What is a Motion in Limine to Exclude?

There have been court rulings specifying when a motion "to exclude" is at issue. e.g.,

  • In Easterby v. Clark (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 772, the Second District Court of Appeal discussed the issue of when exclusion is appropriate under the reasoning of Jones v. Moore (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 557; Kennemur v. State of California (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 907 and Bonds v. Roy (1999) 20 Cal.4th 140. A party’s expert may not offer testimony at trial that exceeds the scope of his deposition testimony if the opposing party has no notice or expectation that the expert will offer the new testimony, or if notice of the new testimony comes at a time when deposing the expert is unreasonably difficult. Id. at 781.
  • Exclusion of evidence at trial for discovery violations is a drastic sanction. It requires evidence of willful abuse of the discovery process and substantial prejudice. See Biles v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1315, 1327.
  • The evidence is admissible to impeach the testimony of a witness who testifies that the condition was not dangerous. Love v. Wolf (1967) 249 Cal.App.2d 822, 831.

The motion to exclude is applicable to many kinds of evidence. For example, motions to exclude:

  • witnesses; Evidence Code, §§ 350, 352, 702
  • police report and opinions of investigating officer; Vehicle Code, § 20013; Evidence Code, § 805
  • expert opinions not offered at deposition; Kennemur v. Jones (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 907; Jones v. Moore (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 557, 565.
  • evidence of expert’s testing of tile; Pullin v. Super. Ct. (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 1161, 1165
  • irrelevant evidence; Evidence Code, §§ 350, 352
  • prior alcohol/drug use; Evidence Code, § 787
  • testimony regarding amount of reasonable medical charges; Code of Civ. Proc., § 2034.300
  • evidence of economic damages
  • worker’s compensation evidence
  • anecdotal evidence
  • undesignated retained experts
  • evidence not previously disclosed in discovery
  • golden rule arguments
  • videotape of deposition
  • reference to settlements
  • documents not produced

Useful Resources for Motion in Limine – Exclude

Recent Documents on Motion in Limine – Exclude

26-50 of 6522 results

APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF FILED (RESPONDENT'S BRIEF IS DUE BY JUL-13-202...

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. TYRRELL JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant. APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF Appellate No. APP-20-008631 Superior Court Docket No. 19007345 APPEAL FROM THE JUDGEMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Honorable Stephen Murphy APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF MICHELLE M. DYLAN Attorney at Law 214 Dubace Avenue San Francisco CA, 94103 Phone: (415) 548-1882 michelledylanlaw.comTABLE OF AUTHORITIES... TABLE

Request for Judical Notice - Exhibits Volume 1 of 2

AVIER ECERRA Attorney Generalof California ARINDER APUR Senior Assistant Attorney General tate ar Number: 198769 TACEY L. OBERTS Supervising Deputy Attorney General State Bar Number: 237998 Ethan A. Turner Deputy

MOTION IN LIMINE # 3 PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE DEFENDANTS M...

THOMAS W. J. PURTELL, ESQ. (SBN 229961) THE LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS W. J. PURTELL 534 Pacific Ave., Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94133 Telephone: (415) 722-6291 Facsimile: (415) 834-5591 Email: tpur[email protected] Attorney for Plaintiffs, CURTIS CHUDE, an individual, NICHOLAS KANILLOPOOLOS, an individual, ELISEO LIWAG, an individual, and ESTEVAN HINOJOSA, an individual, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CURTIS CHUDE, an individual; ) C

In Limine Motion -

1 JEFFERY C. LONG – State Bar # 226618 ERIC S. EMANUELS – State Bar # 140168 2 LEVANGIE LAW GROUP 2021 N Street 3 Sacramento, CA 95811 Tel: (916) 443-4849 4 Fax: (916) 443-4855 Email: [email protected] 5 Attorneys for Defendants/Cro

In Limine Motion -

1 JEFFERY C. LONG – State Bar # 226618 ERIC S. EMANUELS – State Bar # 140168 2 LEVANGIE LAW GROUP 2021 N Street 3 Sacramento, CA 95811 Tel: (916) 443-4849 4 Fax: (916) 443-4855 Email: [email protected] 5 Attorneys for Defendants/Cro

In Limine Motion -

1 JEFFERY C. LONG – State Bar # 226618 ERIC S. EMANUELS – State Bar # 140168 2 LEVANGIE LAW GROUP 2021 N Street 3 Sacramento, CA 95811 Tel: (916) 443-4849 4 Fax: (916) 443-4855 Email: [email protected] 5 Attorneys for Defendants/Cross-Complainants

In Limine Motion -

1 JEFFERY C. LONG – State Bar # 226618 ERIC S. EMANUELS – State Bar # 140168 2 LEVANGIE LAW GROUP 2021 N Street 3 Sacramento, CA 95811 Tel: (916) 443-4849 4 Fax: (916) 443-4855 Email: [email protected] 5 Attorneys for Defendants/Cro

RESPONDENT'S BRIEF FILED (APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF IS DUE BY JUN-11-2020)...

