How to Postpone/Continue Trial Date

Useful Rulings on Motion to Continue Trial

Recent Rulings on Motion to Continue Trial

JOHN CHOI VS SUSAN P. MARTINEZ, ET AL.

.: 19STCV31367 Hearing Date: December 3, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: Defendant’s MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL Plaintiff John Choi (“Plaintiff”) sued Defendants Susan P. Martinez and James P. Martinez (“Defendants”) based on injuries Plaintiff sustained in a motor vehicle collision. Defendants move to continue the trial date, currently set for March 4, 2021, to June 17, 2021, in order to accommodate their motion to compel Plaintiff to submit to a physical examination.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

NICOLE BALL, ET AL. VS PLAN X, INC.

The granting of this motion does not prejudice the defendants when considering the proximity to trial because the defendants may file a motion to continue trial. Thus, the motion is properly granted. CONCLUSION The motion for leave to file a FAC is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are ordered to file and serve the proposed FAC attached as Exhibit B to Rabin Saidian’s declaration within ten days of this ruling. Plaintiffs are ordered to give notice of this ruling.

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2020

HOSSEINI VS. R&R ACCOUNTING AND TAX SERVICES

(1) Motion to Continue Trial (2) Motion to Compel Production (3) Motion to Compel Production (4) Motion to Compel Response to RFAs (5) Motion to Compel Response to RFAs Tentative Ruling: (1) The Court GRANTS Defendants, R&R Accounting and Tax Services, Inc, Green 60 Payroll Services, Inc., Sohrab Rowshan’s Motion to Continue Trial. Defendants have made an affirmative showing of good cause to support a continuance of the trial date. (California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1332(c)-(d).)

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2020

HOSSEINI VS. R&R ACCOUNTING AND TAX SERVICES

(1) Motion to Continue Trial (2) Motion to Compel Production (3) Motion to Compel Production (4) Motion to Compel Response to RFAs (5) Motion to Compel Response to RFAs Tentative Ruling: (1) The Court GRANTS Defendants, R&R Accounting and Tax Services, Inc, Green 60 Payroll Services, Inc., Sohrab Rowshan’s Motion to Continue Trial. Defendants have made an affirmative showing of good cause to support a continuance of the trial date. (California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1332(c)-(d).)

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2020

CHRISTINE CHO VS NATALIE SHOOSHANT, ET AL.

Defendant’s motion to continue trial and all related dates is granted. The 2/16/21 trial date is continued to 8/16/21 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 31 of the Spring Street Courthouse. The 2/1/21 FSC is continued to 8/2/21 at 10:00 a.m. in Department 31. All discovery and expert cut-off dates are continued to reflect the new trial date. Moving Defendant is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2020

SANDY PARK VS ARMSTRONG GARDEN CENTERS, INC

Motion to Continue Trial Date, or Alternatively, to Shorten Times for Hearing on Motions Concerning Physical and Mental Examinations of Plaintiff Having considered the moving and responding papers, the Court rules as follows.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2020

CATHERINE M PACAS VS MANINDER KAUR

The Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to continue trial.

  • Hearing

    Nov 25, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

HANNELORE CISNEROS VS TRACT 349, MUTUAL WATER COMPANY

.: 19STCV15807 HEARING: 11/25/2020 #2 TENTATIVE ORDER Defendant TRACT 349, MUTUAL WATER COMPANY’s Motion to Continue Trial is GRANTED. Moving Party to give Notice. Defendant TRACT 349, MUTUAL WATER COMPANY (“Defendant”) moves for a trial continuance. Trial is currently set for February 16, 2021.

  • Hearing

    Nov 25, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

DAVID RAMOS, ET AL. VS LEONOR VALDIVIA, ET AL.

Ramos, et al vs Valdivia, et al Case No. 19STCV01550 The Motion to Continue Trial and All Related Dates, filed by Defendant/Cross-Complainant Raul Valdivia on 10/21/2020 is Granted. The Court orders the Final Status Conference continued to the dates and times as indicated below: - Final Status Conference continued to 05/02/2022 at 10:00 a.m. in Department 29 of the Spring Street Courthouse. - Jury Trial is continued to 05/16/2022 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 29 of the Spring Street Courthouse.

  • Hearing

    Nov 13, 2020

IPERS SOUTH BAY PORTFOLIO, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION VS THE LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER

Motion to Continue Trial and All Related Date The court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers. RULING The motion is GRANTED. The FSC is continued to June 9, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. The trial is continued to June 16, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. All pre-trial cutoffs are to conform to the new trial date.

  • Hearing

    Nov 13, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

BACHER V. MCPHAIL

The Court denies the motion to continue trial but grants the motion to change the date of the MSC. The conflict with the February 26 MSC is readily resolved by moving the date of the MSC to March 26, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. in Department C32. So ordered. Given that this trial is scheduled to begin on April 12 – and, based on the trial estimate provided by the parties when the case initially was set for trial, is expected to last only 5-6 days – counsel’s May 21-30 vacation poses no genuine conflict.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

OC AUTOSOURCE, INC. V. FLOORIT FINANCIAL INC.

