Confidentiality & Protective Order

Useful Rulings on Motion for Protective Order

Recent Rulings on Motion for Protective Order

1-25 of 10000 results

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Turner’s concern about potential double recovery by T-12 as the property owner and the tenant/operators is not properly raised in this motion, and this Order is without prejudice to Turner bringing a motion at trial addressing that concern.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Where the judgment commands that the order or decision be set aside, it may order the reconsideration of the case in light of the court’s opinion and judgment and may order respondent to take such further action as is specially enjoined upon it by law, but the judgment shall not limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in the respondent. (Emphasis added.) Draft Proposed Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

PERSOLVE LEGAL GROUP, LLP VS LETICIA HERNANDEZ

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for February 1, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

See below.AFTER REVIEW OF THE COURT FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Department 28 of the Personal Injury Court has determined that the above entitled action is complicated based upon the number of pretrial hearings and/or the complexity of the issues presented.AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE CENTRAL DISTRICT, JUDGE MICHAEL P.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

717 NOGALES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS NEW DIAMOND TRUCKING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AND, ET AL.

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for January 15, 2021. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 15, 2021

MARK LIU VS XUEFAN LIU

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for January 12, 2021. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: S. Zhang’s liability remains unclear. Plaintiff states, without more, only that “Defendants Xuefan Liu and Lina Zhang sought the assistance of Defendant Shi Qiang Zhang in the wiring of the funds, and Defendant Shi Qiang Zhang made the representations alleged.”

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

See below.AFTER REVIEW OF THE COURT FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Department 28 of the Personal Injury Court has determined that the above entitled action is complicated based upon the number of pretrial hearings and/or the complexity of the issues presented.AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE CENTRAL DISTRICT, JUDGE MICHAEL P.

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

AVITUS INC. VS ANDIAMO MANAGEMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ET AL.

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment and a Case Management Conference are set for December 18, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: Plaintiff alleged that Andiamo “on or about 08/30/2017, Defendants . . . defaulted under the terms of the CONTRACT by failing to pay the entire balance of money due to the Plaintiff.” (Complaint, ¶9.) Plaintiff’s Chief Financial Officer, J.J.

  • Hearing

    Dec 18, 2020

HASMIK KANATARYAN, ET AL. VS CHARLENE SARSTEDT, ET AL.

This minute order serves as the order of the Court.PLAINTIFF SHALL GIVE NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD.

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2020

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. VS TOTAL BODY EXPERTS LLC, ET AL.

.: 20STCV05770 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Date: December 11, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The Court has considered the moving papers. No opposition papers were filed, and opposition papers were due at least nine court days prior to the hearing under Code Civ. Proc. § 1005(b).

  • Hearing

    Dec 11, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

KOEN WOO KIM VS CENTRAL FITNESS, LP, ET AL.

.: 20STCV32986 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT Date: December 11, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 MOVING PARTIES: Defendants Central Fitness, LP dba Wilfit Sports Club; Central Fitness Partners, Inc.; and Anthony Kim The Court has considered the moving papers. No opposition papers were filed, and opposition papers were due at least nine court days prior to the hearing under Code Civ. Proc. § 1005(b).

  • Hearing

    Dec 11, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

RE: PET’N FOR APRVL OF AMENDED FIRST ACCT & RPT OF SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE,

Spouse did not file an election to subject any inheritance to formal administration so therefore court lacks jurisdiction to order distribution to spouse or fees thereon. Need petition (may be ex parte) showing good cause for allowing late election, and order. Otherwise you will need amended petition eliminating spouse’s portion and a recalculation of statutory fees. Proposed election must comply with LR 7.305. See PrC §§ 13500, 13501, 13502 3.

