What is a Motion in Limine to Exclude?

There have been court rulings specifying when a motion "to exclude" is at issue. e.g.,

  • In Easterby v. Clark (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 772, the Second District Court of Appeal discussed the issue of when exclusion is appropriate under the reasoning of Jones v. Moore (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 557; Kennemur v. State of California (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 907 and Bonds v. Roy (1999) 20 Cal.4th 140. A party’s expert may not offer testimony at trial that exceeds the scope of his deposition testimony if the opposing party has no notice or expectation that the expert will offer the new testimony, or if notice of the new testimony comes at a time when deposing the expert is unreasonably difficult. Id. at 781.
  • Exclusion of evidence at trial for discovery violations is a drastic sanction. It requires evidence of willful abuse of the discovery process and substantial prejudice. See Biles v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1315, 1327.
  • The evidence is admissible to impeach the testimony of a witness who testifies that the condition was not dangerous. Love v. Wolf (1967) 249 Cal.App.2d 822, 831.

The motion to exclude is applicable to many kinds of evidence. For example, motions to exclude:

  • witnesses; Evidence Code, §§ 350, 352, 702
  • police report and opinions of investigating officer; Vehicle Code, § 20013; Evidence Code, § 805
  • expert opinions not offered at deposition; Kennemur v. Jones (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 907; Jones v. Moore (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 557, 565.
  • evidence of expert’s testing of tile; Pullin v. Super. Ct. (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 1161, 1165
  • irrelevant evidence; Evidence Code, §§ 350, 352
  • prior alcohol/drug use; Evidence Code, § 787
  • testimony regarding amount of reasonable medical charges; Code of Civ. Proc., § 2034.300
  • evidence of economic damages
  • worker’s compensation evidence
  • anecdotal evidence
  • undesignated retained experts
  • evidence not previously disclosed in discovery
  • golden rule arguments
  • videotape of deposition
  • reference to settlements
  • documents not produced

Useful Resources for Motion in Limine – Exclude

Documents on Motion in Limine – Exclude

26-50 of 6522 results

Opposition (to Motion to Exclude) filed.

22 23 24 25 28 KaMAaLa D. Attorney Gener. Gavin G. MCCAB. Supervising Deputy “LLIAM JENKINS “alifornia FILED/EHDOA. 5] "L 18 2016 IN rey General By: _—_E ity Attorney Genera. : f. — | . ar No. 143616 Ca Depu State b. 455 Go. San Franc Telephone: Fax: (415) 70. AY 238526 . ! capacities SUPERIOR “TANFORD VINA . *MPANY, Vv. STATE OF THROUGH . RESOURCES STATE WATER ROARD; STATE V. YNTROL BOARD . ‘FORNIA, BY AN. “TATE WATER TROL BOARD; 1 NELSON ROWAN omey General ate Avenue, ...

Motion - PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE DEFENSE EXHIBITS

ANNE MARIE MURPHY (SBN 202540) h [email protected] N DONALD J. MAGILLIGAN (SBN 257714) ' [email protected] COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP San Francisco Airport Office Center ~ ...

Tentative Ruling on Motion to Exclude

SUPERIOR COUR > CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAu ‘ENTO ID. TIME January 13 10:30 a.m. °T.NO | 42 UL HON. AL, *UMNER ¢ ‘K M. GARC. A. TEIC YT & SON, INC. Db. *CHERT Case 34-2012-80001258 CONSTRL ON, Petition. 2, % 9 ‘ YORNIA OCCUP« NAL SAFETY AN *ALTH APPEALS 2D, ndent, a a“ and & % CALIFORNIA L 2TMENT OF 4 ‘NDUSTRIAL REv INS, DIVISION ©. TCUPATIONAL S. *Y AND HEALTH, Real Party in Inter. Ne Nature ceedings: TION TO EXCLU. Sb. es Followir, ‘he court's tenta -ul...

Opposition (to Motion to Exclude) filed.

<CH + CowpreY + JENKIN 18 19 20 nN 23 24 25 26 4 Beac 9Cowprey-Jé. NS. Cee 2 ER PLAZA DRIVE SUITE ILED/ENDO}, Y SAv NTO, CALIFORNIA 95835 es " )NE: (916) 333-5747 FAC (805) 388-3414 MAR 29 2019 | L mas E. Beach - State bo. 096321 By:_N Meging >. Cowdrey - State b. 156115 Clerk i Ja, atterson - State Bar \ °829 = mal ~hcowdrey.com Attorn - Defendant, ESKAT. *OPERTIES INCOR, TED, dba ESKA CARE CENTER FA, KS % ~ TRIOR COURT OF. TATE OF CALIFOK OR THE COUNTY & CRAMENTO DEL...

Ex Parte Application - requesting ost for motion to exclude defs expert ...

Kirill B. Tarasenko State Bar No. 283986 Kellen B. Sinclair State Bar No. 296489 TARASENKO LAW FIRM, INC. 84S University Avenue Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: \OOONO\MAWN-—' ...

Noticed Motion to Exclude Evidence (CCP 454) / Motion in Limine (CRC 312...

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (name and Address): FOR COURT USE ONLY NO.: Sean Lucas ‘ 95 Rlvendell Ln. Paradise, CA 95969 Tel: 5330-2896379 ATTORNEY FOR (Name): IN Proprla Persona SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTI'E ...

