Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
“A party may move for judgment on the pleadings.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 438(b)(1).)
However, “[b]efore filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings. If an amended pleading is filed, the responding party shall meet and confer again with the party who filed the amended pleading before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings against the amended pleading.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 439(a).)
The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either that the parties did not reach an agreement on the motion, the responding party did not respond to the meet and confer request, or the responding party did not meet in good faith. (Code Civ. Proc., § 439(a)(3); see Overstock.com, Inc. v. Goldman Sachs Group (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 471, 499-500 (authority to strike improperly documents).) The meet and confer requirement of § 439 applies to self-represented parties unless the self-represented party is incarcerated. (Code Civ. Proc., § 439(d)(1).)
But “[a] determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient is not grounds to grant or deny the motion for judgment on the pleadings.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 439(a)(4).)
The motion may be made on one of the following grounds:
(Code Civ. Proc., § 438(c)(1).)
“A motion for judgment on the pleadings performs the same function as a general demurrer, and hence attacks only defects disclosed on the face of the pleadings or by matters that can be judicially noticed.... Presentation of extrinsic evidence is therefore not proper on a motion for judgment on the pleadings.” (Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 995, 999; see also Code Civ. Proc., § 438(c).)
A motion for judgment on the pleadings may only be granted if it disposes of an entire cause of action. (Fire Ins. Exchange v. Sup. Ct. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 446, 452.)
“No motion may be made pursuant to this section if a pretrial conference order has been entered pursuant to Section 575, or within 30 days of the date the action is initially set for trial, whichever is later, unless the court otherwise permits.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 438(e).)
“[J]udgment on the pleadings must be denied where there are material factual issues that require evidentiary resolution.” (S. Cal. Edison Co. v. City of Victorville (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 218, 227.)
Similarly, “[m]otions by a plaintiff for judgment on the pleadings... are the equivalent of a demurrer to an answer, and the standard of review is obverse: the appellate court will assume the truth of all facts properly pleaded in the answer and will disregard the controverted allegations of the complaint.” (Engine Manuf's Association v. Cal. Air Rsrcs. Bd. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 1022, 1034; Fremont Indem. Co. v. Fremont Gen. Corp. (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 97, 113–14; Fire Ins. Exchange v. Sup. Ct. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 446, 452.)
But note that “[a] pleading which on its face is barred by the statute of limitations does not state a viable cause of action and is subject to judgment on the pleadings.” (Hunt v. County of Shasta (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 432, 440.)
The court may make its own motion for judgment on the pleadings, on the same grounds. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438(c)(3).)
In the case of a demurrer, leave to amend should be granted if there is any reasonable possibility that defendant can state an affirmative defense. (Virginia G. v. ABC Unified School Dist. (1993) 15 Cal.App.4th 1848, 1852.)
Here, however, Defendants failed to move for judgment on the pleadings as to any cause of action. Instead, Defendants simply moved for judgment on the pleadings as to a claim for punitive damages. Thus, this motion cannot be granted because no proper authority has been presented to seek “judgment on the pleadings” as to a specific claim or as to specific allegations set forth in the Complaint.
PHEBEAN ABRAHAM VS ROBERT ABBASI
19STCV37464
Apr 21, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Personal Injury/ Tort
other
Motion: Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Tentative Ruling: To deny plaintiff Financial Credit Network’s Motion for judgment on the pleadings.
FINANCIAL CREDIT NETWORK V. BUSTOS
VCL 181670
Jul 17, 2018
Tulare County, CA
Discussion Defendants move for judgment on the pleadings, per CCP § 438, as to Plaintiffs’ entire complaint and all causes of action therein. Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will be CONTINUED to ___________________. CCP §§ 128 and 439[2].
XUE XIN LIU VS MAY F. LIOU
KC068521
Feb 07, 2019
Gloria White-Brown
Los Angeles County, CA
CASE NO: BC695407 [TENTATIVE] ORDER PLACING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OFF-CALENDAR Dept. 3 1:30 p.m.
