Motion for Good Faith Settlement

Useful Rulings on Motion for Good Faith Settlement (CCP 877.6)

Recent Rulings on Motion for Good Faith Settlement (CCP 877.6)

1-25 of 10000 results

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

However, character evidence is admissible to prove other facts such as “motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake or accident, or whether a defendant in a prosecution for an unlawful sexual act or attempted unlawful sexual act did not reasonably and in good faith believe that the victim consented.” (Evid. Code, § 1101(b).)

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PTN OF RONALD WULFERDINGER

BARBARA LINDSEY FAITH SANFORD MARILYN TURNER LAYLI M CABORN TIFFANEY TURNER PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Continue to 10-7-2020, to be heard with amended petition. If to proceed, Shannon Wapole, mother, would need to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2. File a verified declaration to state names, current addresses and relationships of all persons entitled to receive notice. LR 7.112 3.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N ON FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR

Need petition (may be ex parte) showing good cause for allowing late election, and order. Otherwise you will need amended petition eliminating spouse’s portion and a recalculation of statutory fees. Proposed election must comply with LR 7.305. See PrC §§ 13500, 13501, 13502 14.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST ACCOUNT OF TRUSTEE AND PET’N FOR ITS SETTLEMENT

FILED ON 08/13/19 BY KIMBERLY CZIRKELBACH PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status Note: Residuary Beneficiaries’ Response and Objections filed by American Cancer Society, Inc., Feed the Children, Inc., Leukemia & Lymphoma Society and ALSAC/St. Judge Children’s Research Hospi...

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

JUAN PALMA ET AL VS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC ET AL

On July 23, 2019, an “Order Re Amended Application for Determination of Good Faith Settlement of Cross-Defendant, Aviation West Charters, LLC dba Angel Medflight World Wide Air Ambulance” was filed. On July 23, 2019, an “Order re Defendant Lew B. Disney. M..D.’s Application for Determination of Good Faith Settlement” was filed. On August 29, 2019, Plaintiffs dismissed KFH, SCPMG, KFHPI and Shah, with prejudice. On May 12, 2020, Lew was dismissed, with prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

MATTER OF THE JOSEPH LEE REVOCABLE TRUST

RE: PET'N FOR SETTLEMENT ON FIRST ACCOUNT FILED ON 08/11/17 BY ELIZABETH SOLOWAY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE -- See also Line # 1 -- Need appearances to report status DOUGLAS C LEE JOHN A HARTOG ELIZABETH SOLOWAY MICHAEL J.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF CZESLAW KENTZER

Stipulation and Order Approving Settlement filed 8-21-2020. DIANE J CRAWFORD KENDAL E FLETCHER MARILYN L DRAPEL KENDAL E FLETCHER SANDRA DRAPEL KONSTANTINE DEMIRIS THE AMENDED AND RESTATED DECLA PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances. This is a competing petition. 2. Proof of Subscribing Witness Form DE-131 with copy of will attached. PrC § 8220. 3.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

NADIA KINDA, ET AL. V. PANTOJA TRUCKING, INC., ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion Good Faith Settlement Tentative

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

RE: PET’N TO APPROVE PMT OF COMPENSATION TO COUNSEL

Note: Petition to Approve Settlement Agreement; Request to Vacate the Trial Currently Set For September 25, 2020, is set for 11-12-2020. EDWARD CHARLES GARNER KATHLEEN NEWSOM DAVID A. BROWN LINDA L GARNER LINDA L. GARNER MARTHA GILSON DAVID G KNITTER MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY GINA D. BOER VALERIE ANNE FERREIRA CHARLES A. TRIAY VALERIE FERREIRA HOWARD E. KANE WILLIAM MICHAEL NORTON CHARLES A. TRIAY WILLIAM MICHAEL NORTON HOWARD E. KANE

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

EVELYN LOZADA VS OGOM CHIJINDU

Lozada is ordered to meet and confer in good faith with Chijindu in strict compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 439 and to file a declaration proving such compliance five days prior to the next hearing date.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

SAN FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL.

After SF Spine’s many attempts to get answers about the issues with Claim Works’s performance, Blatz emailed the practice a settlement and release agreement in October 2015. (FAC, ¶ 21.) Now wary of Blatz and his ability to represent the practice, SF Spine refused to sign the agreement and retained new counsel. (FAC, ¶ 21.) In December 2015, with new counsel at its side, SF Spine commenced an arbitration with Claim Works through JAMS. (FAC, ¶ 22.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

ARIA LAW GROUP, PLC V. SAEID MOHEBBI

The very next month, Mohebbi and the Khazen defendants reached a settlement of $3,625,000, with $2,040,000 earmarked for attorney’s fees and costs. (Vatankhah Decl., ¶¶ 6, 13–17.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

