Motion Types Legal Issues

Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories

Most Useful Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories Examples

Recent Examples of Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories

1-25 of 500 results

CLAIRE LEVINE VS SYLVESTER STEWART, ET AL.

...and overruled the demurrer to the SAC for the abuse of process claim. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel verified responses, or in the alternative, compel further responses, to special interrogatories set one. ANALYSIS: A. Relevant Law Code of Civil Procedure requires a response from the party to whom requests for production are propounded within 30 days after service of the requests. (Code Civ....

... responses in the form of a Motion to Compel Further Discovery with an accompanying Separate Statement” but “she has failed to do so.” (Id. at p. 3:16-18.) The Court finds that Defendant timely served proper responses to Plaintiff’s special interrogatories, set one. Although Defendant’s responses only included objections, this response was proper pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.210, subdivision (a)...

  • Hearing

    Feb 21, 2020

LESLIE BLAKENEY VS SERGIO GARCIA

Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Request for Production (All Set One) Having considered the moving and opposing papers, the Court rules as follows. No reply papers were filed. BACKGROUND On August 1, 2018, Plaintiff Leslie Bl...

...misrepresentation. On January 3, 2020, Defendants Sergio Garcia and Manuela T. Garcia filed a motion to compel Plaintiff to provide verified responses without objections to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Request for Production (All Set One) pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.290 and 2031.300. Trial is set for June 2, 2020. PARTIES’ REQUESTS Defendants Sergio Garcia an...

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

ARSHA CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS CEDARWOOD CAPITAL PARTNERS LA CIENGA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

...multiple requests for relief into a single motion. The Motion moves for an order compelling Defendant to furnish responses to three separate discovery requests: (1) Form Interrogatories, Set One; (2) Special Interrogatories, Set One; and (3) Requests for Production, Set One. It also moves for an order deeming the Request for Admission, Set One, admitted. One of the statutes under which Plaintiff moves is Code of Civil P...

...Indeed, here, Defendants filed the instant discovery motion as a single “Motion to Compel Discovery (not Further Discovery)” when it is in fact it should be reserved as four separate Motions to Compel Responses. Finally, combining discovery motions allows the moving party (or parties in this case) to avoid paying the requisite filing fees. “[I]t is mandatory for the court clerks to demand and receive statut...

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

CASHCALL, INC. VS LIZETT IBARRA

...February 2020. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. MOTION OF PLAINTIFF TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FORM INTERROGATORIES (LIMITED CIVIL CASES), SET ONE; SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE; AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE I. Statement of Facts. Plaintiff filed this verified complaint on 12 March 2019 2019.17 This is an action for breach of contract and common...

...plaintiff served defendant with form interrogatories (limited civil cases), set one; special interrogatories, set one; requests for admissions, set one; and request for production of documents, set one. Responses were due on 8 November 2019. They have not been provided. The matter has a trial date of 4 May 2020. II. Analysis. Responses to interrogatories and request for production of documents are due within...

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

MONICA MARIE DE LA TORRE, ET AL. VS MUOI THI HUA, ET AL.

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF KELLEY JEAN PHILLIPS’S RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY AND MONETARY SANCTIONS On May 23, 2019, Plaintiffs Monica Marie de la Torre and Kelley Jean Phillips (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants Muoi Thi Hua and Binh Dao (collect...

...served special interrogatories, demand for production of documents, and form interrogatories on Plaintiff. On November 13, 2019, Defendants sent a letter asking for the responses. Defendants received no responses. Defendants move to compel Plaintiff’s responses. Where a party fails to serve timely responses to discovery requests, the court may make an order compelling responses. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290,...

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

CHARLES KUTA V. COLORTOKENS, INC.

...that Kuta failed to pay back a loan that was due when Kuta separated from employment with ColorTokens. Defendant ColorTokens served several discovery requests on Kuta and has filed the instant motion to compel further discovery responses. The requested responses are targeted at discovering information regarding Linkaj, a competing company ColorTokens alleges Kuta and several of his coworkers created while t...

...Division of this Court within 10 calendar days. Kuta must produce the requested items within 20 calendar days of the date of this order. ii. Requests to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories Special Interrogatory No. 17: Identify all potential investors who were contacted about Linkaj. Special Interrogatory No. 18: For each potential investor in your response to Special Interrogatory No. 17, sta...

