Motion to Compel Deposition of PMK

Useful Rulings on Motion to Compel Deposition of Person Most Qualified

Recent Rulings on Motion to Compel Deposition of Person Most Qualified

CARLOS HALILI VS FCA US, LLC

.: 20stcv17362 Hearing Date: December 2, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: MOTION to compel deposition of defendant fca’s person most knowledgeable Background Plaintiff CARLOS HALILI (Plaintiff) commenced this action against Defendant FCA US LLC (FCA) on May 6, 220. The Complaint asserts causes of action for violations of the Song Beverly statute. Plaintiff’s claims arise from his purchase of a 2018 Ram 1500 (Vehicle).

  • Hearing

RAYMOND A. PADILLA VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ET AL.

.: 18STCV02854 Hearing Date: December 2, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to compel deposition BACKGROUND Plaintiff Raymond A. Padilla (“Plaintiff”) filed this medical malpractice action against Defendant Nancy Ann McCarthy, M.D. (“Defendant”), among others. Now, Plaintiff moves to compel the deposition of Defendant. The motion is granted. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On April 22, 2019, Plaintiff served a deposition notice on Defendant. (Declaration of Benjamin Fogel, ¶ 3.)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

.: 19STCV10080 Hearing Date: December 2, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: MOTION to compel deposition of defendant GM’s person most knowledgeable Background Plaintiff Jason Smith (Plaintiff) commenced this action against Defendant General Motors, LLC (GM) on March 25, 2019. The Complaint asserts causes of action for violations of the Song Beverly statute. Plaintiff’s claims arise from his purchase of a 2012 Chevy Cruze (Vehicle).

  • Hearing

GENESIS MEDIA LLC VS OWNZONES MEDIA NETWORK INC ET AL

Meet and Confer A motion to compel deposition must be accompanied by a good faith meet and confer declaration under section 2016.040 or, “when the deponent fails to attend the deposition and produce the documents, electronically stored information, or things described in the deposition notice, by a declaration stating that the petitioner has contacted the deponent to inquire about the nonappearance.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450, subd. (b)(2).)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

MARGARET KEYES VS LISA ZEDER, ET AL.

Design Group, Inc.’s Person Most Knowledgeable, to continue the hearing on Defendant Lisa Zeder’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and a request for sanctions. [TENTATIVE] RULING: Plaintiff’s Motion Compel Deposition of Defendant L.Z. Design Group, Inc.’s Person Most Knowledgeable is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Request to Continue the Hearing on Defendant Lisa Zeder’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Request for Sanctions is DENIED.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

STOLLER V. GENERAL MOTORS LLC

Stoller) Motion to Compel Deposition Attendance and Production of Documents of Defendant General Motors LLC’s Person(s) Most Knowledgeable and Custodian(s) of Records (Motion), filed on 6-17-20 under ROA No. 101, is DENIED.

  • Hearing

ANIMAL PROTECTION AND RESCUE LEAGUE INC VS RAMIREZ

Abuzeid, Esq. in Regards to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Attendance at Deposition [ROA 309] and the Supplemental Declaration of Bryan Pease in Support of Motion to Compel Deposition [ROA 310]. Nothing in either declaration causes the court to rule in a manner other than as set forth above.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

DAVID CHAVEZ VS FCA US, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

Therefore, Defendant’s objection that “[d]ue to COVID-19, the resulting shelter in place orders and the travel restrictions put in place by FCA US, the Person Most Knowledgeable is unavailable to appear at the deposition” is frivolous. Further, as this motion is unopposed, Defendant has failed to justify its objections. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to compel deposition of Defendant’s PMK and production of documents. II.

  • Hearing

DAVID CHAVEZ VS FCA US, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

Therefore, Defendant’s objection that “[d]ue to COVID-19, the resulting shelter in place orders and the travel restrictions put in place by FCA US, the Person Most Knowledgeable is unavailable to appear at the deposition” is frivolous. BACKGROUND: Plaintiff brings this action based on warranty obligations in connection with a 2016 Jeep Cherokee Sport vehicle he purchased on March 2, 2017. (Complaint, ¶¶ 5-6.)

  • Hearing

NANCY RAUEN, AN INDIVIDUAL VS K&K FOODS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

ORDER Defendants K&K Food, Inc. and Syed Kaiser Sphere's Motion to Compel Deposition and Motion to Quash came on regularly for hearing on November 20, 2020, with appearances/submissions as noted in the minute order for said hearing, and the court, being fully advised in the premises, did then and there rule as follows: THE MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION IS GRANTED. THE MOTION TO QUASH IS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART. DATE: _______________ _______________________________ JUDGE

  • Hearing

UNI-GLORY DEVELOPMENT, INC. VS. FAIRVIEW EAST LLC

ORDER Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Uni-Glory Development, Inc. and Cross-Defendants George Zhang, Lucy Xiangxin Gao, and Chien-Kuo Liu's Motion to Compel Deposition came on regularly for hearing on November 20, 2020, with appearances/submissions as noted in the minute order for said hearing, and the court, being fully advised in the premises, did then and there rule as follows: THE MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION IS GRANTED, AND ASSOCIATED SANCTIONS ARE AWARDED TO CROSS-DEFENDANTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,111.65.

  • Hearing

AIDA OGANESIAN, ET AL. VS CAH-2014-1 BORROWER, LLC, ET AL.