AKI MOEZZI ET AL VS LUIS ANTONIO RIVAS
BC695407
May 01, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Meet and Confer Prior to Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings “(a) Before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
ASSET CAPITAL RECOVERY GROUP V. BLATT
PCL-20200161
Oct 30, 2020
El Dorado County, CA
A motion for judgment on the pleadings does not lie as to a portion of a cause of action. (Id.) “In the case of either a demurrer or a motion for judgment on the pleadings, leave to amend should be granted if there is any reasonable possibility that the plaintiff can state a good cause of action.” (Gami v. Mullikin Medical Ctr. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 870, 876.) A non-statutory motion for judgment on the pleadings may be made any time before or during trial. (Stoops v.
SARKIS VARDANYAN ET AL VS WESTERN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
BC701700
Oct 30, 2018
Los Angeles County, CA
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Thus there are no grounds for a motion for judgment on the pleadings to the first three causes of action. Wildwood’s & Woods’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: Wildwood and Woods explicitly incorporate their demurrer to the third Amended Complaint into their motion for judgment on the pleadings: “ … there are no restrictions that would not permit a motion for judgment on the pleadings to be allowed and filed.
XXXXX
15CECG03406
Jan 15, 2019
Fresno County, CA
The Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. III. Conclusion Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED.
SUZANNE PORUSH VS DEAN SHERRY, ET AL.
21STCV35467
Dec 08, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
(3) The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the claims raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS MICHAEL V SANCHEZ, AN INDIVIDUAL
19PSCV00910
Mar 22, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Collections
Promisory Note
resolve the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS MICHAEL V SANCHEZ, AN INDIVIDUAL
19PSCV00910
Dec 09, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Collections
Promisory Note
Matevosian properly notes that under the constraints of the statute Devries chose for his motion for judgment on the pleadings, his motion is untimely. The Court agrees. III. CONCLUSION Defendant Dan Devries Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED.
MATEVOSIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. VS MASSGENIE, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
20STCV38469
Sep 19, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
(3) The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the claims raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
KLAUS GOETTEL VS U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
KC070284
Nov 15, 2018
Los Angeles County, CA
“The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the claims raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
VILLASENOR, MARIA ELENA VS BRAN, SANDRA E
16K02501
Jan 16, 2018
Yolanda Orozco or Georgina Torres Rizk
Los Angeles County, CA
The Court notes that pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 439, subdivision (a), [b]efore filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
REHAM MAKHOUL VS TESLA MOTORS, INC., A CORPORATION
22STCV09008
Mar 01, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
CCP§439(a)(3) states that “The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the objections raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings [or] (B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on
FINANCIAL CREDIT NETWORK V. COVALCINE
VCL 180827
Mar 20, 2018
Tulare County, CA
Code of Civil Procedure section 439, subdivision (a) provides that: “Before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.”
DMKA LLC V PERRY DO, DDA, MS., A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
30-2019-01101759
Jul 01, 2020
Orange County, CA
Plaintiff Michael Rojas’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is ordered OFF CALENDER. “Before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 439(a).)
ROJAS, MICHAEL VS KIWANUKA, HEMDEE
16K12448
Apr 26, 2018
Georgina Torres Rizk or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
(3) The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the claims raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS MICHAEL V SANCHEZ, AN INDIVIDUAL
19PSCV00910
Jan 25, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
(3) The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the claims raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS MICHAEL V SANCHEZ, AN INDIVIDUAL
19PSCV00910
Jan 25, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Collections
Promisory Note
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings “Before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.” (CCP § 439(a), emphasis added.)
KENNETH R. CHIATE VS RHONDA JESSUM, PH.D.
18STLC12659
Jan 09, 2019
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
Additionally, a motion for judgment on the pleadings must be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration demonstrating an attempt to meet and confer in person or by telephone, at least five days before the date a motion for judgment on the pleadings is filed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 439, subd. (a).)
OLIVIER SAINT-VICTOR VS SANTA MONICA POLICE DEPARTMENT
18STLC12094
Mar 09, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Therefore, the Court will continue the hearing on Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings so that the parties may have a chance to meet and confer and resolve the claims raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is CONTINUED to be determined at the hearing.