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO APPELLATE DIVISION THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA App. No. Plaintiff and Resp

Notice - Other (Amended Notice of Motion to Exclude Testimony) filed.

Y~ nw B® w& 22 23 24 25 26 2 CARICHOFF ROBERT A.C. 500. Coolidge: Dri vlsom, California ~phone: 916) 47 mile: (916)471-c ’ GROUP, P “HOFF (ti 1066) tite 190 ‘4 Attorney Naintiffs y a 1 A. gS. G)/PERIOR COUR. CALIFORNIA ‘OUNTY OF SAC ‘ENTO 1 NALA POINT < Cas ;34-2018-002301. M. SA MCAFEE, . a PLAL ¥S’ AMENDED tiffs, “ NOTIC, MOTION TO gS. EXCLUD. ‘“STIMONY OF v. % DEFENDA. i 4 SUPPLEME: “LY HERMAN L. ad DOES 1 DESIGNATEL ERT DR. through 10, inc % KEVIN MIKAE. ‘FOR YOLATION OF

Transcript Filed -

DOCUMENT: Transcript Filed [401323] CASE: S-CV-0043463 DATE: 05/18/2020 NUMBER OF PAGES: 63 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PLACER

Request for Judicial Notice, Exhibits Volume 8 - Request Filed

iling Fee Exempt (G CHURCHWELL WHITE LLP [email protected] NOONAN LAW GROUP Attorneys for Plaintiffs COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al

Opposition (to Pltfs Motion to Exclude Testimony of Defs) filed.

au SS & J, Justin McKenn. “ARBONE, SMI1 9 Arden Way, Sur mento, CA 95815- »N 238311) KOYAMA Te, re: (916) 480-1071 Facsi. 916) 481-0990 Attomey. Yefendant HERMAN . 2, SUPERIG @urt OF CALIFG >, COUNTY OF S. AMENTO L. S,NLIMITED CIVIL ISDICTION KEAU A POINT, MARi Case | *-2018-00230191-c 4-GDS MCAFt. 2, DEFEND. _'S OPPOSITION Plaintiffs, &. | PLAINTIF, ‘OTIONTOEXC OF % TESTIMONY “EFENDANT’S SUPPLEMENT. ¥ DESIGNATED "ERMAN LAU an. =S | through 10, *XPERT DR. KE. AIKAELIAN usive Dewgee-

Reply (Brief ISO Motion to Exclude Testimony of defs) filed.

Y nw & w& 10 12 13 22 23 24 25 6 2s CARICHOFF ' GROUP, P' ROBERT A. Cr. 400 Coolidge:Dri, ite 1 som; Califomia. ‘ohorie: (916) 47. 4 1 nile: (916) 471-6. 0 iC OFF #21 1066) 4 ED/ENDORS. Attorney “units by FAX Ger ERIOR COUR. CALIFORNIA OUNTY OF SAC. ‘ENTO K 0 YNALA POINT a Cas ‘34-2018-002301. Me SA MCAFEE, a PLAIN ‘S’ REPLY BR}. % ‘iffs, “~ IN SUP: ™ OF MOTION . & a EXCLUD. ‘STIMONY OF v. %, DEFENDA: 4 SUPPLEME: “LY HERMAN L. xd DOES 1 DESIGNATEL ERT DR. through 10, inc.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AS TO TIMOTHY WEST ONLY AND CONDITIO...

10 11 12 13 14 is 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 F I | LE Court San Franci MAY 0 5 2020 CLERK OF THE COURT BY: Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO JENNIFER SARKANY, RAMSEY ABOUREMELEH, SANDRA FIERRO, and NINA ROBIN PLAINTIFFS, VS. CHRISTIE WEST, TIMOTHY WEST, and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, DEFENDANTS. Case No. CGC-18-571355 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AS TO TIMOTHY WEST ONLY AND CONDITIONALLY DENYING MOTIO

APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF FILED (RESPONDENT'S BRIEF IS DUE BY MAY-07-202...

