What is a Motion for Forum Non Conveniens?

Useful Rulings on Motion for Forum Non Conveniens

Recent Rulings on Motion for Forum Non Conveniens

1-25 of 10000 results

VAGAN AZARYAN VS EXXON MOBILE

BC710152 Azaryan v. Exxon Mobile r/t 20STCV09729 Azaryan v. Zurich American Insurance Company Court Order Re: Transfer and Reassignment of Complicated Personal Injury (“PI”) Case to An Independent Calendar ("IC") Courtroom from Department 29, a PI Hub Court. The Court's order Re: Transfer of Complicated Personal Injury Case to an Independen...

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

CITRUS OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLGY VS CITRUS VALLEY HEALTH

Emanate contends that these materials contain confidential, non-public information about the parties and non-parties, including private contractual and financial information that has been designated “Confidential” by Emanate pursuant to the terms of the Protective Order entered and approved by the court on September 12, 2018. The need to protect trade secrets and non-public, commercially sensitive information provides a justification for sealing. (See NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV), Inc. v.

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

CHING FU CHANG, ET AL. VS PAN MING LEI, ET AL.

The individual Plaintiffs explain that “[t]he principal amount of these returned checks and non-deposited checks total $76,476.15 as of August 8, 2019, when we filed the Complaint. At the time the Complaint was filed, we could only find checks totaling up to about $60,000, so the amount demanded ion the Complaint was $60,000. However, we have later located more checks.” (Ching Fu Chang Decl., ¶21; Yu Chen Wu Decl., ¶18.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

HAGOP TCHAKERIAN VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES

TENTATIVE RULING Defendant Los Angeles World Airports’ Demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED, with twenty (20) days leave to amend, as to the first and second causes of action, and SUSTAINED, without leave to amend, as to the third cause of action. Plaintiff may amend his complaint only as authorized by the Court’s or...

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

EAST COAST FOODS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS THELMA WEAVER, ET AL.

County of Los Angeles DEPARTMENT 17 TENTATIVE RULING EAST COAST FOODS, INC. vs. ROBERT ANCILL, et al. Case No.: 19STCV09251 Hearing Date: July 22, 2020 Defendants’ motions to quash subpoenas for the production of business records are GRANTED. The parties are order to meet and confer with the goal of narrowing these requests ...

  • Hearing

    Jul 22, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

RE: PET’N FOR ATTY FEES & COSTS, TERMINATION OF APPT

Revised, proposed Order on Judicial Council Form GC-224 that contains specific, non- conclusory findings and the basis for each finding; factual basis must specifically state grounds of abuse, neglect and/or abandonment. Order must contain findings that (1) reunification with ward’s parents is not viable; and, (2) it is not in the ward’s best interest to return to his country of origin or last habitual residence and the reason for not returning.

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

GRDSHP OF NICKOLAS P KRAUSE

Revised, proposed Order on Judicial Council Form GC-224 that contains specific, non- conclusory findings and the basis for each finding; factual basis must specifically state grounds of abuse, neglect and/or abandonment. Order must contain findings that (1) reunification with ward’s parents is not viable; and, (2) it is not in the ward’s best interest to return to his country of origin or last habitual residence and the reason for not returning.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CYNTHIA MARIA RIBAS VS BEAU MONDE ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

On February 20, 2020, Defendant’s special motion to strike Plaintiff’s complaint was granted as to the defamation claims, and denied with respect to the non-defamation claims. On March 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. Defendants now demur to Plaintiff’s first, second, fifth, sixth, and seventh causes of action.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

CONSUMER ADVOCACY GROUP, INC. VS THE KROGER CO., ET AL.

On March 23, 2018, a Consent Judgment was entered in that case which, in part, provided for the retention of jurisdiction to enforce the Consent Judgment and provided enforcement procedures to address any alleged non-compliance with the Consent Judgment. Defendants argue that Plaintiff’s allegations concern conduct which is explicitly regulated under the Consent Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CARRIEN QIAN HE, AN INDIVIDUAL VS JAY MIN CHEN, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

Chen’s motion reflects non-compliance with CRC Rule 3.1324(a)(2) and (3). Chen’s counsel’s declaration, moreover, reflects non-compliance with subsection (b).

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

STACEY WILLIAMS, ET AL. VS SELECT PHYSICAL THERAPY, ET AL.

July 17, 2020 INITIAL NOTE: THE COURT NOTES THAT THIS CASE HAS AN FSC SCHEDULED ON 8/27/20 AND A NON-JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED ON 9/10/20. THE FSC WILL NOT BE HELD ON 8/27/20. IF COUNSEL APPEAR ON 7/17/20 (PREFERABLY TELEPHONICALLY), THE COURT WILL CONDUCT A TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE IN ADDITION TO THE MOTION HEARING. IF THE PARTIES DO NOT APPEAR ON 7/17/20, THE COURT WILL TREAT THE 8/27/20 FSC HEARING AS A TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE AND WILL VACATE AND RE-SET THE 9/10/20 NON-JURY TRIAL FOR A LATER DATE.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

CYNTHIA MARIA RIBAS VS BEAU MONDE ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

