What is a Motion for Forum Non Conveniens?

Useful Rulings on Motion for Forum Non Conveniens

Recent Rulings on Motion for Forum Non Conveniens

1-25 of 10000 results

MATTER OF THE BOWERMAN FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST

Although will waives bond, petitioner is a non- resident of California. LR 7.154 4. Order for Probate Form DE-140 DAVID ERIC VOMUND LEE L KASTER ERIC JOSEPH VOMUND PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Proof of Publication. PrC § 8120 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to include himself, trustee of trust, trust beneficiaries, Amy Barr and Jacqueline Breslin in Item # 8. PrC § 8002 3.

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

GRDSHP OF SCOTT

Proposed Order on Judicial Council Form GC-224 that contains specific, non- conclusory findings and the basis for each finding; factual basis must specifically state grounds of abuse, neglect and/or abandonment. Order must contain findings that (1) reunification with ward’s parents is not viable; and, (2) it is not in the ward’s best interest to return to his country of origin or last habitual residence and the reason for not returning.

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES LLC VS MICHAEL D. GARRIS

: (1) Respondent is liable for and shall pay to Petitioner the amount of $230,799.51 in compensatory damages; (2) Respondent is liable for and shall pay to Petitioner interest at the rate of $40.25 per day from the date of service of the Award until the amount of $230,799.51 is paid in full; (3) Respondent is liable for and shall pay to Petitioner the amount of $765.00 in attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Note; (4) Respondent is liable for and shall pay to Petitioner $1,000.00 to reimburse Petitioner for the non-refundable

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2020

FOX VS BRIDLEWOOD

If a party submits on the tentative decision without appearing, but another party appears, the hearing will be conducted in the absence of the non-appearing party. ____________________ TENTATIVE RULING The Court intends to SUSTAIN the demurrer of defendants Bridlewood Homeowners Association and S. H. Chavin, Inc. to the second cause of action in the amended complaint of Plaintiff James Fox and Michelle Fox.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

HQC INC VS VAPUR INC

If a party submits on the tentative decision without appearing, but another party appears, the hearing will be conducted in the absence of the non-appearing party. ____________________ TENTATIVE RULING The Court intends to GRANT Defendant Vapur Inc.'s Motion under the mandatory provision of Code of Civil Procedure, section 473, subd. (b). Defendant's Answer is deemed filed this date. The Court intends to DENY Plaintiff's request for legal fees, without prejudice. Counsel for Defendant to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

CAEZAR SEALS, AN INDIVIDUAL VS WAL-MART STORES, INC.. A CORPORATION, ET AL.

Plaintiff Caezar Seals (“Plaintiff”) filed a notice of non-opposition to the motion. Accordingly, the Court grants the motion as stipulated without leave to amend. However, this order is without prejudice to Plaintiff seeking leave to amend if he develops facts in discovery that support such an amendment. Defendant shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: December 4, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

GATICA VS. BISTANGO-IRVINE

The current language, “but do not include any non-PAGA claims certain claims under PAGA” is confusing and inadequate. Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of the ruling to defendants unless they waive notice.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

AHMED HIJAZI ET AL VS ALVARO ECHEVERRY ET AL

The Court is required to interpret this statement in the light most favorable to Plaintiff as the non-moving party. The trier of fact may conclude that Defendant’s statements constitute an admission of liability. CONCLUSION AND ORDER The Court grants Defendants’ motion for summary judgment with respect to Defendant Penske. The Court denies Defendants’ motion for summary judgment with respect to Defendant Echeverry. Defendants shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

MR BUILD HOME IMPROVEMENT COMPANY D.B.A. MR BUILD SOLAR ELECTRIC VS CALIN KEELEY

Second Cause of Action (Breach of Contract) – To plead breach of contract, the Plaintiff must allege (1) the existence of a contract, (2) Plaintiff’s performance or excuse for non-performance, (3) Defendant’s breach, and (4) resulting damage to Plaintiff. (Lortz v. Connell (1969) 273 Cal. App. 2d 286, 290.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

DO WOO KIM, ET AL. VS HYUN JONG HAN, ET AL.

This interpretation is supported by the fact that where Plaintiffs did so indicate their non-compliance with the request, they raised particular objections and the reasons for those objections. (See Motion, Exh. D., RFP Nos. 41-43.) Based on the foregoing, Han’s motions to compel further responses to his RFPs (Set One) as to Plaintiffs Do Rim Kim, Do Woo Kim, and Wilton Korean Presbyterian Church are DENIED. It is so ordered. Dated: , 2020 Hon. Jon R.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

AGNEWS SANTA CLARA DEVELOPMENT, LLC V. REBELLO

In particular, Defendant maintains that Plaintiff: failed to timely release the parcel map contingency by the February 15, 2020 deadline provided by the 8th addendum (Exhibit D); failed to make the $100,000 non-refundable deposit in order to extend either the contingency removal period or the close of escrow period (Complaint, ¶¶ 12-15, Exhibits D and E); and refused to close escrow, despite a demand to do so.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION, NO WILL, IAEA

Although heirs waive bond, petitioner is a non- resident of California. LR 7.154 ROBERT C BLANSON SHERRY BLANSON JAMES B. WICKERSHAM BEVERLY BALAGTAS RODRIGUEZ Need: 1. Appearances 2. Petition verified by petitioner(s). PrC § 1021. CCP § 2015.5. CRC 7.103 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to state names, current addresses and relationships of all persons entitled to receive notice. LR 7.112 4. Proof of mailing Judicial Council Form Notice of Hearing to all persons entitled to receive notice 5.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION, NO WILL, IAEA

Although heirs waive bond, petitioner is a non- resident of California. LR 7.154 ROBERT C BLANSON SHERRY BLANSON JAMES B. WICKERSHAM BEVERLY BALAGTAS RODRIGUEZ PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Petition verified by petitioner(s). PrC § 1021. CCP § 2015.5. CRC 7.103 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to state names, current addresses and relationships of all persons entitled to receive notice. LR 7.112 4.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CHERIE S LEWIS VS CHRISTOPHER FITZGERALD, MD, ET AL.