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MATTER OF THE LLOYD W HARRICH TRUST

FILED ON 08/31/18 BY MICHELLE WEBBER PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status, including 9-10-2020 order to meet and confer, and mediation

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

FILED ON 10/16/19 BY MONICA L HARRICH-GRISWOLD, JESSICA J HARRICH PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status, including 9-10-2020 order to meet and confer, and mediation PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status, including 9-10-2020 order to meet and confer, and mediation

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: 1ST & FNL ACCT & RPT OF ADMNTR & PET’N FOR SETTLEMENT & FNL DIST

Proposed Order JAMES A WALTERS DANIEL T. QUANE, ESQ. RALPH EDWIN WALTERS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Moving paper is in Vol. 3. Need: 1. Appearances to report status, including 9-8-2020 order to meet and confer 2. Proposed Order 3. Note: Objection filed by Janice Bowerman 2-14-20. JAMES BOWERMAN KONSTANTINE A DEMIRIS JANICE BOWERMAN MATTHEW B TALBOT LAWRENCE BOWERMAN CAROLYN D CAIN PAMELA R. REGATUSO OLIVER W. BRAY THE BOWERMAN FAMILY REVOCABLE

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: MOTION FOR SANCTIONS REGARDING ACCOUNTING OBJECTION

FILED ON 11/06/19 BY MONICA L HARRICH-GRISWOLD, JESSICA J HARRICH PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status, including 9-10-2020 order to meet and confer, and mediation PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status, including 9-10-2020 order to meet and confer, and mediation

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MATTER OF THE BOWERMAN FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST

Order for Probate Form DE-140 Note: Petitioner is former spouse and a creditor of decedent. CALI ESPINELLO BARBARA E SCRAMSTAD ROBERT EDWARDS RUFFIN

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

SHAFIQ SIDIQI VS GAYANE BALABANYAN

.: 19STLC06257 ORDER RE: DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Date: December 10, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 On the Court’s own motion, the Court continues the hearing on the demurrer to the First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Miriam Rodriguez, scheduled for 12/10/2020 at 8:30 a.m. at Stanley Mosk Courthouse in Department 56 to 12/22/2020 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 56. Moving party is ordered to give notice of this ruling. Dated this 10th day of December 2020 Hon. Holly J.

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

.: 19STLC06257 ORDER RE: DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Date: December 10, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 On the Court’s own motion, the Court continues the hearing on the demurrer to the First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Miriam Rodriguez, scheduled for 12/10/2020 at 8:30 a.m. at Stanley Mosk Courthouse in Department 56 to 12/22/2020 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 56. Moving party is ordered to give notice of this ruling. Dated this 10th day of December 2020 Hon. Holly J.

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

GRDSHP OF SCOTT

Proposed Order on Judicial Council Form GC-224 that contains specific, non- conclusory findings and the basis for each finding; factual basis must specifically state grounds of abuse, neglect and/or abandonment. Order must contain findings that (1) reunification with ward’s parents is not viable; and, (2) it is not in the ward’s best interest to return to his country of origin or last habitual residence and the reason for not returning.

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES LLC VS MICHAEL D. GARRIS

.: 20STCP02954 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD Date: December 9, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 MOVING PARTY: Petitioner Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC The Court has considered the moving papers. No opposition papers were filed, and opposition papers were due at least nine court days prior to the hearing under Code Civ. Proc. § 1005(b).

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2020

RE: FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF CO-EXECUTORS ON WAIVER OF ACCOUNT

FILED ON 08/19/20 BY DIANA LEE ASKEW, VICKI E STRICKLAND PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Proposed Order CLARK F STRICKLAND DIANA LEE ASKEW ROBERT J. SILVERMAN VICKI E STRICKLAND ROBERT J. SILVERMAN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required CASSANDRA L GREEN JOHN A MANGINI ETHEL L. SMITH PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SHARON L.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF TRAVEON C GAINS

Per 12-10-19 minute order, court ordered a Petition for Final Distribution to be filed and calendared for 2-25-20.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO COMPEL TIMOTHY MARTINI TO ACCT; RPT ACTS COMPEL

DISTRUBUTION FILED ON 12/19/18 BY JOHN MARTINI, RICHARD MARTINI, DAVID MARTINI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status, including 9-1-2020 order to meet and confer Notes: A. Per 3-19-19 minute order, court ordered Timothy Martini to file an accounting by 7- 19-19, and ordered distribution by 6-28-19. B. Stipulation to Continue Compliance Date for Accounting to 9-17-19 filed 7-16-19.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF DONALD KULICK JR

Have bond presented for filing before Order will be signed. 7. Submit a proposed Order Note: Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss filed by Stephen Kirk is set for hearing 12-24- 2020. FILED ON 08/21/20 BY BARRY THOMPSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Barry Thompson, father, still must do the following: 1. File Waiver of Accounting by Hylie Thompson or Accounting that complies with PrC § 1060 et seq. 2.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.