A party may move for an order compelling the deponent’s attendance and testimony, and the production for inspection of any document, if after service of a deposition notice, a party to the action, without having served a valid objection, fails to appear for examination, or proceed with it, or to produce for inspection any document. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450(a).)
How to Structure the Motion
If a motion seeks to order the deponent to produce documents listed in the deposition notice, then the motion must “set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the production for inspection of any document, electrically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450(b)(1).)
An objection to a deposition question does not excuse the deponent from the duty to answer unless the objecting party demands the deposition be suspended to allow for the filing of a motion for protective order. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2025.460(b), 2025.470.) Otherwise, the deponent must answer the question and the testimony will be received, subject to the objection. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.460(b).)
Meet and Confer
A motion to compel the deposition of a party to the action must also be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration, or, when the deponent failed to attend the deposition, a declaration stating that the petitioner has contacted the deponent to inquire about the nonappearance. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450(b)(2).)
Monetary Sanctions
“If a motion under subdivision (a) is granted, the court shall impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) in favor of the party who noticed the deposition and against the deponent or the party with whom the deponent is affiliated, unless the court finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust.” (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2025.450(g)(1).)
CHRISTINA MUNIZ; Plaintiff, vs. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, et al.; Defendants.
Case No.: BC 704507
Hearing Date: August 12, 2019
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE:
DEFENDANT GENERAL MOTOR LLC’S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION, VERIFIED RESPONSES TO AND ALL RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS FOR THE REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AT DEPOSITION AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS.
Defendant General Motor LLC’s Mot...
..arranty period, the vehicle developed various defects. (Complaint ¶ 8.)
procedural history
Muniz filed the Complaint on May 3, 2018, alleging two causes of action:
Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability
Breach of Express Warranty
GM filed an Answer on June 6, 2018.
This Court on March 28, 2019, granted in part Muniz’s Motion to Compel Further Responses from GM.
This Court on August 1...
Motion: (1) Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Deposition Testimony(2) Defendant’s Motion to Compel Deposition of Julio PalaciosTentative Ruling:(1) To grant the motion to compel plaintiff to submit to further deposition and to provide further responses to all deposition questions specified in the separate statement of disputed responses filed by defendant on September 21, 2018. The further...
..Palacios, without prejudice to the filing of a future motion showing proper service on Mr. Palacios. Explanation:(1) Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Deposition TestimonyAs the moving papers note, an objection...
Robert VArie, Plaintiff, v. Bronislava Zaks, et al., Defendants.Case No.: BC630234Hearing Date: June 26, 2018[TENTATIVE] order RE:Plaintiff’S motion for order compelling Defendant’s Production of Documents Listed in DEPOSITION NoticeBACKGROUNDPlaintiff Robert Varie (“Plaintiff”) moves to compel the production of documents listed in the deposition notice served on defendant Bronislava Zaks (“Defend...
..order compelling the deponent’s attendance and testimony, and the production for inspection of any document. (CCP §2025.450(a).)If a motion seeks to o...
(1) Plaintiff’s Motion for an Award of Sanctions.(2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant’s Attendance and Testimony at Her Deposition, to Produce Documents, and for Monetary Sanctions.Plaintiff moves to compel defendant to appear at plaintiff’s deposition and produce documents on the ground that defendant failed to appear and produce the documents as requested in a duly served notice of deposit...
..otion for sanctions. The motion for sanctions duplicates the request for sanctions sought in the motion to compel attendance at deposition for failure to attend he deposition and produce documents. The proof of service of the motion to compel attendance, produce documents and for sanctions in t...
Ameek Floyd, Plaintiff, v. Jose Salcido, et al., Defendants.Case No.: BC625089Hearing Date: April 18, 2018[TENTATIVE] order RE:Plaintiff’S motion for order compelling Defendant’s DEPOSITIONBACKGROUNDPlaintiff Ameek Floyd (“Plaintiff”) moves to compel the deposition of defendant Erika Bowman (“Defendant Bowman”) and for sanctions against Defendant Bowman and her counsel.[1]Defendant Bowman has file...
..n for inspection of any document. (CCP §2025.450(a).) A motion to compel the deposition of a party to the action must be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration, or...
(1) Christine Rao’s Motion to Compel Deposition of Super Talent Electronics, Inc. and Great World Real Estate, LLC, and for Sanctions
(2) Christine Rao’s Motion to Compel Deposition of Abraham C. Ma and Zachary Zheng, and for Sanctions
I. Christine Rao’s Motion to Compel Deposition of Super Talent Electronics, Inc. and Great World Real Estate, LLC, and for Sanctions is GRANTED.
