Motion to Deem Facts Admitted

Useful Rulings on Motion to Deem Facts Admitted

Recent Rulings on Motion to Deem Facts Admitted

MCKESSON SPECIALITY CARE VS. LOS ALAMITOS HEMATOLOGY

Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests for Production; Motion to Deem Facts Admitted. Moving Party: Plaintiff McKesson Specialty Care Distribution Corporation. Responding Party: N/A Ruling: Plaintiff’s motion to compel is granted. Responses to interrogatories and requests for production of documents are due 30 days after service (plus appropriate time for method of service). (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.260; 2031.260.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

MCKESSON SPECIALTY CARE DISTRIBUTION CORP. VS. LOS ALAMITOS HEMATOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP

Motion: 1) Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories 2) Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories 3) Compel Production 4) Deem Facts Admitted Moving Party: Plaintiff McKesson Specialty Care Distribution Corporation. Responding Party: None. Opposition: None Ruling: Motions 1,2,3 and 4) Plaintiff’s motion to compel is granted. Responses to interrogatories and requests for production of documents are due 30 days after service (plus appropriate time for method of service). (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.260; 2031.260.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

OTERO VS. ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC.

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Defendant Albertson’s LLC seeks to deem admitted the requests for admissions contained in its first set of Request for Admissions propounded upon Plaintiff Greg Otero. Plaintiff did not file an Opposition. As such, the Motion is granted and the Court deems that Plaintif admitted each of the Requests contained in Defendant’s Requests for Admissions, Set No. One, Nos. 1 through 35, served on Plaintiff on 12/3/19.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

BALBOA CAPITAL CORPORATION VS. ID LIGHTING SOLUTIONS INC.

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted X2 The court grants Plaintiff Balboa Capital Corporation’s unopposed Motions to Compel Initial Responses to Discovery. Requests for Admission, Sets One, are admitted as to each Defendant. Within 15 days of the notice of rulings, Defendants shall serve verified, Code-compliant responses to the first set of Special Interrogatories, Form Interrogatories, and Requests for Production of Documents, without objections.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

DELBERT WEBB VS BOB WONDRIES MOTORS, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Delbert Webb’s motion to deem facts admitted is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff’s request for sanctions is GRANTED against Defendant’s counsel Kellie S. Christianson only in the amount of $650.00 (2 hours @ $295/hr. and $60 filing fee). There is no evidence that Defendant itself was responsible for the delay, and indeed, the evidence is to the contrary, given Plaintiff’s repeated correspondence with Defendant’s counsel.

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

SAR V. SAR

1) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories 2) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories 3) Motion to Compel Production 4) Motion to Deem Facts Admitted OFF CALENDAR – CASE SETTLED 6/17/20

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

WATERS VS. PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

Plaintiff Jacqueline Waters’ unopposed motions to compel responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories and request for production of documents, and to deem facts admitted, are granted. Defendant Dianne Anthony must serve full and complete responses, without objections, within 20 days. Plaintiff’s requests for monetary sanctions are granted in the amount of $510 for each of the four motions, payable within 30 days. Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of the ruling.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

BRYANT V. FAY SERVICING, LLC

1) Motion for Order Compelling Responses to Form Interrogatories 2) Motion to Compel Production 3) Motion to Deem Facts Admitted 4) Motion for Sanctions The Court grants the Motion by Defendant Fay Servicing LLC (“Fay”) to compel Plaintiff Mary Jo Byrant (“Bryant”) to provide discovery responses to Form Interrogatories Set One and to Requests for Production of Documents Set One, and also to deem admitted Requests for Admissions Set One.

  • Hearing

    Jun 22, 2020

BELL V. MOMENTOUS SPORTS CENTER LP

1) Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories 2) Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories 3) Motion to Compel Production 4) Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Defendant Momentous Sports Center, LP’s unopposed motions to compel responses from Plaintiff Linda Jane Bell to its form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and request for production of documents are granted.

  • Hearing

    Jun 22, 2020

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC VS, AARON MCCOY

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION — FOR ORDER THAT MATTERS TN REQUEST FOR ADMISSION OF TRUTH OF FACTS BE ADMITTED [PLTF] PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC RULING Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Facts Admitted is GRANTED as to Requests 1-9 of Requests for Admissions (Set One). Plaintiff served Defendant with Requests for Admission on December 17, 2019. Defendant failed to respond Plaintiff has filed a motion to deem the facts admitted, and Defendant has filed no opposition or response.

  • Hearing

    Jun 02, 2020

BELL V. MOMENTOUS SPORTS CENTER LP

1) Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories 2) Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories 3) Motion to Compel Production 4) Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Defendant Momentous Sports Center, LP’s unopposed motions to compel responses from Plaintiff Linda Jane Bell to its form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and request for production of documents are granted.

  • Hearing

    Mar 16, 2020

KINDNESS GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. VS. INTERSTATE CONCRETE CUTTING, INC.