The court grants Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant OC Autosource Inc.’s unopposed motion to continue trial. Trial dates are firm and all parties and their counsel must regard the date set for trial as certain. (Cal. Rules of Ct., Rule 3.1332(a).) When a party seeks a continuance of the trial date, whether by noticed motion or ex parte application, the party must make the motion or application “as soon as reasonably practical once the necessity for the continuance is discovered.” (Cal.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

BACHER V. MCPHAIL

The Court notes that Plaintiff filed a motion to continue trial after the motions to be relieved were filed. Defendants’ counsel shall submit an amended proposed order that includes the hearing information for the motion to continue trial. The Court further notes that the proposed orders and supporting declarations identify the clients only as “Defendants,” not as “Defendants and Cross-Complainants.”

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

ALEXANDRA GRANDE VS WILLIAM S. HART UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, A PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL.

On October 1, 2020, Defendant Long Beach Unified School District filed a motion to continue trial and related dates pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1332. Trial is scheduled for February 11, 2021. PARTY’S REQUESTS Defendant Long Beach Unified School District asks the Court to either specially set its hearing date for its motion for summary judgment or, alternatively, continue trial to April 9, 2021.

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

SHANNON NADJ VS AYESHA KHAMIS MOHAMMAD

Defendant’s motion to continue trial and all related dates is granted. The 1/19/21 trial date is continued to ___________ at 8:30 a.m. in Department 31 of the Spring Street Courthouse. The 1/5/21 FSC is continued to ______________ at 10:00 a.m. in Department 31. All discovery and expert cut-off dates are continued to reflect the new trial date. Defendant is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

LIANG V NGUYEN LE

Based on the court’s order continuing the trial (Stipulation and Order filed on 9-23-20 under ROA No. 57), Defendants’ (Richie Nguyen Le and Phil Nguyen) Motion to Continue Trial, the Trial Readiness Conference, and Expert Discovery (filed on 9-4-20 under ROA No. 42, and scheduled for hearing on 10-27-20) is off calendar.

  • Hearing

    Oct 27, 2020

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO CAMPUS

Similarly, any prejudice to Regents with respect to having sufficient time to conduct discovery and prepare for trial may be addressed, if necessary, via a motion to continue trial. Considering these circumstances, the court exercises its discretion in favor of allowing Plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint. Plaintiff shall file and serve its First Amended Complaint within 10 days of this ruling.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO CAMPUS

Similarly, any prejudice to Regents with respect to having sufficient time to conduct discovery and prepare for trial may be addressed, if necessary, via a motion to continue trial. Considering these circumstances, the court exercises its discretion in favor of allowing Plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint. Plaintiff shall file and serve its First Amended Complaint within 10 days of this ruling.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CYPRESS RIDGE LLC VS JAMES D. MILLER JR. INSURANCE, ET AL.

NOTICE: ok RELIEF REQUESTED: An order reopening discovery for the limited purpose of allowing Plaintiff to depose Defendants’ designated expert following the Court’s granting Defendants’ motion to continue trial. RULING: The motion is granted. This action arises out of Plaintiff Cypress Ridge LLC’s claim that Defendants James D. Miller Insurance Agency and James D. Miller Jr. failed to procure for Plaintiff an insurance policy that contained the coverage requested by Plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JOHNSON VS. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC

Motion to Continue Trial Moving Party (MP): Defendant Brunswick Corporation Responding Party (RP): N/A Ruling: Defendant’s unopposed motion to continue trial is granted. Defendant has shown good cause sufficient to justify a trial continuance (trial counsel will be out of the country), the requested continuance is brief, the parties agree to a continuance, and there is no evidence of any prejudice that either party would suffer as a result of the continuance. (See CRC 3.1332(c) and (d).)

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

NHIEU V. CENTRAL HEALTH PLAN OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

Becker Orthopedic Appliance Company’s (“Becker”) Motion to Continue Trial (“Motion”) is GRANTED. The current trial date of 11/23/20, and the MSC date of 10/23/20, are hereby vacated.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

FILIPINAS CABA, AN INDIVIDUAL VS RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, AN OHIO CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS RALPHS, ET AL.

.: 19STCV22198 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT LINCOLN CENTER, LLC’S MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. October 7, 2020 This action was filed on June 26, 2019. A non-jury trial in this action is scheduled for December 22, 2020. Defendant Lincoln Center LLC seeks a 120-day trial continuance. First, Defendant contends good cause exists for a continuance because it should have its summary judgment/adjudication motion heard.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MELODI ZARET AND CHARLES JOSEPH FLYNN, J'R., ET AL

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: NOTICE OF MOTION — AND MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE [PLTF] MELODI ZARET RULlNG PLEASE NOTE: THE OCTOBER 6, 2020 LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR FOR DEPARTMENT A WILL BE CONDUCTED VIA ZOOM. THE ZOOM INFORMATION IS PROVIDED BELOW.

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2020

ROBERT BOGOSIAN VS ELROY JOHNSON SR, ET AL.

Motion to Continue Trial and Related Dates Having considered the moving papers, the Court rules as follows. No opposing papers were filed. BACKGROUND On February 14, 2019, Plaintiff Robert Bogosian (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Elroy Johnson Jr. and Elroy Johnson Sr. Plaintiff alleges motor vehicle negligence for an incident that occurred on February 21, 2017. On May 29, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to continue trial pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1332.

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2020

MATTHEW A BRILL ET AL VS ALI KHOYNEZHAD MD PHD ET AL

Motion to Continue Trial There is no tentative since the matter is set for a Trial Setting Conference on the same day as the hearing of this motion.

  • Hearing

    Oct 05, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 198     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.