A. Discovery dis...
..September 25, 2018.4
On September 21, 2018, plaintiff STE served defendant Rao with objections to the amended notice of deposition.5
STE’s counsel identified Sharon Wu (“Wu”) to testify on STE’s behalf for a subset of the noticed topics, and identified Abraham Ma (“Ma”) as another designee without identifying which topics Ma would testify to.6 On October 19, 2018, Rao’s counsel deposed STE thro...
Superior Court of California
County of Kern
Bakersfield Department 17
Hearing Date: 01/08/2021 Time: 8:30 AM - 12:00 PM
BROWN ET AL VS ROSEMA ET AL
...
Superior Court of California
County of Kern
Bakersfield Department 17
Hearing Date: 01/08/2021 Time: 8:30 AM - 12:00 PM
BROWN ET AL VS ROSEMA ET AL
...
avid F. Myers, Esq. (SBN 185102)
WOLKIN · CURRAN, LLP
111 Maiden Lane, 6 Floor 11/24/2020
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: (415) 982-9390
[email protected]
ttorneys for Plaintiff
SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY
UPERIOR COURT OF THE...
David F. Myers, Esq. (SBN 1
WOLKIN · CURRAN, LLP
111 Maiden Lane, 6 Floor 11/24/2020
San Francisco, California 941
Telephone: (415) 982 9390
[email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE...
David F. Myers, Esq. (SBN 1
WOLKIN · CURRAN, LLP
111 Maiden Lane, 6 Floor
San Francisco, California 941
11/24/2020
Telephone: (415) 982 9390
[email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY
...
JOINT STATEMENT REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION ATTENDANCE
AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
JOINT STATUS STATEMENT
This lawsuit arises out of General Motors LLC’s (“GM” or “Defendant”) failure to abide
by its statutory duties under the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civil Code sections 17...
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF PLACER
Date: November 19, 2020 Time: 8:30
AM
Judge: Charles D.Wachob Dept:
Reporter: Clerk:W) y (2a TAed an,
...
POS-O50/EFS-050
ATTORNEY ORPARTY WITHOUTATTORNEY: STATEBAR NO:
FOR COURTUSE ONLY
NAME: Zenaida P. Graves, Pro Se
FIRMNAME:
STREETADDRESS: 2351 Sunset Blvd,#170-238. ...
11/16/2020
Zenaida P. GravesRespondent, Pro
2351 SUNSET BLVD., STE 170
ROCKLIN, CA, 95765
(415)
[email protected]
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY ...
PATRICIA A. BOYES, ESQ. [SBN: 244335]
ANTHONY L. PEREZ, ESQ. [SBN: 303045]
HARISH TANGRI, ESQ. [SBN: 325752]
BOYESLEGAL, APC
84 W. Santa Clara Street, Suite 550
San Jose, California 95113 1812
Tel: (408) 572 5665
Fax: (408) 572 5567
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CARLEY R. THOMPSON
...
PATRICIA A. BOYES, ESQ. [SBN: 244335]
ANTHONY L. PEREZ, ESQ. [SBN: 303045]
HARISH TANGRI, ESQ. [SBN: 325752]
BOYESLEGAL, APC
84 W. Santa Clara Street, Suite 550
San Jose, California 95113 1812
Tel: (408) 572 5665
Fax: (408) 572 5567
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CARLEY R. THOMPSON
...
David F. Myers, Esq. (SBN 1 11/12/2020
WOLKIN · CURRAN, LLP
111 Maiden Lane, 6 Floor
San Francisco, California 941
Telephone: (415) 982 9390
[email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE S...
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
Zenaida P. Graves, Respondent, Pro-Se Superior Court of California
2351 SUNSET BLVD., STE 170-238 P County of Placer
ROCKLIN, CA, 95765 ¥
...
11/12/2020
David F. Myers, Esq. (SBN 185102)
WOLKIN · CURRAN, LLP
Telephone: (415) 982-9390
[email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
...
David F. Myers, Esq. (SBN 1 11/12/2020
WOLKIN · CURRAN, LLP
111 Maiden Lane, 6 Floor
San Francisco, California 941
Telephone: (415) 982 9390
[email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ...
David F. Myers, Esq. (SBN 185102)
WOLKIN - CURRAN, LLP
111 Maiden Lane, 6" Floor
San Francisco, California 94108 - I
Telephone: (415) 982-9390 Superior ri ED.
[email protected] County of Plac...
11/12/2020
David F. Myers, Esq. (SBN 1
WOLKIN · CURRAN, LLP
111 Maiden Lane, 6 Floor
San Francisco, California 941
Telephone: (415) 982
[email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY
...