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT On March 29, 2019, Plaintiff Cherie S. Lewis (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants Christopher Fitzgerald, M.D. (“Fitzgerald”) and Tiyana Elise Garcia (collectively, “Defendants”). On July 30, 2020, the Court sustained in part Fitzgerald’s demurrer with leave t...

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS POLLO MEAL, INC.

Special Interrogatory No.2 requests the following: State all contact information, including names, addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses, for all non-exempt employees employed by Pollo Meal, Inc. in the State of California at any time from September 26, 2018 through the present. Defendant objected to the request on the grounds that discovery and investigation are continuing and to the extent the request calls for information and documents protected by its and third parties’ right to privacy.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

ESTHER EZERZER VS SILVIA CARTER, ET AL.

Motion to Strike Civil Code § 3294 authorizes the recovery of punitive damages in non-contract cases “where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, express or implied . . . .” “Malice” means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

LILIANNA DIAZ, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, DAVID DIAZ VS GINGERBREAD COURT L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL.

Plaintiff opposes the motion, arguing the amount of medical damages are not indicative of the amount of non-economic damages that can be awarded. Further, Plaintiff contends that in a similar case where a child fell and broke a finger in a restaurant, the plaintiff in that matter was awarded $25,000 alone for pain and suffering. (Opp. Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”) Exh. 1.) Plaintiff asserts that as a result, there is possibility she may obtain an award in excess of $25,000.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

RICHARD PECH VS THOMAS E. MORGAN, III, ET AL.

Morgan, III; Covina Hills MHC, LP; Covina Hills GP, LLC; Juanita Springs Associates, LP; and Covina Hills MHC, LLC, arising from non-payment of legal fees. On September 18, 2020, Plaintiff moved for summary adjudication of the second cause of action for account stated against Defendants Covina Hills MHC, LP; Covina Hills GP, LLC; and Juanita Springs Associates, LP (collectively, “Defendants”).

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

TINA HIRT ET AL VS SILVER AGE NONE EMERGENCHY MEDICAL TRANSP

., Plaintiffs, v. silver age non-emergency medical transportation, inc., Defendant. Case No.: BC706642 Hearing Date: December 3, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to be relieved as counsel Attorney Patrick K. O’Brien (“Counsel”) moves to be relieved as counsel for Defendant Silver Age Non-Emergency Medical Transportation, Inc. (“Defendant”). Counsel has filed forms MC-051 and MC-052 and has lodged with the Court a copy of the proposed order on form MC-053 as required.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

HIPOLITO PAUL CARRANZA VS SPEARS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.

Issue No.1: Procedural Non-Compliance Defendant contends that the Motion must be denied because Plaintiff failed to submit a separate statement of the discovery in dispute. California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1345(a)(5) requires a separate statement to be filed with a motion to quash the production of documents or tangible things at a deposition.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

DANIEL AVILA VS SMG TAVERNS, INC. DBA IGUANA KELLEY'S

Civil Code § 3294 authorizes the recovery of punitive damages in non-contract cases “where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, express or implied . . . .” “Malice” means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

LEANDRA GONZALEZ, ET AL. VS VICTORIA VU, ET AL.

Wise from liability for his subsequent communications in the litigation forum, Payless cannot avoid the insurmountable fact that its communication outside that forum enjoyed no such protection. We find no persuasive reason to confer section 47(b) immunity to one who wrongfully reveals confidential information simply because the disclosure subsequently becomes a hot potato in the course of court litigation or administrative hearings. (Wise, supra, 83 Cal.App.4th at p. 1296.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

JEROME OGDEN VS LIUMEIBANG ORGANIZATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

A non-statutory motion for judgment on the pleadings may be made any time before or during trial. (Stoops v. Abbassi (2002) 100 Cal.App.4th 644, 650.) Because a motion for judgment on the pleadings performs the same function as a general demurrer, the procedures in responding to demurrers similarly apply to motions for judgment on the pleadings. (See e.g., Evinger v. Moran (1910) 14 Cal.App. 328, 329.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

HAMID SHARIATPANAHI VS ALEC SEUAN HALICI ET AL

Tech-Bilt factors are: (1) a rough approximation of plaintiff’s total recovery and the settlor’s proportionate liability; (2) the amount paid in settlement; (3) the allocation of settlement proceeds among plaintiffs; (4) a recognition that a settlor should pay less in settlement than he would if he were found liable after a trial; (5) the financial conditions and insurance policy limits of settling defendants; and (6) the existence of collusion, fraud, or tortious conduct aimed to injure the interests of the non-settling

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

FRANZ VILLA VS ANDREW KOHLER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT FRANZ VILLA, Plaintiff(s), vs. ANDREW KOHLER, ET AL., Defendant(s). Case No.: BC682561 [TENTATIVE] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES Dept. 31 10:00 a.m. December 3, 2020 Defendant Andrew Koehler’s Motion to Co...

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.