What is a Motion for New Trial?

Useful Rulings on Motion for New Trial

Recent Rulings on Motion for New Trial

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

(Motion p. 19-20.) As an initial matter, the City agrees that it will not enforce AMC § 4.05.100.0115, which requires immediate warrantless access to a STR; will not issue citations for failure to grant immediate access pending a trial in this case, pursuant to AMC § 4.05.140.020.0201(6); and will offer the City Council amendments to remove language providing for the issuance of citations for failure to grant immediate access.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

Given that CCP § 1263.510 mandates compensation for lost goodwill for the owner of a business conducted on the property taken, the Court will not preclude such recovery in the absence of express exclusionary language in the lease. That being said, it is not clear that SARVS necessarily will be eligible for such compensation.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Turner’s concern about potential double recovery by T-12 as the property owner and the tenant/operators is not properly raised in this motion, and this Order is without prejudice to Turner bringing a motion at trial addressing that concern.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

A peremptory writ of administrative mandamus shall issue under the seal of this Court, remanding the matter to Respondents and commanding Respondents to set aside the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System within the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County, except for discharges originating from the City of Long Beach MS4, Order No. R4-2012-0175, NPDES No. CAS004001, as amended on June 16, 2015 by State Board Order WQ 2015-0075. 2.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

HASMIK KANATARYAN, ET AL. VS CHARLENE SARSTEDT, ET AL.

E of the Glendale Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court. Any pending motions or hearings, including trial and status conferences, will be reset, continued or vacated at the direction of the newly assigned Independent Calendar court. This minute order serves as the order of the Court.PLAINTIFF SHALL GIVE NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD.

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2020

1301 GLADSTONE STREET INVESTORS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ET, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

On March 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Et, Demirel and Does 1-20 for: Breach of Lease Breach of Guaranty On May 4, 2020 Et’s and Demirel’s defaults were entered. An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for November 30, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff 1301 Gladstone Street Investors, LLC’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

J of the Pomona Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court. Any pending motions or hearings, including trial and status conferences, will be reset, continued or vacated at the direction of the newly assigned Independent Calendar court.Plaintiff shall give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

DEREK LEE VS JOANNA BOEY

The Motion is DENIED. Plaintiff’s application for default judgment is GRANTED. The Court will inquire of the parties whether Defendant has to ability to file another motion to set aside the Default Judgment within the next six months. The Default Judgment will be processed tomorrow and it appears that Defendant may be able to file another motion.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

VEJ POMONA 8, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. VS FRANK CURTIN, ET AL.

Because relief sought exceeds amount of prayer of complaint, request for attorney fees also does not comply with Local Rule 3.214’s fee schedule. Cross-Complainant Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Inc.’s application for default judgment is DENIED without prejudice for the following reasons: · Request for attorney fees does not comply with Local Rule 3.214’s fee schedule.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

Plaintiffs Cathay Bank and Robb Evans & Associates LLC’s motion for order permitting discovery of financial information as to Defendants Ace Hardware Corporation and John Mikulski, Inc. is DENIED. Judicial notice is taken of Defendant JMI, Inc.’s (“Defendant JMI”) Exhibits 1-2. (Evid. Code § 452.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

Chen advised Plaintiff that he had been operating a successful business, Tissuesco Group (“Tissuesco”), for many years and could assist Plaintiff to open a business and obtain a visa. On or around March 24, 2018, the parties signed a contract, in which Plaintiff agreed to invest $120,000.00 to Tissuesco and, in return, Tissuesco would open, operate and manage a company for Plaintiff and assist Plaintiff in applying for an L-1 visa.

