What is a Motion for New Trial?

Useful Rulings on Motion for New Trial

Recent Rulings on Motion for New Trial

201-225 of 10000 results

IN RE THE REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUST OF JOHN D. ELVIDGE

On 6/22/20, Petitioner Mary Dorsey Elvidge filed an amended petition for instruction and for determination of entitlement to estate distribution. (Prob. C. §§ 21600 et seq.) No DE-120 was filed regarding the amended petition. The Court's Tentative Ruling posted on 7/1/20 inquired as to whether any notice was given to John David Elvidge Jr. The amended petition was continued to this date at the fax request of Petitioner to perfect service. As of 8/4/20, no new notice of hearing has been filed.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC. V. VALLEY FARM SUPPLY INC.

The Case Management Conference set for August 11, 2020 is continued to September 9, 2020 to be heard concurrently with the Application for Writ of Attachment.]

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

PANIAGUA V. BRILLANT GENERAL MAINTENANCE INC.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion: Belaire-West Protective Order As of July 30, 2020, this court has yet to receive service of an order assigning a coordination motion judge. (CRC, rule 3.524 (a).) Consequently, it is not clear whether this action will be stayed pending determination whether coordination is appropriate. (Code Civ. Proc., § 404.5.) Due to these uncertainties, the court intends to continue this motion to September 3, 2020, at 8:30 a.m.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC. V. VALLEY FARM SUPPLY INC.

The Case Management Conference set for August 11, 2020 is continued to September 9, 2020 to be heard concurrently with the Application for Writ of Attachment.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

JOHN S ARCHER VS. AARON LEMAR JOHNSON

For general information regarding Judge DeNoce and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.denoce.com _____________________________________________ Plaintiffs John S. Archer and Richard Ongania's Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One and Request for Production of Documents, Set One; Request to Deem Admission Admitted, Set One; and Request for Sanctions.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

HILDA GUTIERREZ MORENO VS. MARTIN VARGAS MARES

For general information regarding Judge DeNoce and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.denoce.com _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Hilda Gutierrez Moreno's motion to compel deposition of defendant Martin Vargas Mares. Request for monetary sanctions. The court's tentative ruling is as follows: Based on the Defendants' Opposition, it is the court's understanding that Mr. Mares appeared for his deposition on July 6, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

VOITA VS SUNCOAST PRODUCE INC.

Tentative ruling for August 12, 2020 on Defendant Suncoast Produce, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set Three Defendant Suncoast Produce, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set Three, is GRANTED. CCP § 2031.300. In light of Plaintiff's counsel's position that he never received the discovery at issue, the Court finds that objections have not been waived. Further, no responses to this set of discovery have been served.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

KAREN GROGAN VS. VONS

By the settlement, Source agrees to pay to Von's $17,500 in exchange for a release of Von's cross-action against Source for indemnity, contractual indemnity, contribution and declaratory relief. The court is prepared to approve this aspect of the motion. KAOM, Inc. v. Superior Court (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 549, 555. However, Source also wants the court to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint against Source.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

CLAUDIA BROCK VS. COUNTY OF VENTURA

Tentative ruling for August 12, 2020 on Defendant's The court grants Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice. (Ev. Code §§ 452, 453.) The court sustains Defendant's demurrer to both causes of action. The court will discuss with counsel whether leave to amend should be granted. Plaintiff's prelitigation claim failed to comply substantially with all of the statutory requirements of Government Code § 910.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

C SHAWN SKILLERN MD VS. LI SHENG KONG MD

For general information regarding Judge DeNoce and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.denoce.com _____________________________________________ Li Sheong Kong MD and LSK Enterprises, Inc.'s motion for an order that objections to request for production were timely made. The court's tentative ruling is as follows: The court intends to grant the motion of Dr. Kong and LSK Enterprises (LSK) seeking relief from a waiver of objections in response to Dr. Guo's document demand.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

ISAAC GARZA VS. NATHAN MELTON

The Court intends to rule as follows; Deny the motion to be relieved as counsel without prejudice. Reasonable efforts to locate an address for the client must be made and served as required by CRC 3.1362, prior to granting the motion. The declaration here is insufficient (see MC-052, §3. SERVICE). Moving party to give notice

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

GALAXY INTERNATIONAL PURCHASING LLC VS. SARA KESTEN

The actual 'agreement' is blank for borrower identification, amount loaned, payment amounts and the date when payments were to start. Second amended complaint due by August 28, 2020. Moving party to give notice

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

LAURA MORRIS SMITH VS. WILLIAM L MORRIS

Tentative ruling for August 12, 2020 on Executor Lori Morris's Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Duces Tecum, and for Protective Order The court takes Executor Lori Morris's Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Duces Tecum, and for Protective Order off calendar as moot. The subject subpoena was withdrawn on May 13, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