ANI DJOURIAN VS BIG LOTS STORES INC ET AL
BC663738
Apr 17, 2018
Los Angeles County, CA
Employment
Wrongful Term
A motion for judgment on the pleadings does not lie as to a portion of a cause of action. ( Ibid .) A non-statutory motion for judgment on the pleadings may be made any time before or during trial. ( Stoops v. Abbassi (2002) 100 Cal.App.4th 644, 650.) Because a motion for judgment on the pleadings performs the same function as a general demurrer, the procedures in responding to demurrers similarly apply to motions for judgment on the pleadings. (See, for example, Evinger v.
LA PARK LA BREA B, LLC VS YON LEE
23STCV18689
Nov 22, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
VIRIDI FARMS et al PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings is continued pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 439(a)(2)- failure to meet and confer. Plaintiff has brought a statutory motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 438(c)(1)(a) The Court notes that while this motion is unopposed, it is procedurally defective.
THE LYMAN GROUP, INC. DBA GROW WEST VS VIRIDI FARMS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL
22CV02329
Sep 13, 2023
Santa Cruz County, CA
VIRIDI FARMS et al PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings is continued pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 439(a)(2)- failure to meet and confer. Plaintiff has brought a statutory motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 438(c)(1)(a) The Court notes that while this motion is unopposed, it is procedurally defective.
THE LYMAN GROUP, INC. DBA GROW WEST VS VIRIDI FARMS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL
22CV02329
Sep 14, 2023
Santa Cruz County, CA
VIRIDI FARMS et al PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings is continued pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 439(a)(2)- failure to meet and confer. Plaintiff has brought a statutory motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 438(c)(1)(a) The Court notes that while this motion is unopposed, it is procedurally defective.
THE LYMAN GROUP, INC. DBA GROW WEST VS VIRIDI FARMS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL
22CV02329
Sep 15, 2023
Santa Cruz County, CA
VIRIDI FARMS et al PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings is continued pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 439(a)(2)- failure to meet and confer. Plaintiff has brought a statutory motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 438(c)(1)(a) The Court notes that while this motion is unopposed, it is procedurally defective.
THE LYMAN GROUP, INC. DBA GROW WEST VS VIRIDI FARMS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL
22CV02329
Sep 16, 2023
Santa Cruz County, CA
VIRIDI FARMS et al PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings is continued pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 439(a)(2)- failure to meet and confer. Plaintiff has brought a statutory motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 438(c)(1)(a) The Court notes that while this motion is unopposed, it is procedurally defective.
THE LYMAN GROUP, INC. DBA GROW WEST VS VIRIDI FARMS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL
22CV02329
Sep 17, 2023
Santa Cruz County, CA
VIRIDI FARMS et al PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings is continued pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 439(a)(2)- failure to meet and confer. Plaintiff has brought a statutory motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 438(c)(1)(a) The Court notes that while this motion is unopposed, it is procedurally defective.
THE LYMAN GROUP, INC. DBA GROW WEST VS VIRIDI FARMS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL
22CV02329
Sep 18, 2023
Santa Cruz County, CA
VIRIDI FARMS et al PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings is continued pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 439(a)(2)- failure to meet and confer. Plaintiff has brought a statutory motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 438(c)(1)(a) The Court notes that while this motion is unopposed, it is procedurally defective.
THE LYMAN GROUP, INC. DBA GROW WEST VS VIRIDI FARMS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL
22CV02329
Sep 19, 2023
Santa Cruz County, CA
The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (a) the means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the claims raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings; or (b) that the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings failed to respond
MERCEDES CARRILLO VS BOLIVAR G. CARRILLO
21PSCP00166
Oct 25, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
CRYSTAL LEMIEUX VS K & M MEAT COMPANY INC.,
VC065234
Aug 21, 2018
Los Angeles County, CA
Judgment on the Pleadings TENTATIVE Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. Plaintiff to give notice. Legal Standard A defendant may move for judgment on the pleadings where the court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the cause of action alleged in the complaint or the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against that defendant. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438(b)(1), 438(c)(1)(B)(i) and 438(c)(1)(B)(ii).)