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

PETITION OF JANICE ANN DEGRAY ADACHI

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE FILED BY JANICE ANN DEGRAY ADACHI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Janice Adachi still must do the following: File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name JANICE ANN DEGRAY ADACHI MICHAEL RINNE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Jo Ann Schreiber still must do the following: File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name JO ANN SCHREIBER KAREN S.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF ANNIE MAE NASH

Note: First Account and Report filed by Public Guardian is set for hearing 12-14-2020. PUBLIC GUARDIAN STEVEN P RETTIG VERNE VANVLEAR EVAN GOLOGORSKY VERNE VANVLEAR MATTHEW B TALBOT

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF PHYLLIS J. THAMES

Submit a completed Order Appointing Probate Conservator Form GC-340 (adopted 1- 15-16) The Court is waiting for these items: Court Investigator’s Report Note: Capacity Declaration indicates proposed conservatee has dementia; however, petition does not request dementia powers. If needed, petitioner must file an amended petition. Court will appoint counsel for proposed conservatee.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

FALISHA PORTER VS PHARMAVITE, LLC

There is no information about when plaintiff worked for the City of Pasadena. For instance, was it 15 years ago or immediately before Pharmavite’s hire? Defendant does not claim that plaintiff was terminated for cause. Or that she was terminated at all. Also, it is unclear how employment with the City of Pasadena for some unspecified time prior to her employment with Pharmavite is relevant. It is defendant’s burden of establishing good cause for how these records relate to its specific defenses.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

FALISHA PORTER VS PHARMAVITE, LLC

There is no information about when plaintiff worked for the City of Pasadena. For instance, was it 15 years ago or immediately before Pharmavite’s hire? Defendant does not claim that plaintiff was terminated for cause. Or that she was terminated at all. Also, it is unclear how employment with the City of Pasadena for some unspecified time prior to her employment with Pharmavite is relevant. It is defendant’s burden of establishing good cause for how these records relate to its specific defenses.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

RE: CECIL W. RITZ TRUST

RE: MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO FM INTERRGATORIES AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS FILED ON 07/06/20 BY BRIAN KUCHARSKI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Moving paper is in Vol. 1 Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: VERIFIED PET’N FOR ORDER CONFIRMING TRUST ASSETS

FILED ON 06/29/20 BY LYDIA K MORENO, JAMES M WALSH PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify current address of Peter Walsh. Proof of Service attached to Notice filed 7-13-2020 reflects mailing to him at an address other than that listed in petition. 2...

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF JOHN MATTHEW MARCELO LEE

Note: Decree will be available for pick up at the hearing or after the hearing in the Probate Pick Up Box in Room 103. JOHN MATTHEW MARCELO LEE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Ma Adelfa Bollozos still must do the following: File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name MA ADELFA BOLLOZOS JASON A CUEVA

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF WILLIAM LEE ANDERSON

Order for Probate Form DE-140 JOSHUA MICHAEL FOGERTY DOUGLAS B BOHNE MARTHA ANN FOGERTY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required ELIZABETH CASTLE JOAN M GRIMES WILLIAM STANLEY HASTEY REVOCAB

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: CECIL W. RITZ TRUST

RE: MOTION TO QUASH MOTION TO ORDER MATTERS DEEMED ADMITTED FILED ON 08/27/20 BY KELLY D SISNEROZ PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order FILED ON 07/06/20 BY BRIAN KUCHARSKI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: CECIL W. RITZ TRUST

RE: MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPS TO REQS FOR DOCS; DOCUMENT PRODUCTION FILED ON 07/06/20 BY BRIAN KUCHARSKI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order Drop. Note: Calendared in error by clerk. CRYSTAL WHITEHEAD NIA CHRYSSIKOS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petitioners, daughters of decedent, still must do the following: 1. File evidence of what Notice of Hearing was served.

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: 1ST ACCT & RPT OF TEMP TRUSTEE, PET’N FOR ITS SETTLEMENT, SUSPENDED TRUSTEE,

Langston and Charlotte Langston Brown is set for hearing 11-24-2020. CHARLOTTE LANGSTON BROWN KEVIN P O'BRIEN JAMES L LANGSTON JR LOUIS C LANGSTON DR, KEVIN P O'BRIEN MARIA GARDNER LANGSTON MATTHEW B TALBOT YVETTE A FLUNDER LEE L KASTER YVETTE FLUNDER LEE L KASTER

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MATTER OF SERAFIN GARCIA OLVERA, JR

There are no facts alleged that defendant cannot meet a judgment past the policy limits. 3) New proposal for structured settlement. The proposal includes a payout date far past the minor’s 18th birthday.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.