Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories

Useful Resources for Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories

Recent Rulings on Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories

YAN LI VS APRIL LI

Plaintiff Yan Li’s MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE, FOR DEFENDANT ZHIGANG YANG Responding Party: None (unopposed, as of 1/15/21, 11:45 a.m.; due 1/13/21) 4. Plaintiff Yan Li’s MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE, FOR DEFENDANT ZHIGANG YANG Responding Party: None (unopposed, as of 1/15/21, 11:45 a.m.; due 1/13/21) Tentative Ruling 1.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

ROBERT R KORER ET AL VS JACOB R DAVIS ET AL

CASE NO: BC713804 [TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL Dept. 31 8:30 a.m. January 25, 2021 Defendants Jacob R. Davis and Tina Davis (collectively, “Defendants”) propounded form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and requests for productions of documents (“RPDs”) on Plaintiffs Robert R. Korer and Bradford Korer (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) on 2/4/20.

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

CITTELL VS. SOUTH COAST PLAZA

Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories 2. Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories 3. Motion to Compel Production 4. Motion to Compel Production Ruling: Defendant’s unopposed motions to compel are granted. Responses to interrogatories and inspection demands are due 30 days after service (plus appropriate time for method of service). (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.260; 2031.260.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

OLSON, ET AL. V. CHEN, ET AL.

Defendant Deying Chen’s unopposed motions to compel Plaintiffs Mark Olson's and Tawnie Olson’s responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and request for production of documents are granted. A propounding party may move for an order compelling responses to interrogatories at any time “[i]f a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

TURMEL WOODS VS CITY OF COMPTON, A MUNICIPALITY

BACKGROUND Defendant filed a motion to compel Plaintiff to provide written responses to: (1) Defendant’s Form Interrogatories, General, Set One; (2) Defendant’s Form Interrogatories, Employment, Set One; and (3) Defendant’s Special Interrogatories, Set One (collectively, the “Interrogatories”) (the “Interrogatories Motion”), and as to the Interrogatories Motion, Defendant requests monetary sanctions against Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel of record, Virginia L.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

VU V. FEITSER

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production and Special Interrogatories.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

EFRAIN AMAYA, AN INDIVIDUAL VS MATHER BROS. INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES IS GRANTED. Background On July 12, 2019, Plaintiff Efrain Amaya filed the instant action against Defendant Mather Bros. Inc. and Does 1 through 50.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

VIGEN SARKISSIAN VS GENERAL MOTORS LLC, ET AL.

CCP sections 2030.290(c), 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a). Motion to Compel Defendant Allen Gwynn Chevrolet’s Request for Special Interrogatories is GRANTED. Defendant Allen Gwynn Chevrolet, Inc. is ordered to serve verified responses to Plaintiff’s Special Interrogatories Request, Set One, without objection, within 10 days.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ROBERTO HERNANDEZ, ET AL. VS ANGAD SING CHHINA

Nonetheless, Plaintiffs fail to provide evidence the responses to the subject discovery have been served. Therefore, Defendant’s motions to compel responses against Roberto and Edwin are granted. Plaintiffs are each ordered to serve verified responses to form interrogatories and special interrogatories, sets one, without objections, within ten days. (CCP § 2030.290(a),(b).) Sanctions are mandatory. (CCP § 2030.290(c).) As to Edwin, Defendant seeks sanctions in the amount of $461.65 for each motion.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

RANDALL M CARPENTER VS. C W JOHNSON AND SONS INC

To grant Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant, Carpenter's motion to compel verified responses to special interrogatories, set one, without objection. Responses to be served no later than February 4, 2021. Sanctions of $372.50 imposed against C.W. Johnson and Sons, Inc. dba Johnson Floor Covering. (Code of Civil Procedure, sections 2030.290; 2031.300; 2033.280.) To grant Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant, Carpenter's motion to compel verified responses to requests for production, set one, without objection.

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

EMIN TATOS, ET AL. VS NELSON JOHNSON, ET AL.

Defendant’s unopposed Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set, One, and Special Interrogatories, Set One is GRANTED. Plaintiff Emin Tatos is ordered to provide verified responses to the foregoing discovery without objections within 20 days of notice of this order. (Code Civ. Proc. §2030.290.) Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. MORTGAGE LENDER SERVICES

Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. Orders on Motions of Defendant Milestone Financial, LLC to Compel Plaintiff Ruma Chakraborty to Respond to Special Interrogatories, Request for Admissions of Documents, and to Deem Requests for Admissions to Be Admitted; Request for Monetary Sanctions. I. Statement of Facts.

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

ERIC BARON VS BETSY BLECHMAN,, MD

Defendant’s three unopposed Motions to Compel Plaintiff’s Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One; Request for Sanctions is GRANTED. Plaintiff Eric Baron is ordered to provide verified responses to the foregoing discovery without objections within 20 days of notice of this order. (Code Civ. Proc. §2030.290, § 2031.300.) The Court imposes total sanctions of $260.00 against Plaintiff, Eric Baron, for the failure to respond to authorized methods of discovery which is discovery abuse. (Code Civ.