On February 20, 2020, Defendant’s special motion to strike Plaintiff’s complaint was granted as to the defamation claims, and denied with respect to the non-defamation claims. On March 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. Plaintiff now moves for a stay of proceedings while her appeal is pending.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

MATTER OF YVETTE DEROUEN FIGUEROA

Although heirs waive bond, petitioner is a non- resident of California. LR 7.154 9. Submit Order for Probate Form DE-140 KARIN FRANKLIN VERNER D. BURTON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances to report status 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to state names, current addresses and relationships of all persons entitled to receive notice so court can confirm mailing. LR 7.112 3. Note: Accounting was filed 3/4/2020 as a response to this petition.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

The Court notes Plaintiff filed a statement of non-opposition indicating the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings should be granted. Plaintiff’s notice of non-opposition indicated parties in the midst of settling the action. Defendant to submit proposed judgment.TRIAL DATE AND FSC ARE VACATED

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

  • Judge

    H. Jay Ford

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

KELLY ROA VS ABM INDUSTRIES GROUPS, LLC; A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.

California Rules of Court, rule 3.1346 requires a movant to serve a motion to compel on a non-party deponent personally unless the deponent has consented to service by another means. This motion was served by mail, and there is nothing in the record indicating that Deponent consented to service by mail. Therefore, the motion is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: July 16, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF TIMOTHY WILLIAMS

The Petition’s first cause of action alleges non-compliance with CEQA. The second cause of action alleges non-compliance with the Coastal Act. The third cause of action alleges due process violations related to both the first and second causes of action. 2. Course of Proceedings On April 9, 2019, the court granted the Commission’s motion to dismiss Petitioners’ CEQA causes of action and denied Petitioners’ motion for a stay of approval as moot. B.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

ROBERT ARTHUR FERBER VS CITY OF CALABASAS ET AL

Ferber filed a notice of non-opposition to Sorrento Square’s motion. Burdens on Summary Judgment Summary judgment is proper “if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” (Code Civ. Proc. §437c(c).)

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

RUTH XIAOYU ZHANG VS NESTOR H. LLERNA

ATTORNEY FEES: In any action, proceeding, or arbitration between Buyer and Seller arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing Buyer or Seller shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs from the non-prevailing Buyer or Seller . . .” (Klinkert Decl., ¶1, Exh. A, p. 6, ¶27.) Summary judgment was granted in favor of the Llerenas as reflected in an order filed on February 9, 2018.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

BERNADINE RAMIREZ VS 7-ELEVEN INC ET AL

On January 21, 2020, Plaintiff’s counsel appeared for the scheduled deposition and took a Certificate of Non-Appearance. (Id., ¶ 4, Ex. C.) On February 7, 2020, Plaintiff’s counsel sent an email to defense counsel to meet and confer. (Id., ¶ 7, Ex. F.) The Court finds Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate good faith efforts to meet and confer. California Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.450 requires the motion to be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under section 2016.040. (Code Civ.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

GRACE ALBA, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SYLVIA ALBA VS SPARKLETTS, INC., A CORPORATION, ET AL.

Each Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to material that qualifies under the appropriate standards . . . 10.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTO CLUB VS THOMAS WILLIAM L

On 7/30/18, Plaintiff filed a declaration of non-service. Further, Plaintiff has multiple applications for an order for publication on 10/30/19 and 11/15/19, which were rejected. On 1/21/20, the court called the case for trial. No party appeared, and the court dismissed the case. At this time, Plaintiff moves to vacate the dismissal. On 6/15/20, Plaintiff filed the instant motion to vacate dismissal.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

MELODY CHACKER VS SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, AN ARIZONA CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

Plaintiff alleges that Defendant SPS failed to provide adequate responses, and instead improperly initiated proceedings to non-judicially foreclose on her house. (Complaint ¶¶ 17-23.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

JOSE GUEVARA, ET AL. VS WALTER J RODE, ET AL.

MOTIONS TO DEEM REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION ADMITTED ARE GRANTED. Background On August 21, 2019, the instant action was filed. On January 16, 2020, Plaintiffs Ana Peraza; Deisy Guevara; Victor Guevara; Robert Guevara; and Karen Guevara, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Ana Peraza filed the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) against Defendants...

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

ANITA HERREMAN VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL

Counsel also seeks the $374.00 for the certificate of non-appearance. Although the court finds that sanctions are warranted under CCP §2025.450(g)(1), Trustee’s request is excessive. As such, the court finds that $1934.50 is a reasonable sum for 4.5 hours spent in preparing the instant motion at a rate of $160.00 per hour plus $60.00 in filing fees and $374 for the certificate of non-appearance.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

  • Judge

    Paul A. Bacigalupo or Virginia Keeny

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ROMEO NATIVIDAD VS ABS FACILITY SERVICES

On November 21, 2019, , Defendant/Cross-Complainant ABS Facility Services served then non-party, Audiology Distribution, LLC with a subpoena seeking Plaintiff’s employment records. On January 15, 2020, Defendant/Cross-Complainant ABS Facility Services filed an amendment to its cross-complaint naming Audiology Distribution, LLC, as Roe 1.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.