MARGARET STEPHENS, AN INDIVIDUAL VS CITY OF BURBANK, A PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL.
20STCV40501
Dec 13, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Based on the foregoing, Levi Estates Request for Judicial Notice and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED as Moot. Conclusion Defendant/Cross-Complainant Levi Estates, LLCs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED as MOOT. Moving party to give notice.¿¿
20STCV4893
Jan 27, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
CONCLUSION Defendant City of Los Angeles Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED.
STEPHEN GLICK, ET AL. VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES
20STCV00320
Sep 21, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
The motion for judgment on the pleadings is therefore granted without leave to amend.
YUQI ZHANG ET AL VS COLIMA TERRACE APARTMENTS ET AL
BC585649
Oct 24, 2016
Los Angeles County, CA
Plaintiff Karen McGill’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED. Plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings on her conversion cause of action against Defendant. Plaintiff contends that she is entitled to judgment in her favor in the amount of $10,324.55. A motion for judgment on the pleadings performs the same function as a general demurrer, and hence attacks only defects disclosed on the face of the pleadings or by matters that can be judicially noticed. (See, e.g., Weil & Brown, Cal.
MCGILL, KAREN VS WHITE, RUTH
16K08180
Nov 30, 2016
Elaine Lu or Yolanda Orozco
Los Angeles County, CA
Defendants moved to proceed with the motion for judgment on the pleadings in spite of the purported bankruptcy stay, and on May 22, 2018, the Court issued an order allowing the motion for judgment on the pleadings to proceed after finding that the automatic bankruptcy stay does not apply to the instant case. Though no opposition to the motion for judgment on the pleadings was filed, on May 21, 2018, Ramirez filed a First Amended Complaint.
JOSE L RAMIREZ VS JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ET AL
BC688610
Jun 29, 2018
Los Angeles County, CA
Real Property
Foreclosure
Before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings, “the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
STEPHEN CHOI ET AL VS MARCO GARIBALDI ST AL
BC711212
Aug 20, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Personal Injury/ Tort
Fraud
Also, “[t]he moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the claims raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings [or] (B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings failed
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. V. HOLLAND
18CECG03322
Jan 24, 2019
Fresno County, CA
Collections
Collections
CCP§439(a)(3) states that “The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the objections raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings [or] (B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on
GONZALEZ V. VELASCO
VCU 274504
Mar 12, 2019
Tulare County, CA
CCP§439(a)(3) states that “The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the objections raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings [or] (B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on
RODRIGUEZ V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
VCU 272047
Aug 14, 2018
Tulare County, CA
CP§439(a)(3) states that “The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the objections raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings [or] (B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on
RODRIGUEZ V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
VCU 272047
Aug 28, 2018
Tulare County, CA
CCP§439(a)(3) states that “The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the objections raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings [or] (B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on
FIRST INVESTORS SERVICING CORPORATION V. WHITLOCK
VCL 184100
Oct 23, 2018
Tulare County, CA
CCP§439(a)(3) states that “The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the objections raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings [or] (B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on
JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS, LLC V. HYLES
VCL 182953
Dec 04, 2018
Tulare County, CA
CCP§439(a)(3) states that “The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the objections raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings [or] (B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on
DISCOVER BANK V. ALVAREZ
VCL 187239
Apr 09, 2019
Tulare County, CA
A motion for judgment on the pleadings has the same function as a general demurrer. (Id., 7:275.) A statutory judgment on the pleadings can be made by a defendant only on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction or failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (See CCP 438(c)(1)(B).) The same limitation exists for common law motions for judgment on the pleadings.