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

WIBERG V. JOHNSON

...Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS TO DEEM REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO BE ADMITTED; COMPELLING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO WRITTEN INTERROGATORIES, DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND ORDERING GARY JOHNSON AND CONNIE BLUCK TO APPEAR FOR DEPOSITION I. Statement of Facts. Plaintiff filed this complaint on 26 April 2019.19 This is an action for breach of co...

...form interrogatories; and special interrogatories. The respondent has provided no response to these discovery devices. On 2 August 2019, plaintiffs served upon Gary Johnson request for admissions; form interrogatories; and requests for production. The respondent has provided no response to these discovery devices. On 30 August 2019, plaintiffs served a deposition notice upon defendant Gary Johnson, setting the depo...

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

BRADLEY GUEVARA VS JOAQUIN BOBADILLA AKA OSCAR BOBADILLA

bradley guevara, Plaintiff, v. joaquin bobadilla, et al., Defendant. Case No.: BC711242 Hearing Date: February 20, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motions for terminating sanctions Defendant Arash Rajaeeyan (“Defendant”) moves to dismiss the complaint of Cross-Complainant Jennifer Mae Van Buskirk (“Van Buskirk”) as a terminating sanction. The court ha...

...striking a party’s pleading. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.030, subd. (d)(1).) In its order of November 22, 2019, the Court ordered Van Buskirk to serve verified responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories and requests for production of documents that Defendant served on Van Buskirk within 30 days of notice of the order. Defendant served Van Buskirk with notice of the ruling by mail on December 10, 2019...

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

VERNON ALEXANDER ROSADO, ET AL. VS LQK CORPORATION

MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES, SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION (CCP §§ 2030.290; 2031.300) TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant LQK Corporation’s nine Motions to Compel Discovery are GRANTED. Plaintiffs are ordered to serve verified response...

...Plaintiff Alexander Protective Services’ Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Monetary and Evidentiary Sanctions; (3) Motion to Compel Plaintiff Alexander Protective Services’ Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, and Request for Monetary and Evidentiary Sanctions; (4) Motion to Compel Plaintiff APS Security Patrol Systems Corporation’s Responses to Form Interrog...

  • Hearing

    Feb 19, 2020

EGAL SHAHBAZ VS SAB INVESTMENT PROPERTY, LLC, ET AL.

Shahbaz v. SAB Investment Property, LLC, et al. MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES, REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS (CCP §§ 2030.290; 2031.300) TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant SAB Investment Property, LLC (1) Motion For Order Compelling Plaintiff To Respond to Special I...

... Interrogatories; Request for Sanctions; and (2) Motion For Order Compelling Plaintiff to Respond to Request for Production of Documents; Request For Sanctions are GRANTED. PLAINTIFF TO SERVE VERIFIED RESPONSES WITHOUT OBJECTION TO THE DISCOVERY REQUESTS WITHIN 20 DAYS’ NOTICE OF THIS ORDER. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS THAT PLAINTIFF AND COUNSEL OF RECORD ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY TO PAY SANCTIONS OF $1,245.00 ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 19, 2020

AASNESS VS VOGELSINGER

Tentative Ruling on Discovery Motion Aasness v. Vogelsinger, Case No. 2019-08916 February 21, 2020, 1:30 p.m., Dept. 72 1. Overview and Procedural Posture. This is a breach of fiduciary duty case arising out of a blended family situa...

...the court set the case for trial in May of 2020. ROA 18-23. Presently, plaintiffs seek (in a single motion) to compel responses to five discovery devices (a set of form interrogatories, a set of special interrogatories and three sets of document demands) propounded by plaintiffs on defendant Hubert Vogelsinger in October of 2019. ROA 29-32. Plaintiffs also seek (in the same motion) an order establishing admissions r...

  • Hearing

    Feb 19, 2020

TAKOUHI KAIMATLIAN VS 99 CENTS ONLY STORES

Motion to Compel Responses to Supplemental Interrogatories, Supplemental Special Interrogatories, and Supplemental Request for Production (All Set Two) Having considered the moving, opposing, and reply papers, the Court rules as follows. BACKGROUND On October 24, 2016, Plaintiff Takouhi Kaimat...

...that occurred on October 27, 2014. On January 21, 2020, Defendant filed motions to compel Plaintiff to provide verified responses without objections to Supplemental Interrogatories, Supplemental Special Interrogatories, and Supplemental Request for Production (All Set Two) pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.290 and 2031.300. Trial is set for April 2, 2020. PARTY’S REQUESTS Defendant asks...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

KRISTEN ASKEW VS ON TIME OIL, LLC, ET AL.