SPENCER VS ALCAZAR CUSTOM

According to the court's 12/13/19 minute order, the hearing cut-off date ran from the new trial date of 3/23/20. Plaintiff was required to have any discovery motion heard on or before 3/8/20 [3/6/20 as the 8th falls on a Sunday] under CCP §2024.020(a). The court's closure in response to the COVID-19 emergency and subsequent vacating of the 3/23/20 trial date all occurred after the motion cut-off date had passed.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

LAWRENCE WILLIAMS VS. MANOR CARE

HEARING ON MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF COMPLAINT FILED BY MANOR CARE OF WALNUT CREEK CA, LLC, et al. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Continued to October 7, 2020 at 9 am by moving party.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

CADLES OF WEST VA VS. ROUSSET

HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION FILED BY CADLES OF WEST VIRGINIA LLC * TENTATIVE RULING: * Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Cadles of West Virginia, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Cadles”). The Motion relates to Plaintiff’s Complaint for Breach of Contract. Defendant Christian J. Rousset (“Defendant” or “Rousset”) is in pro per.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

KHASHABI VS. PATEL

Board of Equalization (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 666, 681 [finding trial court abused its discretion in sustaining a demurrer for nonjoinder of parties, and stating "[A] demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the pleading, and the complaint in this matter did not disclose the existence of the facts on which the Board relies to support its claim that the absent counties have an interest in the subject of this action."]; Harboring Villas Homeowners Assn. v.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

SKOUMBAS VS. KLAMMCZYNSKA

Yet, Plaintiff was not concerned about adding in these same defendants a few months before trial when he filed a motion for leave to amend in February 2020. Currently, there is no trial date and while adding in new defendants will likely cause some delay, the Court does not find that Plaintiff will be prejudiced. Plaintiff argues that this amendment is an improper motion for reconsideration of the issue the Oznowiczes raised in their motion for judgment on the pleadings.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

PETITION OF ROBIN RICHARDS BISSEMBERG

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE FILED BY ROBIN RICHARDO BISSEMBERG PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Robin Bissemberg still must do the following: Appear at the hearing with proof of residency ROBIN RICHARDO BISSEMBERG Need appearances to report status The Court is waiting for these items: Report of Atty. Daniel S. Vaughan C.C. COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES DEPT STEVEN P RETTIG WALTER KEITH LUCHIE JR WALTER LUCHIE, JR. DANIEL S. VAUGHAN

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CENTRAL COSTA BARNS VS. R.E. MILANO PLUMBING

HEARING ON MOTION TO STRIKE 1st Amended COMPLAINT FILED BY R.E. MILANO PLUMBING CORPORATION, et al. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Pursuant to CCP §§ 435 and 436, Defendants move to strike the following from Plaintiff’s Judicial Council Form Complaint: 1. From First C/A-- Request for attorneys’ fees (Section BC-5, at page 3) 2. From Second C/A—“attorneys’ fees and” (Section FR6, page 5) 3. From FAC: Request for attorney’s fees from section 10(c) at page 2.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

CONS. OF IVY NADINE COPANSKY

RE: PET’N FOR TERMINATION OF CONSERVATORSHIP FILED ON 07/29/19 BY MELVIN PAUL COPANSKY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

THE SMITS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST

Smits is set for hearing 10-8-2020. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE -- See also Line # 27 – File in Dept. 30. Need appearances Note: Objection filed by Elizabeth Rose Harley 11-1-19. ELIZABETH ROSE HARLEY JOSEPH M. MORRILL GERARD SMITS MATTHEW B TALBOT JOSEPHINE DOWEY JONATHAN T. THOMPSON LOUIS SMITS TRACY S REGLI

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ROBERTSON VS. EBMUD

HEARING ON MOTION TO DETERMINE GOOD FAITH OF SETTLEMENT FILED BY EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT * TENTATIVE RULING: * EBMUD’s unopposed motion for a determination of good faith settlement with plaintiff is granted. EBMUD has demonstrated that the settlement is in good faith pursuant to CCP 877 and 877.6 and according to the factors outlined in Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward Clyde & Associates (1985) 38 Cal.3d 488, 499.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

MIGUEL CASTILLO VS. RAUL RAMIREZ

SPECIAL SET HEARING ON: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SET BY THE COURT * TENTATIVE RULING: * NOT A LAW AND MOTION MATTER. ADD-ONS

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

ROBERTSON VS. EBMUD

HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FILED BY CITY OF ORINDA * TENTATIVE RULING: * Defendant’s motion to compel further responses to interrogatories is moot given plaintiff’s amended responses. Defendant’s motion to compel further responses to Request for Production number 37 is granted in part. The court rejects plaintiff’s claim of privacy. Plaintiff’s burden argument may have merit.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.