MICHAEL R KURTZMAN ET AL VS. STEVE SISLER ET AL
CGC11516338
Aug 01, 2013
San Francisco County, CA
Motion by Plaintiff Jerome Dunbar Stark for Judgment on the Pleadings: 2. Motion by Plaintiff Jerome Dunbar Stark for Judgment on the Pleadings: 3. Motion by Plaintiff Jerome Dunbar Stark for Judgment on the Pleadings: 4. Motion by Plaintiff Jerome Dunbar Stark for Judgment on the Pleadings: Moot- Jury is deliberating Future Hearings: None
STARK V. MOREE
30-2014-00706060-CU-CR-CJC
Nov 15, 2018
Orange County, CA
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendant Orange County Property Management: The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings brought by Orange County Property Management is DENIED; however, pursuant to C.C.P. §436, the Court orders ¶68 of the First Amended Complaint stricken. Pursuant to C.C.P. §438, a party may move for judgment on the pleadings, on the basis the Complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (C.C.P. §438(b)(1) and C.C.P. §438(c)(1)(B)(ii)).
MARTIN VS. OC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
30-2019-01060948
Feb 06, 2020
Orange County, CA
on the pleadings.
POURANDOKHT POURAT VS SHAHRAM MOUSSAZADEH
22STCV24086
Mar 08, 2024
Los Angeles County, CA
on the pleadings.
POURANDOKHT POURAT VS SHAHRAM MOUSSAZADEH
22STCV24086
Mar 18, 2024
Los Angeles County, CA
Additionally, “[t]he moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the claims raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings, [or] (B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings
CHANG KOK AHN ET AL VS HOLLYWOOD ENTERPRISES INC ET AL
BC609271
Mar 15, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Employment
Other Employment
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Plaintiff TENTATIVE RULING Petitioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. First, there is no proof of service indicating that the petition, the motion papers, or any other papers in this matter were ever properly served on respondent.
TORRES V. ARNOLD
FCM157955
Aug 14, 2018
Solano County, CA
Nature of Proceedings: Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. Code of Civil Procedure Section 438(c)(1)(A) provides that a motion for judgment on the pleadings may be made by the plaintiff if the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant and the answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint.
PAMELA GEREMIA VS DONALD SCHAFER ET AL
1304799
May 18, 2009
Santa Barbara County, CA
A motion for judgment on the pleadings does not lie as to a portion of a cause of action. (Id.) “In the case of either a demurrer or a motion for judgment on the pleadings, leave to amend should be granted if there is any reasonable possibility that the plaintiff can state a good cause of action.” (Gami v. Mullikin Medical Ctr. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 870, 876.) A non-statutory motion for judgment on the pleadings may be made any time before or during trial. (Stoops v.
BRANDY JOLENE ALEXUS CAVE VS LAUREN A ABEDINI
19STCV26176
Mar 16, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Employment
Discrimination/Harass
Because a motion for judgment on the pleadings performs the same function as a general demurrer, the procedures in responding to demurrers similarly apply to motions for judgment on the pleadings. (See, for example, Evinger v. Moran (1910) 14 Cal.App. 328, 329.) II.
BRENDA SANDOVAL VS VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA INC., ET AL.
23STCV12037
Aug 24, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
“[T]he moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
ABEL SOBERANES, ET AL. VS LANCE BROOKS, ET AL.
18STCV03629
May 23, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
the pleadings.
OH VS REEL FATHERS RIGHTS
CVRI2301369
Jan 02, 2024
Riverside County, CA
the pleadings.
OH VS REEL FATHERS RIGHTS
CVRI2301369
Dec 31, 2023
Riverside County, CA
the pleadings.
OH VS REEL FATHERS RIGHTS
CVRI2301369
Jan 01, 2024
Riverside County, CA
the pleadings.
OH VS REEL FATHERS RIGHTS
CVRI2301369
Dec 30, 2023
Riverside County, CA
Defendants move for judgment on the pleadings as to each cause of action. Timeliness In Opposition, Plaintiffs contend that Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings is untimely under CCP §438(e). However, as argued by Defendants in their Moving and Reply papers, their Motion is styled as a “common law” motion for judgment on the pleadings. A motion for judgment on the pleadings may be brought under CCP §438 or common law. (See Smiley v. Citibank (1995) 11 Cal.4th 138.)
MONTSERRAT SOLIS, ET AL. VS WESTSIDE CAPITAL, LLC, ET AL.