MOTION TO EXCLUDE DOCUMENTS (TRANSACTION ID # 39667302) FILED BY DEFENDA...

BARBARA R. ADAMS, SBN 99231 GEORGES A, HADDAD, SBN 241785 ADAMS | NYE| BECHT LLP 222 Kearny Street, Seventh Floor ELECTRONICALLY San Francisco, California 94108-4521 FILED Telephone: (415) 982-8955 Superior Court of California, Facsimile: (415) 982-2042 County of San Francisco SEP 06 2011 Attorneys for Defendant Clerk of the Court AMCORD, INC. BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO GREGORY ESPITALLIBR, No. CG...

ORDER GRANTING DEFT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE ROBERT MOORE FROM TESTIFYING AT ...

IMATE MA San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Mar-26-2003 10:56 am Case Number: CGC-01-320834 Filing Date: Mar-26-2003 10:55 Juke Box: 001 Image: 00648628 ORDER RAUL MALDONADO VS STEPHEN MOSKOWITZ 001C00648628 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.oOo YW DAD HW BF WHY RMR RM RNY YN KR KR NN Bee Be eB ee Be ee ond A A BF OBO NH =F SOC wM NAR DA HA FB Bw HY S| DS PHILLIPS, GREENBERG...

ORDER SHORTENING TIME RE: MOTION TO EXCLUDE PRODUCT I.D. DOCUMENTS AND W...

MOM San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jan-12-2006 11:40 am Case Number: CGC-04-433290 Filing Date: Jan-12-2006 11:40 Juke Box: 001 Image: 01362393 ORDER DANA BARBOUR et al VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al 001001362393 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.20 21 22 23 24 25 2 ) Case No.: 434990 J 2h mel L Ke ) ORDER SHORTENING TIME RE: MOTION Plaintiff, ) ; To exerve Pkodvet iD. ...

Proposed Order Received - GRANTING MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY, ETC

«\m Jeremy Sugerman, SBN 146315 N Ori Edelstein, SBN 268145 1% GORDON-CREED, KELLEY, if", HOLL & SUGERMAN, LLP fife. ' ““i 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 2650 is: 401/0 ...

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT

ANU SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jan-10-2017 9:52 am Case Number: CGC-14-537814 Filing Date: Jan-10-2017 9:52 Filed by: JOSE RIOS-MERIDA Image: 05698526 ORDER DONALD W KINN et al VS. CAHILL & KAVANAUGH, INC., DBA MALCOLM PLUMBING et al 001005698526 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.oO ON DN BR WH PR PNY YNN WH ~ a ee u2agaP SERFS EC SWRA ZEESEHRerS Robert A. Morgenstern, ...

Opposition (to Motion to Exclude Evidence) filed.

ATED CROSS-ACO EXCLUDE EVIDE5 SL ONE GLOBAL, INc O EXCLUDE EVIDE) POSITION TO PRUDE.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT WITNESS

WATE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Feb-18-2016 10:15 am Case Number: CGC-14-541708 Filing Date: Feb-18-2016 10:14 Filed by: ROSIE NOGUERA Image: 05277878 ORDER BRYAN LOCKWOOD VS. TAVISTOCK RESTAURANTS, LLC A DELAWARE LIMITED ET AL 001005277878 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.oe QW A HU FW DY eB RP BBR SS&RAR BEBRES 26 27 28 THOMAS J: LOSAVIO, SBN 51023 JAMES F. R...

Opposition (to Motion to exclude experts) filed.

916) 503-2777 03-2778 Defendants.PROC. AL FACTS 2 In their expert wi disclosure of March 912, Plaintiff disclo. nong others, a pain 3 |} ma rent doctor, a plastic on and an anesthesh * Defendant disclose *xperts, but 4 |l reserve. “right to supplemen, expert list. Moving , slaims that the Plast. con 5 || disclosed, L Sert Stroup, is a trea. »ysician of the plain. owever, Dr. Stroup + ver 4 || treated the plain d thus at the time o1 *st supplemental dis. > of experts, March . $2, jef...

MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S WITNESSES

THE COSTA La ™RM NANIEL P. COSTA ‘110919 OREEN R. ALTMA. N 190008 > Sunrise Blvd., Ste. FILED _ ‘'DORSED 3y eu ‘iver, California 956 Ter 2: (916) 400-2734 4) Telec (916) 400-2744 5} Attorneys efendant AMERICRL NC. 6 % & % 3, SU-~& OR COURT OF Th \TE OF CALIFORI. 9 THE COUNTY OF *AMENTO 10) a 11}, JAMES M. “IN, dba JAMES L. “~ ) CASENL -2008-00022710 MACKLIN & TRUCTION Sb ) 1 % ) MOTIONT, “LUDE Maintiff, ) TESTIMONY . _AINTIFF’S WITNESSES 1 , 2 PICRETE, INC.;IN. RIAL ) F...

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE T...

IO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-29-2009 4:49 pm Case Number: CGC-07-274310 Filing Date: May-29-2009 4:48 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02511525 ORDER IARLINE COMPTON et ai VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIB 001002511525 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.BRAYTON PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD PO BOX 6169, NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (15) 898-1555 ...

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 261     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.