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted filed by Kindness General Contractors, Inc. OFF CALENDAR

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2020

AMERICAN EXPRESS VS. SMITH

Motion: To Deem Facts Admitted. Moving Party Plaintiff American Express National Bank. Responding Party Defendant Daniel Smith, individually and dba Green Team Ruling: Plaintiff’s motion is granted. The truth of matters specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions, Set One are deemed admitted. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2020

KINDNESS GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. VS. INTERSTATE CONCRETE CUTTING, INC.

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted filed by Kindness General Contractors, Inc. OFF CALENDAR

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2020

KPRS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. V. FRAMING SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL.

MOTION TO DEEM FACTS ADMITTED Defendant Framing Specialists, Inc.’s unopposed motion to deem facts admitted in response to its requests for admission, set one, propounded on Plaintiff, is granted. Defendant served its requests for admission on Plaintiff by mail on October 22, 2019. (Parvin Decl., at ¶ 4; Exh. A.) An extension to respond was provided until December 27, 2019. However, no responses have been served. (Parvin Decl., at ¶¶ 5-11.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 06, 2020

FERRERAS VS. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Goodwill Industries Of Orange County OFF CALENDAR PER MOVING PARTY. Future Hearings: MSC: 8/14/20 Jury Trial: 9/14/20

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2020

BALBOA CAPITAL CORPORATION VS. ID LIGHTING SOLUTIONS INC.

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted X2 Service of the Motions is improper. The court therefore continuing the hearing on these Motions to April 2 at 2pm. On 9/5/19, the court granted Defense Counsel Call & Jensen’s Motions to be Relieved as Counsel, but ordered Defense Counsel to submit new proposed orders with future hearing dates identified.

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2020

LUCIC VS. YODER DEVELOPMENT

DEF Yoder Development Motion to Deem Facts Admitted The court grants Defendant Yoder Development Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions, Set One, admitted. On September 18, 2019, Defendant propounded Requests for Admission, Set One to Plaintiff. (Lien Dec. ¶2, Exhibit A). On September 27, 2019, Defendant received purported responses to its Requests for Admission, Set One from Plaintiff. (See Lien Dec., ¶3, Exhibit B.) The responses were unverified.

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2020

ROWSHAN VS. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE

(1) Motion to Compel Answers to Special Irogs (2) Motion to Compel Answers to Form Irogs (3) Motion to Deem Facts Admitted (4) Motion to Compel Production Tentative Ruling: (1) Defendants’ unopposed Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Response to Special Interrogatories, Set One is GRANTED. Plaintiff Hamid Rowshan is ORDERED to serve verified responses, without objections, within the next 21 calendar days.

  • Hearing

    Mar 03, 2020

WISE B ALLAH VS LATHAM

Motions to Deem Facts Admitted Defendant's David Latham; American A-One Investment Co.; A-A Referral Service, Inc.; Balboa Realty Co., Inc.; and Hitching Post Motel, Inc.'s Motions for an Order Deeming Matters Admitted are both GRANTED, except as to Mr. Latham. (ROA 94, 96.) As the court understands it, Mr. Latham is no longer a party to this case. (ROA 85.) As to Mr. Latham, the court previously granted the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to all causes of action. (ROA 83.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

HOMEOWNER’S LEGAL ADVOCATES, APLC V. HARDIMAN

The unopposed motion of the plaintiff to deem facts admitted is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall give notice.

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2020

WISE B ALLAH VS LATHAM

Motions to Deem Facts Admitted Defendant's David Latham; American A-One Investment Co.; A-A Referral Service, Inc.; Balboa Realty Co., Inc.; and Hitching Post Motel, Inc.'s Motions for an Order Deeming Matters Admitted are both GRANTED, except as to Mr. Latham. (ROA 94, 96.) As the court understands it, Mr. Latham is no longer a party to this case. (ROA 85.) As to Mr. Latham, the court previously granted the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to all causes of action. (ROA 83.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CATARINO VS. SANTOZ

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted The motions by defendants Robert Santoz, Anita Santoz and Zantos Living Trust (“Defendants”) to compel responses by plaintiff Jose Angel Ceja Catarino (“Plaintiff”) to their first sets of form interrogatories, special interrogatories and demand for identification and inspection of documents are granted in part and denied in part. Defendants’ motion for an order that matters be deemed admitted is granted in part and denied in part.

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

HERNANDEZ VS ALEXANDRA INVESTMENT INC

Plaintiff's motion to deem facts admitted [CCP § 2033.280(b)] is denied. Considering the circumstances surrounding Horton, Oberrecht, Kirkpatrick & Martha's (HOKM) erroneous representation of Angelo Enterprises, the court exercises its discretion against imposing CCP § 2033.280(b) relief against Angelo Enterprises at this time. See, Brigante v. Huang (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1569, disapproved of on other grounds in Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973.

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

HERNANDEZ VS ALEXANDRA INVESTMENT INC

Plaintiff's motion to deem facts admitted [CCP § 2033.280(b)] is denied. Considering the circumstances surrounding Horton, Oberrecht, Kirkpatrick & Martha's (HOKM) erroneous representation of Angelo Enterprises, the court exercises its discretion against imposing CCP § 2033.280(b) relief against Angelo Enterprises at this time. See, Brigante v. Huang (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1569, disapproved of on other grounds in Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973.

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 13     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.