There have been court rulings specifying when a motion "to exclude" is at issue. e.g.,
The motion to exclude is applicable to many kinds of evidence. For example, motions to exclude:
S Motion To Exclude The Expert Testimony Of Rachel Mccarter, M.D. And Laura Lee Shaw Howe. Off Calendar at the request of the moving party. Summary Judgment granted August 14, 2014. =(302/JPT)
Aug 21, 2015
San Francisco County, CA
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Exclude The Deposition Transcripts Of February 10, 2014 And August 14, 2014 For Use As Documentary Evidence, As They Pertain To Case # Cgc-11-511212, And Were Withheld From The Plaintiff Who Was Never Given A Copy Of Either Of The Original Transcripts To Be Read, Corrected And Signed Set for hearing on Thursday May 7, 2015, Line 3, PLAINTIFF WILLIAM FAUST'S Motion To Exclude The Deposition Transcripts Of February 10, 2014 And August 14, 2014 For Use As Documentary Evidence,
May 07, 2015
Philip Andersen
San Francisco County, CA
Motion to exclude defense experts The motion will be denied at this time.
Feb 06, 2015
Santa Barbara County, CA
The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling: The motion is granted without prejudice to a defense motion to exclude the photographs at trial. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to [email protected] with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number.
Jan 05, 2015
Tom Cohen
San Francisco County, CA
Motion to exclude simulation The Court defers its ruling at this time. This is substantially similar to motion number 3. A hearing outside the presence of the jury is required. 5. Motion to exclude responses of American Motors to standard interrogatories DENIED without prejudice. Counsel are directed that there shall be no mention of these before the jury without prior leave of court. 6. Motion to exclude defendant's discovery responses from other actions DENIED without prejudice.
Nov 10, 2014
Personal Injury/ Tort
Products Liability
Sacramento County, CA
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Exclude Or Limit Testimony Of Defendants' Expert Allen D. Bott, M.D., Or In The Alternative, To Allow Lynn Ponton, M.D. To Tetify As Plaintiff'S Expert Psychiatrist Matter on Calendar for Friday, September 12, 2014, Line 14, PLAINTIFF TYLER ASH's Motion To Exclude Or Limit Testimony Of Defendants' Expert Allen D. Bott, M.D., Or In The Alternative, To Allow Lynn Ponton, M.D. To Tetify As Plaintiff'S Expert Psychiatrist OFF CALENDAR PER MOVING PARTIES REQUEST =(302/AJR)
Sep 12, 2014
San Francisco County, CA
S Motion To Exclude Plaintiff'S Expert Lynn E. Ponton Or In The Alternative To Continue The Trial Date The matter is on calendar for Friday, September 5, 2014, Line 16, DEFENDANT KZV ARMENIAN SCHOOL, INC.'S Joinder In Defendant Lifetime Products, Inc.'S Motion To Exclude Plaintiff'S Expert Lynn E. Ponton Or In The Alternative To Continue The Trial Date The matter is off calendar per the request of the moving party. =302/EHG
Sep 05, 2014
San Francisco County, CA
Motion And Motion To Exclude Plaintiff'S Expert Lynn E. Ponton Or In The Alternative To Continue The Trial Date The matter is on calendar for Friday, September 5, 2014, Line 16, DEFENDANT LIFETIME PRODUCTS, INC.'S Motion And Motion To Exclude Plaintiff'S Expert Lynn E. Ponton Or In The Alternative To Continue The Trial Date The matter is off calendar per the request of the moving party. =302/EHG
Sep 05, 2014
San Francisco County, CA
The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling: Motion to exclude expert trial testimony of Leslie Zun, M.D. is in all respects granted. The plaintiff failed to comply with the express terms of the previous Order dated August 4, 2014 requiring Dr. Zun to be produced for an expert witness discovery deposition on or before a date certain. The Court accepts defendant's withdrawal of that portion of the motion to exclude the expert trial testimony by Dennis Bietz, R.N.
Aug 19, 2014
Steven Stein
San Francisco County, CA
Motion to Exclude Statements re Wicker's Good Character or Status as a Retired Air Force Colonel The motion is denied pursuant to Kelly v. New West (supra). 14. Motion to Exclude Allegations that TDS lost school districts due to change in fee model The motion is denied pursuant to Kelly v. New West (supra). Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate. Defendants seek to divide the trial into three phases. One would be a court trial on four legal issues.
Aug 05, 2014
Business
Intellectual Property
Sacramento County, CA
Tentative ruling for April 30, 2014 on Plaintiff's motion for relief from order granting motion to exclude expert witnesses GRANT Defendat Berrington custom's request for judicial notice. DENY Plaintiff's motion for relief from the court's prior order granting motion to exclude expert witnesses. The relief plaintiff seeks is not available under CCP § 473(b). (Gotschall v. Daley (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 479, 484.)