ANALYSIS 1-4. Plaintiff Kristen Askew’s motions to compel responses to form interrogatories (general and employment law), special interrogatories, and production of documents are GRANTED. Defendant is ordered to provide responses within 20 days. Plaintiff Kristen Askew (“Plaintiff”), moves ...

...(“Plaintiff”), moves the court for orders requiring Defendant On Time Oil, LLC (“Defendant”) to provide verified responses to its form interrogatories – general, form interrogatories – employment law, special interrogatories, and request for production of documents. CCP § 2030.290(b) allows the propounding party to file a motion to compel responses to interrogatories if a response has not been received. If responses are ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

EGAL SHAHBAZ VS SAB INVESTMENT PROPERTY, LLC, ET AL.

Shahbaz v. SAB Investment Property, LLC, et al. MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES, REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS (CCP §§ 2030.290; 2031.300) TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant SAB Investment Property, LLC (1) Motion For Order Compelling Plaintiff To Respond to Special I...

... Interrogatories; Request for Sanctions; and (2) Motion For Order Compelling Plaintiff to Respond to Request for Production of Documents; Request For Sanctions are GRANTED. PLAINTIFF TO SERVE VERIFIED RESPONSES WITHOUT OBJECTION TO THE DISCOVERY REQUESTS WITHIN 20 DAYS’ NOTICE OF THIS ORDER. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS THAT PLAINTIFF AND COUNSEL OF RECORD ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY TO PAY SANCTIONS OF $1,245.00 ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

KRISTA LYNN TAYLOR VS LISA HANKIN

...Brothers, Inc., Cassandra Karazissis, and Nick Karazissis. Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ three motions to compel discovery responses from Defendant to their second set of form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and request for admissions. ANALYSIS: A. Relevant Law California Code of Civil Procedure requires a response from the party to whom requests for production are propounded within 30 days after serv...

...Court (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 905-906.) B. Discussion 1. Motions to Compel On December 10, 2019, Plaintiffs served their second set of discovery seeking responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and requests for admission. (Leinbach Decl., ¶ 3; Ex. A.) Two days after the responses were due, on January 16, 2020, Defendant’s counsel requested an extension to respond to the discovery requests....

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

KRISTA LYNN TAYLOR VS LISA HANKIN

...Brothers, Inc., Cassandra Karazissis, and Nick Karazissis. Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ three motions to compel discovery responses from Defendant to their second set of form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and request for admissions. ANALYSIS: A. Relevant Law California Code of Civil Procedure requires a response from the party to whom requests for production are propounded within 30 days after serv...

...Court (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 905-906.) B. Discussion 1. Motions to Compel On December 10, 2019, Plaintiffs served their second set of discovery seeking responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and requests for admission. (Leinbach Decl., ¶ 3; Ex. A.) Two days after the responses were due, on January 16, 2020, Defendant’s counsel requested an extension to respond to the discovery requests....

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

DE GUZMAN VS FRANI

Tentative Rulings on Four Motions to Compel Discovery DeGuzman v. Frani, Case No. 2018-59861 February 21, 2020, 1:30 p.m., Dept. 72 1. Overview and Procedural Posture. This is a partition action apparently arising out of a long romance whic...

...47-52. Plaintiff answered the FAC, and cross-complained for breach of contract. ROA 53-54. Plaintiff has answered the cross-complaint. ROA 58. Defendant filed, in early January 2020, four discovery motions. ROA 63-67. She seeks the imposition of monetary sanctions. Plaintiff filed a "response" on January 21, 2020 in which he disputes the timing of his receipt of the discovery requests, claims an interv...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

DE GUZMAN VS FRANI

Tentative Rulings on Four Motions to Compel Discovery DeGuzman v. Frani, Case No. 2018-59861 February 21, 2020, 1:30 p.m., Dept. 72 1. Overview and Procedural Posture. This is a partition action apparently arising out of a long romance whic...

...47-52. Plaintiff answered the FAC, and cross-complained for breach of contract. ROA 53-54. Plaintiff has answered the cross-complaint. ROA 58. Defendant filed, in early January 2020, four discovery motions. ROA 63-67. She seeks the imposition of monetary sanctions. Plaintiff filed a "response" on January 21, 2020 in which he disputes the timing of his receipt of the discovery requests, claims an interv...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

CHERISE FOX VS CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

...Order and for Monetary Sanctions is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. On 8/23/19, the Court granted Defendant’s Seven Motions to Compel Plaintiff’s Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One; Special Interrogatories, Sets One, Two and Four; and Request for Production of Documents, Sets One, Two and Three. The Court also imposed sanctions of $1,320 against Plaintiff and her counsel. Motion, Ex. A. Defendant served...

