Motion for Good Faith Settlement

Useful Rulings on Motion for Good Faith Settlement (CCP 877.6)

Recent Rulings on Motion for Good Faith Settlement (CCP 877.6)

1-25 of 10000 results

GRDSHP OF SCOTT

Parties entered into a mediated settlement agreement on 1/31/2020. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Lutricia Randolph, maternal aunt, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

FALISHA PORTER VS PHARMAVITE, LLC

It is defendant’s burden of establishing good cause for how these records relate to its specific defenses. Finally, the issue of whether every single page of her employment file should be open to discovery is also an issue. For instance, what if she had private conversations about health issues unrelated to the damages in this case. What if she was asked to be a witness in a claim against another co-employee?

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MAX GLEASON VS JOHN DUNGAN ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion: Determine; Motion Good Faith Settlement Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ALLSTATE SETTLEMENT CORPORATION VS J. E.

Tentative Ruling Petitioner Allstate Settlement Corporation’s Petition for Approval of Transfer of Structured Settlement Payment Rights is GRANTED. Background J.E. (“Transferor”) has agreed to sell, and Allstate Settlement Corporation (“Transferee”) has agreed to purchase, Transferor’s rights of structured settlement payments arising in connection with a personal injury claim.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

TOROVERDE, INC. VS. ELEMENT 7, INC.

The motion is off calendar based on the Notice of Settlement filed on November 4, 2020. An OSC re Dismissal on Settled Case is set for February 26, 2021 at 1:30 p.m.

  • Hearing

RE: PET’N FOR PROBATE OF ORIGINAL WILL, LETTERS TEST, IAEA

File a verified declaration providing the name and date of death of decedent’s predeceased spouse DOROTHY M CALHOUN JOAN MARILYN KIMBROUGH FILED ON 08/17/20 BY ANITA AMIRREZVANI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required ANITA AMIRREZVANI LISA WEIMAN HANKS DAVID WALTER ERICKSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances Notice of Conditional Settlement filed 11/2/

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST AMENDED PET’N FOR REMOVAL OF CUSTODIAN, ACCTNG, SURCHG,

Petition for Approval of Settlement Agreement is set for hearing 12-21-2020. MELLO FAMILY TRUST AS AMENDED MICHAEL MELLO MATTHEW B TALBOT ROBERT MELLO MATTHEW B TALBOT SHIRLEY MAGANA RICHARD HOBIN FILED ON 09/24/19 BY ROBERT M MELLO, MICHAEL A MELLO PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE -- See also Line # 23 -- Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order Notes: 1. Response filed by Shirley Magana 11-19-19. 2.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: 1ST & FNL RPT OF ADMNTR, PET’N FOR ITS SETTLEMENT, FNL DIST

FILED ON 07/07/20 BY OANH TRUONG PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required ALEX DUC TRUONG OANH TRUONG KARIMA A BURNS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Gwen Smith, sister, still needs to do ...

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS OF NIKHIL KULKARNI

Court Investigator’s Report BRITTANY AMBER MILLER SIENNA ELEANOR GUEVARA YOLANDA GALVAN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances Jenna Isaac’s Trial Brief filed 11/18/2020 Pursuant to minute order dated 10/01/2020, this matter was referred to a settlement mentor DOMINICK LAMAR NEWTON DOREATHA HILL CHRISTOPHER M MOORE JENNA ISAACS KENDRA SMITH MONESSIA TAYANI FROMMEOTHELYDO MONESSIA TAYANI FROMMOETHELYDO MYA FAIRBANKS OMAIR M FAROOQUI ESQ OMAIR M FAROOQUI

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CARLOS HALILI VS FCA US, LLC

The motion shall set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the production for inspection of any document described in the deposition notice. (CCP § 2025.450(b)(1).) The motion shall also be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration. (CCP § 2025.450(b)(2).)

  • Hearing

RAYMOND A. PADILLA VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ET AL.

The Court finds no good cause for Defendant to have made herself available between May 2019 and July 2020, a period of 14 months. Therefore, the motion is granted. The Court also finds that Defendant and Defendant’s counsel’s conduct constitutes an abusive of the discovery process, warranting sanctions. Therefore, the Court orders both, jointly and severally, to pay sanctions in the amount of $635. CONCLUSION AND ORDER Plaintiff’s motion is granted.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

SIMON RUIZ-HERNANDEZ VS WALTER ZAMORA, ET AL.

The basis for this motion is the breakdown of Counsel’s relationship with Plaintiff, which constitutes good cause. Based upon the foregoing, the motion is granted. The Court provides notice to Plaintiff that he must address the outstanding discovery, as Defendant has filed the following motions: (1) Motion to compel responses to form interrogatories, and (2) Motion to compel responses to demand for inspection and production of documents. These motions shall be heard on January 29, 2021, at 8:30 a.m.

