How to Postpone/Continue Trial Date

Useful Rulings on Motion to Continue Trial

Recent Rulings on Motion to Continue Trial

BRAD WAISBREN ET AL VS HEGER INDUSTRIAL ET AL

Plaintiffs request that the court take judicial notice of the following documents attached as exhibits to the request: Notice of Ruling on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen Discovery Notice of Motion and Motion to Continue Trial and Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment Notice of Ruling regarding Ex Parte Application to Specially Set and/or Shorten Time on Hearing for Motion to Continue Trial and Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment Plaintiffs’ request is granted.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

GARY WRIGHT VS. BIOPRODUCTION GROUP, INC. A CALFORNIA CORPORATION

Petitioner challenges specific billing entries, as follows: - Respondent Bio-G claims 1.5 hours for preparation of opposition to a motion to continue trial. In fact, the "opposition" was merely a statement of non-opposition that also listed counsel's dates of availability for the trial continuance. The Court cannot fathom how preparation of this document, in which the Memorandum of Points Authorities is comprised of a single sentence, required 1.5 hours.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Enforcement

YONG HWAN KIM ET AL VS CHRISTINE Y KIM ET AL

BC593197 YONG HWAN KIM vs CHRISTINE Y KIM Motion to Continue Trial and Motion for Leave to Intervene TENTATIVE RULING: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Trial is GRANTED. The court will discuss the new trial counsel with counsel in conjunction with today’s Trial Setting Conference. 2. Kinsale’s Motion for Leave to Intervene is DENIED. The motion is untimely and does not comply with the requirements of C.C.P. § 387 in that it does not provide a proposed answer in intervention.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

JG DUPONT CENTRE, LLC V. MATRIX BIOMED, INC.

Withdrawal of Notice, and Taking Off Calendar, Defendant’s Motion to Continue Trial and All Related Dates (filed on 6-10-20 under ROA No. 97), Defendant’s Motion to Continue Trial and All Related Dates (filed on 5-26-20 under ROA No. 84) is off-calendar.

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2020

JENNIFER HARRIS, AN INDIVIDUAL VS CAPRI URBAN BALDWIN, LLC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

CASE NO.: 19STCV17703 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT PROFESSIONAL SECURITY CONSULTANTS (DOE 2)’S MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. July 7, 2020 On May 21, 2019, plaintiff Jennifer Harris filed this action against Capri Urban Baldwin, LLC for negligence and premises liability arising from a May 27, 2017 trip and fall on a sidewalk near the parking lot of the Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza (“Plaza”).

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2020

DUANMING CAI AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND ATTORNEY IN FACT, ET AL. VS ROCKY HONG, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

Further, the Court intends to grant the concurrent motion to continue trial, and set trial in the fall of 2021. Given the nature of the alterations, the Court finds good cause to allow amendment. Since any delay was not prejudicial, the motion is GRANTED. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

FERNANDO HERNANDEZ VS GEORGE "FRANK" ALVAREZ

Defendant George Alvarez’s Motion to Continue Trial or, in the Alternative, to Shorten Time to Hear Defendant’s Motions Currently Scheduled for June 29, 2020 to this Date is TAKEN OFF-CALENDAR as MOOT. Background Plaintiffs Fernando Hernandez (“F. Hernandez”) and Maria De Jesus Hernandez (“M.

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JENNIFER HARRIS, AN INDIVIDUAL VS CAPRI URBAN BALDWIN, LLC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

CASE NO.: 19STCV17703 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT PROFESSIONAL SECURITY CONSULTANTS (DOE 2)’S MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. July 7, 2020 On May 21, 2019, plaintiff Jennifer Harris filed this action against Capri Urban Baldwin, LLC for negligence and premises liability arising from a May 27, 2017 trip and fall on a sidewalk near the parking lot of the Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza (“Plaza”).

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2020

ALAN NAITO ET AL VS CENTEX HOMES REALTY COMPANY ET AL

Centex Homes Realty Company, et al.’s Motion to Continue Trial TENTATIVE RULING Centex Homes Realty Company, et al.’s Motion to Continue Trial is granted. Pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1332(a), “To ensure the prompt disposition of civil cases, the dates assigned for a trial are firm. All parties and their counsel must regard the date set for trial as certain.”

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANN MARIE STREIBICH VS MARK SHINNICK

.: 19SMCV00919 MOTION: Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Trial and All Pre-trial Dates BACKGROUND On May 10, 2019, Plaintiff Ann Marie Streibich, individually and as trustee of the Survivor’s Trust under the Mary Frances Gage and Robert Vincent Gage Living Trust (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendant Mark Shinnick (“Defendant”) alleging the following causes of action: (1) interference with prospective economic advantage, (2) publication of private facts, and (3) trespass.

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

STEPHEN HARRIS VS JACK SWANK

Motion to Continue Trial Date The motion to continue trial date is moot in light of the Court’s sua sponte order vacating the trial date. The case is currently scheduled for a trial setting conference on 7/06/20. The Court will schedule trial at that time. VI.

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

STEPHEN HARRIS VS JACK SWANK

Motion to Continue Trial Date The motion to continue trial date is moot in light of the Court’s sua sponte order vacating the trial date. VI. Sanctions Defendant also seeks sanctions. §2032.240(c) requires the Court to impose sanctions in connection with a motion to compel IME unless the Court finds Plaintiff acted with substantial justification or other circumstances make imposition of sanctions unjust. .