19NWCV00070
Jul 09, 2020
Lori Ann Fournier or Olivia Rosales
Los Angeles County, CA
Employment
Other Employment
(3) The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the claims raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)
KC079873
Mar 26, 2018
Los Angeles County, CA
Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the answer is DENIED.
JEROME OGDEN VS LIUMEIBANG ORGANIZATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
19STCV39186
Dec 03, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Personal Injury/ Tort
other
If leave to file the motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted today, the earliest date the motion for judgment on the pleadings could be heard on regular notice is December 2, 2017 (if that date is even available in the court reservation system), after the summary judgment moving papers would have to be filed on November 20.
MICKEY GORDON VS LAKIHA SPICER TYSON ET AL
EC063293
Oct 28, 2016
Los Angeles County, CA
"Before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings." (Code Civ. Proc., § 439, subd. (a).)
ASHFORD VS CASE
37-2023-00012802-CU-PO-CTL
Sep 01, 2023
San Diego County, CA
claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS MICHAEL V SANCHEZ, AN INDIVIDUAL
19PSCV00910
Oct 02, 2020
Gloria White-Brown
Los Angeles County, CA
Collections
Promisory Note
Plaintiff Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC's unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. (See CCP § 1788.60(a).) Whether Plaintiff has established admissions on its side or not, it is a debt buyer and, as such, cannot obtain a judgment on the pleadings absent the evidence required by Civil Code section 1788.50 et seq. With this motion for judgment on the pleadings, Plaintiff seeks an "other judgment."
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC VS. KINNAMAN
37-2016-00037257-CL-CL-NC
Feb 22, 2018
San Diego County, CA
Collections
Collections
“A motion for judgment on the pleadings performs the same function as a general demurrer, and hence attacks only defects disclosed on the face of the pleadings or by matters that can be judicially noticed. Presentation of extrinsic evidence is therefore not proper on a motion for judgment on the pleadings.” (Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 995, 999 (Citations Omitted).)
BALTAZAR VALENCIA, JR., ET AL. VS CARLOS CORCUERA
20STCV04654
Jul 28, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Gary Kuhlmann’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings TENTATIVE RULING H. Gary Kuhlmann’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is denied, in part, and granted, with 20 days leave to amend, in part. Meet and Confer Defendant set forth a declaration in sufficient compliance with CCP § 439(a). (Decl., Shane E. Coons, ¶¶ 3-6.) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings A motion for judgment on the pleadings has the same function as a general demurrer but is made after the time for demurrer has expired.
BRIGHT END LLC VS GARY H. KUHLMANN
19TRCV00534
Oct 07, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Real Property
other
PARTY : Plaintiff Lisa Mak MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (CCP § 438) TENTATIVE RULING : Defendants Au AuYeung, Hoa Thai Hoang, Keith Hong, and Ami Lis Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED .
LISA MAK VS AU AUYEUNG, ET AL.
19STCV44630
Jun 02, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
Plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings. TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Michael Fletcher’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. DISCUSSION: Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Meet and Confer On November 1, 2019, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer on this motion. Plaintiff was also directed to file a supplemental declaration regarding the meet and confer. (Minute Order, 11/1/2019, at p. 2.)
MICHAEL R FLETCHER VS MATTHEW FLETCHER, ET AL.
19STCP01306
Jan 30, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Other
Intellectual Property
However, the Demurrer is brought pursuant to the statute for judgment on the pleadings, Code of Civil Procedure section 438. (Demurrer, p. 2:1-8.) No opposition has been filed to date. Discussion Whether brought as a general demurrer or motion for judgment on the pleadings, the legal standard is the same. Accordingly, the Court will treat Defendants response as a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.
SISI MISSY, INC., ET AL. VS DORIS ANDERSON
22STLC03332
Jul 12, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
In deciding or reviewing a judgment on the pleadings, all properly pleaded material facts are deemed to be true, as well as all facts that may be implied or inferred from those expressly alleged. ( Fire Ins. Exch. v. Superior Court (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 446, 452.) A motion for judgment on the pleadings normally does not lie as to a portion of a cause of action.