Apr 30, 2014
Ventura County, CA
Notice Of Motion To Exclude Witness Nichole West And To Exclude Evidence Of Pltf'S New Injury Claim Developed With Assistance Of Counsel After The Close Of Discovery And After Disclosure Of Expert Witnesses, Or In The Alternative, For An Order Allowing Defts To Conduct Discovery Of This New Evidence Only (**See Notes**) Matter on Calendar for Thursday, April 17, 2014, Line 1, PLAINTIFF DEIDRENNE ASHCRAFT'S Motion To Exclude Witness Nichole West And To Exclude Evidence Of Plaintiff's New Injury Claim Developed
Apr 17, 2014
James Watson
San Francisco County, CA
s motion to exclude and/or strike plaintiff's supplemental expert witnesses, and Joinder of Gary Berrington and Phyllis Berrington. GRANT the motion. Plaintiff unreasonably failed to designate her experts pursuant to CCP § 2034.260. Having failed to comply with this section, she is not entitled to supplement pursuant to CCP § 2034.280.
Mar 17, 2014
Ventura County, CA
Ntc Of Mtn To Exclude Experts For Failure To Make Available For Deposition And To Compel Production Of Vehicle For Examination Set for hearing on Thursday, March 6, 2014, Line 19, PLAINTIFFS CHASTIDY RONAN AND MATTHEW RONAN'S MOTION To Exclude Experts For Failure To Make Available For Deposition And To Compel Production Of Vehicle For Examination Off calendar per the moving party. =302/EG
Mar 06, 2014
San Francisco County, CA
S Motion To Exclude Plaintiff's Testimony As Evidentiary Sanction For Failure To Appear At Noticed Deposition Pro Tem Judge Nils Rosenquest, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge.
Oct 31, 2013
Nils Rosenquest
San Francisco County, CA
Mtn To Exclude Pltf'S Testimony Set for hearing on Thursday, October 31, 2013, Line 4: Defendant LUIS GONZALEZ'S Motion To Exclude Plaintiff's Testimony Pro Tem Judge Nils Rosenquest, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge.
Oct 31, 2013
Nils Rosenquest
San Francisco County, CA
Nature of Proceedings: Motion: to Exclude Evidence in Limine - #12 on the probate calendar
Sep 05, 2013
Santa Barbara County, CA
Motion to Exclude Opinion Testimony from Dr. Strauchan The motion is denied. The request for sanctions is denied. Defendant seeks to exclude Dr. Strauchen's testimony because Dr. Strauchen failed to answer questions at deposition regarding the total income he earned from employment as a medical expert. Effectively, defendant seeks exclusion and monetary compensation as a discovery sanction.
May 22, 2013
Personal Injury/ Tort
Products Liability
Sacramento County, CA
Only if plaintiff fails to comply with that order will plaintiff be able to file a motion to exclude the evidence. (Ibid.) If defendant fails to make this showing, the motion will be denied. The parties are directed to appear at the scheduled hearing.
May 14, 2013
Santa Barbara County, CA
Kiss And Gershwin Matter on calendar for Tuesday, April 9, 2013, Line 21, DEFENDANT CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST, DBA MERCY MEDICAL CENTER's motion to Exclude And/Or Strike Opinions And Evidence Of Drs. Kiss And Gershwin. The motion to exclude is treated as an evidentiary objection, which the Court does not reach because the declarations are not relevant to the Court's reasoning.
May 07, 2013
San Francisco County, CA
Based on the foregoing, the court will deny plaintiff’s motion to exclude the expert testimony of Mr. Arnold. The opposition sufficiently demonstrates that the failure to timely designate Mr. Arnold as an expert was the result of a mistake and was not unreasonable within the meaning of Section 2034.300.
Jan 30, 2013
Santa Barbara County, CA
Therefore, any motion to exclude such testimony on the grounds that the testimony is not supported by sufficient evidence is untimely and should be rejected.") In light of the foregoing, Mr. Garland is precluded from presenting any "critique opinion" testimony at trial, absent a strong showing of substantial justification described above and prior leave of Court. 2. Examination of Appraiser on Prior Published Opinions. The motion is unopposed and is granted.
Jan 16, 2013
Real Property
Breach
Sacramento County, CA
Notice Of Motion To Exclude Evidence Set for hearing on Wednesday, December 5, 2012, Line 1, DEFENDANT CARMY DELEON Notice Of Motion To Exclude Evidence, Pro Tem Judge William Shapiro, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge.
Dec 05, 2012
William Shapiro
San Francisco County, CA
The trial court granted the attorneys’ motion to exclude all evidence of attorney- client discussions immediately preceding, and during, the mediation concerning mediation settlement strategies and the attorneys’ efforts to persuade the client to reach a settlement in the mediation.
Dec 03, 2012
Santa Barbara County, CA
On 5/31 father filed his reply: reports that the motion was submitted to place the issue of his claim for fees before the Court so it can grant him his fees after hearing the evidence at the evidentiary hearing; mother does not need a private attorney for the hearing because DCSS is prosecuting the action; father simply wants to “try” the arrearages issue. 4) Father’s motion to exclude evidence filed on 5/7; to exclude all evidence produced by Bank of America in response to mother’s deposition subpoena to produce
Jun 05, 2012
Santa Barbara County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.