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

LOGAN VS. STEADFAST HILLTOP

HEARING ON MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE & TO RESET ALL PRETRIAL DATES FILED BY STEADFAST HILLTOP COMMONS LP, et al. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Appear by CourtCall as required by the Local Civil Emergency Rules.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

ANDREA CARRILLO, ET AL. VS PACE FUNDING GROUP, LLC

F-47 Date: 7/2/20 Case #19STCV23740 MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL Motion filed on 2/26/20.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

CHRISTINE LAWSON, ET AL. VS DAVID JAMES MASSIE, ET AL.

On March 18, 2020 and April 14, 2020, pursuant to the Administrative Order of the Presiding Judge regarding COVID-19, the Court, on its own motion, advanced and continued the hearing on Plaintiffs motion to continue trial. The April 14, 2020 continuance set the hearing date to July 1, 2020. Trial is set for July 29, 2020. PARTY’S REQUEST Plaintiffs request a court order continuing the May 1, 2020 trial date to November 16, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

SANDRA BERNAL VS ARCONIC VALLEY ET AL

.: BC721408 Hearing Date: 7/1/2020 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Trial; Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is moot. Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Trial and Final Status Conference to August 27, 2020. Each party may file a supplemental declaration within ten days of this order.

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Tentative Ruling re: Defendants’ Motion to Continue Trial and Related Deadlines Defendants move to continue the trial and related deadlines. The Court finds that the motion is moot. The trial and final status conference dates have been vacated due to the Covid 19 pandemic. A trial setting conference is scheduled for July 9, 2020 at which time a new trial date will be scheduled.

  • Hearing

    Jun 30, 2020

MICHAEL STANG VS ACCESS SERVICES ET AL

Finally, Defendants contend that the stipulation that the parties signed pursuant to the prior motion to continue trial only allowed for discovery to track with the new trial date if it were for purposes of independent medical examination of Plaintiff or expert discovery, and that Plaintiff’s counsel agreed to the stipulation limited discovery by email. (Zimmer Decl., ¶¶ 9-11, Exhibits 1, 2.) In reply, Plaintiff agrees to limit his request to reopen discovery to taking Papaliitele’s deposition.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MICHAEL STANG VS ACCESS SERVICES ET AL

Finally, Defendants contend that the stipulation that the parties signed pursuant to the prior motion to continue trial only allowed for discovery to track with the new trial date if it were for purposes of independent medical examination of Plaintiff or expert discovery, and that Plaintiff’s counsel agreed to the stipulation limited discovery by email. (Zimmer Decl., ¶¶ 9-11, Exhibits 1, 2.) In reply, Plaintiff agrees to limit his request to reopen discovery to taking Papaliitele’s deposition.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

SHAHRZAD MOROVATI VS CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS:, ET AL.

On May 28, 2020, Defendant City of Beverly Hills filed a motion to continue trial pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1332. A trial setting conference is scheduled for June 24, 2020. PARTY’S REQUESTS Defendant City of Beverly Hills (“Moving Defendant”) asks the Court to continue trial and related dates to December 9, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Jun 24, 2020

ARMANDO LOPEZ VS GLOCKSTORE ET AL

On June 1, 2020, Defendant LMP/Mail Order Video, Inc. dba Glockstore filed a motion to continue trial pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1332. Trial is set for July 8, 2020. PARTY’S REQUESTS Defendant LMP/Mail Order Video, Inc. dba Glockstore (“Moving Defendant”) asks the Court to vacate trial and set a trial setting conference.

  • Hearing

    Jun 24, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

RICHARD ANTHONY EASBEY V. CITY OF SANTA BARBARA, ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Continue Trial The court's tentative ruling is to grant the continuance request. At the time of hearing the court will discuss with counsel when the matter is most appropriately set.

  • Hearing

    Jun 22, 2020

: MILLER V. GREENHORN CAMPGROUND

The Stipulated Motion to Continue Trial is granted. The currently set Trial, PTC, and MSC dates are vacated. A trial setting CMC is set for June 8, 2020, at 9:00 am in Dept. 6. DUE TO THE CORONAVIRUS, APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED AND ARE NOT PERMITTED. THE COURT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTING V-COURT TELEPHONIC APPEARANCES FOR THIS CALENDAR. YOU MAY SUBMIT ORDERS AFTER HEARING THROUGH THE MAIL FOR PROCESSING.

  • Hearing

    Apr 10, 2020

  • Judge

    Dept. 6

  • County

    Nevada County, CA

KEMPER V. DIGNITY HEALTH 3-27-20

The Motion to Continue Trial is continued on the court's own motion to May 22, 2020, at 10:00 am in Dept. 6. The reason for the continuance is due to the reduction in services related to the coronavirus. See Nevada County Superior Court Executive Order #178 issued on March 18, 2020, available on the court's website. DUE TO THE CORONAVIRUS, APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED AND ARE NOT PERMITTED. THE COURT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTING V-COURT TELEPHONIC APPEARANCES FOR THIS CALENDAR.

  • Hearing

    Mar 25, 2020

  • Judge

    Dept. 6

  • County

    Nevada County, CA

HALDEMAN BUILDERS V. LINGARD 3-20-20

Defendant's Motion to Continue Trial is denied. Defendant has failed to demonstrate good cause for the continuance. However, on the court's own motion, the trial currently set for March 24, 2020, is hereby vacated. This is due to the reduction in services related to the coronavirus. See Nevada County Superior Court Executive Order #178 issued on March 18, 2020, available on the court's website. Defendant's Motion for Leave to Serve the Cross-Complaint is dropped as moot.

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2020

  • Judge

    Dept. 6

  • County

    Nevada County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 195     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.