ALMA MALDONADO, ET AL. VS XIN CHENG LIANG, ET AL.
20STCV10916
May 16, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
Defendant/Cross-Complainant Advanced Information Management, LLC’S (AIM) unopposed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED without prejudice. Pursuant to AIM’s notice of motion, moving party moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to CCP 438(c)(1)(B)(i).
PRIME STAFF, INC. VS. ADVANCED INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, LLC
30-2017-00905042-CU-BC-CJC
Sep 12, 2018
Orange County, CA
The defendant who filed the motion for judgment on the pleadings is ordered to meet and confer in person or by telephone with the plaintiffs who filed the complaint, for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
FALCO VS. CITY OF MENIFEE MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 6
MCC1700399
Mar 21, 2019
Raquel A. Marquez
Riverside County, CA
Those devices lack the particular party and pleading restrictions section 438 places on motions for judgment on the pleadings. Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied.
DIABLO CONTRACTORS, INC. V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FCS053348
May 26, 2020
E. BRADLEY NELSON
Solano County, CA
Plaintiff Michael Rojas’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is CONTINUED to April 26, 2018. “Before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.” (Code Civ.
ROJAS, MICHAEL VS KIWANUKA, HEMDEE
16K12448
Mar 08, 2018
Georgina Torres Rizk or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
RSL 820 Idaho, LLC et al., Case No. 21STCV24736 Hearing Date June 10, 2022 Defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Plaintiff tenant alleges various dangerous and/or unsanitary conditions at defendant landlords property. Defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings to strike punitive damages. A defendant is entitled to judgment on the pleadings if the plaintiffs complaint does not state a cause of action and has the same purpose and function as a general demurrer.
LAUREN VALENTE VS RSL 820 IDAHO LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.
21STCV24736
Jun 10, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
The Court DENIES the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. C. Conclusion Defendants/Cross-Complainants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED.
IN HOSPITALITY LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS LAUNCH WITH US, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.
22STCV31263
Mar 24, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Subdivision (a)(3) of CCP §439 states that the moving party must file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either: (a) the means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the objections raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings; or (b) that the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on
BURKE V. RAN
30-2017-00929682-CU-CO-CJC
Aug 16, 2018
Orange County, CA
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 439, subdivision (a), [b]efore filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
MOSTAFAVI LAW GROUP APC VS LARRY RABINEAU APC ET AL
BC565480
Apr 03, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Meet and Confer “Before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.” (CCP § 439(a).)
MOHAMMAD ALI MOAYERY ET AL VS MATTHEW KLINE ET AL
BC717945
Feb 01, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Real Property
Quiet Title
Notice And Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Set for hearing on Friday, July 9, 2010, line 1. PLAINTIFFS LEILA YEE, LITTY PAPPACHEN'S Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings. Grant motion for judgment on the pleadings with 10 days leave to amend as to affirmative defenses 2, 4, and 13.
LEILA YEE ET AL VS. TRALEE MANAGEMENT LLC, ET AL
CGC08477610
Jul 09, 2010
San Francisco County, CA
“[T]he moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
ISAAC VILLA, ET AL. VS DIANA HUGHES, ET AL.
19NWCV00182
Dec 26, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Personal Injury/ Tort
Fraud
"A party moving for judgment on a pleading that has been amended after a motion for judgment on the pleadings on an earlier version of the pleading was granted shall not move for judgment on any portion of the pleadings on grounds that could have been raised by a motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the earlier version of the pleading." CCP § 439(b). Here, defendant has not shown why this second motion for judgment on the pleadings does not run afoul of CCP section 439(b).
ESTRADA VS MUNOZ
37-2020-00045283-CU-OR-CTL
Sep 01, 2023
San Diego County, CA
.: 19SMCV02159 MOTION: Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings HEARING DATE: 10/28/2022 Legal Standard A defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings may be made after the time to demur has expired and an answer has been filed. (CCP § 438(f).)
HDEVELOPMENT, ET AL. VS ALAN I SCHIMMEL, ET AL.