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

ERIC BARON VS BETSY BLECHMAN,, MD

Defendant’s three unopposed Motions to Compel Plaintiff’s Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One; and Request for Production of Documents, Set One; Request for Sanctions are GRANTED. Plaintiff Eric Baron is ordered to provide verified responses to the foregoing discovery without objections within 20 days of notice of this order. (Code Civ. Proc. §2030.290, § 2031.300.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

WONDERLAND BRANDS CALIFORNIA, LLC VS. DEV BAKERY, LLC

Motions to Compel By Dev Bakery, there are four motions to compel Wonderland’s further responses, without objections, to the following discovery: 1. Form Interrogatories, set 1 2. Special Interrogatories, set 1 3. Requests for Admission, set 1 4. Requests for Production of Documents, set 1 Given the Court’s ruling on Wonderland’s motions for relief from waiver of objection, the motions as to the Special Interrogatories, Requests for Production of Documents, and Requests for Admission are MOOT.

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

To date, despite attempts to meet and confer, Plaintiff has not served responses. Defendant therefore seeks an order compelling Plaintiff to respond, without objections, to the outstanding interrogatories and RPDs, deeming the RFAs admitted, and imposing sanctions. Defendant’s motions to compel are granted. Plaintiff is ordered to serve verified responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and RPDs, without objections, within ten days. (CCP §§ 2030.290(a),(b), 2031.300(a),(b).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

TITANIUM FABRICS LLC VS VIV COLLECTION INC ET AL

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS FOR $1,951.65 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION Background Plaintiff Titanium Fabrics, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on August 9, 2018 against, among others, Defendant Steve Jun (“Jun”).

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

BELLA ALL NATURAL, INC VS MAYELI ALONSO

On June 16, 2020, Cross-Defendant served special interrogatories, set number 2, on Cross-Complainant. Cross-Complainant did not respond. Cross-Defendant filed a motion to compel responses. Cross-Complainant did not oppose the motion.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ, ET AL. VS RAY OF HOPE HOME INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

ORDER RE MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS On April 16, 2019, Plaintiffs Vitalina Munoz and Guadalupe Rodriguez filed this wrongful termination action against Defendant Ray of Hope Home Inc. In late 2019 and early 2020, the Court granted several motions to compel responses to special interrogatories, form interrogatories, requests for admission, and requests for documents. The Court ordered monetary sanctions. Defendant did not serve supplemental responses or pay the sanctions.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

NELSON CASTRO, ET AL. VS AZATUI SAMVELIAN

Accordingly, the Motion to deem admitted requests for admissions is DENIED. Monetary Sanctions Where the court grants a motion to compel responses, sanctions shall be imposed against the party who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel, unless the party acted with substantial justification or the sanction would otherwise be unjust. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (c).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

ANTONIO LOPEZ VS ELI HO, ET AL.

Discussion There is no requirement for a prior meet and confer effort before a motion to compel initial responses can be filed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290.) Further, the motion can be brought any time after the responding party fails to provide the responses. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

VIGEN SARKISSIAN VS GENERAL MOTORS LLC, ET AL.

CCP sections 2030.290(c), 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a). UNOPPOSED Motion to Compel Defendant General Motors’ Request for Special Interrogatories is GRANTED. Defendant General Motors LLC is ordered to serve verified responses to Plaintiff’s Special Interrogatories Request, Set One, without objection, within 10 days.

  • Hearing

    Jan 15, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

LAURA LUBINSKY VS MYLES JOSEF ZAKHEIM, O.D., ET AL.

.: 19STCV29065 Hearing Date: January 15, 2021 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motions to compel discovery responses Defendants Myles Josef Zakheim, O.D. and Dr. Myles Josef Zakheim, O.D., Optometric Corporation (“Defendants”) move to compel responses from Plaintiff Laura Lubinsky (“Plaintiff”) to: (1) Request for Production of Documents, set one (“RPD”); (2) Form Interrogatories, set one (“FROG”); and (3) Special Interrogatories, set one (“SROG”).

  • Hearing

    Jan 15, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

BASMA ISMAIL VS CAROLYN CAMPBELL

Monetary Sanctions Where the court grants a motion to compel responses, sanctions shall be imposed against the party who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel, unless the party acted with substantial justification or the sanction would otherwise be unjust. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290,subd. (c).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 15, 2021

DEMETRIO HARO, ET AL. VS C&P PROPERTIES #1, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

PRESENTATION: The Court received the Motion to Compel RFP as to Demetrio; Motion to Compel RFP as to Quintero; Motion to Deem RfA Admitted as to Demetrio; Motion to Deem RfA Admitted as to Quintero; Motion to Compel Special Interrogatories as to Demetrio; Motion to Compel Special Interrogatories as to Quintero; Motion to Compel Form Interrogatories as to Demetrio; and Motion to Compel Form Interrogatories as to Quintero, each filed by Defendant, on November 18, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Jan 15, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 184     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.