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO APPELLATE DIVISION PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ) CALIFORNIA ) App. Case No. 8604 ) Plaintiff/Respondent ) ) Appeal from Superior Court, v. ) San Francisco, ) Case No. 19001004 ) ) DENNIS CHUK WU ) ) Defendant/Appellant ) ) APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for The City and County of San Francisco Hon. Andre

REMITTITUR AFFIRMED - A152930 DIV. 3

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT 350 MCALLISTER STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 DIVISION 3 Office of the County Clerk San Francisco County Superior Court - Main Attention: Civil Appeals 400 McAllister Street, 1st Floor 2 es San Francisco, CA 94102 APR -7 2020 CLERK OF FHE/COURT SAN FRANCISCO PRINT MEDIA COMPANY, me Deputy Clerk Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HEARST CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. San Franelseo County Superior Court A152930 San Francisco County Super.

OPPOSITION -REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS 640 ...

1 Yosef Peretz (SBN 209288) [email protected] 2 David Garibaldi (SBN 313641) [email protected] 3 PERETZ & ASSOCIATES 22 Battery Street, Suite 200 4 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: 415.732.3777 5 Fax: 415.732.3791 6 Attorneys for Plain

OPPOSITION -REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS 640 ...

1 Yosef Peretz (SBN 209288) [email protected] 2 David Garibaldi (SBN 313641) ELECTRONICALLY [email protected] 3 PERETZ & ASSOCIATES F I L E D

Supplemental - Other (Second Supplemental Filing ISO Plaintiffs' Opposit...

10 11 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 Award P. Dudensi. _»« No. 182221) A FILEDJEN. SED rew J. Collins (Bar 99080) XM ). Renneisen (Bar Nu 331) Th A. Reyda(BarNo. _°2) WAR 16 2020 Thel. “ | | 1610 Rs Suite 220 t ‘adden, Deputy Clerk Sacramentc 15811 i TT Telephone: (. 48-6400 Facsimile: (916, “401 \ttorney for Plaintitt eS % SUPERIOK. RT OFTHESTA1 CALIFORNIA FORTh %UNTYOFSACRA. TO DEAN HIC yy and through his “).) Case No. 34-20. 186569 successor-in-i1. DENNIS AGUIL, & &. SECOND SUPPL. NTAL

PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE...

GILBERT L. PURCELL, ESQ., S.B. #113603 JAMES P. NEVIN, ESQ., S.B. #220816 [email protected] BRAYTON PURCELL LLP Attorneys at Law 222 Rush Landing Road P.O. Box 6169 Novato, California 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 At

Ex Parte Application - Other (for OST on Motion to Exclude Testimony) fi...

~~ nN Us w 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 76 2 CARICHOFF GROUP, ROBERT A. Cz 4YOFF 2) 311068) 400 Coolid, a Drix ‘ite 1 lsom, California . 4 ~ohone? ¥ 16): 47, 4 s mile: (916):471-6. Attorney . ants e @PERIOR COUR: CALIFORNIA FAX YUNTY OF SAC. NTO Kk NALA POINT, : ‘SSA Cas, *34-2018-002301s Mc 7&5, a ‘ iffs, “% EX PAR. PPLICATION “& FORANt “R v. *@ SHORTEN: “IME ON MOTION TG “LUDE HERMAN Ls. 4 DOES 1 TESTIMONY v through 10, inci. YEFENDANT’S Rowe Te oee Defendants. “IGNATED EX) SIN ‘ as TI

Tentative Ruling -

oO ON DM PWN NN NY NY NY NN NY NH BB BR Be Be Be Be eR Re OAnN DUM FWN RF DO DOD DOAN DU PWN HP OO erlor Court of Californ| Sup County of Placer MAR 1 0 2020 Jake Chatter: . Executive Officer & By: M. Taylor, Dep’ SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PLACER ESSENTIAL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Case No.: SCV - 40825 INC., Plaintiff, Tentative Rulings On Motions In Limine vs. PACIFIC AIR CONDITIONING & HEATING, INC., et al., Defendants. AND RELATED CROSS-ACTI

OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 (TRANSACTION ID # 20000...

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BWA LAW GROUP APC Hillary Johns, Esq. (SBN 167944) 1901 E. Fourth Street, Suite 150 Santa Ana, California 92705 Telephone: (714) 581-8838 Facsimile: (714) 581-8836 Email: [email protected] Attorney for Defendants and Cross- Complainants, MARK PINSUKANJANA, BRYAN YEDINAK, individually and doing business as ARCHITEKTUR, MODERNBOOK, and THEMES+PROJECTS, a California partnership Doing business as MODERNBOOK and THEMES+PROJECTS SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STAT

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 261     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.