19SMCV02159
Oct 28, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
Code of Civil Procedure section § 439(a) provides that [b]efore filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
JOSE ANGEL MANAIZA JR. VS ZACHARY PAUL KOSAREFF
22STCV14549
Sep 12, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
“The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the claims raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
SAFEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY, VS KARINA ALVAREZ DIAZ
18STLC09574
Dec 18, 2018
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
On February 14, 2018, Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The court denied this motion on March 14, 2018. On March 23, 2018, Defendants filed the instant motion for judgment on the pleadings.
SIMAALSADAT MASAJEDIAN VS LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, ET AL.
17STLC01411
Apr 17, 2018
Georgina Torres Rizk or Jon R. Takasugi
Los Angeles County, CA
“The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: [¶] (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the claims raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings. [¶] (B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings failed to
BANK OF AMERICA NA VS NORMA C HIGUERA
18CV01206
Jan 07, 2019
Santa Barbara County, CA
As such, Plaintiff is not entitled to judgment on the pleadings. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED.
MERCEDES CARRILLO VS BOLIVAR G. CARRILLO
21PSCP00166
Nov 22, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
MSC18-01210 CASE NAME: SANTOMAURO VS 360 MORTGAGE *HEARING ON MOTION IN RE: FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS MOTION FILED TO/FOR FILED BY: *TENTATIVE RULING:* The standard for granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings is essentially the same as that applicable to a general demurrer. (Burnett v. Chimney Sweep (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th 1057, 1064.)
SANTOMAURO VS. 360 MORTGAGE
MSC18-01210
Nov 13, 2023
Contra Costa County, CA
.: BC641199 Hearing Date: March 10, 2017 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BACKGROUND On January 12, 2017, Defendant El Camino Community College District (“Defendant”) filed the present motion for judgment on the pleadings. Defendant argues that judgment on the pleadings should be granted with respect to Plaintiff’s cause of action for General Negligence because Plaintiff fails to state a sufficient cause of action against Defendant, a public entity.
CARINA HURD VS EL CAMINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE ET AL
BC641199
Mar 10, 2017
Los Angeles County, CA
Villasenor’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. “Before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 439(a).)
VILLASENOR, MARIA ELENA VS BRAN, SANDRA E
16K02501
Feb 20, 2018
Yolanda Orozco or Georgina Torres Rizk
Los Angeles County, CA
C/O: 11-03-20 MOTION C/O: 11-18-20 TRIAL DATE: 12-03-20 PROCEEDINGS: MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (x2) MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company RESP. PARTY: None MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (CCP § 438) TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company’s Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings are CONTINUED to OCTOBER 15, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. in Department 25 at the SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE.
IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY VS ANGELA MARIE HERRERA, ET AL.
18STLC15014
Jul 28, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Uncertainty is not a basis for judgment on the pleadings under Code of Civil Procedure section 438. The Motion instead cites Code of Civil Procedure section 430.30, which is the demurrer statute to argue that the rules of demurrers apply to motions for judgment on the pleadings. However, the specific statutory grounds for judgment on the pleadings are distinct from the grounds for demurrer. (See Code Civ. Proc., §§ 430.30, 438.)
WILLIAMS BRIAND, INDIVIDUALLY ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHER PERSONS AND CLASS SIMILARLY VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
20STCV32385
Mar 14, 2024
Echo Dawn Ryan
Los Angeles County, CA
The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating either of the following: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the claims raised by the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
GREEN VS HANLON
37-2022-00017979-CU-BC-CTL
Oct 13, 2023
San Diego County, CA
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 439, subdivision (a), [b]efore filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purpose of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
STAR SCRAP METAL CO., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL. VS THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL.
23STCV02465
Nov 29, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
On August 27, 2020, Klosk filed the instant unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings. Legal Standard A defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings may be made after the time to demur has expired and an answer has been filed. (CCP § 438(f).)
COREY GRAY VS GEORGE GELSEBACH ET AL
BC644227
Oct 27, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Personal Injury/ Tort
other
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.