ORDER Defendants CAH 2014-1 Borrower, LLC and Colfin AI-CA 5, LLC's three motions to compel deposition all came on regularly for hearing on November 20, 2020, with appearances/submissions as noted in the minute order for said hearing, and the court, being fully advised in the premises, did then and there rule as follows: THE MOTIONS TO COMPEL DEPOSITION AS TO OGANESIAN, GAREGIN, AND NARINE ARE DENIED. DATE: _______________ _______________________________ JUDGE

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

ANPING ZENG VS LOS ANGELES FILM REGIONAL CENTER II LP ET AL

Unsuccessful Motion to Compel Deposition Florence made entries totaling $2,875 in connection with drafting an unsuccessful motion to compel Jiang’s deposition. Jiang notes that the Court denied the fee requests made in connection with the motion to compel the deposition. Indeed, the Court held that both parties’ requests for monetary sanctions were denied given that the parties failed to adequately meet and confer.

  • Hearing

JUDI BEDDOW, ET AL. VS ALTEC, INC.,, ET AL.

As to witnesses Dave Cunningham, Philippe Cueto, Ken Jones, Bryce Chumley, Chris Pepin, Jason Kobler, Corey Wells, and Bryce Dallas, Plaintiffs’ motion to compel deposition is DENIED. Plaintiffs are required to issue deposition subpoenas to the third-party witnesses in order to compel their depositions. Defendant is ordered to provide Plaintiffs forthwith the witnesses’ last known contact information.

  • Hearing

JOHN RIOS VS CITY OF BALDWIN PARK

Motion to Compel Deposition Rios seeks to compel the deposition of Rose Tam (“Tam”), the City’s finance director. 1.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

ANPING ZENG VS LOS ANGELES FILM REGIONAL CENTER II LP ET AL

Unsuccessful Motion to Compel Deposition Florence made entries totaling $2,875 in connection with drafting an unsuccessful motion to compel Jiang’s deposition. Jiang notes that the Court denied the fee requests made in connection with the motion to compel the deposition. Indeed, the Court held that both parties’ requests for monetary sanctions were denied given that the parties failed to adequately meet and confer.

  • Hearing

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Motion to Compel Deposition Code of Civil Procedure section 2020.010 permits discovery of non-party witnesses through oral and written depositions. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2020.010(a)(1), (2); Hawkins v. TACA International Airlines, S.A. (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 466, 476.) A deposition subpoena may command the attendance and testimony of the deponent, the production of business records, or both. (Id., § 2020.020.)

  • Hearing

ALYSSA ROBERTS, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL. VS MAX ROSE, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

Motion to Compel Deposition Code of Civil Procedure section 2020.010 permits discovery of non-party witnesses through oral and written depositions. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2020.010(a)(1), (2); Hawkins v. TACA International Airlines, S.A. (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 466, 476.) A deposition subpoena may command the attendance and testimony of the deponent, the production of business records, or both. (Id., § 2020.020.)

  • Hearing

ERIKA FLORES, ET AL. VS FELIX CHEVROLET, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, DBA FELIX CHEVROLET, ET AL.

C.C.P. §2025.450(b)(1) provides that, “[t]he motion [to compel deposition] shall set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the production for inspection of any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice.”

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

DAVID G. BERTRAND, ET AL. V. JESSICA BERRY

On October 27, Berry filed her “Objection to Appellants Motion to Compel Deposition.” She requests a monetary sanction of $2,695. Berry also asks the court to appoint a special master to oversee discovery. Piecing together the chronology of what transpired in this case is very difficult because Mr.

  • Hearing

MARCELA SANTILLIAN ESTRADA VS GLOBALMED SYSTEMS INC ET AL

Motion to Compel Deposition Having considered the moving and opposing papers, the Court rules as follows. No reply papers were filed. BACKGROUND On February 16, 2018, Plaintiff Marcela Santillan Estrada (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Globalmed Systems, Inc., Sina Aulai, and Mobile Dialysis. Plaintiff alleges premises liability and negligence in the complaint for a pedestrian-automobile collision that occurred on February 29, 2016.

  • Hearing

ELSA JUAREZ VS SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION

CATEGORY NO. 6: YOUR Person(s) Most Knowledgeable regarding the maintenance of the PROPERTY. CATEGORY NO. 7: YOUR Person(s) Most Knowledgeable regarding repairs of the LOCATION. CATEGORY NO. 8: YOUR Person(s) Most Knowledgeable regarding the cleaning of the LOCATION. CATEGORY NO. 9: YOUR Person(s) Most Knowledgeable regarding inspections of LOCATION. Sears’ general argument is that these categories are overbroad.

  • Hearing

VELASQUEZ VS GENERAL MOTORS LLC

Velasquez's unopposed motion to compel deposition of a person most knowledgeable and custodian of records of defendant General Motors LLC is granted. Defendant shall produce the PMK, and produce all responsive documents identified in plaintiff's notice of deposition. Plaintiff is granted sanctions in the amount of $800.00. The deposition may be done via a video conference platform within three weeks, with plaintiff to make the arrangements and inform all parties in advance.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

ALVAREZ VS. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.

MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF PMK WITH PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RULING: Plaintiff Maria Alvarez’s motion to compel Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. to produce its Person(s) Most Knowledgeable for deposition, is CONTINUED to 12/15/2020 at 09:00 AM in Department C19. The request to compel production of documents is DENIED.

  • Hearing

THOMAS MARTINEZ VS JUDD GRISELDA, ET AL.

Motion to Compel Deposition Having considered the moving and supplemental moving papers, the Court rules as follows. No opposing papers have been filed. BACKGROUND On February 27, 2020, Plaintiff Thomas Martinez (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Enterprise Rent-A-Car (“Defendant Enterprise”) and Judd Griselda. Plaintiff alleged motor vehicle negligence arising from a collision that occurred on December 4, 2018.

  • Hearing

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 54     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.