...lieu of or in addition other sanctions. Cal Code Civil Procedure § 2030.290(c). Plaintiff is ordered to comply with the court’s order of 8/23/19 to provide verified responses without objections to Form Interrogatories, Set One, within 15 days. The Court imposes additional monetary sanctions of $370.00 against Plaintiff, Cherise Fox, and her counsel of record, Vincent J. Quigg, for disobeying a court order to provid...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

FE PALOMIQUE, AN INDIVIDUAL VS. WILSON GARDEN HOMEOWNERS

...seq) Moving Party: Defendant Sargis Yeritsyan Responding Party: Defendant Wilson Garden Homeowners Association (No Opposition) RELIEF REQUESTED: Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One Responses to Requests for Production, Set One Order Deeming Requests for Admissions, Set One, Admitted CHRONOLOGY Date Discovery served: October 4, 2019 Extensions of tim...

...Responding party requested that motions to compel not be filed until January 13, 2020, but not request or obtain a further extension. Moving party nevertheless waited until January 20, 2020 to file this motion. Defendant Wilson Gardens Homeowners Association has failed to serve timely responses and has therefore waived all objections. Defendant Yeritsyan has filed a noticed motion requesting an order that t...

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2020

CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC. VS. OB CONSTRUCTION, LLC

...TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS [PLTF] CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC. 2) NOTICE OF MOTION — AND MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED BY PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT; REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS [PLTF] CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC. RULING Plaintiff Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc.’s unopposed Motion to Compel Response...

...Plaintiff s First Set of Demand for Production of Documents and Request for Monetary Sanctions is GRANTED, Plaintiff Creditors Adjustment Bureau) Inc.’s unopposed Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories Propounded by Plaintiff to Defendant and Request for Monetary Sanctions is GRANTED. Production of Documents Plaintiff served Defendant’s counsel with its First Set of Demand for Production of Documen...

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2020

DEMARTINI V. HANKINS

This case is on calendar for Defendants’ motion to compel Plaintiff to provide verified responses to Defendants’ form interrogatories, set one; special interrogatories, set one; and requests or production of documents, set one. Defendants bring the motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.290 and 2031.300 and on the grounds that Plaintiff simply fail...

...Defendant $488.10 in monetary sanctions by the time she serves her responses. Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290 provides that if a party to whom interrogatories were directed fails to serve timely responses, the responding party waives all objections, including those based on privilege and work product protection, and the propounding party may move for an order compelling responses. (Code Civ. Proc. §203...

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2020

GARCIA V. ACTERBERG

Defendant’s Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories and Requests for Production. Defendant’s counsel declares: on October 29, 2019 form and special interrogatories and requests for production were served on plaintiff; and despite a request for responses and production, plaintiff failed to provide any responses to the discovery propounded. Defendant moves to comp...

...Procedure, §§ 2030.260, 2030.270, 2031.260, and 2031.270.) The failure to timely respond waives all objections to the interrogatories and requests and the propounding party may move to compel answers to interrogatories and production of documents. (Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 2030.290 and 2031.300.) Absent opposition, it appears appropriate under the circumstances to grant the motion to compel answers and production...

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2020

MARIA CASTILLO VS PANORAMA GARDENS NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Motion: Motions to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Request for Production (All Set One) filed by Defendant Ensign Panorama LLC dba Panoma Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (erroneously sued as Panorama Gardens Nur...

...Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation) Opposed: No Proposed Ruling: Deny the motions. Special Issues: None Law Clerk: Jamison Gilmore, ext. 7101 Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Request for Production (All Set One) Having considered the moving papers, the Court rules as follows. No opposing papers were filed. BACKGROUND On November 15, 2018, Plaintiff Maria Castillo (...

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2020

MANUEL MARTINEZ VS MICHAEL DOKUNMU

Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Request for Production (All Set One) Having considered the moving papers, the Court rules as follows. No opposing papers were filed. BACKGROUND On April 19, 2016, Plaintiff Manuel Martinez (“P...

...automobile collision that occurred on April 25, 2016. On December 6, 2019, Defendant filed motions to compel Plaintiff to provide verified responses without objections to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Request for Production (All Set One) pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.290 and 2031.300. Trial is set for April 9, 2020. PARTY’S REQUESTS Defendant asks the Court to...

  • Hearing

    Feb 13, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 20     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.