  • Hearing

ADRIAN MADDEN VS GURUCUL SOLUTIONS, LLC

The moving party must lodge the record with the court in a separate envelope when the motion or application is made, unless good cause exists for not lodging it or it has been lodged previously. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.551(b)(4) and (d).) The lodged record is conditionally under seal pending the judge's determination of the motion or application. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.551(b)(4).)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MARIELA DIAZ, ET AL. VS JOHN RUBEN RAMOS COVARRUBIAS, ET AL.

The basis for this motion is that Plaintiff is not cooperative with Counsel, which constitutes good cause. Based upon the foregoing, the motion is granted.

  • Hearing

JOSE ZARAGOZA-HERNANDEZ VS DOROTHY MENDOZA

The basis for this motion is that Counsel’s relationship with Plaintiff has deteriorated, which constitutes good cause. Based upon the foregoing, the motion is granted.

  • Hearing

MICHAEL WATT VS RODEWAY INN HOTEL, ET AL.

The basis for this motion is irreconcilable differences in Counsel’s relationship with Plaintiff, which constitutes good cause. Based upon the foregoing, the motion is granted. The Court orders Plaintiff’s counsel to serve a copy of this order, as well as a copy of the Court’s order on Form MC-053, upon all parties including Plaintiff within ten (10) days. The Court orders Plaintiff’s counsel to file proof of service within twenty (20) days.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

The motion shall set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the production for inspection of any document described in the deposition notice. (CCP § 2025.450(b)(1).) The motion shall also be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration. (CCP § 2025.450(b)(2).)

  • Hearing

ESTATE OF DOROTHY E. BENFORD

The Petition suffers from the following defects that must be corrected: a) The Petition lacks sufficient facts to state the basis of the claim in terms that can be relied upon by the court to find “good cause” (Prob. Code, § 11704(b)(2)) to determine persons entitled to distribution. (Prob. Code, § 11700 [“The petition shall include a statement of the basis for the petitioner’s claim.”].)

  • Hearing

SHAFFER V RICE RANCH COMMUNITY LLC

Business and Professions Code section 7109, subdivision (a) proscribes a contractor from making a “wilful departure in any material respect from accepted trade standards for good and workmanlike construction . . .”

  • Hearing

RE: PET’N TO COMPEL TRUSTEE TO ACCT, REMOVE, APPT SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE

Trustee’s Opposition filed PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status of settlement ALPHA HEATH ROGERS TRUST AKA B KENT B. ROGERS CHARLES A. TRIAY MARK H ROGERS SUZANNE C FARLEY NEIL L ROGERS SUZANNE C FARLEY

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MIKE GHOLAMI, ET AL. VS VICTOR DANIEL FELIXOROZCO

Counsel establishes good cause to grant the motion. Based upon the foregoing, Counsel’s motion is granted. The Court orders Counsel to provide notice to all parties, including Plaintiff, within ten (10) days, and file proof of such with the Court. Counsel should note that he shall remain attorney of record until he files the proof of service of the signed order. DATED: December 1, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

TAMEKA DIXON, ET AL. VS EDGAR S. GONZALEZ, ET AL.

Plaintiffs, in opposition, contend that Saul’s motion should be denied because Saul does not establish good cause to set aside the default entered against him. Plaintiffs argue that Saul was properly served by substituted service, and Defendant does not establish otherwise. Furthermore, Plaintiffs asserts Saul was previously served with two requests for default against him on 1/31/20 and 2/24/20, and thus, Saul was surely aware of the action prior to March 2020.

  • Hearing

JINSONG SHI VS ALG LAWYERS INC., ET AL.

Fifth Cause of Action for Common Counts “The action for money had and received is based upon an implied promise which the law creates to restore money which the defendant in equity and good conscience should not retain. The law implies the promise from the receipt of the money to prevent unjust enrichment. The measure of the liability is the amount received. Recovery is denied in such cases unless the defendant himself has actually received the money.” (Rotea v. Izuel (1939) 14 Cal.2d 605, 611.)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

XIAOXING ZHANG VS ZHE ZHANG, ET AL.

“A breach of the contract may also constitute a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. But insofar as the [] acts are directly actionable as a breach of an implied-in-fact contract term, a claim that merely realleges that breach as a violation of the covenant is superfluous.” (Guz v. Bechtel Nat. Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 317, 352.) Generally, allegations that a breach of a contract was “in bad faith, arbitrary, and unfair are unavailing[.]” (Id.)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ARTURO LANDEROS VS GENERAL MOTORS, LLC

After reviewing the supplemental declaration filed by Defendant’s counsel on October 30, 2020, regarding meet and confer efforts, the Court finds that Defendant General Motors, LLC still has not sufficiently made a good faith attempt to meet and confer pursuant to the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure sections 430.41 and 435.5.

  • Hearing

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.