #1) The unopposed motion of Attorney Robert B. Gibson and Gibson & Hughes to be relieved as counsel of record for Plaintiff Matthew Cittell is GRANTED. The order relieving counsel will be effective upon the filing of a proof of service of the executed order upon all parties. Moving attorney to give notice and file a proof of service of such notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

BANK OF AMERICA NA VS. AMBER Y LARIEVY

Motion: Plaintiff's motion to deem facts admitted. TENTATIVE RULING The Court intends to rule as follows: The motion to deem requests for admissions admitted is DENIED without prejudice. Defendant is ordered to prepare and serve responses that are in substantial compliance with the statutory requirements on or before January 27, 2021. Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

BH FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC VS, DONALD BEECHER

To appear by phone: +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 930 2560 6752 Passcode: 208604 Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Facts Admitted is GRANTED as to Requests 1-8 of Requests for Admissions, Plaintiff served Defendant with Requests for Admission on February 12, 2020. Defendant failed to respond. Plaintiff sent a further meet and confer letter on July 3, 2020 granting additional time to respond. Defendant again failed to respond.

  • Hearing

    Dec 29, 2020

BH FINANCIAL GROUP LLC VS SMITH

Plaintiff BH Financial Group LLC's unopposed motion to deem facts admitted is GRANTED. The truth of the facts specified in Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions, Set No. One, is deemed admitted. IT IS SO ORDERED. This is the ruling of the Court, filed as of this date. No formal order is required.

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

  • County

    San Diego County, CA

ROIC BOUQUET CENTER, LLC VS OSCAR VASQUEZ, ET AL.

MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff ROIC Bouquet Center, LLC RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant Fabiola Huerta dba Cali’s Tacos RELIEF REQUESTED: An order to deem facts admitted that are set forth in the Requests for Admissions propounded on Fabiola Huerta dba Cali’s Tacos. Additionally, Plaintiff requests sanctions against Fabiola Huerta in the amount of $2,685.00. RULING: The motion is denied without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2020

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC VS. JOEL REYES

s unopposed Motion to Deem Facts Admitted is GRANTED. The truth of all specified facts in Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions, Set No. One, is hereby deemed admitted. Plaintiff's request for sanctions is also GRANTED. However, the sum requested ($810) is excessive in light of current circumstances.

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

  • County

    San Diego County, CA

UNIFUND CCR LLC VS WALKER

Plaintiff Unifund CCR, LLC's unopposed motion to deem facts admitted is GRANTED. The truth of all facts specified in Plaintiff's Requests for Admission, Set No. One, is deemed admitted. Plaintiff's request for sanctions is also GRANTED. The Court awards $260 in sanctions to Plaintiff, payable by Defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED. This is the ruling of this Court, filed as of this date. No formal order is required.

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

  • County

    San Diego County, CA

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC VS. JOEL REYES

s unopposed Motion to Deem Facts Admitted is GRANTED. The truth of all specified facts in Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions, Set No. One, is hereby deemed admitted. Plaintiff's request for sanctions is also GRANTED. However, the sum requested ($810) is excessive in light of current circumstances.

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

  • County

    San Diego County, CA

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC VS. JOEL REYES

s unopposed Motion to Deem Facts Admitted is GRANTED. The truth of all specified facts in Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions, Set No. One, is hereby deemed admitted. Plaintiff's request for sanctions is also GRANTED. However, the sum requested ($810) is excessive in light of current circumstances.

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

  • County

    San Diego County, CA

ROIC BOUQUET CENTER, LLC VS OSCAR VASQUEZ, ET AL.

MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff ROIC Bouquet Center, LLC RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant Oscar Vasquez dba Cali’s Tacos RELIEF REQUESTED: An order to deem facts admitted that are set forth in the Requests for Admissions propounded on Oscar Vasquez dba Cali’s Tacos. Additionally, Plaintiff requests sanctions against Oscar Vasquez in the amount of $2,685.00. RULING: The motion is denied.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

FONTAINE V MCCARTHY

Counsel is ordered to add to item 8 of the proposed order th upcoming deposition dates and to file a proof of service when Plaintiff is served with the order Dept. 5 19CV02666 CAPITAL ONE BANK v FLYNN MOTION TO DEEM FACTS ADMITTED No Opposition having been filed, the motion to deem admitted the matters stated in th Request for Admissions is granted. 1

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

SRI VS DUTCH GIRL ENTERPRISES,

HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR DEEM FACTS ADMITTED & FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS, FILED BY DUTCH ENTERPRISES, INC. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Withdrawn by moving party.

  • Hearing

    Dec 02, 2020

TEAM MAKENA, LLC VS. LASSO

MOTION TO DEEM FACTS ADMITTED (MOTION 4) The court will CONTINUE the hearing on Ossur’s motions to deem admitted each of the requests included in Ossur’s Request for Admissions, Set One, to SpartaMed, as discussed below. MERITS It appears undisputed that Ossur properly served the requests for admission at issue in this motion, and that SpartaMed failed to timely serve responses. It is also undisputed that SpartaMed served untimely responses to these requests for admission before the hearing on this motion.

  • Hearing

    Nov 24, 2020

THE VERSAILLES HOA VS. ROLFES

(1-2) Motion to Compel Answers to Form Irogs (3-4) Motion to Compel Answers to Special Irogs (5-6) Motion to Compel Production (7) Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Tentative Ruling: (1) Cross-Defendant The Versailles Homeowners Association’s Motion to Compel Answer to Form Interrogatories (Set 1) to Cross-Complainant, Rosemary C. Steinbrecher is GRANTED. (2) Cross-Defendant The Versailles Homeowners Association’s Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories (Set 2) to Cross-Complainant, Rosemary C.

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2020

CAVALRY SPV VS. WARD

Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.280(c) requires that before the hearing on a pending motion to deem facts admitted, the opposing party is required to serve her proposed response to the requests for admissions in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.220. It appears obvious that the Defendant has not done so.

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC V. LAURA BRELSFORD

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted TENTATIVE RULING Plaintiff’s motion is granted. Each of the requests in Plaintiff’s requests for admissions propounded June 12, 2020 is hereby deemed to be admitted. Sanctions are imposed against Defendant LAURA BRELSFORD in the amount of $100, and are due and payable thirty days after service of this order.

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2020

CAVALRY SPV I VS. SILVIA ESPINO

HEARING ON MOTION TO DEEM FACTS ADMITTED FILED BY CAVALRY SPV I, LLC * TENTATIVE RULING: * This is a routine collections case that was served on the Defendant Espino by “substitute service” on December 15, 2019. The Defendant has not filed an answer and, therefore, has been in default in this case for almost a year. Notwithstanding the Defendant’s default, on August 27, 2020 Plaintiff filed a motion to Deem facts as Admitted.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 16     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.