What is a Motion for Terminating Sanctions?

Useful Rulings on Motion for Sanctions – Motion for Terminating Sanctions

Recent Rulings on Motion for Sanctions – Motion for Terminating Sanctions

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Provided that the City will stipulate to a preliminary injunction with respect to the provisions of Ordinance No. 6374 relating to immediate warrantless access to the short-term rental (STR) units, the Court DENIES the application for a preliminary injunction in all other respects, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

Given that CCP § 1263.510 mandates compensation for lost goodwill for the owner of a business conducted on the property taken, the Court will not preclude such recovery in the absence of express exclusionary language in the lease. That being said, it is not clear that SARVS necessarily will be eligible for such compensation.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

T-12 The motion is moot as to the Third Cause of Action by T-12 for indemnity.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

A peremptory writ of administrative mandamus shall issue under the seal of this Court, remanding the matter to Respondents and commanding Respondents to set aside the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System within the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County, except for discharges originating from the City of Long Beach MS4, Order No. R4-2012-0175, NPDES No. CAS004001, as amended on June 16, 2015 by State Board Order WQ 2015-0075. 2.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

J of the Pomona Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court. Any pending motions or hearings, including trial and status conferences, will be reset, continued or vacated at the direction of the newly assigned Independent Calendar court.Plaintiff shall give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

Chen advised Plaintiff that he had been operating a successful business, Tissuesco Group (“Tissuesco”), for many years and could assist Plaintiff to open a business and obtain a visa. On or around March 24, 2018, the parties signed a contract, in which Plaintiff agreed to invest $120,000.00 to Tissuesco and, in return, Tissuesco would open, operate and manage a company for Plaintiff and assist Plaintiff in applying for an L-1 visa.

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. MATTHEWS

For general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

Proc. § 435.5(b) “[a] party moving to strike a pleading that has been amended after a motion to strike an earlier version of the pleading was granted shall not move to strike any portion of the pleadings on grounds that could have been raised by a motion to strike as to the earlier version of the pleading.” Here, the attorney’s fees request was included in the SAC, but Defendants did not move to strike such request. The Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Request for Attorney’s Fees is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

Muniz (20PSCV00337) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff PNC Equipment Finance, LLC’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff PNC Equipment Finance, LLC’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

Zhao (KC070595) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

(“Defendant”) and Does 1-25 for: Unlawful Detainer On December 5, 2019, Defendant’s default was entered; that day, a clerk’s default judgment for possession only was filed. A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for October 14, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The court notes that the lease provided for a $69,804.04 security deposit.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

BELINDA AGUILAR, ET AL. VS TG PROPERTIES LLC

At the direction of Department 1, this case is hereby ordered reassigned and transferred to the South Central District, Compton, the Honorable Maurice Leiter, Judge presiding in Department A, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the cause for trial to that Independent Calendar Court.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On November 22, 2019, a clerk’s default judgment for possession only was filed. On November 22, 2019, Defendant’s default was entered. A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for July 2, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: This instant case pertains to 16010 Phoenix Drive, City of Industry, CA, 91745 only.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

PETITION OF ERIC CHAVARIN

File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name ERIC SAMUEL CHAVARIN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved. Proposed Order Submitted. No Appearance Required. Note: Decree will be available for pick up at the hearing or after the hearing in Dept. 30. RAVINDER SINGH

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PTN OF RONALD WULFERDINGER

Proposed Order on Judicial Council Form GC-224 that contains specific, non- conclusory findings and the basis for each finding; factual basis must specifically state grounds of abuse, neglect and/or abandonment. Order must contain findings that (1) reunification with ward’s parents is not viable; and, (2) it is not in the ward’s best interest to return to his country of origin or last habitual residence and the reason for not returning.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CHANHO C. JOO, APC, DBA LAW OFFICES OF CHANHO JOO VS HONGYE LLC, DBA SPA RENAISSANCE, ET AL.

REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED; CORRECTED JUDGMENT REQUIRED. On September 18, 2019, Plaintiff Chanho C. Joo, a professional corporation, dba Law Offices of Chanho Joo filed the instant action against Defendants Hongye LLC dba Spa Renaissance (“Hongye”); Domingo Hsu; Juan Tan; and Does 1 through 20. The Complaint asserts causes of action for: Breach of Contract; Account Stated; Open Book Account; and Quantum Meruit.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

MATTER OF YVETTE DEROUEN FIGUEROA

Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Memorandum of Costs filed by Patricia Rettig is set for hearing 11-19-2020. 3. Request for Dismissal entered 7-21-2020 as to Petition to Transfer Trust Assets into Special Needs Trust. 4. It appears no underlying petition is on calendar in this matter.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION, NO WILL, IAEA

File a verified declaration with copy of Will offered for probate attached PrC § 8002. No will attached to the petition as alleged. 3. Have a Notice of Petition to Administer Estate and copy of petition mailed to all beneficiaries. PrC § 8110; LR 7.151(e) 4. File Proof of Publication. PrC § 8120 Note: Per 7-2-2020, court directed original Will to be lodged with the court. Original Will lodged 7-2-2020 is missing from court file.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO ESTABLISH CLAIM OF OWNERSHIP OVER REAL PPTY

Order for Probate Form DE-140 GEORGE STANLEY NUNN JR FRANCIS X MOHAN MEREDITH F NUNN

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF KATHRYN NUDELMAN

Note: Decree will be available for pick up at the hearing or after the hearing in Dept. 30. KATHRYN ANDREA NUDELMAN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Unable to review. File is unavailable at this time. Continue to 12-29-20, to be heard with amended petition. Note: Amended Petition to Approve Ninth Account and Report filed 9-4-2020 is set for hearing 12-29-2020. Absent appearances or objections, this matter will be continued to 12- 29-2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N ON FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR

Court intends to set this matter for trial. 3. Discovery motion filed by Diana Bundrum 8-7-2020 is set for 11-24-2020. CHERYL COPELAND DIANA BUNDRUM MICHAEL CRAMER DOUGLAS ETCHIESON GARY CLEVENGER JACK CLEVENGER JOSEPH ETCHIESON MARIE B ETCHIESON TIMOTHY ETCHIESON TIMOTHY ETHIESON FILED ON 05/04/20 BY ANDRE DEROUEN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE -- See also Line #15 -- Need: 1. Appearances 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST ACCOUNT OF TRUSTEE AND PET’N FOR ITS SETTLEMENT

FILED ON 08/13/19 BY KIMBERLY CZIRKELBACH PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status Note: Residuary Beneficiaries’ Response and Objections filed by American Cancer Society, Inc., Feed the Children, Inc., Leukemia & Lymphoma Society and ALSAC/St. Judge Children’s Research Hospi...

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

JUAN PALMA ET AL VS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC ET AL

In its September 18, 2020 “response,” SARC points out that Vigil’s reply is essentially a completely new motion to compel a second deposition of Clay. Based on the above, the court is inclined to continue the hearing for approximately 60 days, to December 4, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. The court declines to consider Vigil’s request for an order to compel a second deposition of Clay, which must be addressed via a separately filed motion.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.