RE: FIRST AND FINAL REPORT ON WVR OF ACCT, FOR FEES, COSTS, FINAL DIST FILED ON 05/11/20 BY TIM F BAILEY

LR 7.317 Note: Petition for Settlement of First and Final Account filed by Birthe Kirsch 9-3-2020 is set for hearing 12-22-2020. Absent appearances or objections, court will continue this matter to 9-3-2020. BIRTHE KIRSCH ZACHARY EPSTEIN JACK F. KIRSCH PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proof of Holographic Instrument Form DE-135. PrC § 8222 3. Order for Probate Form DE-140 Notes: 1. Original will is attached to petition. 2.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

BRIANA HUDSON VS BEVERLY TERRACE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

“For discovery purposes, information is relevant if it ‘might reasonably assist a party in evaluating the case, preparing for trial, or facilitating settlement ...” (citation).” These rules are applied liberally in favor of discovery, (Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (1982) 31 Cal.3d 785, 790), and contrary to popular belief fishing expeditions are permissible in some cases. (Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355, 385.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

IN RE JOYCE FOREST INTER VIVOS TRUST DTD 06/29/1981 AS AMENDED

Accounting ________________ The Court has reviewed the status report re: status of compliance with the Arbitration Award/settlement of all outstanding issues. The Court intends to continue the matters to 12/2/20 10:30 a.m in J6 to complete compliance with the Arbitration Award. Mr. Vener to give notice. No appearance is required. Dismisal may be filed prior to next hearing. __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN RE CONNIE GUTIERREZ TRUST

Stipulated Settlement Agreement and Order filed Dismissal yet to be filed. Status of dismissal? Proposed Order to be lodged prior to hearing per Local Rule 10.00.D.1. __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF THE EVELYN LOPEZ LIVING TRUST DATED 12/11/2006

Petition for Return of Trust Personal Property and for Wrongful Taking of Trust Personal Property ********************* It appears a petition for approval of settlement agreement has been calendared for 10/1/20. Continue to 10/1/20. Mr. Esquibias to give notice of these continued matters; no appearance is necessary. ______________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

JOSHUA JOHNSON ET AL VS JOSE LIMA ESPINA

Therefore, the Court orders the following sanctions: Joshua Johnson to pay Defendant sanctions in the amount of $1,305 Faith Johnson to pay Defendant sanctions in the amount of $1,305 Brihtsy Atlan to pay Defendant sanctions in the amount of $1,305 CONCLUSION AND ORDER Defendant’s motions to compel responses to the RPD, FROG, and SROG are granted per Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.290 and 2031.300.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

WALTHER ZALDIVAR VS MOULTON LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

Terms of the Settlement Agreement The Court finds it necessary to set forth the terms of the Settlement Agreement advanced in connection with Plaintiff’s motion for approval of the PAGA settlement. The Settlement Agreement is attached as Exhibit 1 to the declaration of Plaintiff’s counsel, Edwin Aiwazian (“Aiwazian”).

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

JOSE M IBARRA VS BAKER COMMODITIES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION

Discussion The parties jointly move for approval of the settlement of Plaintiff’s PAGA action. The Proposed Settlement The Settlement provides that the parties agree to settle the instant action for the non-reversionary Gross Settlement Amount (“GSA”) of $450,000.00. (Haines Decl., Exh. 1, § III.2.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

LATOYIA G. FURLOW VS RODERICK CULPEPPER, ET AL.

Similarly, Defendant Culpepper stated that the parties were working towards a settlement, which is contradicted by Plaintiff’s counsel. This supports the idea that Anderson was reassured by Defendant Culpepper that he would take care of the action. Defendant Culpepper expressly admits to making these reassurances. Under these circumstances, the Court finds A&M Financial had demonstrated excusable neglect in failing to respond to the Complaint.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JANE GIBSON VS CHENG MENG LAM

Discussion The initial time to amend the pleadings having passed, Plaintiff must show good cause for the timing of the Motion to Reclassify and that the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdiction of this Court. Plaintiff relies on the declaration of counsel, who states that this action was mistakenly filed as a limited case due to clerical error. (Motion, Clark Decl., ¶4.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JAIMIE VALENZUELA, ET AL. VS MARTIN ANDALUZ ABARCA, ET AL.

On April 30, 2020, an “Order on R&R Auto Group, Inc.’s Application for Determination of Good Faith Settlement” was filed. On June 22, 2020, Plaintiff dismissed R&R with prejudice. On July 2, 2020, U-Haul’s, eMove’s, Kham’s, Grand Super Center, Inc., N. Abdelrahman’s, H Mart—Grand Super Center, Inc.’s and K. Abdelrahman’s defaults were entered. On July 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed an “Amendment to Complaint,” wherein Ahmed Abdelrahman (“A. Abdelrahman”) was named in lieu of Doe 204.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

REPUBLIC UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY VS C J CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION INC., ET AL.

(B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to demurrer failed to respond to the meet and confer request of the demurring party or otherwise failed to meet and confer in good faith.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.41(a)(3)(A)-(B).)

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

CHASE METALS INC VS MARK A BENAVIDES

Courts have imposed tort liability in contract cases in certain limited contexts, for example, “for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing in insurance contracts; for wrongful discharge in violation of fundamental public policy; or where the contract was fraudulently induced.” (Erlich, supra, 21 Cal.4th at p. 552.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.